NATION

PASSWORD

UK Politics Thread VII: Wake me DUP inside [can't wake UUP]

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Thu Dec 14, 2017 6:15 am

HMS Barham wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:Let us briefly contend that there is a pro-women bias in discussion of social issues

Begging the question. Modern culture is virulently anti-woman in that most women want a stable marriage and children, something that feminism denies them. Ostroeuropa is anti-woman because he is a radical feminist.


one day i'm going to print this out and frame it
Last edited by Souseiseki on Thu Dec 14, 2017 6:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Thu Dec 14, 2017 6:28 am

Its not untrue.

Men also want children and a stable marriage though and women also want careers.

And ostro is a radfem. He’s only different because hr wants radfem for men too
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Dec 14, 2017 6:30 am

Souseiseki wrote:
HMS Barham wrote:Begging the question. Modern culture is virulently anti-woman in that most women want a stable marriage and children, something that feminism denies them. Ostroeuropa is anti-woman because he is a radical feminist.


one day i'm going to print this out and frame it


It's fuckin' perfect.

Questers wrote:Its not untrue.

Men also want children and a stable marriage though and women also want careers.

And ostro is a radfem. He’s only different because hr wants radfem for men too


I explicitly reject patriarchy theory and think it's the biggest pile of bollocks in history for explaining why sexism is a thing, and is in fact detrimental. I reject the fundamental tenets of radical feminism and consider their impact to be misandrist.

Some people might up and decide to call me a feminist because they believe all western morality is derived from the ten commandments and you can't be good without being christian, but radical feminist is definitely a non-starter.

Your point about men+children/women+careers is on point, at least.
"Ostro is one of those people who thinks Jewish Usury causes poverty, he just wants anti-semitism for jews too." absolutely incoherent, much like "Radfem for men."

If you mean radical as in extremist, I don't see how. It's a binary state kind of thing. You're either an egalitarian or you're not. There's varying extremes of sexism and racism in society, but only one state of being egalitarian. I, and everyone else above the age of 2, probably isn't in that one state of egalitarian, and are varying levels of extreme on sexism and racism.

I'd argue i'm one of the least extremist people around, when you bare that in mind. Compare to the british institutions like the BBC, which are very extremist in terms of misandry and often racism. It's like looking at a car and saying it's "Extremely parked."
The fuck does that mean?

It can be moving at extreme speeds, but stillness is just stillness. Only racism/sexism and such on the egalitarianism axis can qualify as extreme, imo, much like "Extreme speeds." as opposed to "Extremely motionless."
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Thu Dec 14, 2017 6:41 am, edited 7 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Taihei Tengoku
Senator
 
Posts: 4851
Founded: Dec 15, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Taihei Tengoku » Thu Dec 14, 2017 7:00 am

Anecdotally HMS Barham is correct--trawl a dating site or The Tind and men will give you dick pics while the stated preference of women is "no games" or "not into one-night stands."
REST IN POWER
Franberry - HMS Barham - North Point - Questers - Tyrandis - Rosbaningrad - Sharfghotten
UNJUSTLY DELETED
OUR DAY WILL COME

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Dec 14, 2017 7:03 am

Taihei Tengoku wrote:Anecdotally HMS Barham is correct--trawl a dating site or The Tind and men will give you dick pics while the stated preference of women is "no games" or "not into one-night stands."


Men have sex they don't want as a result of stereotypes and social pressures and the urge to live up to them, according to studies.
So they don't want to send dick pics, or 40% of them at least of them.

https://ladyfreethinker.org/dev/study-4 ... xual-acts/

Incidentally, searching for an unwanted sex study turns up mostly studies on women raping men, which is pretty sad that the two terms are conflated.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Thu Dec 14, 2017 7:07 am, edited 2 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Thu Dec 14, 2017 7:15 am

Men have sex they don't want as a result of stereotypes and social pressures and the urge to live up to them, according to studies.
So they don't want to send dick pics, or 40% of them at least of them.


i don't think the data you gave can be extrapolated to such a conclusion.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163936
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Thu Dec 14, 2017 7:28 am

Tories defeat themselves in Brexit vote.
BRAVELY FENDING off their sworn enemies, the democracy hating Tories have vanquished their sternest foe, democracy hating Tories, by democratically voting to ensure the final Brexit deal between Britain and the EU must be voted on and approved by parliament.

Strong and stable like you can't even comprehend.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Thu Dec 14, 2017 7:37 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Taihei Tengoku wrote:Anecdotally HMS Barham is correct--trawl a dating site or The Tind and men will give you dick pics while the stated preference of women is "no games" or "not into one-night stands."


