to end this lies and disscussion for ever

[Jedi 999]

The occupation of India is most worthy of discussion, but you'll get nowhere by simply shouting 'liar!'.

well some people here claim india was

tribal
backwards
poor
barbaric

that hurts me

Tough it out, kiddo.

Labelling all British people as liars and supportive of colonisation is utter tripe.

than why the hell did they colonize

Have you ever considered that there may have been some British at the time who opposed it?

there were but mainly communists ,anarchists ,socialist a.k.a minority

I don't see how far-left political ideas have anything to do with anti-colonialism, other than not wanting commercial companies to have military power.

communists are staunch anti colonists anyways only the far left supported anti colonialism read a little bit of marx (he was german but stayed and worked in england everyone knows him )

Colonialism is expansion, which is politically neutral. Well, the only people who are sure to be anti-colonialist are those that don't seek any expansion.

well politically neutral lol dont shamelessly lie

It isn't a lie. The most frequent colonisers n the 20th century have been the communist states.

no the british

[Tagmatium]

the ussr according to trotsky was a deformed workers state

That's not what he said.

You're very good at answering questions other than those said.

[Caninope]

The occupation of India is most worthy of discussion, but you'll get nowhere by simply shouting 'liar!'.

well some people here claim india was

tribal
backwards
poor
barbaric

that hurts me

Tough it out, kiddo.

Labelling all British people as liars and supportive of colonisation is utter tripe.

than why the hell did they colonize

Have you ever considered that there may have been some British at the time who opposed it?

there were but mainly communists ,anarchists ,socialist a.k.a minority

I don't see how far-left political ideas have anything to do with anti-colonialism, other than not wanting commercial companies to have military power.

communists are staunch anti colonists anyways only the far left supported anti colonialism read a little bit of marx (he was german but stayed and worked in england everyone knows him )

Colonialism is expansion, which is politically neutral. Well, the only people who are sure to be anti-colonialist are those that don't seek any expansion.

well politically neutral lol dont shamelessly lie

How does wanting to expand mean that you're right or left wing?

The Soviets wanted to expand into eastern Europe and Afghanistan.

the ussr according to trotsky was a deformed workers state

Which is much different than a free market state. Believe me, there have been, and as long as human nature stays the same, never will be a truly communistic state.

[Johz]

The occupation of India is most worthy of discussion, but you'll get nowhere by simply shouting 'liar!'.

well some people here claim india was

tribal
backwards
poor
barbaric

that hurts me

Tough it out, kiddo.

Labelling all British people as liars and supportive of colonisation is utter tripe.

than why the hell did they colonize heard about the bnp

Do you understand either of these two concepts:
# Time?
# Individuality?

In order to pre-empt your confused rant, I shall briefly pick out a few points.

TIME
Time, as a concept, means that things pass. What was there once may not be there any more. Can you go and wonder at the spectacle of the hanging gardens of Babylon? No. And that is due to the fact that we live in a different time. They were there, now they are not.
Time can also mean that people change, which is important when dealing with your fellow humans on a day to day basis. In fact, I've even written a poem about it, which I might show to you if you learn how to debate. So, someone who was feeling rather colonial once, may decide that ruling other countries for them isn't a nice thing to do. He, or she, may stop. Such are the mysteries of time.

INDIVIDUALITY
Now what I am refering to here is the fact that everyone is different, with different beliefs, opinions, and anything else you might want to mention. Even, and I know this is getting rather advanced here, even different people who all live in a single nation (tell me if I've lost you, please) can act differently. For example, my neighbour supports far right racist organisations, and I hate the idea of such evil. We are individuals.

I hope you are not too confused by my explanation. I apologise in advance if I have offended you, as I recognise that this is a rather unnecessary and horrible post in many ways. However, you do seem to be forgetting the fact that we may not have the same opinions of colonial behaviour, and also Indian culture, as our ancestors when they did whatever they did. We are different.

[Tagmatium]

no the british

In the 20th Century?

We were loosing most of the thing, then.

