I guess. I am half Japanese and lived in Japan for half my life and they seem to see themselves as unique not western or like the mainland Asians and rightly so. Similar to great Britain
Advertisement
by Thervingia » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:21 pm
The Feylands wrote:Multiculturalism is a revolt against nature, that alienates us from who we truly are, like all other Cultural Marxist mumbo jumbo. Ironically, would you suggest an en-masse migration of Greeks or Armenians to their former lands in what is now called Turkey, the Turks would be the first to object to that, Islamists and secularists alike. They even object to it, and view it as an insult to their national pride, when its Christians living in Christian land that Turks might have a claim too due Atheist Marxist Stalin drawing their border there.
Or when Israelis living in a land they built up from nothing through the genius of the Jewish people, where the so called Palestinians subjected them to a pogrom years before Israel was reborn, in an area now seen as legitimately perpetually "Judenrein". Non-westerners do not surrender their national pride, their natural urge to protect their families and their communities. If I were pro-Palestine I'd be overjoyed. Gradually, they'd be able to overrun and murder the Israelis due the later western nativity, thinking that the Arabs only wanting to live in peace or sing kumbaya, if they get prosperous or educated enough.
Another consequence of this kind of thinking is of course, that women cannot naturally expect their men to feel a natural inclination protect them any longer, western men are devoid of any sense of identity or connection of who they are. Both men and women here in the west become individualistic, identityless consumerists, fixated with their own temporary urges for a new TV or whatever, and devoid of and often depressed over the lack of any meaning in their lives. It's the worst betrayal of everyone else one could think of. Very few non-western men will ever turn up like that. And thus, the west will lose, we will lose badly in the same way Western Rome did, because of ideologies like this.
by Ultramarr » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:23 pm
Thervingia wrote:The Feylands wrote:Multiculturalism is a revolt against nature, that alienates us from who we truly are, like all other Cultural Marxist mumbo jumbo. Ironically, would you suggest an en-masse migration of Greeks or Armenians to their former lands in what is now called Turkey, the Turks would be the first to object to that, Islamists and secularists alike. They even object to it, and view it as an insult to their national pride, when its Christians living in Christian land that Turks might have a claim too due Atheist Marxist Stalin drawing their border there.
Or when Israelis living in a land they built up from nothing through the genius of the Jewish people, where the so called Palestinians subjected them to a pogrom years before Israel was reborn, in an area now seen as legitimately perpetually "Judenrein". Non-westerners do not surrender their national pride, their natural urge to protect their families and their communities. If I were pro-Palestine I'd be overjoyed. Gradually, they'd be able to overrun and murder the Israelis due the later western nativity, thinking that the Arabs only wanting to live in peace or sing kumbaya, if they get prosperous or educated enough.
Another consequence of this kind of thinking is of course, that women cannot naturally expect their men to feel a natural inclination protect them any longer, western men are devoid of any sense of identity or connection of who they are. Both men and women here in the west become individualistic, identityless consumerists, fixated with their own temporary urges for a new TV or whatever, and devoid of and often depressed over the lack of any meaning in their lives. It's the worst betrayal of everyone else one could think of. Very few non-western men will ever turn up like that. And thus, the west will lose, we will lose badly in the same way Western Rome did, because of ideologies like this.
Well, I just ate Russian dumplings covered in Israeli sour cream and Libyan thuma pepper, alongside an Armenian brandy. That's some fine multiculturalism right there, I tell ya.
by Flaxxony » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:23 pm
The Feylands wrote:Multiculturalism is a revolt against nature, that alienates us from who we truly are, like all other Cultural Marxist mumbo jumbo. Ironically, would you suggest an en-masse migration of Greeks or Armenians to their former lands in what is now called Turkey, the Turks would be the first to object to that, Islamists and secularists alike. They even object to it, and view it as an insult to their national pride, when its Christians living in Christian land that Turks might have a claim too due Atheist Marxist Stalin drawing their border there.
Or when Israelis living in a land they built up from nothing through the genius of the Jewish people, where the so called Palestinians subjected them to a pogrom years before Israel was reborn, in an area now seen as legitimately perpetually "Judenrein". Non-westerners do not surrender their national pride, their natural urge to protect their families and their communities. If I were pro-Palestine I'd be overjoyed. Gradually, they'd be able to overrun and murder the Israelis due the later western nativity, thinking that the Arabs only wanting to live in peace or sing kumbaya, if they get prosperous or educated enough.
