Is Diversity and Multiculturalism a Good or Bad Thing?

[Ultramarr]

It will result in genocide in time as muslims hate white people and arent afraid to show it even nowadays.

*** One day ban for continued trolling after being warned for it. ***

No need to censor him for honestly stating his beliefs.

[Ultramarr]

The Ainus did very little to build Japanese civilisation or the nation which the Japanese people built, they lost thousands of years ago end of story.

According to you, land belongs to the natives, and they should have sovreignty on their own land, so why should you care what Ainus do or don't do on their own land? Why shouldn't they take their land back?

As for Palestine I support them because I am anti Israel

I'm pretty sure you're anti-Jewish also

and the natives have their reservations where they can live with their fellow tribes.

Because reservations are the best places to live /s

The Neanderthals also existed outside of Europe too and they didn't build any nations.

Land belongs to the natives according to you, remember?

I said the stereotype on Brits isn't true same with the immigrants

Yet you still used a stereotype about immgrants

The land belongs to the natives as in the civilisation that build the civilisation. If you been there for over a 1000 years and built a civilisation you are the native.

[Australian rePublic]

*** One day ban for continued trolling after being warned for it. ***

No need to censor him for honestly stating his beliefs.

Agreed

[Neanderthaland]

*** One day ban for continued trolling after being warned for it. ***

No need to censor him for honestly stating his beliefs.

If you actually read that you will notice that he is stating other people's beliefs.

[Ultramarr]

Diversity for diversity's sake is meaningless. You done even specify if you're differentiating between good kinds of cultures and bad kinds of cultures. You just say that having different cultures is inherently good. That's like saying having a diverse array of food is good, even if 90% of it is junk food crap that's gonna make you nothing but sick.

To whom are you referring to?

What is a bad culture to you?

The aghori cannibals of India, the Islamic theoracy culture of Pakistan, savages in the amazon ect

[Minoa]

With all due respect, I remain firm that xenophobia is unacceptable, especially with this incident in Italy.

merely an incident triggered by the behaviour of the people you are trying to force society to accept

same thing with the finsbury mosque attacker

Basically this argument is blaming the victims just because of their ethnicity.

[El-Amin Caliphate]

*** One day ban for continued trolling after being warned for it. ***

No need to censor him for honestly stating his beliefs.

No need to censor him for honestly stating his beliefs.

Agreed

These are his beliefs.
And Ultramarr, didn't you say in the Student expelling thread that spouting racist b.s. is wrong?

According to you, land belongs to the natives, and they should have sovreignty on their own land, so why should you care what Ainus do or don't do on their own land? Why shouldn't they take their land back?

I'm pretty sure you're anti-Jewish also

Because reservations are the best places to live /s

Land belongs to the natives according to you, remember?

Yet you still used a stereotype about immgrants

The land belongs to the natives as in the civilisation that build the civilisation. If you been there for over a 1000 years and built a civilisation you are the native.

Not the definition of a native.
This mean that you don't support natives having the right to their land, you support whoever "develops" the land.

The aghori cannibals of India

I just read about the Aghoris and have not come across them being cannibals.

the Islamic theoracy culture of Pakistan

1: Pakistan and other Muslim-majority countries have a loooooong way to go for that to happen
2: Even if Pakistan was Islamic, you say that like that's a bad thing.

savages in the amazon

>Implying every single indigenous ethnic group in the Amazon is savage

[The Empire of Pretantia]

2: Even if Pakistan was Islamic,

>95% of Pakistan is Muslim
>"Even if Pakistan was Islamic-"
>Le "Muslims not Islam" meme

[El-Amin Caliphate]

2: Even if Pakistan was Islamic,

>95% of Pakistan is Muslim
>"Even if Pakistan was Islamic-"
>Le "Muslims not Islam" meme

Yes. Some of Pakistan's laws are not consistent with Al-Islam. Instead of Shari'ah, they follow laws based off of British common law

[Ultramarr]

No need to censor him for honestly stating his beliefs.

Agreed

These are his beliefs.
And Ultramarr, didn't you say in the Student expelling thread that spouting racist b.s. is wrong?

The land belongs to the natives as in the civilisation that build the civilisation. If you been there for over a 1000 years and built a civilisation you are the native.

