NATION

PASSWORD

UK Politics Thread VII: Wake me DUP inside [can't wake UUP]

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Sun Dec 17, 2017 7:39 am

Questers wrote:
Souseiseki wrote: which is what i assume you were trying to get at.
Wrong assumption!

then you should be more clear with what you're saying
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Sun Dec 17, 2017 7:44 am

https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... ssion=true

lol pulling plays because one of the people originally involved in it was accused of an unrelated crime and getting mad about a painting because bloomers. the only shocking part about this is that people to be under the idea that it is somehow new. the moralist puritans of today are nothing more than the successors of the moralist puritans of yesterday, and they have always wielded a great influence in this country.
Last edited by Souseiseki on Sun Dec 17, 2017 8:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Sun Dec 17, 2017 7:56 am

Souseiseki wrote:
Questers wrote: Wrong assumption!

then you should be more clear with what you're saying
Leftism is fundamentally about changing the world to be better than it is. I can't think of a more concise way of putting it, and I am not in the mood to make an essay. It's impossible without authoritarian perspectives at least sometimes.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Sun Dec 17, 2017 8:03 am

Questers wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:then you should be more clear with what you're saying
Leftism is fundamentally about changing the world to be better than it is. I can't think of a more concise way of putting it, and I am not in the mood to make an essay. It's impossible without authoritarian perspectives at least sometimes.

then i can't do much but refer you back to what i already said, and in fact, would say that my original assumption was actually correct.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Sun Dec 17, 2017 10:04 am

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-42366629

man acquitted of rape after police ordered to hand over evidence from the defendants mobile phone. this presents two possibilities, both of which are horrible. the first is that we know the police are snoopy bastards that love to poke around people's phones regardless of the offences they are charged with, so there's no fucking way they didn't see that evidence. so they deliberately chose not to provide it in order to help their case. the second is that they didn't find it but were told about it, but then refused to look into it or just couldn't be arsed with it. both of these indicate that they are incompetent, lazy, underfunded, actively malicious or some combination.

then, of course, there are the CPS. those who are no strangers to souseiseki posting will already be aware that i am no friend of the CPS. in that sense, i agree with what someone else posted on another site. the CPS are measured on the number of cases they bring forward and the number of successful prosecutions they make. there is also public pressure to convict lots of people for the crimes de jour or highly emotional crimes, which the CPS play into by boasting in for example the VAWG reports about how the number of cases they bring forward and the number of convictions they get is always rising. i feel like they're getting close to japanese prosecutors, boasting about their numbers without any context. i've seen enough cases of the CPS playing loose with evidence and fucking it up and enough cases of the CPS actively ignoring evidence and being bad faith pricks that i am unsure if they were just incompetent again or if they deliberately decided to not put the evidence forward out of some personal desire to convict the bad rapist dude or a desire to see their numbers go up. both of these seem to be equally plausible to me.

all that can really be said is that they fucked up, and that it's almost certain they will learn no lessons from this and nothing will change.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
HMS Barham
Diplomat
 
Posts: 604
Founded: Nov 24, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby HMS Barham » Sun Dec 17, 2017 11:33 am

Questers wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:then you should be more clear with what you're saying
Leftism is fundamentally about changing the world to be better than it is. I can't think of a more concise way of putting it, and I am not in the mood to make an essay. It's impossible without authoritarian perspectives at least sometimes.

I think that is only partly true. Leftism is about advancing a view of the world in which certain policies will make the world better. If those policies succeed, little repression is needed. But if they fail, leftists escalate the repression rather than choosing different policies to make the world better (or just leave it how they found it since they are making it worse).
Last edited by HMS Barham on Sun Dec 17, 2017 11:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
Pour la canaille: Faut la mitraille.

User avatar
Eastfield Lodge
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10027
Founded: May 23, 2008
Democratic Socialists

Postby Eastfield Lodge » Sun Dec 17, 2017 11:45 am

HMS Barham wrote:
Questers wrote: Leftism is fundamentally about changing the world to be better than it is. I can't think of a more concise way of putting it, and I am not in the mood to make an essay. It's impossible without authoritarian perspectives at least sometimes.

I think that is only partly true. Leftism is about advancing a view of the world in which certain policies will make the world better. If those policies succeed, little repression is needed. But if they fail, leftists escalate the repression rather than choosing different policies to make the world better (or just leave it how they found it since they are making it worse).

:eek:
>mfw HMS acknowledges leftism can have positive policies.
Economic Left/Right: -5.01 (formerly -5.88)
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.31 (formerly 2.36)
ISideWith UK
My motto translates to: "All Eat Fish and Chips!"
First person to post the 10,000th reply to a thread on these forums.
International Geese Brigade - Celebrating 0 Radiation and 3rd Place!
info to be added
stuff to be added
This nation partially represents my political, social and economic views.

