Takaram wrote:Price just summed up a year of Republican arguments in one short speech.
And I really don't like where Woolsey is going.
Why not? I thought she mae a valid point?
Advertisement
by Helertia » Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:42 pm
Takaram wrote:Price just summed up a year of Republican arguments in one short speech.
And I really don't like where Woolsey is going.
by Maxen von Bismarck » Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:43 pm
by JuNii » Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:45 pm
Rolling squid wrote:Is it just me, or do the only two republican points that actually have any substance (IE not just screaming "socialism!") are higher taxes and medicare cuts?
by Vesser » Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:45 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Hassett wrote:There are about 50 million Americans without health insurance now, if this bill passes, they will immediately get government funded insurance and who's going to pay for that? The middle and upper classes. Also, where are the extra doctors to treat these newly insured people? Answer: There are none, 50 million more patients and not a single additional doctor
Immediately? No, sometime after the year after next year. Almost nothing in the bill goes into effect immediately. And the number is around 30 million, not 50 million. Interesting how the opponents of the bill lower and raise that number to suit the argument they're trying to make. And do you actually think all those uninsured people need medical attention right this minute? Or that no new doctors are being graduated in this country? Please, at least be creative in the lies you make up.
by United Dependencies » Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:48 pm
JuNii wrote:Rolling squid wrote:Is it just me, or do the only two republican points that actually have any substance (IE not just screaming "socialism!") are higher taxes and medicare cuts?
I dunno... I hear more Democrats spouting that they will vote for this bill because it's 'historic'... nothing else, just that they are glad to vote for this 'historic' bill.
Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).
Cannot think of a name wrote:Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.
Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.
by Port Arcana » Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:49 pm
by United Dependencies » Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:49 pm
Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).
Cannot think of a name wrote:Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.
Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.
by Free Soviets » Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:50 pm
United Dependencies wrote:I think the Repub complaints against earmarks might be vaild.
by O5vx » Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:50 pm
by United Dependencies » Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:50 pm
Port Arcana wrote:I've been away for the past few hours, can someone kindly tell me if we are close to 216?
Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).
Cannot think of a name wrote:Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.
Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.
by Maxen von Bismarck » Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:51 pm
by Our L Lawliet » Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:52 pm
by JuNii » Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:53 pm
United Dependencies wrote:JuNii wrote:Rolling squid wrote:Is it just me, or do the only two republican points that actually have any substance (IE not just screaming "socialism!") are higher taxes and medicare cuts?
I dunno... I hear more Democrats spouting that they will vote for this bill because it's 'historic'... nothing else, just that they are glad to vote for this 'historic' bill.
I think the Repub complaints against earmarks might be vaild.
by United Dependencies » Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:53 pm
Free Soviets wrote:United Dependencies wrote:I think the Repub complaints against earmarks might be vaild.
when have republicans ever told the truth before?
the earmark complaint is especially stupid this time since they are being axed out in the reconciliation bill, and only exist at all due to the republican filibuster.
Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).
Cannot think of a name wrote:Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.
Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.
by Free Soviets » Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:55 pm
Maxen von Bismarck wrote:Would you kindly list the relevant page numbers? I have a digital copy I'd like to put to good use.
by United Dependencies » Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:57 pm
Wilgrove wrote:This is not debate, this is just "Take time to spew rhetoric."
Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).
Cannot think of a name wrote:Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.
Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.
by Free Soviets » Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:57 pm
United Dependencies wrote:What of the cornhusker kickback and the like?
by Kalysk » Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:59 pm
United Dependencies wrote:Wilgrove wrote:This is not debate, this is just "Take time to spew rhetoric."
Probably still stalling for votes then. If your just watching now than it's a shame. You missed the real debate at the begining when they were talking abou the provisions of the bill. That was pretty tense.
Rhodmhire wrote:Kalysk you are a total fucking bro for professing your love (of Erasure)
by United Dependencies » Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:59 pm
Free Soviets wrote:United Dependencies wrote:What of the cornhusker kickback and the like?
that was exactly what i was thinking of. it is specifically kicked out in the reconciliation bill, and it only exists because the republican filibuster gave the 60th vote in the senate massive clout for causing mischief.
Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).
Cannot think of a name wrote:Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.
Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bienenhalde, Cyptopir, Nimzonia, Repreteop, Republics of the Solar Union, Reyo, Shidei, Statesburg, The Kharkivan Cossacks, The Vooperian Union, Tiami, Umeria, Upper Harmania, Vishizzia
Advertisement