NATION

PASSWORD

UK Politics Thread VII: Wake me DUP inside [can't wake UUP]

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41258
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Sat May 19, 2018 2:43 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:So apparently progressives have gone around inventing new slurs against demographics they don't like again and this time the leader of the english nationalist party is sueing one of them for hate speech.

The "Gammon" thing explicitly relies on race and sex as part of the criteria, but the progressive mentality often outright denies the possibility of racism and sexism against whites/males so they didn't have self-awareness about this.

I don't expect it to work, but it probably should if we were being consistent on it.


And heavy drinking.

It's not new, people have been calling SAF gammon face for years.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat May 19, 2018 2:45 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:So apparently progressives have gone around inventing new slurs against demographics they don't like again and this time the leader of the english nationalist party is sueing one of them for hate speech.

The "Gammon" thing explicitly relies on race and sex as part of the criteria, but the progressive mentality often outright denies the possibility of racism and sexism against whites/males so they didn't have self-awareness about this.

I don't expect it to work, but it probably should if we were being consistent on it.


And heavy drinking.

It's not new, people have been calling SAF gammon face for years.


It's notable that this section of the progressive left is focusing on white males as responsible for brexit and using slurs against them rather than arguing against, say, people in general who voted for brexit. Strikes me sort of like when nazis and fascists endlessly rant about corrupt Jewish bankers.

Because ultimately its the same kind of shit going on, they just hate white people, males, and white males especially. Let's not forget this is the group that brought us the memes of kill all men, male tears, manspreading, mansplaining, etc.

It appears to be a hobby of theirs to pollute culture with more racism and sexism. I'm fine with people starting to try and get them done for it.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Sat May 19, 2018 2:47 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66787
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Sat May 19, 2018 2:53 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:So apparently progressives have gone around inventing new slurs against demographics they don't like again and this time the leader of the english nationalist party is sueing one of them for hate speech.

The "Gammon" thing explicitly relies on race and sex as part of the criteria, but the progressive mentality often outright denies the possibility of racism and sexism against whites/males so they didn't have self-awareness about this.

I don't expect it to work, but it probably should if we were being consistent on it.


That was meant to be a slur? I thought it was just conservatives getting hot and bothered over nothing.

Ironic considering who gets called the easily offended snowflakes.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat May 19, 2018 2:57 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:So apparently progressives have gone around inventing new slurs against demographics they don't like again and this time the leader of the english nationalist party is sueing one of them for hate speech.

The "Gammon" thing explicitly relies on race and sex as part of the criteria, but the progressive mentality often outright denies the possibility of racism and sexism against whites/males so they didn't have self-awareness about this.

I don't expect it to work, but it probably should if we were being consistent on it.


That was meant to be a slur? I thought it was just conservatives getting hot and bothered over nothing.

Ironic considering who gets called the easily offended snowflakes.


You don't see a problem with racial slurs?

The difference is that many on the progressive left get offended by people with different opinions than them and can't handle dissent. This is an outright insult, it's intended to offend, and it's a racial and sexist slur on top of that, and that is the context of its use here.

If someone went around commenting on hooked noses it wouldn't be "Gosh you're so easily offended snowflakes" and most of society would recognize it as repulsive and racist. This is not much different.

I think you're just throwing that out there in order to pretend something that isn't true about the dynamic in play here.

Notably, we don't have mainstream politicians and journalists talking about people "Jewing" others out of their money, but we do have a bunch of progressives lackign self awareness and waffling about manspreading and mansplaining while saying "No but the term describes a real thing (That both some men and women do but we're only focusing on men)"

...
So does Jewing (That people of all races do but we're only focusing on Jews.). Doesn't change what they are.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Sat May 19, 2018 3:00 pm, edited 4 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41258
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Sat May 19, 2018 3:01 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:So apparently progressives have gone around inventing new slurs against demographics they don't like again and this time the leader of the english nationalist party is sueing one of them for hate speech.

The "Gammon" thing explicitly relies on race and sex as part of the criteria, but the progressive mentality often outright denies the possibility of racism and sexism against whites/males so they didn't have self-awareness about this.

I don't expect it to work, but it probably should if we were being consistent on it.


