Queer Unit Formed Against ISIS

[Bakery Hill]

I'm pretty sure Islam has some sort of commandment to not be an ungrateful bastard.

Yeah, Americans are loved in Iraq.

This isn't in Iraq.

[United Muscovite Nations]

It's pretty much a stereotype that you shouldn't trust Kurds because they'll stab you in the back. The current president of Iraqi Kurdistan was an enemy of Saddam, then an ally, then an enemy again.

What? Like Saddam and the United State? Almost as if that's how politics... works?

He allied with Saddam so he could murder other Kurds and take over the Kurdish government.

Kurds have a reputation for stabbing their allies in the back, ask the Turks too. It's not like every Middle Eastern ethnicity can be wrong about them.

[Bakery Hill]

Yeah, Americans are loved in Iraq.

You should use Afghanistan as an example. Much, much stronger to this point.

Actually, Iraq isn't even relevant. The Shia and the Kurds, the only groups that have benefited from America's illegal invasion, are pretty pro-American (for their own interests of course).

The Shi'a are more pro-Iran and Iraq is likely to fully switch over to them in the short term. Which after almost fifteen years of constant American commitment is just great.

[Olerand]

What? Like Saddam and the United State? Almost as if that's how politics... works?

He allied with Saddam so he could murder other Kurds and take over the Kurdish government.

Kurds have a reputation for stabbing their allies in the back, ask the Turks too. It's not like every Middle Eastern ethnicity can be wrong about them.

Most Middle Eastern ethnicities don't have opinions of them. Most of the Middle East, and its inhabitants, don't live near Kurdistan.
Additionally, almost all of the Middle East is Arab, and will obviously side with the Arabs (Muslims) over the Kurds if necessary.

Finally, though the stereotype is truly present, I'm not entirely sure how this can be held over the Kurds.
Why should they be loyal?

[The East Marches II]

Yeah, Americans are loved in Iraq.

You should use Afghanistan as an example. Much, much stronger to this point.

Actually, Iraq isn't even relevant. The Shia and the Kurds, the only groups that have benefited from America's illegal invasion, are pretty pro-American (for their own interests of course).

>illegal invasion

There is literally no such thing. We've been over this. It was all perfectly acceptable.

[The Southern Confederacy]

Yeah, Americans are loved in Iraq.

You should use Afghanistan as an example. Much, much stronger to this point.

Actually, Iraq isn't even relevant. The Shia and the Kurds, the only groups that have benefited from America's illegal invasion, are pretty pro-American (for their own interests of course).

What would a legal invasion look like?

[Bakery Hill]

What? Like Saddam and the United State? Almost as if that's how politics... works?

He allied with Saddam so he could murder other Kurds and take over the Kurdish government.

Oh yeah, Barzani is a cunt. But you're acting like this is exceptional to the Kurds.

Kurds have a reputation for stabbing their allies in the back, ask the Turks too. It's not like every Middle Eastern ethnicity can be wrong about them.

The Kurds think their allies stab them in the back, no friends but the mountains etc. The treacherous rebellious mountain people is a trope the world round from the Hmong to West Virginia.

[Neo Balka]

Yeah, Americans are loved in Iraq.

You should use Afghanistan as an example. Much, much stronger to this point.

Actually, Iraq isn't even relevant. The Shia and the Kurds, the only groups that have benefited from America's illegal invasion, are pretty pro-American (for their own interests of course).

Go ahead, call the UN, they cant uninvade you!

[Bakery Hill]

You should use Afghanistan as an example. Much, much stronger to this point.

Actually, Iraq isn't even relevant. The Shia and the Kurds, the only groups that have benefited from America's illegal invasion, are pretty pro-American (for their own interests of course).

What would a legal invasion look like?

It'd probably look more successful. When everyone calls it illegal, it's a sign you've lost.

[Olerand]

You should use Afghanistan as an example. Much, much stronger to this point.

Actually, Iraq isn't even relevant. The Shia and the Kurds, the only groups that have benefited from America's illegal invasion, are pretty pro-American (for their own interests of course).

The Shi'a are more pro-Iran and Iraq is likely to fully switch over to them in the short term. Which after almost fifteen years of constant American commitment is just great.

They're obviously pro-Iran, but not anti-America.

Does the regime in Baghdad behave with America as Teheran does?

Now, is this because they "like" America, of course not. No one "likes" America in the region. But America is useful, so they are not against it.
By the criteria of the region, they are "pro-America".

[The East Marches II]

He allied with Saddam so he could murder other Kurds and take over the Kurdish government.

Oh yeah, Barzani is a cunt. But you're acting like this is exceptional to the Kurds.

Kurds have a reputation for stabbing their allies in the back, ask the Turks too. It's not like every Middle Eastern ethnicity can be wrong about them.

The Kurds think their allies stab them in the back, no friends but the mountains etc. The treacherous rebellious mountain people is a trope the world round from the Hmong to West Virginia.

I think you mean truism.

[United Muscovite Nations]

He allied with Saddam so he could murder other Kurds and take over the Kurdish government.

Kurds have a reputation for stabbing their allies in the back, ask the Turks too. It's not like every Middle Eastern ethnicity can be wrong about them.

