Zakah, also, I misspoke there. Zakah is not something Muslims pay for being Muslim, it's an obligation as mandated by Allah (SWT). Same for jizyah. Both are used for the same purpose in Al-Islam: to build up an Islamic nation.
Advertisement

by El-Amin Caliphate » Wed Jan 31, 2018 8:11 pm
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by El-Amin Caliphate » Wed Jan 31, 2018 8:13 pm
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by Petrasylvania » Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:32 am
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Petrasylvania wrote:Better to quarantine those savages out of sight, out of mind than give their people exposure to new ideas that may precipitate an evolution in cultural attitudes, clearly.
"New ideas"
Yeah, we stopped whipping people for religious reasons a while ago. Maybe that's something you want to experiment with but I'm not down with my nation having such nonsense.

by The Empire of Pretantia » Thu Feb 01, 2018 3:18 pm
Petrasylvania wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
"New ideas"
Yeah, we stopped whipping people for religious reasons a while ago. Maybe that's something you want to experiment with but I'm not down with my nation having such nonsense.
Oh right, the Renaissance happened because Europeans kept out dirty foreigners and dirty foreign ideas. Better follow the example of World War Z and build a huge wall to keep those savagezombiesforeigners out for good.

by Washington Resistance Army » Thu Feb 01, 2018 3:24 pm
Petrasylvania wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
"New ideas"
Yeah, we stopped whipping people for religious reasons a while ago. Maybe that's something you want to experiment with but I'm not down with my nation having such nonsense.
Oh right, the Renaissance happened because Europeans kept out dirty foreigners and dirty foreign ideas. Better follow the example of World War Z and build a huge wall to keep those savagezombiesforeigners out for good.

by Genivaria » Thu Feb 01, 2018 3:26 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Petrasylvania wrote:Oh right, the Renaissance happened because Europeans kept out dirty foreigners and dirty foreign ideas. Better follow the example of World War Z and build a huge wall to keep those savagezombiesforeigners out for good.
IIRC the largest kick to get the renaissance rolling was the fall of the Eastern Roman Empire and the resulting exodus of thinkers and literature to the west.

by Thervingia » Fri Feb 02, 2018 3:13 am
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:Petrasylvania wrote:Oh right, the Renaissance happened because Europeans kept out dirty foreigners and dirty foreign ideas. Better follow the example of World War Z and build a huge wall to keep those savagezombiesforeigners out for good.
>The Middle East is the same bastion of reason it was a millennium ago

by El-Amin Caliphate » Fri Feb 02, 2018 4:57 am
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by Ultramarr » Fri Feb 02, 2018 1:06 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Petrasylvania wrote:Oh right, the Renaissance happened because Europeans kept out dirty foreigners and dirty foreign ideas. Better follow the example of World War Z and build a huge wall to keep those savagezombiesforeigners out for good.
IIRC the largest kick to get the renaissance rolling was the fall of the Eastern Roman Empire and the resulting exodus of thinkers and literature to the west.


by Al-Ismailiyya » Fri Feb 02, 2018 1:21 pm
Ultramarr wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
IIRC the largest kick to get the renaissance rolling was the fall of the Eastern Roman Empire and the resulting exodus of thinkers and literature to the west.
Oh yes the East Roman/Byzantium exiles. What happened to the empire and the fall of Constantinople was so sad

by Shaggtopia » Fri Feb 02, 2018 1:41 pm
by Post War America » Fri Feb 02, 2018 1:44 pm
Gravlen wrote:The famous Bowling Green Massacre is yesterday's news. Today it's all about the Cricket Blue Carnage. Tomorrow it'll be about the Curling Yellow Annihilation.

by The Eternal Aulus » Fri Feb 02, 2018 1:54 pm

by Ultramarr » Fri Feb 02, 2018 1:55 pm
Post War America wrote:Ultramarr wrote:That was horrible too but what the Ottomans did was even sadder
The Ottomans actually took steps to preserve elements of Byzantine culture. The "Latin Empire" was a farce, that led to the interminable decline of Byzantine Constantinopolis and of the Empire in general. In fact one could say that the Ottomans merely finished what the Latins started in regards to the Byzantine Empire.

by Al-Ismailiyya » Fri Feb 02, 2018 1:56 pm

by Washington Resistance Army » Fri Feb 02, 2018 1:59 pm

by Holy Tedalonia » Fri Feb 02, 2018 2:03 pm
Al-Ismailiyya wrote:Ultramarr wrote:That was horrible too but what the Ottomans did was even sadder
Was it? When the Crusaders conquered Constantinople, there are plenty of accounts of how they raped nuns, pillaged churches and convents, took/destroyed numerous artifacts like the Horses of Saint Mark (which are still in Venice today), the statue of Hercules by Lysippos (the court sculptor of Alexander the Great), and destroyed the Great Library of Constantinople. Then there was the later partition of the empire where Venice took 3/8 and the rest of given to other Crusader lords. Not to mention the $120,000,000 worth of silver that was taken. Then all of the Eastern Orthodox clergy was replaced with Catholic ones.
Now, compare that to the Ottomans where the looting lasted for the same amount of time (after which the Sultan shed tears over what he had done; don't think Dandolo felt too bad over what he did), all Christians were allowed to return home and remain there and the Sultan ordered that the houses and property of those who had fled be returned, the Greek Orthodox Church was left intact and the Patriarchate maintained power, and the city later went on to become the capital of an empire larger than the Romans' and one of the most properous cities in the world for several hundred more years.
But 'muh ebil Muslims', right?