That was meant to be a slur? I thought it was just conservatives getting hot and bothered over nothing.

Ironic considering who gets called the easily offended snowflakes.


It is very much an insult.

I was slightly off with SAF, it was bacon face for him. And take a look at who was using it and how.

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=bacon ... e&ie=UTF-8

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat May 19, 2018 3:04 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
That was meant to be a slur? I thought it was just conservatives getting hot and bothered over nothing.

Ironic considering who gets called the easily offended snowflakes.


It is very much an insult.

I was slightly off with SAF, it was bacon face for him. And take a look at who was using it and how.

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=bacon ... e&ie=UTF-8


Insulting individuals is somewhat different to inventing slurs to describe a group of people.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
The Huskar Social Union
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58285
Founded: Apr 04, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Huskar Social Union » Sat May 19, 2018 3:26 pm

Saw it through around on the NI subreddit towards some members of the DUP, other than that ive never heard of it.
Irish Nationalist from Belfast / Leftwing / Atheist / Alliance Party voter
"I never thought in terms of being a leader, i thought very simply in terms of helping people" - John Hume 1937 - 2020



I like Miniature painting, Tanks, English Gals, Video games and most importantly Cheese.


User avatar
Trumptonium1
Senator
 
Posts: 4022
Founded: Apr 03, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Trumptonium1 » Sat May 19, 2018 4:17 pm

If 'gammon' is the worst slur they can think of for white men...
Preferred pronouns: His Majesty/Your Highness

https://www.bolsonaro.com.br/
Resident Non-Pumpkin Character

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Sun May 20, 2018 5:47 am

>He told BBC One's Andrew Marr show, presented by Emma Barnett, that the government "just don't know" how many children of the millions using using social media were not old enough for an account and he was "very worried" about age verification.
>
>[...]
>
>He told the programme he "hopes we get to a position" where all users of social media users has to have their age verified.

are you ready for the porn verification to get expanded to all social media sites

who could have predicted this coming
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159121
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sun May 20, 2018 5:53 am

Souseiseki wrote:>He told BBC One's Andrew Marr show, presented by Emma Barnett, that the government "just don't know" how many children of the millions using using social media were not old enough for an account and he was "very worried" about age verification.
>
>[...]
>
>He told the programme he "hopes we get to a position" where all users of social media users has to have their age verified.

are you ready for the porn verification to get expanded to all social media sites

who could have predicted this coming

Do you have a forum pass, citizen?

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45251
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Sun May 20, 2018 5:56 am

Souseiseki wrote:>He told BBC One's Andrew Marr show, presented by Emma Barnett, that the government "just don't know" how many children of the millions using using social media were not old enough for an account and he was "very worried" about age verification.
>
>[...]
>
>He told the programme he "hopes we get to a position" where all users of social media users has to have their age verified.

are you ready for the porn verification to get expanded to all social media sites

who could have predicted this coming


The government's central computer. For it will predict all broadcastable comings.
Last edited by Dumb Ideologies on Sun May 20, 2018 5:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159121
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sun May 20, 2018 6:08 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:So apparently progressives have gone around inventing new slurs against demographics they don't like again and this time the leader of the english nationalist party is sueing one of them for hate speech.

The "Gammon" thing explicitly relies on race and sex as part of the criteria, but the progressive mentality often outright denies the possibility of racism and sexism against whites/males so they didn't have self-awareness about this.

I don't expect it to work, but it probably should if we were being consistent on it.

This explains the parody song lyrics I saw on Twitter about living like gammon people.

