Her VP knew what was up though, that guy was all sorts of batshit

Advertisement

by Washington Resistance Army » Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:05 am


by Thermodolia » Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:08 am

by Seangoli » Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:08 am

by Washington Resistance Army » Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:09 am
Seangoli wrote:
Thats my problem with third parties in general. They tend to be batshit insane. They also temd to have very limited agendas that touch on only a few policies. Or in the casr of Johnson amd Stein, had no fucking clue about amythong beyond their pet policies.

by Astrolinium » Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:12 am

by Northern Davincia » Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:13 am
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."

by The Black Forrest » Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:20 am
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Seangoli wrote:
Thats my problem with third parties in general. They tend to be batshit insane. They also temd to have very limited agendas that touch on only a few policies. Or in the casr of Johnson amd Stein, had no fucking clue about amythong beyond their pet policies.
I'd disagree with putting Johnson in that category but yeah that is a problem third parties do tend to have.
Of course it's not like they have much reason to be serious tbh. It's not like they'll ever win with how the system works.

by The Black Forrest » Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:24 am
Seangoli wrote:
Thats my problem with third parties in general. They tend to be batshit insane. They also temd to have very limited agendas that touch on only a few policies. Or in the casr of Johnson amd Stein, had no fucking clue about amythong beyond their pet policies.

by AiliailiA » Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:29 am
The Flutterlands wrote:AiliailiA wrote:Oh fuck it.
I will obviously never get an answer from The Flutterlands, about how they voted last year. I will just assume The Flutterlands voted for Trump.
Yeah, but I'm not proud of it at all. It was an anti-hillary protest vote than a supportive vote. Much like most of Hillary's votes were anti-Trump rather than supportive.
Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.

by Genivaria » Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:33 am
AiliailiA wrote:The Flutterlands wrote:Yeah, but I'm not proud of it at all. It was an anti-hillary protest vote than a supportive vote. Much like most of Hillary's votes were anti-Trump rather than supportive.
Thanks for giving the answer. And I apologize for including you in "Trump voters" who I blamed more than I blamed Trump himself. The lesser of two evils, and the dreadful stricture of a de facto two party system, I understand that. It's not your fault, it's the system, that you had to choose one of the two most likely to win or else waste your vote.
If I may say? It's still better to vote, whoever you vote for, than not to vote at all.

by The Black Forrest » Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:34 am
Genivaria wrote:AiliailiA wrote:
Thanks for giving the answer. And I apologize for including you in "Trump voters" who I blamed more than I blamed Trump himself. The lesser of two evils, and the dreadful stricture of a de facto two party system, I understand that. It's not your fault, it's the system, that you had to choose one of the two most likely to win or else waste your vote.
If I may say? It's still better to vote, whoever you vote for, than not to vote at all.
In fairness to Trump voters (not a statement I post often) a surprising number actually ARE regretting their vote.
Not all are the Trump cultists we talk about.

by Steffan » Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:36 am


by Thermodolia » Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:44 am
Steffan wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/08/politics/trump-retweet-fox-news-north-korea-story-haley/index.html
Trump retweets news story containing classified information

by Geilinor » Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:48 am
Steffan wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/08/politics/trump-retweet-fox-news-north-korea-story-haley/index.html
Trump retweets news story containing classified information

by Steffan » Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:54 am

by Steffan » Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:56 am

by Telconi » Tue Aug 08, 2017 11:01 am
Steffan wrote:Oooooo...good news day
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2017/ ... ins-ground
White House weighs plans to privatize Afghanistan War via Blackwater Security

by Ifreann » Tue Aug 08, 2017 11:01 am
Steffan wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/08/politics/trump-retweet-fox-news-north-korea-story-haley/index.html
Trump retweets news story containing classified information

by Ism » Tue Aug 08, 2017 11:46 am
Steffan wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/08/politics/trump-retweet-fox-news-north-korea-story-haley/index.html
Trump retweets news story containing classified information
Steffan wrote:Oooooo...good news day
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2017/ ... ins-ground
White House weighs plans to privatize Afghanistan War via Blackwater Security...
wut...
Is Trump TRYING to ruin the U.S's image? Not only are these the people responsible for human rights abuses in Iraq, the Blackwater CEO just so happens to be the brother of Betsy DeVos, who wants to privatize schools.![]()
The U.S Gov't: truly the piggybank to the rich![]()
![]()

by Kramania » Tue Aug 08, 2017 11:53 am

by Empire of Cats » Tue Aug 08, 2017 12:05 pm
Steffan wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/08/politics/trump-retweet-fox-news-north-korea-story-haley/index.html
Trump retweets news story containing classified information

by Empire of Cats » Tue Aug 08, 2017 12:06 pm
Kramania wrote:Apparently the Trump Administration has more generals in top positions than any since Eisenhower's.
Looks like he's turning to military men to bring order to the West Wing.


by The Black Forrest » Tue Aug 08, 2017 12:09 pm

by Washington Resistance Army » Tue Aug 08, 2017 12:18 pm
Kramania wrote:Apparently the Trump Administration has more generals in top positions than any since Eisenhower's.
Looks like he's turning to military men to bring order to the West Wing.

by Victoria and Vacuna » Tue Aug 08, 2017 12:19 pm
Kramania wrote:Apparently the Trump Administration has more generals in top positions than any since Eisenhower's.
Looks like he's turning to military men to bring order to the West Wing.
Advertisement
Advertisement