Another consequence of this kind of thinking is of course, that women cannot naturally expect their men to feel a natural inclination protect them any longer, western men are devoid of any sense of identity or connection of who they are. Both men and women here in the west become individualistic, identityless consumerists, fixated with their own temporary urges for a new TV or whatever, and devoid of and often depressed over the lack of any meaning in their lives. It's the worst betrayal of everyone else one could think of. Very few non-western men will ever turn up like that. And thus, the west will lose, we will lose badly in the same way Western Rome did, because of ideologies like this.
by The Feylands » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:23 pm
But the Anglo-Saxons are Germanic invaders...Ultramarr wrote:I guess. I am half Japanese and lived in Japan for half my life and they seem to see themselves as unique not western or like the mainland Asians and rightly so. Similar to great Britain
Hey there u! I'm Fey - the Celestial Fairy Princess! "Mᴀᴋɪɴɢ NS ᴄᴏsɪᴇʀ sɪɴᴄᴇ 2017!"® (◕‿◕✿) ♀, Vegetarian, Crazy Cat Lady, Dharmic Pagan, Metal, Fantasy, Elf/Fairy, Chinaboo, Yogi etc. How can I be so cuddly and huggable? ♥♥♥ Because I exist to ease the suffering of this world! (⌒▽⌒) #TheBuddhaRocks Little secret: I have a superpower called "ADHD". (^̮^) | ♥Her Radiance's Celestial Thought♥ Neat: Essentialism, Monarchy, Difference Feminism, Animal rights, Green Conservatism, 中国, Beauty, Dignity of all life ಠ~ಠ: Passive aggressive dorks, Abrahamic/Antropocentric world-view(s), the EU, celebrating ugliness.. I support Israel and everyone who suffer needlessly because of their own compassion.♥ (ಥ﹏ಥ) |
by The Rich Port » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:23 pm
Flaxxony wrote:The Rich Port wrote:
It's not being sassy, it's called basic fucking facts.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Europe
Muslims are spread extremely thin throughout "Europe" and their being about 6% of the population means nothing when analyzed closely.
Also, yeah, they're free to practice the LOCAL version of Islam. Muslims who practice any other kind of Islam are fucked, and a major reason why so many people are fleeing ISIS and the wars in general is that they're worried they won't chalk up to their insane ideas of Muslimhood.
You say that like it's a bad thing.
Another paranoid conservative who is afraid of foreigners because they steal the white women.
Another liberal who doesn't know the definition of birth rate or migration.
Can you seriously not conceptualize that people outside of your ideological bubble may actually, wait for it, not give a rat's ass about other people's "freedoms" if it doesn't directly benefit them? And it doesn't take that many people in a minority to substantially worsen the quality of life for the native population.
The exact reason why different sects of Muslims regularly murder each other in the Muslim world is directly related to the fact that Islam doesn't value diversity of opinion. It is a dogma, and dogmas shut out other views by definition.
And I "say it like it's a bad thing" because if you had any notion of nationhood, you would see this as a bad thing as well.
I'm not even going to address the "White wimminz" meme comment. Liberals are demonstrably less attractive by a multitude of studies on the matter.
by San Lumen » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:25 pm
The Rich Port wrote:Flaxxony wrote:
Another liberal who doesn't know the definition of birth rate or migration.
Can you seriously not conceptualize that people outside of your ideological bubble may actually, wait for it, not give a rat's ass about other people's "freedoms" if it doesn't directly benefit them? And it doesn't take that many people in a minority to substantially worsen the quality of life for the native population.
The exact reason why different sects of Muslims regularly murder each other in the Muslim world is directly related to the fact that Islam doesn't value diversity of opinion. It is a dogma, and dogmas shut out other views by definition.
And I "say it like it's a bad thing" because if you had any notion of nationhood, you would see this as a bad thing as well.
I'm not even going to address the "White wimminz" meme comment. Liberals are demonstrably less attractive by a multitude of studies on the matter.
I realize that entirely. I'm talking to you, aren't I? And I realize you don't give a shit about the freedoms of others, and I'm telling you that's just as bad as your boogieman version of Islam that blinds you to your own biases.
Yeah, because the Christian religion isn't subject to dogma, authoritarianism, or sectarian violence for that matter.
Yeah, because Latinos are such a threat to American nationhood.
AND TO ALL OF THE WHITE WOMEN.
by Ultramarr » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:26 pm
The Feylands wrote:But the Anglo-Saxons are Germanic invaders...Ultramarr wrote:I guess. I am half Japanese and lived in Japan for half my life and they seem to see themselves as unique not western or like the mainland Asians and rightly so. Similar to great Britain
One of the reasons I support a free Wales, or a free Catalonia, Basque country, Brittany, Venice etc.. is (apart from their angelic language!! ❤❤❤) the fact that I actually like diversity. Every people should be free to express their uniqueness.
by Ultramarr » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:28 pm
San Lumen wrote:The Rich Port wrote:
I realize that entirely. I'm talking to you, aren't I? And I realize you don't give a shit about the freedoms of others, and I'm telling you that's just as bad as your boogieman version of Islam that blinds you to your own biases.