[Caninope]

The occupation of India is most worthy of discussion, but you'll get nowhere by simply shouting 'liar!'.

well some people here claim india was

tribal
backwards
poor
barbaric

that hurts me

Tough it out, kiddo.

Labelling all British people as liars and supportive of colonisation is utter tripe.

than why the hell did they colonize

Have you ever considered that there may have been some British at the time who opposed it?

there were but mainly communists ,anarchists ,socialist a.k.a minority

I don't see how far-left political ideas have anything to do with anti-colonialism, other than not wanting commercial companies to have military power.

communists are staunch anti colonists anyways only the far left supported anti colonialism read a little bit of marx (he was german but stayed and worked in england everyone knows him )

Colonialism is expansion, which is politically neutral. Well, the only people who are sure to be anti-colonialist are those that don't seek any expansion.

well politically neutral lol dont shamelessly lie

It isn't a lie. The most frequent colonisers n the 20th century have been the communist states.

no the british

Poland, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, Romania, etc.

[Jedi 999]

read this man

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frantz_Fanon

[Jedi 999]

The occupation of India is most worthy of discussion, but you'll get nowhere by simply shouting 'liar!'.

well some people here claim india was

tribal
backwards
poor
barbaric

that hurts me

Tough it out, kiddo.

Labelling all British people as liars and supportive of colonisation is utter tripe.

than why the hell did they colonize

Have you ever considered that there may have been some British at the time who opposed it?

there were but mainly communists ,anarchists ,socialist a.k.a minority

I don't see how far-left political ideas have anything to do with anti-colonialism, other than not wanting commercial companies to have military power.

communists are staunch anti colonists anyways only the far left supported anti colonialism read a little bit of marx (he was german but stayed and worked in england everyone knows him )

Colonialism is expansion, which is politically neutral. Well, the only people who are sure to be anti-colonialist are those that don't seek any expansion.

well politically neutral lol dont shamelessly lie

It isn't a lie. The most frequent colonisers n the 20th century have been the communist states.

no the british

Poland, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, Romania, etc.

they were not colonies

[Crabulonia]

The occupation of India is most worthy of discussion, but you'll get nowhere by simply shouting 'liar!'.

well some people here claim india was

tribal
backwards
poor
barbaric

that hurts me

Tough it out, kiddo.

Labelling all British people as liars and supportive of colonisation is utter tripe.

than why the hell did they colonize

Have you ever considered that there may have been some British at the time who opposed it?

there were but mainly communists ,anarchists ,socialist a.k.a minority

I don't see how far-left political ideas have anything to do with anti-colonialism, other than not wanting commercial companies to have military power.

communists are staunch anti colonists anyways only the far left supported anti colonialism read a little bit of marx (he was german but stayed and worked in england everyone knows him )

Colonialism is expansion, which is politically neutral. Well, the only people who are sure to be anti-colonialist are those that don't seek any expansion.

well politically neutral lol dont shamelessly lie

It isn't a lie. The most frequent colonisers n the 20th century have been the communist states.

no the british

Seeing as the British Empire was built long before the 20th Century and disintegrated halfway through, I'd say you are lying

[Tagmatium]

they were not colonies

The anology works fairly well, though.

[Caninope]

The occupation of India is most worthy of discussion, but you'll get nowhere by simply shouting 'liar!'.

well some people here claim india was

tribal
backwards
poor
barbaric

that hurts me

Tough it out, kiddo.

Labelling all British people as liars and supportive of colonisation is utter tripe.

than why the hell did they colonize

Have you ever considered that there may have been some British at the time who opposed it?

there were but mainly communists ,anarchists ,socialist a.k.a minority

I don't see how far-left political ideas have anything to do with anti-colonialism, other than not wanting commercial companies to have military power.

communists are staunch anti colonists anyways only the far left supported anti colonialism read a little bit of marx (he was german but stayed and worked in england everyone knows him )

Colonialism is expansion, which is politically neutral. Well, the only people who are sure to be anti-colonialist are those that don't seek any expansion.

well politically neutral lol dont shamelessly lie

It isn't a lie. The most frequent colonisers n the 20th century have been the communist states.

no the british

Poland, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, Romania, etc.

they were not colonies

What are they when the government is overthrown, and a new regime put in that is friendly to a superpower? Satellite States.