by Al-Ismailiyya » Fri Feb 02, 2018 2:08 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:The Ottomemes and Venice never should have existed.

by Ultramarr » Fri Feb 02, 2018 2:10 pm
Al-Ismailiyya wrote:Ultramarr wrote:That was horrible too but what the Ottomans did was even sadder
Was it? When the Crusaders conquered Constantinople, there are plenty of accounts of how they raped nuns, pillaged churches and convents, took/destroyed numerous artifacts like the Horses of Saint Mark (which are still in Venice today), the statue of Hercules by Lysippos (the court sculptor of Alexander the Great), and destroyed the Great Library of Constantinople. Then there was the later partition of the empire where Venice took 3/8 and the rest of given to other Crusader lords. Not to mention the $120,000,000 worth of silver that was taken. Then all of the Eastern Orthodox clergy was replaced with Catholic ones.
Now, compare that to the Ottomans where the looting lasted for the same amount of time (after which the Sultan shed tears over what he had done; don't think Dandolo felt too bad over what he did), all Christians were allowed to return home and remain there and the Sultan ordered that the houses and property of those who had fled be returned, the Greek Orthodox Church was left intact and the Patriarchate maintained power, and the city later went on to become the capital of an empire larger than the Romans' and one of the most properous cities in the world for several hundred more years.
But 'muh ebil Muslims', right?

by Al-Ismailiyya » Fri Feb 02, 2018 2:11 pm
Holy Tedalonia wrote:Al-Ismailiyya wrote:Was it? When the Crusaders conquered Constantinople, there are plenty of accounts of how they raped nuns, pillaged churches and convents, took/destroyed numerous artifacts like the Horses of Saint Mark (which are still in Venice today), the statue of Hercules by Lysippos (the court sculptor of Alexander the Great), and destroyed the Great Library of Constantinople. Then there was the later partition of the empire where Venice took 3/8 and the rest of given to other Crusader lords. Not to mention the $120,000,000 worth of silver that was taken. Then all of the Eastern Orthodox clergy was replaced with Catholic ones.
Now, compare that to the Ottomans where the looting lasted for the same amount of time (after which the Sultan shed tears over what he had done; don't think Dandolo felt too bad over what he did), all Christians were allowed to return home and remain there and the Sultan ordered that the houses and property of those who had fled be returned, the Greek Orthodox Church was left intact and the Patriarchate maintained power, and the city later went on to become the capital of an empire larger than the Romans' and one of the most properous cities in the world for several hundred more years.
But 'muh ebil Muslims', right?
To be fair, the crusaders were excommunicated by the Pope for them attacking a catholic city, and pretty much became a merc army at that point. Then went to Constantinople where if they helped a dude becoming emperor he would pay them money. All was goo until that emperor got overthrown leaving a bunch of angry Catholics without pay.
Imagine being hired for a year, but since your employer was fired your also fired.

by Al-Ismailiyya » Fri Feb 02, 2018 2:15 pm
Ultramarr wrote:Al-Ismailiyya wrote:Was it? When the Crusaders conquered Constantinople, there are plenty of accounts of how they raped nuns, pillaged churches and convents, took/destroyed numerous artifacts like the Horses of Saint Mark (which are still in Venice today), the statue of Hercules by Lysippos (the court sculptor of Alexander the Great), and destroyed the Great Library of Constantinople. Then there was the later partition of the empire where Venice took 3/8 and the rest of given to other Crusader lords. Not to mention the $120,000,000 worth of silver that was taken. Then all of the Eastern Orthodox clergy was replaced with Catholic ones.
Now, compare that to the Ottomans where the looting lasted for the same amount of time (after which the Sultan shed tears over what he had done; don't think Dandolo felt too bad over what he did), all Christians were allowed to return home and remain there and the Sultan ordered that the houses and property of those who had fled be returned, the Greek Orthodox Church was left intact and the Patriarchate maintained power, and the city later went on to become the capital of an empire larger than the Romans' and one of the most properous cities in the world for several hundred more years.
But 'muh ebil Muslims', right?
Then the Ottomans later committed the Greek genocide in all the Byzantine lands in Asia minor, castrated the boys and kidnapped women as sex slaves and kidnapped little boys as janissaries or child soldiers and during the Latin empire the city's inhabitants weren't all killed or forced to leave while modern day Constantinople/Istanbul when I went there(I liked Turkey now but when they invaded the Byzantines it was horrible) has no Byzantine/Greek left
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, American Legionaries, Best Mexico, Cachard Calia, Corporate Collective Salvation, Dtn, Eahland, Elejamie, Emotional Support Crocodile, Escalia, Fartsniffage, Google [Bot], Heavenly Assault, Hirota, Karazicu, Necroghastia, Old Tyrannia, Pangurstan, Pizza Friday Forever91, Port Caverton, Rary, Sheershire, Tarsonis, The Black Forrest, The Jamesian Republic, Urkennalaid, Vassenor
Advertisement