Yeah, because the Christian religion isn't subject to dogma, authoritarianism, or sectarian violence for that matter.
Yeah, because Latinos are such a threat to American nationhood.
AND TO ALL OF THE WHITE WOMEN.
Yeah we should only along white people into Europe and the US and Canada. Its not like Canada and the United States was founded on immigration
by The Rich Port » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:28 pm
San Lumen wrote:The Rich Port wrote:
I realize that entirely. I'm talking to you, aren't I? And I realize you don't give a shit about the freedoms of others, and I'm telling you that's just as bad as your boogieman version of Islam that blinds you to your own biases.
Yeah, because the Christian religion isn't subject to dogma, authoritarianism, or sectarian violence for that matter.
Yeah, because Latinos are such a threat to American nationhood.
AND TO ALL OF THE WHITE WOMEN.
Yeah we should only along white people into Europe and the US and Canada. Its not like Canada and the United States was founded on immigration
by San Lumen » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:29 pm
Ultramarr wrote:San Lumen wrote:Yeah we should only along white people into Europe and the US and Canada. Its not like Canada and the United States was founded on immigration
European immigration mainly. If you lots want that and agree to have immigration fine. I just don't want much of it here a little bit isn't bad but mass immigration from backward parts of the world is
by Ultramarr » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:30 pm
The Rich Port wrote:San Lumen wrote:Yeah we should only along white people into Europe and the US and Canada. Its not like Canada and the United States was founded on immigration
To be fair, I have an enormous crush on Ellen Page, I don't care how degenerate or Muslim she is.
I am indeed a threat to white women's panties everywhere.
by The Rich Port » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:31 pm
Ultramarr wrote:The Rich Port wrote:
To be fair, I have an enormous crush on Ellen Page, I don't care how degenerate or Muslim she is.
I am indeed a threat to white women's panties everywhere.
Have some class really. And your a far leftist and you lot always go on about respecting women ironically yet here you are.
by Ultramarr » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:33 pm
by Flaxxony » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:34 pm
The Rich Port wrote:Flaxxony wrote:
Another liberal who doesn't know the definition of birth rate or migration.
Can you seriously not conceptualize that people outside of your ideological bubble may actually, wait for it, not give a rat's ass about other people's "freedoms" if it doesn't directly benefit them? And it doesn't take that many people in a minority to substantially worsen the quality of life for the native population.
The exact reason why different sects of Muslims regularly murder each other in the Muslim world is directly related to the fact that Islam doesn't value diversity of opinion. It is a dogma, and dogmas shut out other views by definition.
And I "say it like it's a bad thing" because if you had any notion of nationhood, you would see this as a bad thing as well.
I'm not even going to address the "White wimminz" meme comment. Liberals are demonstrably less attractive by a multitude of studies on the matter.
I realize that entirely. I'm talking to you, aren't I? And I realize you don't give a shit about the freedoms of others, and I'm telling you that's just as bad as your boogieman version of Islam that blinds you to your own biases.
Yeah, because the Christian religion isn't subject to dogma, authoritarianism, or sectarian violence for that matter.
Yeah, because Latinos are such a threat to American nationhood.
AND TO ALL OF THE WHITE WOMEN.
by Genivaria » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:34 pm
Ultramarr wrote:The Rich Port wrote:
But Ultramarr. I am a degenerate pseudo-Muslim who wants to impose pseudo-Shariah law. CLASS IS FOR KAFIRS.
Yes sure seem like it from your comments. Also in Europe there is a problem with Islamic rape gangs from Rotherham to Cologne so your joke is pretty distasteful.
by San Lumen » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:34 pm
Ultramarr wrote:The Rich Port wrote:
But Ultramarr. I am a degenerate pseudo-Muslim who wants to impose pseudo-Shariah law. CLASS IS FOR KAFIRS.
Yes sure seem like it from your comments. Also in Europe there is a problem with Islamic rape gangs from Rotherham to Cologne so your joke is pretty distasteful.
by Ultramarr » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:36 pm
San Lumen wrote:Ultramarr wrote:Yes sure seem like it from your comments. Also in Europe there is a problem with Islamic rape gangs from Rotherham to Cologne so your joke is pretty distasteful.
No there really isn't. Based on your comments what your saying is you'd limit immigration to white people only. But somehow thats not racist.
by Flaxxony » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:37 pm
San Lumen wrote:The Rich Port wrote:
I realize that entirely. I'm talking to you, aren't I? And I realize you don't give a shit about the freedoms of others, and I'm telling you that's just as bad as your boogieman version of Islam that blinds you to your own biases.
Yeah, because the Christian religion isn't subject to dogma, authoritarianism, or sectarian violence for that matter.
Yeah, because Latinos are such a threat to American nationhood.