User avatar
HMS Barham
Diplomat
 
Posts: 604
Founded: Nov 24, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby HMS Barham » Sun Dec 17, 2017 12:09 pm

Eastfield Lodge wrote:
HMS Barham wrote:I think that is only partly true. Leftism is about advancing a view of the world in which certain policies will make the world better. If those policies succeed, little repression is needed. But if they fail, leftists escalate the repression rather than choosing different policies to make the world better (or just leave it how they found it since they are making it worse).

:eek:
>mfw HMS acknowledges leftism can have positive policies.

I didn't say that at all.
Pour la canaille: Faut la mitraille.

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Mon Dec 18, 2017 3:14 pm

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/bbfc ... ornography

so turns out the BBFC is going to be out national censor

woo!
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Greater vakolicci haven
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18661
Founded: May 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater vakolicci haven » Mon Dec 18, 2017 3:18 pm

Souseiseki wrote:https://www.gov.uk/government/news/bbfc-proposed-to-enforce-age-verification-of-online-pornography

so turns out the BBFC is going to be out national censor

woo!

Do they know how fruitless trying to regulate the internet is?
Join the rejected realms and never fear rejection again
NSG virtual happy hour this Saturday: join us on zoom, what could possibly go wrong?
“I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.” - Thomas Jefferson
“Silent acquiescence in the face of tyranny is no better than outright agreement." - C.J. Redwine
“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles." - Jeff Cooper

User avatar
Eastfield Lodge
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10027
Founded: May 23, 2008
Democratic Socialists

Postby Eastfield Lodge » Mon Dec 18, 2017 4:23 pm

Souseiseki wrote:https://www.gov.uk/government/news/bbfc-proposed-to-enforce-age-verification-of-online-pornography

so turns out the BBFC is going to be out national censor

woo!

*inb4 Wikipedia rated 18*
Economic Left/Right: -5.01 (formerly -5.88)
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.31 (formerly 2.36)
ISideWith UK
My motto translates to: "All Eat Fish and Chips!"
First person to post the 10,000th reply to a thread on these forums.
International Geese Brigade - Celebrating 0 Radiation and 3rd Place!
info to be added
stuff to be added
This nation partially represents my political, social and economic views.

User avatar
Trumptonium
Minister
 
Posts: 2818
Founded: Jan 27, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Trumptonium » Mon Dec 18, 2017 4:53 pm

if the tories take porn away, how low do you think they can go with the youth vote?

it's 17% atm

let's not even think about the effects on current underaged future voters

not that porn is worth single-issue voting about but.. it's uh

incredibly inconveniencing

also shows once again how much they hate the internet. we're literally the only country marked as 'enemy of the internet' in europe .. except for russia.
Last edited by Trumptonium on Mon Dec 18, 2017 4:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Pro: Things and people I like
Anti: Things and people I dislike

https://www.bolsonaro.com.br/

User avatar
Trumptonium
Minister
 
Posts: 2818
Founded: Jan 27, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Trumptonium » Mon Dec 18, 2017 4:54 pm

Eastfield Lodge wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:https://www.gov.uk/government/news/bbfc-proposed-to-enforce-age-verification-of-online-pornography

so turns out the BBFC is going to be out national censor

woo!

*inb4 Wikipedia rated 18*


Tbh they do have plenty of 18+ images on there for educational purposes

wonder how that's gonna work
Pro: Things and people I like
Anti: Things and people I dislike

https://www.bolsonaro.com.br/

User avatar
HMS Barham
Diplomat
 
Posts: 604
Founded: Nov 24, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby HMS Barham » Mon Dec 18, 2017 8:43 pm

Souseiseki wrote:https://www.gov.uk/government/news/bbfc-proposed-to-enforce-age-verification-of-online-pornography

so turns out the BBFC is going to be out national censor

woo!

"The government should direct and control everything."

"No I didn't mean that!"

*picture of child pushing stick into own bike wheel*
Pour la canaille: Faut la mitraille.

User avatar
Dooom35796821595
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9309
Founded: Sep 11, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Dooom35796821595 » Tue Dec 19, 2017 3:54 am

When life gives you lemons, you BURN THEIR HOUSE DOWN!
Anything can be justified if it is cool. If at first you don't succeed, destroy all in your way.
"Your methods are stupid! Your progress has been stupid! Your intelligence is stupid! For the sake of the mission, you must be terminated!”