Satellite State = Colony

[Dododecapod]

The occupation of India is most worthy of discussion, but you'll get nowhere by simply shouting 'liar!'.

well some people here claim india was

tribal
backwards
poor
barbaric

that hurts me

Tough it out, kiddo.

Labelling all British people as liars and supportive of colonisation is utter tripe.

than why the hell did they colonize

Have you ever considered that there may have been some British at the time who opposed it?

there were but mainly communists ,anarchists ,socialist a.k.a minority

I don't see how far-left political ideas have anything to do with anti-colonialism, other than not wanting commercial companies to have military power.

communists are staunch anti colonists anyways only the far left supported anti colonialism read a little bit of marx (he was german but stayed and worked in england everyone knows him )

Colonialism is expansion, which is politically neutral. Well, the only people who are sure to be anti-colonialist are those that don't seek any expansion.

well politically neutral lol dont shamelessly lie

It isn't a lie. The most frequent colonisers n the 20th century have been the communist states.

no the british

The British colonised a small area of the Mid-east in the early part of the 20th century. The communist states colonised Tibet, Poland, Romania, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, the Baltic states, and numerous others as well as attempting Austria, Afghanistan, Finland and Vietnam.

[Jedi 999]

The occupation of India is most worthy of discussion, but you'll get nowhere by simply shouting 'liar!'.

well some people here claim india was

tribal
backwards
poor
barbaric

that hurts me

Tough it out, kiddo.

Labelling all British people as liars and supportive of colonisation is utter tripe.

than why the hell did they colonize

Have you ever considered that there may have been some British at the time who opposed it?

there were but mainly communists ,anarchists ,socialist a.k.a minority

I don't see how far-left political ideas have anything to do with anti-colonialism, other than not wanting commercial companies to have military power.

communists are staunch anti colonists anyways only the far left supported anti colonialism read a little bit of marx (he was german but stayed and worked in england everyone knows him )

Colonialism is expansion, which is politically neutral. Well, the only people who are sure to be anti-colonialist are those that don't seek any expansion.

well politically neutral lol dont shamelessly lie

It isn't a lie. The most frequent colonisers n the 20th century have been the communist states.

no the british

Seeing as the British Empire was built long before the 20th Century and disintegrated halfway through, I'd say you are lying

i just realised its the french

[SD_Film Artists]

The occupation of India is most worthy of discussion, but you'll get nowhere by simply shouting 'liar!'.

well some people here claim india was

tribal
backwards
poor
barbaric

that hurts me

Tough it out, kiddo.

Labelling all British people as liars and supportive of colonisation is utter tripe.

than why the hell did they colonize

Have you ever considered that there may have been some British at the time who opposed it?

there were but mainly communists ,anarchists ,socialist a.k.a minority

I don't see how far-left political ideas have anything to do with anti-colonialism, other than not wanting commercial companies to have military power.

communists are staunch anti colonists anyways only the far left supported anti colonialism read a little bit of marx (he was german but stayed and worked in england everyone knows him )

Colonialism is expansion, which is politically neutral. Well, the only people who are sure to be anti-colonialist are those that don't seek any expansion.

well politically neutral lol dont shamelessly lie

It isn't a lie. The most frequent colonisers n the 20th century have been the communist states.

no the british

Poland, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, Romania, etc.

they were not colonies

So what are?

[EvilDarkMagicians]

After reading the whole thread, I am simply in tears with laughter. Please stop Jedi 999, my sides are literally splitting.

As a 'Britisher' what do you want from me? I'll do anything to make you stop.

[Jedi 999]

The occupation of India is most worthy of discussion, but you'll get nowhere by simply shouting 'liar!'.

well some people here claim india was

tribal
backwards
poor
barbaric

that hurts me

Tough it out, kiddo.

