NATION

PASSWORD

UK Politics Thread VII: Wake me DUP inside [can't wake UUP]

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163856
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Mon May 14, 2018 10:37 am

New Emeline wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Evaluating feminism based on reality is too hard compared to just outright accepting the outright assertions its adherents make about its positivity and necessity and assuming any defect is individual actors not representative of the movement, despite extremely often literally being representatives of the movement.

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/M ... dPublicity

did you just link to a tvtropes page

TVTropes is political analysis worthy of NSG.
Last edited by Ifreann on Mon May 14, 2018 10:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58535
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon May 14, 2018 10:40 am

New Emeline wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Evaluating feminism based on reality is too hard compared to just outright accepting the outright assertions its adherents make about its positivity and necessity and assuming any defect is individual actors not representative of the movement, despite extremely often literally being representatives of the movement.

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/M ... dPublicity

did you just link to a tvtropes page


It's an apt one to get across a concept.
"They write their own press releases." should be remembered about feminism given the prevalence of feminist journalists. Extreme skepticism should be given to their claims.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Mon May 14, 2018 10:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
New Emeline
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6275
Founded: Jan 16, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby New Emeline » Mon May 14, 2018 10:42 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
New Emeline wrote:did you just link to a tvtropes page


It's an apt one to get across a concept.

I mean
I can start linking to tvtropes too
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/M ... awFeminist

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58535
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon May 14, 2018 10:46 am

New Emeline wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
It's an apt one to get across a concept.

I mean
I can start linking to tvtropes too
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/M ... awFeminist


That's nice, but why not trying evaluating feminism as actually imposed on the public by institutions and legislation instead of just telling me some imperialists are nice people who don't like massacres.

Feminism in practice is misandrist, gynocentric, and a supremacy movement. That's not a strawman, it's the only reasonable conclusion that can be drawn by actually looking at the impacts it has had.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Mon May 14, 2018 10:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
New Emeline
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6275
Founded: Jan 16, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby New Emeline » Mon May 14, 2018 10:47 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
New Emeline wrote:I mean
I can start linking to tvtropes too
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/M ... awFeminist


That's nice, but why not trying evaluating feminism as actually imposed on the public by institutions and legislation instead of just telling me some imperialists are nice people who don't like massacres.

Institutions I can see but what legislation mandates that you have to be a feminist?

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58535
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon May 14, 2018 10:50 am

New Emeline wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
That's nice, but why not trying evaluating feminism as actually imposed on the public by institutions and legislation instead of just telling me some imperialists are nice people who don't like massacres.

Institutions I can see but what legislation mandates that you have to be a feminist?


There's legislation specifically brought about due to feminist lobbying, and it's usually pretty awful, gynocentric, misandrist, etc.

You've got lifelong alimony, child support, their routine revisions to UK rape laws (that STILL don't include female perpetrators or male victims, and the movement subsequently frequently uses crime office statistics to shout about rape being a male perpetrated womens issue, after that very same movement had multiple opportunities to fix this.).

There's plenty of legislation and institutional behaviors and routines that show feminism as actually imposed on the public is a terrible system, and any feminist who wants to pretend they care about men while ignoring that context and still calling themselves a feminist has explaining to do, just like someone standing up in an all-india congress meeting to complain about them "Being mean about imperialism."

It shows a lack of self-awareness and lack of genuine concern and interest for mens situation.

The conservatives have recently addressed one of these abuses by the feminist movement against the male population, based in total disregard for their wellbeing and experiences, by moving to reduce alimony to three years maximum.

When your movement is more shit than Tories on a social issue, that's pretty terrible.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Mon May 14, 2018 10:52 am, edited 3 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon May 14, 2018 10:59 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
New Emeline wrote:did you just link to a tvtropes page


It's an apt one to get across a concept.
"They write their own press releases." should be remembered about feminism given the prevalence of feminist journalists. Extreme skepticism should be given to their claims.

Women journalists, who do get attacked and underpaid for being women, might have a problem with the way society is perceived to view women.

This makes them part of a plot and were installed by The Matriarchy™ because it is impossible to arrive at such a point in one's life by one's own volition.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Mon May 14, 2018 11:00 am

New Emeline wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
That's nice, but why not trying evaluating feminism as actually imposed on the public by institutions and legislation instead of just telling me some imperialists are nice people who don't like massacres.

