N. Korea Disscusion Thread

[The Empire of Pretantia]

I just don't see the problem with North Korea developing missiles.
I mean the Second Amendment clearly states that you have the right to bear arms to protect yourself from
the tyranny of the US government. So why the hell are people angry at North Korea, when they're doing the
same thing to also protect themselves from the tyranny of the US government?! Where's the problem?

North Korea is run by a tyrant, so we should exercise or right to bear arms and nuke them.

Also, it's "the right of the people to keep and bear arms", and nukes aren't owned by the people.

[True Alimeria]

No, I was just joking lol

[The Empire of Pretantia]

No, I was just joking lol

I can never tell.

[True Alimeria]

Logic!

[The Knockout Gun Gals]

Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-41431057

I do not know if I can call China a former ally of North Korea yet, because after the textile trade ban and the oil export cap, China has ordered North Korean companies out by January 2018.

So what will get China to be more confident of a world post-North Korea and cut the tiny risk of global nuclear war further in the process? I would say that straight after liberation of North Korea, Chinese and US troops leave the Korea peninsula, leaving Korea to be a neutral country with a self-defence force like Japan, and possibly a treaty that requires US and Chinese relations to be at equal levels.

Maybe I can offer to mediate.

Liberation has never been part of destroying North Korea. China would ripped apart their mind and body if they liberated North Korea, since refugees will rush in to China. And they don't want that. But on the other hand, keeping North Korea like that will results in a (hopefully not happening, but that's unlikely) worse results. So...they're kind in a hard spot.

[The United Artherian Federation]

(Image)

Logic!

Gtfo, the U.S. Is not tyrannical. And US law doesn't apply to fat assed dictators.

[Minoa]

Sources: http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-northk ... KBN1CB221/

Again, can't offer a proper opinion due to mental health issues, but it is clear that Morozov’s views should be taken with caution, because Morozov is a member of the far-right LDPR: the party’s leader, Vladimir Zhirinovsky, is known for really insane views such as suggesting in December 2015 that Russia should detonate a nuclear bomb on the Bosphorus to create a 10 meters high tsunami wave that would wipe out at least 9 million Istanbul residents, in retaliation for the aircraft incident.

It seems that missile tests and test explosions within the country is how far North Korea can go without risking their survival. For North Korea, it is all about survival.

[Candy and Chocolate]

Do you think that South Korea should get an anti missisle system? Do you think North Korea’s a threat. This is recent topic that has been debate for a long time. Recently, South Korea deployed anti missiles. Was that a good idea? Join this discussion so everyone can hear your voice!

---

Anyway, I’m supposed to be promoting Dauiland. It’s a really cool region! You should join. Also, we are happy to have embassies with anyone unless they are raiders.

[Hackity Hacker 666]

North Korea isn’t even a real threat. The anti missile systems are a bad idea. It will just cause trouble between North Korea and the USA

[Gagium]

North Korea isn’t even a real threat. The anti missile systems are a bad idea. It will just cause trouble between North Korea and the USA

Anything the US does at this point will 'cause trouble' between North Korea and us, one way or the other...

[Vassenor]

Do you think that South Korea should get an anti missisle system? Do you think North Korea’s a threat. This is recent topic that has been debate for a long time. Recently, South Korea deployed anti missiles. Was that a good idea? Join this discussion so everyone can hear your voice!

---

Anyway, I’m supposed to be promoting Dauiland. It’s a really cool region! You should join. Also, we are happy to have embassies with anyone unless they are raiders.

South Korea already has a missile defence system.

[The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp]

I just don't see the problem with North Korea developing missiles.
I mean the Second Amendment clearly states that you have the right to bear arms to protect yourself from
the tyranny of the US government. So why the hell are people angry at North Korea, when they're doing the
same thing to also protect themselves from the tyranny of the US government?! Where's the problem?

Because when you shoot a gun it doesn't turn a city into ash.

[Candy and Chocolate]

I just don't see the problem with North Korea developing missiles.
I mean the Second Amendment clearly states that you have the right to bear arms to protect yourself from
the tyranny of the US government. So why the hell are people angry at North Korea, when they're doing the
same thing to also protect themselves from the tyranny of the US government?! Where's the problem?

The problem is that missiles KILL people. Also the 2nd Amendment is in America, not in North Korea. Bearing arms is different from having missiles.
Guns are not missiles, if you need some clarification.

---

Anyway, I’m supposed to be promoting Dauiland here. You should join! Also, we will be happy to have embassies with you, unless you are an invader.

[Albrenia]

Missiles are arms though. Not saying I agree, but missiles and guns are both 'arms'.

[Candy and Chocolate]

Missiles are arms though. Not saying I agree, but missiles and guns are both 'arms'.

Nope! Missiles are way bigger. You should probably do some research.

[Candy and Chocolate]

Missiles are arms though. Not saying I agree, but missiles and guns are both 'arms'.

Do research. They are not the same thing.

---

Anyway, I’m supposed to be promoting Dauiland here. You should join! Also, we will be happy to have embassies with you, unless you are an invader.

[Herador]

Missiles are arms though. Not saying I agree, but missiles and guns are both 'arms'.

I don't think intercontinental ordinance was what the authors od the Second Amendment had in mind when they wrote it.

[Albrenia]

Missiles are arms though. Not saying I agree, but missiles and guns are both 'arms'.

I don't think intercontinental ordinance was what the authors od the Second Amendment had in mind when they wrote it.

They were fine with privately owned warships though, apparently.

Not a gun control thread though, it was just a random thought.

[Herador]

I don't think intercontinental ordinance was what the authors od the Second Amendment had in mind when they wrote it.

They were fine with privately owned warships though, apparently.

Not a gun control thread though, it was just a random thought.

I didn't know that, unless you're talking about privateers?

Fair point though, not the gun control general.

[Sanctissima]

I don't think intercontinental ordinance was what the authors od the Second Amendment had in mind when they wrote it.

They were fine with privately owned warships though, apparently.

Not a gun control thread though, it was just a random thought.

To be fair, that was... a different time.

Can't really be picky about privateering when your arch-nemesis owns the largest navy in the world and is looking for the earliest available opportunity to crush you utterly.

[The United Artherian Federation]

-sighs-
Bumpide bump.

[Minoa]

Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-41629233

Make your mind up, Trump: should I panic or not panic?

[The United Artherian Federation]

Bump