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45979
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Tue Dec 19, 2017 4:32 am

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-42411144

BBC reports that the Lib Dems have been fined £18,000 for failing to "deliver a complete and accurate spending return" in relation to "80 payments worth more than £80,000" relating to the EU referendum. A smaller fine has also been given to the Remain campaign (now known as Open Britain).

Remember this the next time people whip up hysteria about Vote Leave being "dodgy".
Last edited by Dumb Ideologies on Tue Dec 19, 2017 4:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 63226
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Tue Dec 19, 2017 4:34 am

Dumb Ideologies wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-42411144

BBC reports that the Lib Dems have been fined £18,000 for failing to "deliver a complete and accurate spending return" in relation to "80 payments worth more than £80,000". A smaller fine has also been given to the Remain campaign (now known as Open Britain).

Remember this the next time people whip up hysteria about Vote Leave being "dodgy".


I'll use this to whip up hysteria about British politics being corrupt as a whole :)
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45979
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Tue Dec 19, 2017 4:36 am

The Blaatschapen wrote:
Dumb Ideologies wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-42411144

BBC reports that the Lib Dems have been fined £18,000 for failing to "deliver a complete and accurate spending return" in relation to "80 payments worth more than £80,000". A smaller fine has also been given to the Remain campaign (now known as Open Britain).

Remember this the next time people whip up hysteria about Vote Leave being "dodgy".


I'll use this to whip up hysteria about British politics being corrupt as a whole :)


That awkward feel when our politics is terrible but when a FOREIGNER is attacking it you almost feel duty bound to defend it.

Almost! :p
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Tue Dec 19, 2017 5:24 am

HMS Barham wrote:
Eastfield Lodge wrote: :eek:
>mfw HMS acknowledges leftism can have positive policies.

I didn't say that at all.

You literally ceded exactly that.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Tue Dec 19, 2017 7:57 am

UK feminist pressure groups ran a study asking if girls in UK schools experience sexism or sexual harassment.

1/3rd of all girls aged from infancy to 18 said they had.

They then used this to bellow about how 1/3rd of girls have been sexually harassed, rather than note that 1/3rd saying they've experienced sexism is actually pretty fucking low and calls into question this notion of widespread misogyny, despite all the widespread attempts to cast light on womens issues and educate people on the subject in media, schooling, and culture.

Notably;
If an 18-year-old claims that once, when she was seven, she heard a boy shout across the playground that ‘boys are better than girls’, then that is recorded as an experience of sexist language.


And despite the widespread campaign of disinformation about sexism against men, denials it exists and public demonization of figures who say it does, 20% of boys say they have experienced sexism against them. (Again, worth noting that there is a concerted effort to appropriate sexism against males as being sexism against women, and to indoctrinate the populace into this view, as well as a comparative dirth in the amount of exposure given to mens issues. In terms of class consciousness, these results are fairly surprising, and constitute a fifth of boys being directly at odds with mainstream feminist ideology and willing to say so.)

http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/ar ... jkne99l_IV

Personally, I would bet more than 1/3rd of girls have experienced sexism, but they have been indoctrinated into not knowing or ignoring that other girls are the primary source of it for them, as the current mindset our institutions seek to cultivate is that sexism is a male perpetrated phenomena against females.
A good example of feminism hurting women too.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:03 am, edited 5 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Val Halla
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38977
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Val Halla » Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:13 am

UK feminism and sometimes politics thread 7

Also lol that expensive carrier is leaking like crazy
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
WOMAN

She/her

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:16 am

Val Halla wrote:UK feminism and sometimes politics thread 7

Also lol that expensive carrier is leaking like crazy


The carrier is leaking?
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 63226
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:18 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Val Halla wrote:UK feminism and sometimes politics thread 7

Also lol that expensive carrier is leaking like crazy


The carrier is leaking?


Yes, just look at that puddle of water under it.

That leak must be massive.
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
Val Halla
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38977
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Val Halla » Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:18 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Val Halla wrote:UK feminism and sometimes politics thread 7

Also lol that expensive carrier is leaking like crazy


The carrier is leaking?

HMS Queen Elizabeth, which cost £3.1 billion, has been taking on 200 litres of water an hour because of a faulty seal.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
WOMAN

She/her

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 63226
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:22 am

Val Halla wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
The carrier is leaking?

HMS Queen Elizabeth, which cost £3.1 billion, has been taking on 200 litres of water an hour because of a faulty seal.


Could be worse. A faulty o-ring (also a type of seal) created the challenger disaster :(

Here I guess it is a matter of fixing the seal, which should be a very routine matter.
The Blaatschapen should resign

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Heatnikki, Numadsh

Advertisement

Remove ads