Labelling all British people as liars and supportive of colonisation is utter tripe.

than why the hell did they colonize

Have you ever considered that there may have been some British at the time who opposed it?

there were but mainly communists ,anarchists ,socialist a.k.a minority

I don't see how far-left political ideas have anything to do with anti-colonialism, other than not wanting commercial companies to have military power.

communists are staunch anti colonists anyways only the far left supported anti colonialism read a little bit of marx (he was german but stayed and worked in england everyone knows him )

Colonialism is expansion, which is politically neutral. Well, the only people who are sure to be anti-colonialist are those that don't seek any expansion.

well politically neutral lol dont shamelessly lie

It isn't a lie. The most frequent colonisers n the 20th century have been the communist states.

no the british

The British colonised a small area of the Mid-east in the early part of the 20th century. The communist states colonised Tibet, Poland, Romania, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, the Baltic states, and numerous others as well as attempting Austria, Afghanistan, Finland and Vietnam.

colonized no

[Caninope]

The occupation of India is most worthy of discussion, but you'll get nowhere by simply shouting 'liar!'.

well some people here claim india was

tribal
backwards
poor
barbaric

that hurts me

Tough it out, kiddo.

Labelling all British people as liars and supportive of colonisation is utter tripe.

than why the hell did they colonize

Have you ever considered that there may have been some British at the time who opposed it?

there were but mainly communists ,anarchists ,socialist a.k.a minority

I don't see how far-left political ideas have anything to do with anti-colonialism, other than not wanting commercial companies to have military power.

communists are staunch anti colonists anyways only the far left supported anti colonialism read a little bit of marx (he was german but stayed and worked in england everyone knows him )

Colonialism is expansion, which is politically neutral. Well, the only people who are sure to be anti-colonialist are those that don't seek any expansion.

well politically neutral lol dont shamelessly lie

It isn't a lie. The most frequent colonisers n the 20th century have been the communist states.

no the british

Seeing as the British Empire was built long before the 20th Century and disintegrated halfway through, I'd say you are lying

i just realised its the french

That's a bit of a failure, seeing how the French lost all of their colonies in the 1900's

[Tagmatium]

After reading the whole thread, I am simply in tears with laughter. Please stop Jedi 999, my sides are literally splitting.

As a 'Britisher' what do you want from me? I'll do anything to make you stop.

An apology, your money and your first born child.

[Jedi 999]

After reading the whole thread, I am simply in tears with laughter. Please stop Jedi 999, my sides are literally splitting.

As a 'Britisher' what do you want from me? I'll do anything to make you stop.

provide source against my op

[Crabulonia]

Off of the massive quote pyramids a second (this small post may be ignored because of it) does anyone else not think that the title of this thread should be changed to the title of this post?

[SD_Film Artists]

The occupation of India is most worthy of discussion, but you'll get nowhere by simply shouting 'liar!'.

well some people here claim india was

tribal
backwards
poor
barbaric

that hurts me

Tough it out, kiddo.

Labelling all British people as liars and supportive of colonisation is utter tripe.

than why the hell did they colonize

Have you ever considered that there may have been some British at the time who opposed it?

there were but mainly communists ,anarchists ,socialist a.k.a minority

I don't see how far-left political ideas have anything to do with anti-colonialism, other than not wanting commercial companies to have military power.

communists are staunch anti colonists anyways only the far left supported anti colonialism read a little bit of marx (he was german but stayed and worked in england everyone knows him )

Colonialism is expansion, which is politically neutral. Well, the only people who are sure to be anti-colonialist are those that don't seek any expansion.

well politically neutral lol dont shamelessly lie

It isn't a lie. The most frequent colonisers n the 20th century have been the communist states.

no the british

The British colonised a small area of the Mid-east in the early part of the 20th century. The communist states colonised Tibet, Poland, Romania, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, the Baltic states, and numerous others as well as attempting Austria, Afghanistan, Finland and Vietnam.

colonized no

Britain didn't colonise India in the same way as the Falklands, but India was still part of the empire.