Not the definition of a native.
This mean that you don't support natives having the right to their land, you support whoever "develops" the land.

The aghori cannibals of India

I just read about the Aghoris and have not come across them being cannibals.

the Islamic theoracy culture of Pakistan

1: Pakistan and other Muslim-majority countries have a loooooong way to go for that to happen
2: Even if Pakistan was Islamic, you say that like that's a bad thing.

savages in the amazon

>Implying every single indigenous ethnic group in the Amazon is savage

The natives would mean the population living in and building the soceity even the native Americans came from elsewhere so when I say native thats what I mean. The Aghoris are definately cannibals and they also cover themseleves in human ash and steal and eat dead bodies, do drugs and and drink from human skulls. Reza Aslan even interviews and eats brain with them its really messed up. The indegenious poulation of the amazon are savages its the truth.
Here are some videos on the aghori sect and Pakistan's theocracy and revenge rapes a part of their culture in swathes of their country:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eM-NMfn48c4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pp-sr5LNA50
I said on the other thread I don't agree with the guys racist comment about torturing people but I don't believe in censoring them either especially since the guy that got censored here never went on about torturing people

[El-Amin Caliphate]

These are his beliefs.
And Ultramarr, didn't you say in the Student expelling thread that spouting racist b.s. is wrong?

Not the definition of a native.
This mean that you don't support natives having the right to their land, you support whoever "develops" the land.

I just read about the Aghoris and have not come across them being cannibals.

1: Pakistan and other Muslim-majority countries have a loooooong way to go for that to happen
2: Even if Pakistan was Islamic, you say that like that's a bad thing.

>Implying every single indigenous ethnic group in the Amazon is savage

The natives would mean the population living in and building the soceity even the native Americans came from elsewhere so when I say native thats what I mean.

Ok. Still, that's not the definition of what a native is

The Aghoris are definately cannibals

Proof?

Reza Aslan even interviews and eats brain with them its really messed up.

Proof about Reza Azlan doing this?

The indegenious poulation of the amazon are savages its the truth.

Again:
>Implying that every single indigenous ethnic group in the Amazon is savage

[Ultramarr]

The natives would mean the population living in and building the soceity even the native Americans came from elsewhere so when I say native thats what I mean.

Ok. Still, that's not the definition of what a native is

The Aghoris are definately cannibals

Proof?

Reza Aslan even interviews and eats brain with them its really messed up.

Proof about Reza Azlan doing this?

The indegenious poulation of the amazon are savages its the truth.

Again:
>Implying that every single indigenous ethnic group in the Amazon is savage

I left the video on the Aghoris and Raza Aslan you just didn't click on it and yes the Amazon is inhabited by savages

[El-Amin Caliphate]

yes the Amazon is inhabited by savages

>Implying that every single indigenous ethnic group is savage.

[Ultramarr]

yes the Amazon is inhabited by savages

>Implying that every single indigenous ethnic group is savage.

I am not implying it I am stating it

[El-Amin Caliphate]

>Implying that every single indigenous ethnic group is savage.

I am not implying it I am stating it

Well either way I doubt it
These are all the indigenous peoples of Brazil(these people too, and these people), Ecuador, Peru, Peru and Brazil, Colombia (the list is of the groups regarless of whether they live in the Amazon or not. Now, you're telling me that every single indigenous ethnicity in the Amazon is savage?

[Ultramarr]

I am not implying it I am stating it

Well either way I doubt it
These are all the indigenous peoples of Brazil(these people too, and these people), Ecuador, Peru, Peru and Brazil, Colombia (the list is of the groups regarless of whether they live in the Amazon or not. Now, you're telling me that every single indigenous ethnicity in the Amazon is savage?

Yes when everyone else has massive civilisation they live in the jungle like pre historic people so yes

[El-Amin Caliphate]

Well either way I doubt it
These are all the indigenous peoples of Brazil(these people too, and these people), Ecuador, Peru, Peru and Brazil, Colombia (the list is of the groups regarless of whether they live in the Amazon or not. Now, you're telling me that every single indigenous ethnicity in the Amazon is savage?

Yes when everyone else has massive civilisation they live in the jungle like pre historic people so yes

Living in the jungle doesn't make someone a savage.
Ok wait, it does. but people use more modern terms for people like them.