Men have sex they don't want as a result of stereotypes and social pressures and the urge to live up to them, according to studies.
So they don't want to send dick pics, or 40% of them at least of them.

https://ladyfreethinker.org/dev/study-4 ... xual-acts/
errrrrr
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Dec 14, 2017 7:38 am

Souseiseki wrote:
Men have sex they don't want as a result of stereotypes and social pressures and the urge to live up to them, according to studies.
So they don't want to send dick pics, or 40% of them at least of them.


i don't think the data you gave can be extrapolated to such a conclusion.


Mehhh, i'm feeling lazy. (Not sure come to think of it if that one is the study about men having sex they don't want to live up to gender roles, it might be a rape study.)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic ... d-sex.html
S'this one.


While another described that men can't say no to women if she shows any interest.


Marital rape springs to mind. A decent example of misandrist culture in society.

Ifreann wrote:Tories defeat themselves in Brexit vote.
BRAVELY FENDING off their sworn enemies, the democracy hating Tories have vanquished their sternest foe, democracy hating Tories, by democratically voting to ensure the final Brexit deal between Britain and the EU must be voted on and approved by parliament.

Strong and stable like you can't even comprehend.


Normally i'd say a brexit vote doesn't reflect on the current leadership, since it's a notorious issue for rebellions and may have happened under any leader, but losing by a mere 4 votes does kind of give the impression that if there was a better leadership or more competent negotiation, they might have swung it.

I'm calling it btw.
There are gonna be a dozen tory factions spending their time/energy preparing for a leadership run, and none of them will prepare for the election.

None will launch the coup because it would cost them in the subsequent leadership bid.

So May will make it to election day, and they'll run around like a bunch of headless chickens wondering why none of their colleagues got rid of her. Most of their research will be about their competitor tories, and they'll rely on just going "SOCIALISM!" at Corbyn to win.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Thu Dec 14, 2017 7:44 am, edited 6 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 63227
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:07 am

https://twitter.com/Nigel_Farage/status ... 9772718080

Guess who has been a politician since last millennium?
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
Val Halla
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38977
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Val Halla » Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:11 am

Britain first got arrested again
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
WOMAN

She/her

User avatar
Alvecia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20361
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:14 am

Val Halla wrote:Britain first got arrested again

All of them? That's quite the operation :P

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:15 am

Alvecia wrote:
Val Halla wrote:Britain first got arrested again

All of them? That's quite the operation :P


Who do we give the medal to?
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Alvecia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20361
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:17 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Alvecia wrote:All of them? That's quite the operation :P


Who do we give the medal to?

The Belfast police force it would seem

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163936
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:18 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:
i don't think the data you gave can be extrapolated to such a conclusion.


Mehhh, i'm feeling lazy. (Not sure come to think of it if that one is the study about men having sex they don't want to live up to gender roles, it might be a rape study.)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic ... d-sex.html
S'this one.


While another described that men can't say no to women if she shows any interest.


Marital rape springs to mind. A decent example of misandrist culture in society.

I don't think we can attribute the sending of unsolicited dick pics to misandrist culture in society.

Ifreann wrote:Tories defeat themselves in Brexit vote.

Strong and stable like you can't even comprehend.


Normally i'd say a brexit vote doesn't reflect on the current leadership, since it's a notorious issue for rebellions and may have happened under any leader, but losing by a mere 4 votes does kind of give the impression that if there was a better leadership or more competent negotiation, they might have swung it.

I'm calling it btw.
There are gonna be a dozen tory factions spending their time/energy preparing for a leadership run, and none of them will prepare for the election.

None will launch the coup because it would cost them in the subsequent leadership bid.

So May will make it to election day, and they'll run around like a bunch of headless chickens wondering why none of their colleagues got rid of her. Most of their research will be about their competitor tories, and they'll rely on just going "SOCIALISM!" at Corbyn to win.

Maybe the Tories will break up into a bunch of splinter groups. The Real Tory Party, the Provisional Tory Party, the Continuity Tory Party, and the Boris Johnson Three Ring Circus.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:19 am

Alvecia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Who do we give the medal to?

The Belfast police force it would seem


The charges seem ridiculous to me.

They aren't incitement to violence.
It's "Behavior intended or likely to stir up hatred." Authoritarian progressive bullshit that will never be evenly applied. If that's the worst they've got them on, they are political prisoners.

You don't have to like them to notice that.
Britain First should have been disbanded over the charity fraud they pulled, but I still think this arrest is a sign of the creeping authoritarianism on the left wing.

S'fine though. Leave it in place. I'm going into politics and can keep my mouth shut a while.
Give me that rod, and start wondering how i'd wield it. If I get that far, I promise to repeal it once I'm done. :p
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:22 am, edited 4 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163936
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:23 am

Alvecia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Who do we give the medal to?