Institutions I can see but what legislation mandates that you have to be a feminist?


i mean if we're going there then you have no choice but to the follow the laws as dictated by a select group of feminists. for example, the government have decided that unacceptably non-feminist pornography has "no place in out society" and must be restricted or flat out criminalized in order to "send a message" and "discourage interest" in it. if you want to deviate from the strain of feminism endorsed and enforced by the state then you face the prospect of arrest, fines or even a jail sentence. if you want to air non-feminist views in public, you must be very careful. the government has decided that hate speech and grossly offensive views are literally illegal to air and non-feminist or anti-feminist views have a high chance of falling afoul of such laws. they also want to expand the laws to include mandates about "british values", and you can guess what they are. there's also social ramifications which while not strictly a law are hard to ignore. if you do not subscribe to the official good british feminism then people will try to get you fired and you will find it harder to get a new job or get into politics.
Last edited by Souseiseki on Mon May 14, 2018 11:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon May 14, 2018 11:03 am

Souseiseki wrote:
New Emeline wrote:Institutions I can see but what legislation mandates that you have to be a feminist?


i mean if we're going there then you have no choice but to the follow the laws as dictated by a select group of feminists. for example, the government have decided that unacceptably non-feminist pornography has "no place in out society" and must be restricted or flat out criminalized in order to "send a message" and "discourage interest" in it. if you want to deviate from the strain of feminism endorsed and enforced by the state then you face the prospect of arrest, fines or even a jail sentence. if you want to air non-feminist views in public, you must be very careful. the government has decided that hate speech and grossly offensive views are literally illegal to air and non-feminist or anti-feminist views have a high chance of falling afoul of such laws. they also want to expand the laws to include mandates about "british values", and you can guess what they are. there's also social ramifications which while not strictly a law are hard to ignore. if you do not subscribe to the official good british feminism then people will try to get you fired and you will find it harder to get a new job or get into politics.

Please stop pretending that the porn ban is an expression of latent feminist sympathies of the Tory party Sous.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58535
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon May 14, 2018 11:05 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
It's an apt one to get across a concept.
"They write their own press releases." should be remembered about feminism given the prevalence of feminist journalists. Extreme skepticism should be given to their claims.

Women journalists, who do get attacked and underpaid for being women, might have a problem with the way society is perceived to view women.

This makes them part of a plot and were installed by The Matriarchy™ because it is impossible to arrive at such a point in one's life by one's own volition.


When you evaluate harassment as a whole, men experience more of it. It's only by focusing on sexual harassment women experience more.

Women journalists writing or talking about their love of a supremacy movement being harassed is also not surprising or even noteworthy, a bunch of Antoinettes constantly crowing about cake in a situation where 2/3rds of the public has had enough of their bullshit and wants it to stop being harassed isn't note worthy. Here's a tony benn quote for you that might help it click into place.

“The House will forgive me for quoting five democratic questions that I have developed during my life. If one meets a powerful person--Rupert Murdoch, perhaps, or Joe Stalin or Hitler--one can ask five questions: what power do you have; where did you get it; in whose interests do you exercise it; to whom are you accountable; and, how can we get rid of you? Anyone who cannot answer the last of those questions does not live in a democratic system.”

No plot has been mentioned. You appear unable or unwilling to consider it's possible for them to just be biased and believe in a nonsense solution and keep applying it.

It's possible to have a problem with the way society views women without joining a supremacy movement and shilling for its doctrines and rhetoric. It's possible to have a problem with the way people view muslims without joining the muhajideen, etc.

No plot necessary, just a refusal to wonder where all the female bigots are and look around for them.
(Hint. It's the feminist movemet. That's what organized female bigotry looks like. Just look at the results.)
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Mon May 14, 2018 11:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58535
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon May 14, 2018 11:07 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:
i mean if we're going there then you have no choice but to the follow the laws as dictated by a select group of feminists. for example, the government have decided that unacceptably non-feminist pornography has "no place in out society" and must be restricted or flat out criminalized in order to "send a message" and "discourage interest" in it. if you want to deviate from the strain of feminism endorsed and enforced by the state then you face the prospect of arrest, fines or even a jail sentence. if you want to air non-feminist views in public, you must be very careful. the government has decided that hate speech and grossly offensive views are literally illegal to air and non-feminist or anti-feminist views have a high chance of falling afoul of such laws. they also want to expand the laws to include mandates about "british values", and you can guess what they are. there's also social ramifications which while not strictly a law are hard to ignore. if you do not subscribe to the official good british feminism then people will try to get you fired and you will find it harder to get a new job or get into politics.

Please stop pretending that the porn ban is an expression of latent feminist sympathies of the Tory party Sous.


