Katzenstaat wrote:Really? Good luck finding a crime-ridden ghetto in South Korea. Wait..you can't.
Are you fucking joking me right now?
Am I on candid camera or some shit?
Advertisement

by Conserative Morality » Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:01 pm
Katzenstaat wrote:Really? Good luck finding a crime-ridden ghetto in South Korea. Wait..you can't.

by Katzenstaat » Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:01 pm

by United Islamic Commonwealth » Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:02 pm
Katzenstaat wrote:Really? Good luck finding a crime-ridden ghetto in South Korea. Wait..you can't. Poverty does not have to cause this problem.


by Katzenstaat » Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:03 pm

by Katzenstaat » Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:04 pm
Alvecia wrote:Katzenstaat wrote:Really? Good luck finding a crime-ridden ghetto in South Korea. Wait..you can't. Poverty does not have to cause this problem.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=South+Korean+slums

by Kubumba Tribe » Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:04 pm
Katzenstaat wrote:Kubumba Tribe wrote:You don't know what jihad is either huh. And broken neighborhoods happen across all demographics.
Really? Good luck finding a crime-ridden ghetto in South Korea. Wait..you can't. Poverty does not have to cause this problem.
Furthermore the ghetto problem isn't racial in nature. It is just socioeconomic and needs to be fixed.
Yeah I know there are two jihads.
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.

by Katzenstaat » Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:04 pm
Kubumba Tribe wrote:Katzenstaat wrote:Really? Good luck finding a crime-ridden ghetto in South Korea. Wait..you can't. Poverty does not have to cause this problem.
Furthermore the ghetto problem isn't racial in nature. It is just socioeconomic and needs to be fixed.
Yeah I know there are two jihads.
To clarify so you won't twist what jihad is:
1: Jihad of the soul (keeping to Allah [SWT])
2: Military jihad (which does not include the likes of Muslim terrorists)

by United Islamic Commonwealth » Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:05 pm

by Conserative Morality » Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:05 pm

by Katzenstaat » Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:06 pm
United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:Katzenstaat wrote:Nope. But I'm confident that Koreans will prove me right.
Well, I have. It's not the utopia that a great many people would make it out to be. Same with Japan. The difference with these countries and the US is that there, less crimes are reported. That doesn't mean they don't happen.

by Alvecia » Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:06 pm
Katzenstaat wrote:
Poor neighborhood != ghetto
You can have poor people without having the sort of violent crime.
Katzenstaat wrote:San Lumen wrote:No Islam has nothing to do with it.
It is a part of it. The more people justify absurd behaviors with tolerance the more people hate tolerance itself. To have true tolerance we must have some standards. Eating kebabs or drinking Turkish coffee is good culture while jihad is not. European architecture being different from Northeast Asian architecture is legitimate diversity while completely broken neighborhoods are what they are, something broken that needs to be fixed.
Diversity should only apply to what is good, not what is awful. If A and B are both awesome but are different that's called diversity. If A is good but B is awful then A is good and B is awful.

by Katzenstaat » Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:06 pm

by United Islamic Commonwealth » Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:07 pm
Katzenstaat wrote:United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:Well, I have. It's not the utopia that a great many people would make it out to be. Same with Japan. The difference with these countries and the US is that there, less crimes are reported. That doesn't mean they don't happen.
Sure. But they are still much safer than the States. Tokyo at night isn't a war zone.

by Katzenstaat » Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:08 pm
Alvecia wrote:Katzenstaat wrote:Poor neighborhood != ghetto
You can have poor people without having the sort of violent crime.
Only in the sense that they're typically not ethnically diverse. Either way, a slum still fits the definition of "broken neighbourhood" that you made in your initial point.Katzenstaat wrote:It is a part of it. The more people justify absurd behaviors with tolerance the more people hate tolerance itself. To have true tolerance we must have some standards. Eating kebabs or drinking Turkish coffee is good culture while jihad is not. European architecture being different from Northeast Asian architecture is legitimate diversity while completely broken neighborhoods are what they are, something broken that needs to be fixed.
Diversity should only apply to what is good, not what is awful. If A and B are both awesome but are different that's called diversity. If A is good but B is awful then A is good and B is awful.

by United Islamic Commonwealth » Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:09 pm
Katzenstaat wrote:Alvecia wrote:Only in the sense that they're typically not ethnically diverse. Either way, a slum still fits the definition of "broken neighbourhood" that you made in your initial point.
LOL no. The actual facts are much more uncomfortable than the one segregationists advocate for (i.e. as long as people are separate there can be no ghettos). Singapore is diverse but it isn't fucked up either. There are places that are less diverse and much more fucked up.

by Katzenstaat » Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:09 pm

by Kubumba Tribe » Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:09 pm
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.

by Katzenstaat » Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:10 pm
United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:Katzenstaat wrote:
LOL no. The actual facts are much more uncomfortable than the one segregationists advocate for (i.e. as long as people are separate there can be no ghettos). Singapore is diverse but it isn't fucked up either. There are places that are less diverse and much more fucked up.
I repeat what I've said before: that's because Singapore is far stricter and brutal in how they mete out justice. You ever been caned?

by Conserative Morality » Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:12 pm

by United Islamic Commonwealth » Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:12 pm

by Katzenstaat » Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:13 pm

by Katzenstaat » Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:14 pm

by United Islamic Commonwealth » Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:14 pm

by Kubumba Tribe » Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:15 pm
United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:Katzenstaat wrote:
LOL no. The actual facts are much more uncomfortable than the one segregationists advocate for (i.e. as long as people are separate there can be no ghettos). Singapore is diverse but it isn't fucked up either. There are places that are less diverse and much more fucked up.
I repeat what I've said before: that's because Singapore is far stricter and brutal in how they mete out justice. You ever been caned?
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Eahland, Fartsniffage, Galloism, Grinning Dragon, Ifreann, Immoren, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Stellar Colonies, The Acolyte Confederacy, The Jamesian Republic, The Rio Grande River Basin, Thermodolia, Umeria
Advertisement