Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 12:29 pm
Jedi 999 wrote:
it means the colonizer (in this case british) thinks the colonized are there for the welfare of mother country and therefore inferior human beings
I don't know why I bother. *leaves*
Because sometimes even national leaders just want to hang out
https://forum.nationstates.net/
Jedi 999 wrote:
it means the colonizer (in this case british) thinks the colonized are there for the welfare of mother country and therefore inferior human beings
Jedi 999 wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:Jedi 999 wrote:well stop trolling even people in countries never colonised by dirty brits speak english its easy altough sanskritized urdu is easy to but english is easy
I'm not trolling. I'm pointing out that your supposed principles aren't even so important as to allow you to forgo a bit of ease of communication for them.
you wanna speak in hindi i am ready but i bet you dont even know know hindi
Jedi 999 wrote:tribes are different
Wikipedia wrote:A tribe, viewed historically or developmentally, consists of a social group existing before the development of, or outside of, states.
Cameroi wrote:the rate of increase is becoming less exponential. sorry i've never been worth a dam at keeping track of sources, but they do come mostly from jurried scientific literature.
Jedi 999 wrote:well because you are full of lies
Dododecapod wrote:CHEAP material back to England.
Avenio wrote:Jedi 999 wrote:tribes are different
How so? According to Wikipedia;Wikipedia wrote:A tribe, viewed historically or developmentally, consists of a social group existing before the development of, or outside of, states.
The Indian government, if my memory serves, has recognized tribes within India as seperate political bodies, such as the Sikhs. Many inhabitants of India and Pakistan identify much more strongly with these 'tribes' than with the states they inhabit or even the greater nation.
Jedi 999 wrote:you said it imperialist you just did well looks like you dont know crap
Birnadia wrote:
No, what I meant was that I don't even get the point of arguing with someone as ignorant as you.
Jedi 999 wrote:Avenio wrote:Jedi 999 wrote:tribes are different
How so? According to Wikipedia;Wikipedia wrote:A tribe, viewed historically or developmentally, consists of a social group existing before the development of, or outside of, states.
The Indian government, if my memory serves, has recognized tribes within India as seperate political bodies, such as the Sikhs. Many inhabitants of India and Pakistan identify much more strongly with these 'tribes' than with the states they inhabit or even the greater nation.
they are different we had empires not tribes and several nationstates not tribes
Conserative Morality wrote:I'll have to get someone to pretend to crown me, but I'll refuse them. For show, of course, I'll still have all the power of a king.
Jedi 999 wrote:well tell me do you liars remember who forced us to grow opium and who started that war
The Parkus Empire wrote:But, even being a God, to keep that power you'll have to pay your troops more than the rest of the generals pay theirs, unless you're willing to contract barbarians. Might have to add some more bronze to that gold at the mint. . . .
Jedi 999 wrote:Birnadia wrote:
No, what I meant was that I don't even get the point of arguing with someone as ignorant as you.
you are ignorant go and watch your bbc and worship churchill