Sure. Many agricultural societies developed independently eg. in the Maghreb, much of the Americas, places in the Pacific, etc. But Eurasia (and North Africa, which I didn't but probably should have mentioned) were certainly the brunt of it.Torrocca wrote:Quency wrote:He said they were uncivilised. Which I would find to be a fairly ridiculous statement to consider controversial. Advanced intelligence and social structures necessary for civilisation only really developed in Eurasia, where conditions were right that settled agriculutralists could produce enough short-term relative to hunter-gatherers to take have a leg to stand on.
Namely in colder climates where it was largely necessary for modern humans after the last Ice Age, very fertile lands where agriculture payed off well versus hunting-gathering (Mesopotamia, the Nile, Indus river, China, etc.), and places where hunting-gathering was not very effective short-term.
That's some advanced level bullshittery right there, considering several civilizations developed in what's not Eurasia. Take those disingenuous lies of yours someplace else.