[The Empire of Pretantia]

>95% of Pakistan is Muslim
>"Even if Pakistan was Islamic-"
>Le "Muslims not Islam" meme

Yes. Some of Pakistan's laws are not consistent with Al-Islam.

Islam as a religion is inconsistent across sects. Otherwise they wouldn't be sects.

Instead of Shari'ah, they follow laws based off of British common law

Including the court dedicated to determining if a law is consistent with Sharia?

Though I will give credit due where it's mentioned that stoning was initially ruled unislamic in 1981, until the court was replaced and the ruling reversed. Also says they prevent stonings and amputations.

[Ultramarr]

Yes when everyone else has massive civilisation they live in the jungle like pre historic people so yes

Living in the jungle doesn't make someone a savage.
Ok wait, it does. but people use more modern terms for people like them.

Such as. No use sugar coating it I call them what they are savage. Its only regarded as an insult in civilised civilisations or at least more developed ones they wouldn't even think of it as an insult if there primitive language had a word for it

[El-Amin Caliphate]

Yes. Some of Pakistan's laws are not consistent with Al-Islam.

Islam as a religion is inconsistent across sects. Otherwise they wouldn't be sects.

Well, sects are inconsistent with Al-Islam, so...

Including the court dedicated to determining if a law is consistent with Sharia?

I said "some", not "al"l.

Though I will give credit due where it's mentioned that stoning was initially ruled unislamic in 1981

Always has been, always will be

until the court was replaced and the ruling reversed.

Why?

Also says they prevent amputations.

Why?

[Thervingia]

Living in the jungle doesn't make someone a savage.
Ok wait, it does. but people use more modern terms for people like them.

Such as. No use sugar coating it I call them what they are savage. Its only regarded as an insult in civilised civilisations or at least more developed ones they wouldn't even think of it as an insult if there primitive language had a word for it

At least they're not seeped in western decadence.

[The Empire of Pretantia]

Islam as a religion is inconsistent across sects. Otherwise they wouldn't be sects.

Well, sects are inconsistent with Al-Islam, so...

Then Islam is inconsistent if that's true.

Including the court dedicated to determining if a law is consistent with Sharia?

I said "some", not "al"l.

All law is subject to the court; ergo all law must be consistent with sharia.

Though I will give credit due where it's mentioned that stoning was initially ruled unislamic in 1981

Always has been, always will be

until the court was replaced and the ruling reversed.

Why?

Because military regimes are governments of assholes, by assholes, for assholes.

Also says they prevent amputations.

Why?

They prevent stonings too, but I already said that and I'm not sure why you'd deliberately omit that.

Presumably, it's because both punishments are absolutely unacceptable for any moral person.

[El-Amin Caliphate]

Well, sects are inconsistent with Al-Islam, so...

Then Islam is inconsistent if that's true.

Sects are inconsistent with Al-Islam.

All law is subject to the court

No, all law should be subject to Allah (SWT), not a court. The court should be subject to Allah (SWT), not itself.
Because military regimes are governments of assholes, by assholes, for assholes.

They prevent stonings too, but I already said that and I'm not sure why you'd deliberately omit that.

Stonings have nothing to do with Al-Islam.

Presumably, it's because both punishments are absolutely unacceptable for any moral person.

A 'moral' person upon kufr or a moral person upon imaan?

[The Empire of Pretantia]

Then Islam is inconsistent if that's true.

Sects are inconsistent with Al-Islam.

Then Islam is inconsistent.

All law is subject to the court

No, all law should be subject to Allah (SWT), not a court. The court should be subject to Allah (SWT), not itself.

Assuming God is real and he's the Muslim one, logically the court dedicated to enforcing his law is subject to him.

Because military regimes are governments of assholes, by assholes, for assholes.

They prevent stonings too, but I already said that and I'm not sure why you'd deliberately omit that.

Stonings have nothing to do with Al-Islam.

Islam does have something to do with stonings however.

Presumably, it's because both punishments are absolutely unacceptable for any moral person.

A 'moral' person upon kufr or a moral person upon imaan?

Is amputation acceptable in Islam?

[Kubumba Tribe]

Then Islam is inconsistent.

Muslims do not define Al-Islam

Is amputation acceptable in Islam?

Yes