Is Diversity and Multiculturalism a Good or Bad Thing?

[Kasynatia]

No, diversity is a very bad thing. Countries like Iceland vs South Africa prove that less diversity is better.

*NS mod crosshair appears over my head*

[San Lumen]

No, diversity is a very bad thing. Countries like Iceland vs South Africa prove that less diversity is better.

*NS mod crosshair appears over my head*

could you explain why its bad?

[Kubumba Tribe]

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/featur ... 38303.html

[Bakery Hill]

No, diversity is a very bad thing. Countries like Iceland vs South Africa prove that less diversity is better.

*NS mod crosshair appears over my head*

Or you can bring up Singapore to prove the opposite.

[Proctopeo]

No, diversity is a very bad thing. Countries like Iceland vs South Africa prove that less diversity is better.

*NS mod crosshair appears over my head*

Or you can bring up Singapore to prove the opposite.

The right answer is "it varies from place to place".

[Oil exporting People]

Or you can bring up Singapore to prove the opposite.

Which can also be countered by pointing out the Singapore is not exactly Democratic in the Western mold, and is very much dominated by one group in the form of the ethnic Chinese.

[Torrocca]

Or you can bring up Singapore to prove the opposite.

Which can also be countered by pointing out the Singapore is not exactly Democratic in the Western mold, and is very much dominated by one group in the form of the ethnic Chinese.

*Gasp* are you s-s-saying that problems in countries have more to do with politics than diversity?

Heavens no, what'll the supremacists have going for them now???

[Kasynatia]

No, diversity is a very bad thing. Countries like Iceland vs South Africa prove that less diversity is better.

*NS mod crosshair appears over my head*

could you explain why its bad?

Europe.... nuff said

[Bakery Hill]

Or you can bring up Singapore to prove the opposite.

Which can also be countered by pointing out the Singapore is not exactly Democratic in the Western mold

So truly the values of a society contribute to the degree that it can sustain ethnic plurality.

and is very much dominated by one group in the form of the ethnic Chinese.

And yet the level to which it is dominated by the Chinese is less than in many of those countries that are apparently being laid low by multiculturalism already.

[San Lumen]

could you explain why its bad?

Europe.... nuff said

Thats not an answer.

[Kubumba Tribe]

Europe.... nuff said

Thats not an answer.

I was gonna say something similar to that

[Genivaria]

could you explain why its bad?

Europe.... nuff said

So you can't actually explain, got it.

[Pope Joan]

The city where we live now is 1/3 Mexican, 1/3 African American, and 1/3 white. Most guys from all sectors and vectors wear cowboy hats and drive pickup trucks, and enjoy fried chicken. It is not perfect but there is vitality here and folks get along remarkably well.

[Mattopilos II]

I think it is more beneficial than not. Doesn't help others disagree and actively aim to create a divide between people, in turn making it a "bad" thing.

[Trumptonium]

No, diversity is a very bad thing. Countries like Iceland vs South Africa prove that less diversity is better.

*NS mod crosshair appears over my head*

Or you can bring up Singapore to prove the opposite.

A country which is explicitly self-described as authoritarian in order to keep all the ethnicities peacefully in line?

Aight, let's implement that in the West. Abolishment of multiparty democracy when?

Oh.

[Bakery Hill]

Or you can bring up Singapore to prove the opposite.

A country which is explicitly self-described as authoritarian in order to keep all the ethnicities peacefully in line?

Aight, let's implement that in the West. Abolishment of multiparty democracy when?

Oh.

damn i am so very wedded to liberal democratic values and parliamentarianism and all how dreadfully sad for me to fall upon this conundrum

[Liriena]

could you explain why its bad?

Europe.... nuff said

Not an argument.

[Liriena]

The city where we live now is 1/3 Mexican, 1/3 African American, and 1/3 white. Most guys from all sectors and vectors wear cowboy hats and drive pickup trucks, and enjoy fried chicken. It is not perfect but there is vitality here and folks get along remarkably well.

Lies! Deception!

[San Lumen]

Or you can bring up Singapore to prove the opposite.

A country which is explicitly self-described as authoritarian in order to keep all the ethnicities peacefully in line?

Aight, let's implement that in the West. Abolishment of multiparty democracy when?

Oh.

Singapore is not my ideal at all.

[Ultramarr]

How is the west forced to be multicultural

The West wasn't forced into being multicultural. It is just nonsense
Many of the immigrants were brought to the west after the Second World War to fill up the labour shortages and allowed people to come.
UK allowed people from the Commonwealth to come whilst France brought people from their former North African and Sub-Saharan Colonies. It was all done by businesses to carry on producing.

High end business brought them in not the people hence its forced and it failed miserable as large swathes of them don't work and live off welfare and the damage they did like terrorism, no go zones and mass rape cases like cologne and Rotherham out did any "good" hiring 3rd world labour did. Although to be fair most of this applies to the new arrivals not the post ww2 ones

[San Lumen]

The West wasn't forced into being multicultural. It is just nonsense
Many of the immigrants were brought to the west after the Second World War to fill up the labour shortages and allowed people to come.
UK allowed people from the Commonwealth to come whilst France brought people from their former North African and Sub-Saharan Colonies. It was all done by businesses to carry on producing.

High end business brought them in not the people hence its forced and it failed miserable as large swathes of them don't work and live off welfare and the damage they did like terrorism, no go zones and mass rape cases like cologne and Rotherham out did any "good" hiring 3rd world labour did. Although to be fair most of this applies to the new arrivals not the post ww2 ones

Sorry but you can't make claims like that without a valid source

[Ultramarr]

High end business brought them in not the people hence its forced and it failed miserable as large swathes of them don't work and live off welfare and the damage they did like terrorism, no go zones and mass rape cases like cologne and Rotherham out did any "good" hiring 3rd world labour did. Although to be fair most of this applies to the new arrivals not the post ww2 ones

Sorry but you can't make claims like that without a valid source

So do you deny cologne and Rotherham? Do you deny the ghettos and crime zones? What do you deny?

[San Lumen]

Sorry but you can't make claims like that without a valid source

So do you deny cologne and Rotherham? Do you deny the ghettos and crime zones? What do you deny?

I know the case in Cologne of which you speak. But the rest of your post has no proof.

[Greater Germany]

Depends how different the cultures are. If they have different moral codes, then it can be very dangerous to civil society.

In what way? How does having Muslims in England, Canada or Germany for example dangerous to society?

^This.

Some cultures are incompatible due to differing values. This can render some multiculturalism a bad thing. It's a case by case matter though, and so multiculturalism as a whole can't be listed as a bad thing.

[Ultramarr]

It doesn't work because some cultures are better than others and its mainly masses of people from cultural backwards 3rd countries going to small highly cultured 1st world countries then behaving with their backwards culture. For example many migrants from North Africa in Germany would play a game they called "the rape game" and rape women in crowds.