It's made possible because of feminism's grip on institutions and those institutions input to the government. I doubt the Tories give a fuck, they're more interested in looting shit, but when it comes down to it, if institutions tell them something is a good idea and it doesn't hurt their friends bottom line, they're going to do it because it saves them having to actually do their jobs and come up with policy.

Civil service all over again, appleby's everywhere, except just feminist activists.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Mon May 14, 2018 11:10 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:
i mean if we're going there then you have no choice but to the follow the laws as dictated by a select group of feminists. for example, the government have decided that unacceptably non-feminist pornography has "no place in out society" and must be restricted or flat out criminalized in order to "send a message" and "discourage interest" in it. if you want to deviate from the strain of feminism endorsed and enforced by the state then you face the prospect of arrest, fines or even a jail sentence. if you want to air non-feminist views in public, you must be very careful. the government has decided that hate speech and grossly offensive views are literally illegal to air and non-feminist or anti-feminist views have a high chance of falling afoul of such laws. they also want to expand the laws to include mandates about "british values", and you can guess what they are. there's also social ramifications which while not strictly a law are hard to ignore. if you do not subscribe to the official good british feminism then people will try to get you fired and you will find it harder to get a new job or get into politics.

Please stop pretending that the porn ban is an expression of latent feminist sympathies of the Tory party Sous.


feminist academics and rape charities pushed for the ban to protect women. labour went forward with it while talking about protecting women. the tory party expanded it while spouting rhetoric about protecting women. current pornography laws in the UK cannot be separated from feminism, or at least, they cannot be separated from feminist rhetoric.

e: and of course, the same groups wrote into the recent consultation on age verification with their usual rhetoric on how pornography harms women and objectifies women and how it's having a negative effect on boy's views on women and oh no. the cynical interpretation is that they don't care about feminism but are using feminism to get it passed, but that has little relevance to whether or not you are forced to be feminist.
Last edited by Souseiseki on Mon May 14, 2018 11:12 am, edited 3 times in total.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58535
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon May 14, 2018 11:12 am

Souseiseki wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:Please stop pretending that the porn ban is an expression of latent feminist sympathies of the Tory party Sous.


feminist academics and rape charities pushed for the ban to protect women. labour went forward with it while talking about protecting women. the tory party expanded it while spouting rhetoric about protecting women. current pornography laws in the UK cannot be separated from feminism, or at least, they cannot be separated from feminist rhetoric.


Notably the impulse of these types of people and their organizations wasn't to provide education on what sex should be, but to move to suppress expressions of sexuality. (Reminder; sexuality is an aspect of humanity.)

e: and of course, the same groups wrote into the recent consultation on age verification with their usual rhetoric on how pornography harms women and objectifies women and how it's having a negative effect on boy's views on women and oh no. the best possible interpretation is that they don't care about feminism but are using feminism to get it passed, but that has little relevance to whether or not you are forced to be feminist.


"Using feminism to get it passed" is part of the problem. Until people get the fuck over the fact they got played and feminism isn't actually very good, it will be a trump card powerful people can and will use to railroad the public into anything they feel like doing.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Mon May 14, 2018 11:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Eastfield Lodge
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10025
Founded: May 23, 2008
Democratic Socialists

Postby Eastfield Lodge » Mon May 14, 2018 11:20 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:tfw you're too focused on romance to like porn anyway because there's an under-representation of wub making and you get bored without personal connection.

Unless you're off your nut on cocaine. Then porn is fine. Hell i'd leer at a bagel on coke.

If I may quote Frankie Boyle, find a woman and leave the pastries alone.

I'm struggling to remember the context for this and it's actually annoying me.
Economic Left/Right: -5.01 (formerly -5.88)
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.31 (formerly 2.36)
ISideWith UK
My motto translates to: "All Eat Fish and Chips!"
First person to post the 10,000th reply to a thread on these forums.
International Geese Brigade - Celebrating 0 Radiation and 3rd Place!
info to be added
stuff to be added
This nation partially represents my political, social and economic views.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Mon May 14, 2018 11:26 am

Eastfield Lodge wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:If I may quote Frankie Boyle, find a woman and leave the pastries alone.

I'm struggling to remember the context for this and it's actually annoying me.


Apparently something to do with Russel Howard confusing donuts and Viagra.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Eastfield Lodge
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10025
Founded: May 23, 2008
Democratic Socialists

Postby Eastfield Lodge » Mon May 14, 2018 11:36 am

Vassenor wrote:
Eastfield Lodge wrote:I'm struggling to remember the context for this and it's actually annoying me.


Apparently something to do with Russel Howard confusing donuts and Viagra.

