None of this is recent history is it? The Celts lost England and the Angles and Saxons built England
Advertisement

by United Islamic Commonwealth » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:30 pm

by United Islamic Commonwealth » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:30 pm

by Proctopeo » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:31 pm
San Lumen wrote:Proctopeo wrote:So, because historically immigrants weren't highly skilled and highly educated, we shouldn't have skills and educations as standards for immigration?
Also, refugees (actual refugees) are an exception.
No they should not be. The new mayor of Helena came to the US from Liberia with almost nothing and little skills is now the first black mayor in Montana history. He served in the Navy Reserve and worked for the state government in Health and Human Services. But we should have denied him entry because he wasn't highly skilled or educated.

by San Lumen » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:32 pm
Proctopeo wrote:San Lumen wrote:No they should not be. The new mayor of Helena came to the US from Liberia with almost nothing and little skills is now the first black mayor in Montana history. He served in the Navy Reserve and worked for the state government in Health and Human Services. But we should have denied him entry because he wasn't highly skilled or educated.
What degree of standards should we have then?
Note that I also think work ethic should be considered - someone with barely any skills but a drive to learn and be useful should still be let in. Someone with no skills who's likely just going to be a lazy bum shouldn't; we have enough of them domestically.

by United Islamic Commonwealth » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:34 pm

by Proctopeo » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:35 pm
San Lumen wrote:Proctopeo wrote:What degree of standards should we have then?
Note that I also think work ethic should be considered - someone with barely any skills but a drive to learn and be useful should still be let in. Someone with no skills who's likely just going to be a lazy bum shouldn't; we have enough of them domestically.
saying someone with no skills will be a lazy bum is absurd. I just gave you an example of someone with little skills who made something of himself.

by Iyanden » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:35 pm
United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:Iyanden wrote:I said the 2nd and 3rd gen ones are the citizens because legally its people born there or had a parent from there in the case of the UK most of the time
Oh? Well, the British government's web-page says nothing about that, fortunately.

by United Islamic Commonwealth » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:36 pm

by Kubumba Tribe » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:37 pm
Iyanden wrote:when they don't need to
Iyanden wrote:just so they can live in a 1st world welfare state not to mention people encouraging them to do this like criminal NGOs and far left governments such as Sweden and Germany in the EU.
Iyanden wrote:They not refugees if they aren't going to the nearest safe country and there are plenty of countries at peace near Syria and there are the government held areas there too.
Iyanden wrote:Most of these so called refugees aren't even Syrian and are economic migrants
Proctopeo wrote:San Lumen wrote:No they should not be. The new mayor of Helena came to the US from Liberia with almost nothing and little skills is now the first black mayor in Montana history. He served in the Navy Reserve and worked for the state government in Health and Human Services. But we should have denied him entry because he wasn't highly skilled or educated.
What degree of standards should we have then?
Note that I also think work ethic should be considered - someone with barely any skills but a drive to learn and be useful should still be let in. Someone with no skills who's likely just going to be a lazy bum shouldn't; we have enough of them domestically.
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.

by United Islamic Commonwealth » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:37 pm
Iyanden wrote:United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:Oh? Well, the British government's web-page says nothing about that, fortunately.
I am pretty sure you get the passport and everything if your born here or have a parent from their like in my case and people can also get it for certain acheivements

by Proctopeo » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:38 pm
Kubumba Tribe wrote:Proctopeo wrote:What degree of standards should we have then?
Note that I also think work ethic should be considered - someone with barely any skills but a drive to learn and be useful should still be let in. Someone with no skills who's likely just going to be a lazy bum shouldn't; we have enough of them domestically.
This is what I think:
Someone with a track record of a violent crime in the last >insert time period here< shouldn't be allowed in.
And that's it.

by Kubumba Tribe » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:39 pm
Iyanden wrote:United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:It is relevant. England is built on immigration, contrary to what you asserted.
Yes from the same culture that made the country and they emigrated over a 1000 years ago. They didn't have the modern model of mass immigration they conquered and made their country
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.