Most Middle Eastern ethnicities don't have opinions of them. Most of the Middle East, and its inhabitants, don't live near Kurdistan.
Additionally, almost all of the Middle East is Arab, and will obviously side with the Arabs (Muslims) over the Kurds if necessary.

Finally, though the stereotype is truly present, I'm not entirely sure how this can be held over the Kurds.
Why should they be loyal?

Because the only reason they have the land they do now is because those allies helped them get it. They were given it for helping other groups kill off the Armenians and Assyrians.

[Olerand]

You should use Afghanistan as an example. Much, much stronger to this point.

Actually, Iraq isn't even relevant. The Shia and the Kurds, the only groups that have benefited from America's illegal invasion, are pretty pro-American (for their own interests of course).

What would a legal invasion look like?

One authorized by the Security Council, as stipulated in the United Nations Charter that America (but that was a different America of course) set up.

[Siburria]

Our wars are now being fought by a bunch of fruit cakes toting bongs and dildos.

Mmmmmmm fuitcake

[Bakery Hill]

Oh yeah, Barzani is a cunt. But you're acting like this is exceptional to the Kurds.


The Kurds think their allies stab them in the back, no friends but the mountains etc. The treacherous rebellious mountain people is a trope the world round from the Hmong to West Virginia.

I think you mean truism.

Lol. Take a look at this plains dweller. You probably don't even try and kill the cousin of the dude that slept with your great grandmother. Go do some corvee labour for your master you statist shill.

[Olerand]

Most Middle Eastern ethnicities don't have opinions of them. Most of the Middle East, and its inhabitants, don't live near Kurdistan.
Additionally, almost all of the Middle East is Arab, and will obviously side with the Arabs (Muslims) over the Kurds if necessary.

Finally, though the stereotype is truly present, I'm not entirely sure how this can be held over the Kurds.
Why should they be loyal?

Because the only reason they have the land they do now is because those allies helped them get it. They were given it for helping other groups kill off the Armenians and Assyrians.

Who helped them? The Turks incited them to kill the Armenians and Assyrians, and they did.

Why is that a measure deserving loyalty? Did the Turks not want the genocide? Did they do this for the Kurds's sake?
It was a win-win.

[United Muscovite Nations]

Because the only reason they have the land they do now is because those allies helped them get it. They were given it for helping other groups kill off the Armenians and Assyrians.

Who helped them? The Turks incited them to kill the Armenians and Assyrians, and they did.

Why is that a measure deserving loyalty? Did the Turks not want the genocide? Did they do this for the Kurds's sake?
It was a win-win.

Because the Turks gave them the land for killing them.

[Olerand]

Who helped them? The Turks incited them to kill the Armenians and Assyrians, and they did.

Why is that a measure deserving loyalty? Did the Turks not want the genocide? Did they do this for the Kurds's sake?
It was a win-win.

Because the Turks gave them the land for killing them.

But it wasn't a measure for the Kurds's sake.

The Turks wanted the Armenians/Assyrians dead. The Kurds wanted their land. They helped each other out.
The Turks did the Kurds no favors. Nothing here deserves loyalty. The Turks needed something from the Kurds and they delivered. It's a done deal.

[The East Marches II]

I think you mean truism.

Lol. Take a look at this plains dweller. You probably don't even try and kill the cousin of the dude that slept with your great grandmother. Go do some corvee labour for your master you statist shill.

B T F O
T
F
O

Great plains best plains. Farm subsidies 2020 nevar forget!

[The Southern Confederacy]

What would a legal invasion look like?

It'd probably look more successful. When everyone calls it illegal, it's a sign you've lost.

The Nazi invasion of Poland was legal and superior to America's invasion of Iraq.

[Kubra]

Kurdish national identity is a very new thing. Back during the ottoman times they were, well, illiterate mountain men of a warrior tribe.
But to hold that against them now is akin to me calling members of the orthodox church a load of drunkards, and to therefore decide UMN to be sloshed off his mind on Ruskova.

[The Southern Confederacy]

What would a legal invasion look like?

One authorized by the Security Council, as stipulated in the United Nations Charter that America (but that was a different America of course) set up.

That's a lot of bs, once you get to the point of invading another country, international law goes out the window.

[The East Marches II]

What would a legal invasion look like?

One authorized by the Security Council, as stipulated in the United Nations Charter that America (but that was a different America of course) set up.

>Authorized by the Security Council

Excuse me but it was clear we were restoring the police. If we really broke any rules, the robust international law system could call us to account :^)

[Olerand]

One authorized by the Security Council, as stipulated in the United Nations Charter that America (but that was a different America of course) set up.

That's a lot of bs, once you get to the point of invading another country, international law goes out the window.

No, it doesn't. You can invade, but it's still not legal.

America obviously invaded Iraq. Illegally.

[Kubra]

One authorized by the Security Council, as stipulated in the United Nations Charter that America (but that was a different America of course) set up.

That's a lot of bs, once you get to the point of invading another country, international law goes out the window.

So the real problem with the invasion of Iraq was the americans not bringing their own chemical weapons to the playing field