I thought she was American.
Advertisement

by Ostroeuropa » Sat May 19, 2018 5:50 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:Peterson and Fry are orators. Peterson is a recent celebrity, but Fry has more years of experience in showmanship than you or I do of breathing put together.
They both have enormous fanbases, albeit for very different reasons.
Where was this debate held and what was the makeup of its audience?
Without that information, the "support rate" can't really be discussed, but anyway, "debates" are pointless. The Ken Ham/Bill Nye debate was pointless.
Debates assume that all participants are rational individuals looking to open their mind to - if not change - understanding of the alternative side.
You and I both know this is not the case.
I found a Youtube video of the debate (here) and it seems that the polls was literally just a live, anonymous internet poll open to anyone with a link.
So it doesn't tell us anything, since Peterson clearly has a fanbase who are willing to mobilise for him, given how they've come completely out of the woodwork since the Cathy Newman interview.
The debate starts around 10 minutes in, the vote link is put up maybe 8 minutes in.

by Ostroeuropa » Sat May 19, 2018 5:51 am

by The New California Republic » Sat May 19, 2018 5:54 am


by Imperializt Russia » Sat May 19, 2018 5:54 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:I found a Youtube video of the debate (here) and it seems that the polls was literally just a live, anonymous internet poll open to anyone with a link.
So it doesn't tell us anything, since Peterson clearly has a fanbase who are willing to mobilise for him, given how they've come completely out of the woodwork since the Cathy Newman interview.
The debate starts around 10 minutes in, the vote link is put up maybe 8 minutes in.
True, but the polling aligns with polling showing 66% of british people have had enough of feminism.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.


by Ostroeuropa » Sat May 19, 2018 5:57 am
The New California Republic wrote:The wedding is over, we can finally ditch the collective madness that we have embarked upon as a country.
The wedding means that Brexit is ditched, right?

by Eastfield Lodge » Sat May 19, 2018 7:47 am

by Saiwania » Sat May 19, 2018 7:47 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:Sex doesn't ruin people. At worst, you would have fed into some guys insecurities, a problem for sure, but not one to be dealt with in the way you did imo.

by Anywhere Else But Here » Sat May 19, 2018 7:50 am
Eastfield Lodge wrote:Ifreann wrote:Such is my understanding. She does televisual acting. Or she did? Maybe she's going to retire now that she's married into royalty.
Her last main role was in Suits, an american corporate law drama. She quit that soon after the engagement was announced. I imagine she'll be like Kate, doing random philanthropic work that royals do.

by Ifreann » Sat May 19, 2018 8:19 am
Anywhere Else But Here wrote:Eastfield Lodge wrote:Her last main role was in Suits, an american corporate law drama. She quit that soon after the engagement was announced. I imagine she'll be like Kate, doing random philanthropic work that royals do.
It makes sense she'd retire. She's going to need to save all her acting skills for maintaining a smile when Prince Philip is around.

by Fartsniffage » Sat May 19, 2018 10:13 am

by Vassenor » Sat May 19, 2018 10:28 am

by Fartsniffage » Sat May 19, 2018 11:02 am

by Freezic Vast » Sat May 19, 2018 11:11 am

by Eastfield Lodge » Sat May 19, 2018 11:25 am
Freezic Vast wrote:I hope that means no more royal wedding jokes on HIGNFY, it wasn't funny in the first episode this series, and it certainly wasn't funny last night.

by Trumptonium1 » Sat May 19, 2018 11:34 am

by Vassenor » Sat May 19, 2018 11:54 am

by Fartsniffage » Sat May 19, 2018 12:05 pm

by Greater vakolicci haven » Sat May 19, 2018 12:05 pm

by Ostroeuropa » Sat May 19, 2018 2:38 pm

by Freezic Vast » Sat May 19, 2018 2:41 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:So apparently progressives have gone around inventing new slurs against demographics they don't like again and this time the leader of the english nationalist party is sueing one of them for hate speech.
The "Gammon" thing explicitly relies on race and sex as part of the criteria, but the progressive mentality often outright denies the possibility of racism and sexism against whites/males so they didn't have self-awareness about this.
I don't expect it to work, but it probably should if we were being consistent on it.

by Ostroeuropa » Sat May 19, 2018 2:42 pm
Freezic Vast wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:So apparently progressives have gone around inventing new slurs against demographics they don't like again and this time the leader of the english nationalist party is sueing one of them for hate speech.
The "Gammon" thing explicitly relies on race and sex as part of the criteria, but the progressive mentality often outright denies the possibility of racism and sexism against whites/males so they didn't have self-awareness about this.
I don't expect it to work, but it probably should if we were being consistent on it.
I saw this last night on HIGNFY and heard about it there, it's about middle-aged men who get angry, and red in the face about Brexit.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire, Diuhon, Fartsniffage, Hubaie, Ifreann, Komarovo, Phage, The Holy Therns
Advertisement