AND TO ALL OF THE WHITE WOMEN.
Yeah we should only along white people into Europe and the US and Canada. Its not like Canada and the United States was founded on immigration
by San Lumen » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:38 pm
Ultramarr wrote:San Lumen wrote:No there really isn't. Based on your comments what your saying is you'd limit immigration to white people only. But somehow thats not racist.
No I said I will limit it altogether and other Europeans are more compatible than Africa or the middle east. I am pushing for a Japan style immigration policy where foreign people aren't mistreated or anything but its native first and strict and it allows in small numbers of skilled people
by Flaxxony » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:39 pm
San Lumen wrote:Ultramarr wrote:No I said I will limit it altogether and other Europeans are more compatible than Africa or the middle east. I am pushing for a Japan style immigration policy where foreign people aren't mistreated or anything but its native first and strict and it allows in small numbers of skilled people
And what about someone from say Uzbekistan who wants a better opportunity or way of life. Tough luck you were born in the wrong country
by The Feylands » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:40 pm
Thank you! And yes... well... ironically, they seem to be okay with, if a bit unable to control, ethnic nationalism among blacks (BLM) and other minorities.Flaxxony wrote:Spot on. The point of race and ethnicity is something that is irreconcilable with the western liberal viewpoint.
Race exists when it is convenient to them as a concept. The concept of something like "white privilege" hinges on the existence of whiteness. Because if they ditch the idea of racial, cultural, etc. identities and dump the nationhood model altogether, you would necessarily have to ditch the whole "oppressor-victim" paradigm and start from scratch.
When it is white people whose birthrates plummet and get their countries loaded with foreigners, it is no problem. Because what they can do is just pull the "race is a social construct" card and throw it in the faces of whites who resist the demographic replacement. But when it comes to "Privilege", suddenly they need to flip the script because without it they couldn't group people en masse and demand reparations to non-whites.
Maybe I didn't mean what I wrote in the completely literal sense. Anyway, I love Wales because of its uniqueness - and my point was, I believe in true diversity - I think all peoples should be able to express their uniqueness, the Welsh nation shouldn't be shouldn't be denied their heritage by the English, the English shouldn't be denied their heritage by other foreigners, etc.Ultramarr wrote:Anglo Saxons made England and been their for over a 1000 years they are the natives now.
Hey there u! I'm Fey - the Celestial Fairy Princess! "Mᴀᴋɪɴɢ NS ᴄᴏsɪᴇʀ sɪɴᴄᴇ 2017!"® (◕‿◕✿) ♀, Vegetarian, Crazy Cat Lady, Dharmic Pagan, Metal, Fantasy, Elf/Fairy, Chinaboo, Yogi etc. How can I be so cuddly and huggable? ♥♥♥ Because I exist to ease the suffering of this world! (⌒▽⌒) #TheBuddhaRocks Little secret: I have a superpower called "ADHD". (^̮^) | ♥Her Radiance's Celestial Thought♥ Neat: Essentialism, Monarchy, Difference Feminism, Animal rights, Green Conservatism, 中国, Beauty, Dignity of all life ಠ~ಠ: Passive aggressive dorks, Abrahamic/Antropocentric world-view(s), the EU, celebrating ugliness.. I support Israel and everyone who suffer needlessly because of their own compassion.♥ (ಥ﹏ಥ) |
by The Rich Port » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:40 pm
Flaxxony wrote:San Lumen wrote:Yeah we should only along white people into Europe and the US and Canada. Its not like Canada and the United States was founded on immigration
The US and Canada were conquered by whites. The native population has been essentially reduced to nothing by this event.
The European conquest of the Americas is one of the clearest exhibits of what happens to populations that don't or can't stem foreign migration.
Ultramarr wrote:The Rich Port wrote:
But Ultramarr. I am a degenerate pseudo-Muslim who wants to impose pseudo-Shariah law. CLASS IS FOR KAFIRS.
Yes sure seem like it from your comments. Also in Europe there is a problem with Islamic rape gangs who target Europeans from Rotherham to Cologne so your joke is pretty distasteful.
by San Lumen » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:41 pm
The Rich Port wrote:Flaxxony wrote:
The US and Canada were conquered by whites. The native population has been essentially reduced to nothing by this event.
The European conquest of the Americas is one of the clearest exhibits of what happens to populations that don't or can't stem foreign migration.
So what you're saying is we should ban white people from immigrating.
They went after the Native Americans, and now they're coming after us.Ultramarr wrote:Yes sure seem like it from your comments. Also in Europe there is a problem with Islamic rape gangs who target Europeans from Rotherham to Cologne so your joke is pretty distasteful.
Sounds like someone is an SJW who is overly sensitive and doesn't know what jokes are.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Port Carverton, Shidei, Simonia, Turenia
Advertisement