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Sun May 20, 2018 6:19 am

i don't understand the gammon thing and it just sounds utterly dumb

i just woke up one day and people were talking about gammon

weird
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Trumptonium1
Senator
 
Posts: 4022
Founded: Apr 03, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Trumptonium1 » Sun May 20, 2018 6:32 am

Souseiseki wrote:>He told BBC One's Andrew Marr show, presented by Emma Barnett, that the government "just don't know" how many children of the millions using using social media were not old enough for an account and he was "very worried" about age verification.
>
>[...]
>
>He told the programme he "hopes we get to a position" where all users of social media users has to have their age verified.

are you ready for the porn verification to get expanded to all social media sites

who could have predicted this coming


Now each time you have an urge or want to post a restaurant selfie you need to hop down to Mr Singh and ask for permission to use the internets.
Preferred pronouns: His Majesty/Your Highness

https://www.bolsonaro.com.br/
Resident Non-Pumpkin Character

User avatar
Greater vakolicci haven
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18661
Founded: May 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater vakolicci haven » Sun May 20, 2018 7:10 am

Souseiseki wrote:i don't understand the gammon thing and it just sounds utterly dumb

i just woke up one day and people were talking about gammon

weird

Gammon is on special offer at hungry horse pubs at the minute so I think that might be it.
Join the rejected realms and never fear rejection again
NSG virtual happy hour this Saturday: join us on zoom, what could possibly go wrong?
“I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.” - Thomas Jefferson
“Silent acquiescence in the face of tyranny is no better than outright agreement." - C.J. Redwine
“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles." - Jeff Cooper

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 29265
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Sun May 20, 2018 7:25 am

Trumptonium1 wrote:I suppose it's a gray area. I wonder if the Home Office remotely got involved in her arrival .. or her stay. But one rule for them different rules for the rest of us I assume. Wallis Simpson certainly did not have British citizenship.


The Duchess of Sussex has already started the process of gaining British citizenship, and Kensington Palace has confirmed that she'll have to go through the same process as everyone else, though she'll likely get a bit more support than with your standard applicant.

https://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/lo ... 36896.html

There's actually a pressing legal reason why she has to gain UK citizenship and renounce her US citizenship as soon as possible.

The United States is one of two countries (along with Eritrea) that taxes on the basis of citizenship as well as residence; so all US citizens (and Green Card holders) living outside the United States have to pay US taxes. This is, of course, why our part-Turkish US-born Foreign Secretary renounced his US citizenship a few years back.

The corollary is that the new Duchess of Sussex would have to reveal at least part of the royal family's financial affairs to the American IRS if she doesn't renounce her US citizenship ASAP.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159121
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sun May 20, 2018 7:46 am

The Archregimancy wrote:
Trumptonium1 wrote:I suppose it's a gray area. I wonder if the Home Office remotely got involved in her arrival .. or her stay. But one rule for them different rules for the rest of us I assume. Wallis Simpson certainly did not have British citizenship.


The Duchess of Sussex has already started the process of gaining British citizenship, and Kensington Palace has confirmed that she'll have to go through the same process as everyone else, though she'll likely get a bit more support than with your standard applicant.

https://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/lo ... 36896.html

There's actually a pressing legal reason why she has to gain UK citizenship and renounce her US citizenship as soon as possible.

The United States is one of two countries (along with Eritrea) that taxes on the basis of citizenship as well as residence; so all US citizens (and Green Card holders) living outside the United States have to pay US taxes. This is, of course, why our part-Turkish US-born Foreign Secretary renounced his US citizenship a few years back.

The corollary is that the new Duchess of Sussex would have to reveal at least part of the royal family's financial affairs to the American IRS if she doesn't renounce her US citizenship ASAP.

That and the Home Office might accidentally shred the paperwork allowing her in the country.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Sun May 20, 2018 9:44 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:So apparently progressives have gone around inventing new slurs against demographics they don't like again and this time the leader of the english nationalist party is sueing one of them for hate speech.

The "Gammon" thing explicitly relies on race and sex as part of the criteria, but the progressive mentality often outright denies the possibility of racism and sexism against whites/males so they didn't have self-awareness about this.

I don't expect it to work, but it probably should if we were being consistent on it.

It's not reliant on sex, since it is used against some women as well. Just so happens that, quelle surprise, more men typify the remark.

It's not an ethnic slur. It's poking fun at unreasonably angry politicians about being unreasonably angry.
It's not like "thug" or "paki" which are used to typify entire ethnic groups.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Sun May 20, 2018 9:47 am

Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:>He told BBC One's Andrew Marr show, presented by Emma Barnett, that the government "just don't know" how many children of the millions using using social media were not old enough for an account and he was "very worried" about age verification.
>
>[...]
>
>He told the programme he "hopes we get to a position" where all users of social media users has to have their age verified.

are you ready for the porn verification to get expanded to all social media sites

who could have predicted this coming


The government's central computer. For it will predict all broadcastable comings.