[Caninope]

The occupation of India is most worthy of discussion, but you'll get nowhere by simply shouting 'liar!'.

well some people here claim india was

tribal
backwards
poor
barbaric

that hurts me

Tough it out, kiddo.

Labelling all British people as liars and supportive of colonisation is utter tripe.

than why the hell did they colonize

Have you ever considered that there may have been some British at the time who opposed it?

there were but mainly communists ,anarchists ,socialist a.k.a minority

I don't see how far-left political ideas have anything to do with anti-colonialism, other than not wanting commercial companies to have military power.

communists are staunch anti colonists anyways only the far left supported anti colonialism read a little bit of marx (he was german but stayed and worked in england everyone knows him )

Colonialism is expansion, which is politically neutral. Well, the only people who are sure to be anti-colonialist are those that don't seek any expansion.

well politically neutral lol dont shamelessly lie

It isn't a lie. The most frequent colonisers n the 20th century have been the communist states.

no the british

The British colonised a small area of the Mid-east in the early part of the 20th century. The communist states colonised Tibet, Poland, Romania, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, the Baltic states, and numerous others as well as attempting Austria, Afghanistan, Finland and Vietnam.

colonized no

What did they do to them then? Give them lollipops and kites?

[Jedi 999]

The occupation of India is most worthy of discussion, but you'll get nowhere by simply shouting 'liar!'.

well some people here claim india was

tribal
backwards
poor
barbaric

that hurts me

Tough it out, kiddo.

Labelling all British people as liars and supportive of colonisation is utter tripe.

than why the hell did they colonize

Have you ever considered that there may have been some British at the time who opposed it?

there were but mainly communists ,anarchists ,socialist a.k.a minority

I don't see how far-left political ideas have anything to do with anti-colonialism, other than not wanting commercial companies to have military power.

communists are staunch anti colonists anyways only the far left supported anti colonialism read a little bit of marx (he was german but stayed and worked in england everyone knows him )

Colonialism is expansion, which is politically neutral. Well, the only people who are sure to be anti-colonialist are those that don't seek any expansion.

well politically neutral lol dont shamelessly lie

It isn't a lie. The most frequent colonisers n the 20th century have been the communist states.

no the british

Seeing as the British Empire was built long before the 20th Century and disintegrated halfway through, I'd say you are lying

i just realised its the french

That's a bit of a failure, seeing how the French lost all of their colonies in the 1900's

nope algeirs puduchcherry all colonies were gone after 1960-70

[Caninope]

Off of the massive quote pyramids a second (this small post may be ignored because of it) does anyone else not think that the title of this thread should be changed to the title of this post?

Hear, Hear!

[Dododecapod]

The occupation of India is most worthy of discussion, but you'll get nowhere by simply shouting 'liar!'.

well some people here claim india was

tribal
backwards
poor
barbaric

that hurts me

Tough it out, kiddo.

Labelling all British people as liars and supportive of colonisation is utter tripe.

than why the hell did they colonize

Have you ever considered that there may have been some British at the time who opposed it?

there were but mainly communists ,anarchists ,socialist a.k.a minority

I don't see how far-left political ideas have anything to do with anti-colonialism, other than not wanting commercial companies to have military power.

communists are staunch anti colonists anyways only the far left supported anti colonialism read a little bit of marx (he was german but stayed and worked in england everyone knows him )

Colonialism is expansion, which is politically neutral. Well, the only people who are sure to be anti-colonialist are those that don't seek any expansion.

well politically neutral lol dont shamelessly lie

It isn't a lie. The most frequent colonisers n the 20th century have been the communist states.

no the british

The British colonised a small area of the Mid-east in the early part of the 20th century. The communist states colonised Tibet, Poland, Romania, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, the Baltic states, and numerous others as well as attempting Austria, Afghanistan, Finland and Vietnam.

colonized no

Somewhat less erudite than even your previous offerings, but what else would you call it? They took over militarily, adjusted the social and governmental conditions to suit themselves, and took most of the wealth. Really, the only difference was that the "classic" Colonial Powers took better care of the people.