Oil exporting People wrote:The Knockout Gun Gals wrote:Invasion is not part of those option. You cannot really expect the European armies to survive without US. Sure, Russia's military is outdated and not whole modernized, but they are Russians. They have huge military.
Except Russia (As well as China, for that matter) aren't really that outdated, and are rapidly closing the gap.New haven america wrote:Actually they only have about 200,000 more fighters than the US' total armed forces. (2.5 mil vs 2.3 mil respectively)
However, when you take NATO into account, we're more than 2x the size of them (Let's change that number to 2.5 mil vs 7.4 mil (With 3.5 mil ready for deployment)).
Vast oversimplification here. First and foremost, the US Army currently rates a third of its combat brigades as effective as the most clear cut example. What does this mean in real terms? Back in 2003 we went into Iraq with 22 Brigade Combat Teams (BCTs have about 4,500 men); today we only have 20 that the Army rates as ready for combat duty. I don't think I should have to explain how bad of an idea it is to assume you can take on a peer power like Russia with less troops then it took to bungle the Iraqi War. As for our Europeanleechespartners, the state of the Dutch Army having no ammo to even train says it all.The East Marches II wrote:Oh no, old T-72s, whatever will we do?
To be blunt, we die.
Back during the Cold War we knew for a fact it was almost impossible to punch through the forward armor of even the T-62s, while we had a documented instance during the First Gulf War of a T-64 knocking out two of our Abrams before it was destroyed. That feat is made all the more startlingly when you realize that this Iraqi tank crew was less well trained than a Russian crew would be and was using export models of Russian tanks (Thus lacking the modern ammo and armor systems of the Russian Army's own tanks). If you've got the time, I'd also highly recommend you give a read to this Russian ERA testing back from the 1990s, then reflect upon the fact that they've had a new system of it since the mid-2000s while the US just started producing the ammo to counter it in 2013.Neo Balka wrote:Oh no, the SOviet army of the 1970s is coming!
You'd be wise to remember that core elements of U.S. equipment, such as the F-15, are likewise from the 1970s.
The Iraqi army never used T-64's.