Farnhamia wrote:Cool, Stupak is calling the GOP anti-choicers on their bullshit.
If only the Republicans would let him speak. Honestly, there are six-year-olds better behaved than them.
Advertisement

by United Dependencies » Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:02 pm
Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).
Cannot think of a name wrote:Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.
Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.

by Ashmoria » Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:02 pm
Jordaxia wrote:So... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Pr ... e_Care_Act is that the bill that just passed? It seems to indicate so. It also says "Impose a penalty on individuals who do not buy health insurance" is part of its provisions. Can somebody clear that up for me? That doesn't sound progressive, it sounds like the sort of thing someone with an irrational hatred of the poor would do.

by Greed and Death » Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:03 pm
Jordaxia wrote:So... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Pr ... e_Care_Act is that the bill that just passed? It seems to indicate so. It also says "Impose a penalty on individuals who do not buy health insurance" is part of its provisions. Can somebody clear that up for me? That doesn't sound progressive, it sounds like the sort of thing someone with an irrational hatred of the poor would do.

by Farnhamia » Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:03 pm
Caninope wrote:Jordaxia wrote:So... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Pr ... e_Care_Act is that the bill that just passed? It seems to indicate so. It also says "Impose a penalty on individuals who do not buy health insurance" is part of its provisions. Can somebody clear that up for me? That doesn't sound progressive, it sounds like the sort of thing someone with an irrational hatred of the poor would do.
It means fine you if you don't have health care.
by Cannot think of a name » Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:03 pm


by Hahklallah » Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:03 pm

by Greed and Death » Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:03 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Caninope wrote:Jordaxia wrote:So... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Pr ... e_Care_Act is that the bill that just passed? It seems to indicate so. It also says "Impose a penalty on individuals who do not buy health insurance" is part of its provisions. Can somebody clear that up for me? That doesn't sound progressive, it sounds like the sort of thing someone with an irrational hatred of the poor would do.
It means fine you if you don't have health care.
I f you can afford to buy health insurance and don't buy it, yes. Relatively small fines.

by Jordaxia » Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:03 pm
Caninope wrote:Jordaxia wrote:So... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Pr ... e_Care_Act is that the bill that just passed? It seems to indicate so. It also says "Impose a penalty on individuals who do not buy health insurance" is part of its provisions. Can somebody clear that up for me? That doesn't sound progressive, it sounds like the sort of thing someone with an irrational hatred of the poor would do.
It means fine you if you don't have health care.

by United Dependencies » Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:04 pm
Hahklallah wrote:I heard from an undiclosed source that 37 states are going to sue because the Healthcare Bill passed
Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).
Cannot think of a name wrote:Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.
Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.

by SaintB » Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:04 pm

by Post-Unity Terra » Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:04 pm
Hahklallah wrote:I heard from an undiclosed source that 37 states are going to sue because the Healthcare Bill passed

by Serrland » Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:04 pm
Hahklallah wrote:I heard from an undiclosed source that 37 states are going to sue because the Healthcare Bill passed

by United Dependencies » Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:04 pm
Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).
Cannot think of a name wrote:Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.
Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.

by Rolling squid » Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:04 pm
Jordaxia wrote:Caninope wrote:Jordaxia wrote:So... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Pr ... e_Care_Act is that the bill that just passed? It seems to indicate so. It also says "Impose a penalty on individuals who do not buy health insurance" is part of its provisions. Can somebody clear that up for me? That doesn't sound progressive, it sounds like the sort of thing someone with an irrational hatred of the poor would do.
It means fine you if you don't have health care.
Right, I understand that. What I'm saying is, if you're too poor -to afford- healthcare, they fine you? How does that work?
Hammurab wrote:An athiest doesn't attend mass, go to confession, or know a lot about catholicism. So basically, an athiest is the same as a catholic.
Post-Unity Terra wrote:Golly gosh, one group of out-of-touch rich white guys is apparently more in touch with the average man than the other group of out-of-touch rich white guys.

by Greed and Death » Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:04 pm
Jordaxia wrote:Caninope wrote:Jordaxia wrote:So... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Pr ... e_Care_Act is that the bill that just passed? It seems to indicate so. It also says "Impose a penalty on individuals who do not buy health insurance" is part of its provisions. Can somebody clear that up for me? That doesn't sound progressive, it sounds like the sort of thing someone with an irrational hatred of the poor would do.
It means fine you if you don't have health care.
Right, I understand that. What I'm saying is, if you're too poor -to afford- healthcare, they fine you? How does that work?

by NERVUN » Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:04 pm
Jordaxia wrote:So... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Pr ... e_Care_Act is that the bill that just passed? It seems to indicate so. It also says "Impose a penalty on individuals who do not buy health insurance" is part of its provisions. Can somebody clear that up for me? That doesn't sound progressive, it sounds like the sort of thing someone with an irrational hatred of the poor would do.

by Farnhamia » Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:05 pm
greed and death wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Caninope wrote:Jordaxia wrote:So... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Pr ... e_Care_Act is that the bill that just passed? It seems to indicate so. It also says "Impose a penalty on individuals who do not buy health insurance" is part of its provisions. Can somebody clear that up for me? That doesn't sound progressive, it sounds like the sort of thing someone with an irrational hatred of the poor would do.
It means fine you if you don't have health care.
I f you can afford to buy health insurance and don't buy it, yes. Relatively small fines.
750 dollars is by no means small.

by Big Jim P » Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:05 pm
Jordaxia wrote:Caninope wrote:Jordaxia wrote:So... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Pr ... e_Care_Act is that the bill that just passed? It seems to indicate so. It also says "Impose a penalty on individuals who do not buy health insurance" is part of its provisions. Can somebody clear that up for me? That doesn't sound progressive, it sounds like the sort of thing someone with an irrational hatred of the poor would do.
It means fine you if you don't have health care.
Right, I understand that. What I'm saying is, if you're too poor -to afford- healthcare, they fine you? How does that work?

by Greed and Death » Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:05 pm
Rolling squid wrote:Jordaxia wrote:Caninope wrote:Jordaxia wrote:So... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Pr ... e_Care_Act is that the bill that just passed? It seems to indicate so. It also says "Impose a penalty on individuals who do not buy health insurance" is part of its provisions. Can somebody clear that up for me? That doesn't sound progressive, it sounds like the sort of thing someone with an irrational hatred of the poor would do.
It means fine you if you don't have health care.
Right, I understand that. What I'm saying is, if you're too poor -to afford- healthcare, they fine you? How does that work?
No. If you fall below a certin minimum income, you aren't fined, and you may be covered by medicare.

by Hahklallah » Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:05 pm


by San Guillermo » Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:05 pm

by Ashmoria » Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:05 pm
Jordaxia wrote:Caninope wrote:Jordaxia wrote:So... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Pr ... e_Care_Act is that the bill that just passed? It seems to indicate so. It also says "Impose a penalty on individuals who do not buy health insurance" is part of its provisions. Can somebody clear that up for me? That doesn't sound progressive, it sounds like the sort of thing someone with an irrational hatred of the poor would do.
It means fine you if you don't have health care.
Right, I understand that. What I'm saying is, if you're too poor -to afford- healthcare, they fine you? How does that work?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadouya, Askusia, Greater Ziegenian Reich, Grinning Dragon, Ifreann, Morlencey, Sheeptopia, Utquiagvik, Yasuragi
Advertisement