The Belfast police force it would seem

Police Service of Norn Iron. So named because if they were the Norn Iron Police Service there'd be far too many jokes about getting caught by the NIPS.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45991
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:23 am

Val Halla wrote:Britain first got arrested again


Prison Thirst?
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:27 am

I mean christ, i've pointed out the BBC's shenanigans.
Just arrest the lot and throw them in prison.
Go through the universities and grab a bunch of professors.
Lots of feminist organizations.

Most imams, a substantial number of priests, the entire daily mail, anyone who waffles about "scroungers"...

We'd need to start a new war and annex some land to ship them off too there'd be so many.

Britain first being arrested on these charges merely fuels the far-right by giving them more fuel to correctly point out government bias in favor of immigrants and muslims, women too, against the native population and men.

It might be slightly less bullshit if it was just "Intended to stir up hatred" and you could nail them on that with quotes saying "This'll make everyone hate muslims", but there's the "Or Likely to stir up hatred" in there.

So what.
A bunch of armed thugs turning up to threaten brock turner with death isn't hatred?
Then why don't we arrest journalists?

It amounts to allowing the established institutions to use tactics that the general populace can't, and is a power grab by those institutions under the guise of moral guardianship that progressivism gives them the excuse to claim. It allows them to frame discussions in purely hateful terms and then cry and say to the police "He *sniff* he's stirring up hatred *sniff sniff* wahhh." when someone directly opposes their claims in the same way.

It's the criminalization of opposition from the grassroots.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:34 am, edited 5 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 63227
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:32 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:


The charges seem ridiculous to me.

They aren't incitement to violence.
It's "Behavior intended or likely to stir up hatred." Authoritarian progressive bullshit that will never be evenly applied. If that's the worst they've got them on, they are political prisoners.

You don't have to like them to notice that.
Britain First should have been disbanded over the charity fraud they pulled, but I still think this arrest is a sign of the creeping authoritarianism on the left wing.

S'fine though. Leave it in place. I'm going into politics and can keep my mouth shut a while.
Give me that rod, and start wondering how i'd wield it. If I get that far, I promise to repeal it once I'm done. :p


If "Behavior intended or likely to stir up hatred" is a crime, shouldn't the Belfast police not round up the orange marchers?
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:33 am

The Blaatschapen wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
The charges seem ridiculous to me.

They aren't incitement to violence.
It's "Behavior intended or likely to stir up hatred." Authoritarian progressive bullshit that will never be evenly applied. If that's the worst they've got them on, they are political prisoners.

You don't have to like them to notice that.
Britain First should have been disbanded over the charity fraud they pulled, but I still think this arrest is a sign of the creeping authoritarianism on the left wing.

S'fine though. Leave it in place. I'm going into politics and can keep my mouth shut a while.
Give me that rod, and start wondering how i'd wield it. If I get that far, I promise to repeal it once I'm done. :p


If "Behavior intended or likely to stir up hatred" is a crime, shouldn't the Belfast police not round up the orange marchers?


Exactly mate.
It's not applied evenly. It's a ridiculous set of charges, and the fact it's a law is a damning fact about how badly our standards have slipped thanks to moral panics from the progressive left and islamophiles.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:37 am

the right-wing are accomplices to these moral panics and bad laws. blaming them on the left is reductionist.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45991
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:38 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:


The charges seem ridiculous to me.

They aren't incitement to violence.
It's "Behavior intended or likely to stir up hatred." Authoritarian progressive bullshit that will never be evenly applied. If that's the worst they've got them on, they are political prisoners.

You don't have to like them to notice that.
Britain First should have been disbanded over the charity fraud they pulled, but I still think this arrest is a sign of the creeping authoritarianism on the left wing.

S'fine though. Leave it in place. I'm going into politics and can keep my mouth shut a while.
Give me that rod, and start wondering how i'd wield it. If I get that far, I promise to repeal it once I'm done. :p


Have a vote. You've been good this year.
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:40 am

Souseiseki wrote:the right-wing are accomplices to these moral panics and bad laws. blaming them on the left is reductionist.


It's more noteworthy when coppers start wearing balaclavas and breaking into houses, and one of them saying about how i'm being unfair to cops for noticing it doesn't change that.

The right is always a shambles, it's been the lefts job to reign them in since practically forever.

It's not "Reductionist" to blame the fact everyones house is being robbed on the coppers going rogue, just like it's not reductionist to blame our rapid decline on the left losing its marbles.

The reason we're in this mess is that now there's nobody reigning it in, and the people supposed to be doing it are making it worse. Yes, it's the lefts fault.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:41 am, edited 2 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:54 am

sounds like the racism of low expectations to me...

i'll admit it's the left's fault in so that the left have become the right
Last edited by Souseiseki on Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Floofybit, Google [Bot], HISPIDA, Ineva, Juristonia, Lycom, South Neviersia, The Brosketeers, Thoses germans, Western Theram, Window Land

Advertisement

Remove ads