by Iyanden » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:39 pm
Kubumba Tribe wrote:Iyanden wrote:No one is letting them drown apart from criminal gangs and people smugglers and these people irresponsibly putting their family on those rubber boats
"Yeah, why don't they just get more money?" /sIyanden wrote:when they don't need to
"Yeah, stay in a war zone you sand niggers!" /sIyanden wrote:just so they can live in a 1st world welfare state not to mention people encouraging them to do this like criminal NGOs and far left governments such as Sweden and Germany in the EU.
"Yeah, how dare they show compassion to other humans!" /sIyanden wrote:They not refugees if they aren't going to the nearest safe country and there are plenty of countries at peace near Syria and there are the government held areas there too.
"Yeah, at least you have bread and not a piece of bread. Be greatful!" /sIyanden wrote:Most of these so called refugees aren't even Syrian and are economic migrants
"Yeah, they should just go from poverty to poverty! That always works out in the end!" /sIyanden wrote:But the countries they are moving to must defend their people and culture first. I say the rest of the world must all fix their own problems although we can help a bit with things like foreign aid
Culture always changes, this has been said alreadyIyanden wrote:None of this is recent history is it? The Celts lost England and the Angles and Saxons built England
Wait a minute, I thought you supported maintaining one's culture?Proctopeo wrote:What degree of standards should we have then?
Note that I also think work ethic should be considered - someone with barely any skills but a drive to learn and be useful should still be let in. Someone with no skills who's likely just going to be a lazy bum shouldn't; we have enough of them domestically.
This is what I think:
Someone with a track record of a violent crime in the last >insert time period here< shouldn't be allowed in.
And that's it.

by United Islamic Commonwealth » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:39 pm
Iyanden wrote:United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:It is relevant. England is built on immigration, contrary to what you asserted.
Yes from the same culture that made the country and they emigrated over a 1000 years ago. They didn't have the modern model of mass immigration they conquered and made their country

by Kubumba Tribe » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:41 pm
Iyanden wrote:Kubumba Tribe wrote:"Yeah, why don't they just get more money?" /s
"Yeah, stay in a war zone you sand niggers!" /s
"Yeah, how dare they show compassion to other humans!" /s
"Yeah, at least you have bread and not a piece of bread. Be greatful!" /s
"Yeah, they should just go from poverty to poverty! That always works out in the end!" /s
Culture always changes, this has been said already
Wait a minute, I thought you supported maintaining one's culture?
This is what I think:
Someone with a track record of a violent crime in the last >insert time period here< shouldn't be allowed in.
And that's it.
I do support maintain ones culture and the Celts were unable to in most of England because they lost however they didn't in Scotland, Wales and Ireland
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.

by Iyanden » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:41 pm
United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:Iyanden wrote:Yes from the same culture that made the country and they emigrated over a 1000 years ago. They didn't have the modern model of mass immigration they conquered and made their country
The Normans, in France, had the same culture as the Anglo-Saxons? Really?

by Iyanden » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:42 pm
Kubumba Tribe wrote:Iyanden wrote:Yes from the same culture that made the country and they emigrated over a 1000 years ago. They didn't have the modern model of mass immigration they conquered and made their country
Celts, Angles and Saxons are different cultures.
Also, you support maintaining one's culture, but now you aren't. What's up with that?

by San Lumen » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:43 pm
Iyanden wrote:Kubumba Tribe wrote:"Yeah, why don't they just get more money?" /s
"Yeah, stay in a war zone you sand niggers!" /s
"Yeah, how dare they show compassion to other humans!" /s
"Yeah, at least you have bread and not a piece of bread. Be greatful!" /s
"Yeah, they should just go from poverty to poverty! That always works out in the end!" /s
Culture always changes, this has been said already
Wait a minute, I thought you supported maintaining one's culture?
This is what I think:
Someone with a track record of a violent crime in the last >insert time period here< shouldn't be allowed in.
And that's it.
I do support maintain ones culture and the Celts were unable to in most of England because they lost however they didn't in Scotland, Wales and Ireland

by United Islamic Commonwealth » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:43 pm

by Iyanden » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:44 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Bradfordville, Floofybit, Galloism, Necroghastia, Ostroeuropa, Raskana, Stellar Colonies, Tarsonis, The Black Forrest, The Sherpa Empire
Advertisement