NationStates

Washington Resistance Army wrote:

Thermodolia wrote:
The gays

Even gays like tits.

Straight women?

Sovaal wrote:

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Even gays like tits.

Straight women?

I've met many a straight woman who enjoys the tatas.

I don't understand how this could be a bad thing. If there is no supply, the demand will die.

Democratic Mongol Popular State wrote:I don't understand how this could be a bad thing. If there is no supply, the demand will die.

Eh, my main worry is abusement, but then again Youtube is a private entity and can do what ever it wants.

Also, that's not how it works.

Wait, wrong thread.

Washington Resistance Army wrote:

Sovaal wrote:Straight women?

I've met many a straight woman who enjoys the tatas.

Asexuals?

Sovaal wrote:

Democratic Mongol Popular State wrote:I don't understand how this could be a bad thing. If there is no supply, the demand will die.

Eh, my main worry is abusement, but then again Youtube is a private entity and can do what ever it wants.

Also, that's not how it works.

I doubt it'll come to that. And yes it is.

Ifreann wrote:

Democratic Mongol Popular State wrote:I don't understand how this could be a bad thing. If there is no supply, the demand will die.

Passing a law banning porn won't actually stop the production of porn.

Removing porn will.

Democratic Mongol Popular State wrote:

Sovaal wrote:Eh, my main worry is abusement, but then again Youtube is a private entity and can do what ever it wants.

Also, that's not how it works.

I doubt it'll come to that. And yes it is.

Ifreann wrote:Passing a law banning porn won't actually stop the production of porn.

Removing porn will.

have you never heard of Prohibition? Or the drug war for that matter?

Washington Resistance Army wrote:

Thermodolia wrote:
The gays

Even gays like tits.

As a Gays, Con confirm

Sovaal wrote:

Democratic Mongol Popular State wrote:I doubt it'll come to that. And yes it is.

Removing porn will.

have you never heard of Prohibition? Or the drug war for that matter?

Get the right people to build networks and find anyone who's taking part and remove them. The issue with prohibition and the drug war is that there is a limit with funding, and there are limits on what people can do. And, of course, bribes and corruption in general.

Democratic Mongol Popular State wrote:

Sovaal wrote:have you never heard of Prohibition? Or the drug war for that matter?

Get the right people to build networks and find anyone who's taking part and remove them. The issue with prohibition and the drug war is that there is a limit with funding, and there are limits on what people can do. And, of course, bribes and corruption in general.

We've spent more than a trillion dollars on the drug war. Funding isn't an issue.

Sovaal wrote:

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
I've met many a straight woman who enjoys the tatas.

Asexuals?

I'm sure we could find a few that do, yeah.

Democratic Mongol Popular State wrote:

Sovaal wrote:have you never heard of Prohibition? Or the drug war for that matter?

Get the right people to build networks and find anyone who's taking part and remove them. The issue with prohibition and the drug war is that there is a limit with funding, and there are limits on what people can do. And, of course, bribes and corruption in general.

so you want an ASI similar to Samaritan , solely for the purpose to kill porn?

Washington Resistance Army wrote:

Democratic Mongol Popular State wrote:Get the right people to build networks and find anyone who's taking part and remove them. The issue with prohibition and the drug war is that there is a limit with funding, and there are limits on what people can do. And, of course, bribes and corruption in general.

We've spent more than a trillion dollars on the drug war. Funding isn't an issue.

Yes it is. Do you think most, even half of that goes to catching/finding people selling or smuggling drugs?

Yes Im Biop wrote:

Democratic Mongol Popular State wrote:Get the right people to build networks and find anyone who's taking part and remove them. The issue with prohibition and the drug war is that there is a limit with funding, and there are limits on what people can do. And, of course, bribes and corruption in general.

so you want an ASI similar to Samaritan , solely for the purpose to kill porn?

No, I was just saying it's a possibility. The way to stop ISIS videos is to kill off ISIS, and since it's not a domestic issue you can't do it from home.

Democratic Mongol Popular State wrote:

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
We've spent more than a trillion dollars on the drug war. Funding isn't an issue.

Yes it is. Do you think most, even half of that goes to catching/finding people selling or smuggling drugs?

Finding, catching, imprisoning etc yeah.

Washington Resistance Army wrote:

Thermodolia wrote:
The gays

Even gays like tits.

But I'm the gay and I don't like the tatas.

Democratic Mongol Popular State wrote:

Sovaal wrote:have you never heard of Prohibition? Or the drug war for that matter?

Get the right people to build networks and find anyone who's taking part and remove them. The issue with prohibition and the drug war is that there is a limit with funding, and there are limits on what people can do. And, of course, bribes and corruption in general.

We've spent billions of dollars on the Drug War. Funding is not a problem.
"Killing" supply won't cause demand to die as well, rather it finds other supplies elsewhere.

Anyway, in regards to the topic, yes, this is something that can be abused, and YouTube doesn't have the best track record.

Thermodolia wrote:

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Even gays like tits.

But I'm the gay and I don't like the tatas.

Fake news.

Washington Resistance Army wrote:

Thermodolia wrote:But I'm the gay and I don't like the tatas.

Fake news.

Well if pecs count as tatas then yes I like them.

Sovaal wrote:

Democratic Mongol Popular State wrote:Get the right people to build networks and find anyone who's taking part and remove them. The issue with prohibition and the drug war is that there is a limit with funding, and there are limits on what people can do. And, of course, bribes and corruption in general.

We've spent billions of dollars on the Drug War. Funding is not a problem.
"Killing" supply won't cause demand to die as well, rather it finds other supplies elsewhere.

Anyway, in regards to the topic, yes, this is something that can be abused, and YouTube doesn't have the best track record.

Billions lost to a corrupt project that never aimed to remove any drugs from anywhere. How surprising. When there is no supply, and no one knows they would demand it, nobody will demand it.

Democratic Mongol Popular State wrote:

Sovaal wrote:We've spent billions of dollars on the Drug War. Funding is not a problem.
"Killing" supply won't cause demand to die as well, rather it finds other supplies elsewhere.

Anyway, in regards to the topic, yes, this is something that can be abused, and YouTube doesn't have the best track record.

Billions lost to a corrupt project that never aimed to remove any drugs from anywhere. How surprising. When there is no supply, and no one knows they would demand it, nobody will demand it.

Uh huh, You know there's roughly a billion addicts in the world right?

Thermodolia wrote:

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Even gays like tits.

But I'm the gay and I don't like the tatas.

Regardless of whether one is attracted to women, things that jiggle are just inherently appealing. Like an executive stress toy, except if you play with them in the office you'll get fired. Or possibly promoted.

Yes Im Biop wrote:

Democratic Mongol Popular State wrote:Billions lost to a corrupt project that never aimed to remove any drugs from anywhere. How surprising. When there is no supply, and no one knows they would demand it, nobody will demand it.

Uh huh, You know there's roughly a billion addicts in the world right?

I'm saying the project could be a lot more effective if it had a real focus.

Democratic Mongol Popular State wrote:

Yes Im Biop wrote:
Uh huh, You know there's roughly a billion addicts in the world right?

I'm saying the project could be a lot more effective if it had a real focus.

Except it kinda wouldn't, people will always get high, someone will always sell them the stuff to get high

Yes Im Biop wrote:

Democratic Mongol Popular State wrote:I'm saying the project could be a lot more effective if it had a real focus.

Except it kinda wouldn't, people will always get high, someone will always sell them the stuff to get high

It would be more effective than this, quite easily. Incompetence is not tough to replace.