"Traveller 3465, you are ##OFF MISSION##"
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sun May 20, 2018 12:08 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:So apparently progressives have gone around inventing new slurs against demographics they don't like again and this time the leader of the english nationalist party is sueing one of them for hate speech.

The "Gammon" thing explicitly relies on race and sex as part of the criteria, but the progressive mentality often outright denies the possibility of racism and sexism against whites/males so they didn't have self-awareness about this.

I don't expect it to work, but it probably should if we were being consistent on it.

It's not reliant on sex, since it is used against some women as well. Just so happens that, quelle surprise, more men typify the remark.

It's not an ethnic slur. It's poking fun at unreasonably angry politicians about being unreasonably angry.
It's not like "thug" or "paki" which are used to typify entire ethnic groups.


Got an example of it being used against a woman?
Do you have any example of it being used on a non-white?

Even on twitter between randoms will do.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41258
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Sun May 20, 2018 12:12 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:It's not reliant on sex, since it is used against some women as well. Just so happens that, quelle surprise, more men typify the remark.

It's not an ethnic slur. It's poking fun at unreasonably angry politicians about being unreasonably angry.
It's not like "thug" or "paki" which are used to typify entire ethnic groups.


Got an example of it being used against a woman?
Do you have any example of it being used on a non-white?

Even on twitter between randoms will do.


https://twitter.com/ComradePangloss/sta ... 8106315776

User avatar
The Huskar Social Union
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58285
Founded: Apr 04, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Huskar Social Union » Sun May 20, 2018 12:13 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:It's not reliant on sex, since it is used against some women as well. Just so happens that, quelle surprise, more men typify the remark.

It's not an ethnic slur. It's poking fun at unreasonably angry politicians about being unreasonably angry.
It's not like "thug" or "paki" which are used to typify entire ethnic groups.


Got an example of it being used against a woman?
Do you have any example of it being used on a non-white?

Even on twitter between randoms will do.
Scroll down till you find a reply by "Natalie Rowe"

Couple of other replies calling her one as well further down iirc
Last edited by The Huskar Social Union on Sun May 20, 2018 12:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Irish Nationalist from Belfast / Leftwing / Atheist / Alliance Party voter
"I never thought in terms of being a leader, i thought very simply in terms of helping people" - John Hume 1937 - 2020



I like Miniature painting, Tanks, English Gals, Video games and most importantly Cheese.


User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sun May 20, 2018 12:16 pm

The Huskar Social Union wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Got an example of it being used against a woman?
Do you have any example of it being used on a non-white?

Even on twitter between randoms will do.
Scroll down till you find a reply by "Natalie Rowe"

Couple of other replies calling her one as well further down iirc


This doesn't appear to be a use of the term against non-whites.

Fartsniffage wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Got an example of it being used against a woman?
Do you have any example of it being used on a non-white?

Even on twitter between randoms will do.


https://twitter.com/ComradePangloss/sta ... 8106315776


There's a woman there, okay.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
The Huskar Social Union
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58285
Founded: Apr 04, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Huskar Social Union » Sun May 20, 2018 12:18 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Scroll down till you find a reply by "Natalie Rowe"

Couple of other replies calling her one as well further down iirc


This doesn't appear to be a use of the term against non-whites.



There's a woman there, okay.

No but its against a woman.
Irish Nationalist from Belfast / Leftwing / Atheist / Alliance Party voter
"I never thought in terms of being a leader, i thought very simply in terms of helping people" - John Hume 1937 - 2020



I like Miniature painting, Tanks, English Gals, Video games and most importantly Cheese.


User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sun May 20, 2018 12:18 pm

The Huskar Social Union wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
This doesn't appear to be a use of the term against non-whites.



There's a woman there, okay.

No but its against a woman.


Fair, so it's merely a racial slur.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire, Diuhon, Fartsniffage, Hubaie, Ifreann, Komarovo, Phage, The Holy Therns

Advertisement

Remove ads