Ah yeah, just looked it up. Sweet memories.
Context (at the time of the Swine Flu outbreak I believe) for anyone interested.
Economic Left/Right: -5.01 (formerly -5.88)
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.31 (formerly 2.36)
ISideWith UK
My motto translates to: "All Eat Fish and Chips!"
First person to post the 10,000th reply to a thread on these forums.
International Geese Brigade - Celebrating 0 Radiation and 3rd Place!
info to be added
stuff to be added
This nation partially represents my political, social and economic views.

User avatar
An Alan Smithee Nation
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7623
Founded: Apr 18, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby An Alan Smithee Nation » Tue May 15, 2018 12:15 am

Theresa May has managed to keep her government going longer than I thought it would last. But I suspect that with the Scottish Parliament, the House of Lords, Rees-Mogg and Johnson in her own party, all against her the end is in sight. At some point she is going to have to say "this is my plan support me or I go".
Everything is intertwinkled

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Tue May 15, 2018 12:45 am

Ifreann wrote:
New Emeline wrote:did you just link to a tvtropes page

TVTropes is political analysis worthy of NSG.

Not untrue

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45968
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Tue May 15, 2018 1:06 am

MERIZoC wrote:
Ifreann wrote:TVTropes is political analysis worthy of NSG.

Not untrue


Thought we were more at an urban dictionary sort of level so we thank you for the compliment.
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Tue May 15, 2018 1:29 am

Dumb Ideologies wrote:
MERIZoC wrote:Not untrue


Thought we were more at an urban dictionary sort of level so we thank you for the compliment.

Urban dictionary isn't analysis though, that's just a dictionary.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45968
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Tue May 15, 2018 1:31 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Thought we were more at an urban dictionary sort of level so we thank you for the compliment.

Urban dictionary isn't analysis though, that's just a dictionary.


Are you saying we're analysis? I'm blushing!
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Hurdergaryp
Post Czar
 
Posts: 49239
Founded: Jul 10, 2016
Democratic Socialists

Postby Hurdergaryp » Tue May 15, 2018 5:23 am

Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:Urban dictionary isn't analysis though, that's just a dictionary.

Are you saying we're analysis? I'm blushing!

Not exactly uncommon for you, given how you tend to find many things overly lewd.


“Everything under heaven is in utter chaos; the situation is excellent.”
Mao Zedong

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163856
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Tue May 15, 2018 5:24 am

Dumb Ideologies wrote:
MERIZoC wrote:Not untrue


Thought we were more at an urban dictionary sort of level so we thank you for the compliment.

It's taken years of hard work, but we're moving up in the world.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Hurdergaryp
Post Czar
 
Posts: 49239
Founded: Jul 10, 2016
Democratic Socialists

Postby Hurdergaryp » Tue May 15, 2018 5:27 am

Ifreann wrote:
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Thought we were more at an urban dictionary sort of level so we thank you for the compliment.

It's taken years of hard work, but we're moving up in the world.

Finally, respect, affluence and everything!


“Everything under heaven is in utter chaos; the situation is excellent.”
Mao Zedong

User avatar
Juristonia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6435
Founded: Oct 30, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Juristonia » Tue May 15, 2018 5:29 am

An Alan Smithee Nation wrote:Theresa May has managed to keep her government going longer than I thought it would last. But I suspect that with the Scottish Parliament, the House of Lords, Rees-Mogg and Johnson in her own party, all against her the end is in sight. At some point she is going to have to say "this is my plan support me or I go".

At this point, I'm pretty sure May's only still there so they'll have someone to blame when things go tits up.
From the river to the sea

Liriena wrote:Say what you will about fascists: they are remarkably consistent even after several decades of failing spectacularly elsewhere.

Ifreann wrote:Indeed, as far as I can recall only one poster has ever supported legalising bestiality, and he was fucking his cat and isn't welcome here any more, in no small part, I imagine, because he kept going on about how he was fucking his cat.

Cannot think of a name wrote:Anyway, I'm from gold country, we grow up knowing that when people jump up and down shouting "GOLD GOLD GOLD" the gold is gone and the only money to be made is in selling shovels.

And it seems to me that cryptocurrency and NFTs and such suddenly have a whooooole lot of shovel salespeople.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Cyptopir, Emotional Support Crocodile, General TN, Hypron, Ifreann, Ineva, Kreushia, Mergold-Aurlia, Nanatsu no Tsuki, Thermodolia, Tungstan, Valentine Z, Wisteria and Surrounding Territories

Advertisement

Remove ads