Which is never going to happen because your Saudi friends are fucking cooperating with Tel Aviv
Advertisement
by Alsheb » Sun Nov 19, 2017 1:11 pm
by Alsheb » Sun Nov 19, 2017 1:14 pm
Shurjah wrote:Pilarcraft wrote:well, of the majority of the Persian Supremacist Parties, the following are also anti-islam: Pan-Iranist Party, Nation Party of Iran, National Front, and SUMKA.
there are no other major Persian Supremacist factions either lmao.
I know this but the Shiia religion/sect is a Persian supramacist movement
by Alsheb » Sun Nov 19, 2017 1:16 pm
by Shurjah » Sun Nov 19, 2017 3:39 pm
Alsheb wrote:Shurjah wrote:I know this but the Shiia religion/sect is a Persian supramacist movement
For the first milennium of its existance, Shia Islam was a majority Arab religion.
Do you even think before you type anything? Do you honestly believe Imams Ali, Hassan and Husayn to have been "Persian supremacists"?
by Shurjah » Sun Nov 19, 2017 3:40 pm
Alsheb wrote:Pilarcraft wrote:Hi yeah.
To most people inside Iran (and this number is increasing) Khomeini was a thousand times worse than Shah on his worst day lmao.
Nonsense. Under the Shah, the country was nothing but a poverty-ridden brothel of the West. To deny the advances in basically every aspect of human development made after the Revolution is ridiculous.
by Shurjah » Sun Nov 19, 2017 3:44 pm
by Qandaristania » Sun Nov 19, 2017 4:40 pm
Audioslavia wrote:Recognising 'ISIS or WASWAS' as a great title, but merged with this thread all the same.
Soomaaliya: 3 men executed earlier today for treason
I am: Pro: Palestine, Somaliland, Ba'athism (Iraqi), IRA, Rohingya Neutral: FSA, Somalia, Anti: Israel, Daesh, Ba'athism (Syrian), Iran, Saudi Arabia, | PROUD DRISELBIAN! ☪ Proud member of The International Islamic Coalition ☪ - Ittihad ☝ Tawheed ☝ Jihad! ☪ This nation is a Member of the Council of Islamic Cooperation! |
by Qandaristania » Sun Nov 19, 2017 4:42 pm
Soomaaliya: 3 men executed earlier today for treason
I am: Pro: Palestine, Somaliland, Ba'athism (Iraqi), IRA, Rohingya Neutral: FSA, Somalia, Anti: Israel, Daesh, Ba'athism (Syrian), Iran, Saudi Arabia, | PROUD DRISELBIAN! ☪ Proud member of The International Islamic Coalition ☪ - Ittihad ☝ Tawheed ☝ Jihad! ☪ This nation is a Member of the Council of Islamic Cooperation! |
by Shurjah » Sun Nov 19, 2017 6:26 pm
Qandaristania wrote:Shurjah wrote:I have never been to KSA I do not like the royal family and I have nothing to do with them I just will not condemn them for their retirbution on Huthiyun
With all due respect brother instead of bombing Houthi targets KSA is bombing hospitals and schools in the country and an Emirati naval blockade has led to milions of Yemenis starving.
by Durin VII » Sun Nov 19, 2017 6:42 pm
by Pilarcraft » Sun Nov 19, 2017 9:58 pm
Alsheb wrote:Pilarcraft wrote:Hi yeah.
To most people inside Iran (and this number is increasing) Khomeini was a thousand times worse than Shah on his worst day lmao.
Nonsense. Under the Shah, the country was nothing but a poverty-ridden brothel of the West. To deny the advances in basically every aspect of human development made after the Revolution is ridiculous.
B.P.D.: Dossier on parallel home-worlds released, will be updated regularly to include more encountered in the Convergence.
by United Islamic Commonwealth » Sun Nov 19, 2017 10:02 pm
Pilarcraft wrote:Alsheb wrote:
Nonsense. Under the Shah, the country was nothing but a poverty-ridden brothel of the West. To deny the advances in basically every aspect of human development made after the Revolution is ridiculous.
First off, Technically speaking that is bullshit. Iran's economy and HDI have both fell after the revolution. the majority of that was because there was a war, an extensive terror campaign, and poor infrastructure after shah left, but after the war ended (and Khomeini Died), when Iran started becoming a little liberal under Khatami, Iran started returning to a state almost as good as before Khomeini.
So no. The Revolution did not, in fact, have any good result for us Iranians.
Of course, Shah himself sucked as a ruler, but it was neither poverty-ridden nor a brothel (at least, until the last couple of years)
by Herador » Sun Nov 19, 2017 10:31 pm
United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:Pilarcraft wrote:First off, Technically speaking that is bullshit. Iran's economy and HDI have both fell after the revolution. the majority of that was because there was a war, an extensive terror campaign, and poor infrastructure after shah left, but after the war ended (and Khomeini Died), when Iran started becoming a little liberal under Khatami, Iran started returning to a state almost as good as before Khomeini.
So no. The Revolution did not, in fact, have any good result for us Iranians.
Of course, Shah himself sucked as a ruler, but it was neither poverty-ridden nor a brothel (at least, until the last couple of years)
Well, for example, there is the literacy rate of post-revolution Iran compared to it under the Shah.
by Pilarcraft » Sun Nov 19, 2017 11:20 pm
B.P.D.: Dossier on parallel home-worlds released, will be updated regularly to include more encountered in the Convergence.
by Pilarcraft » Sun Nov 19, 2017 11:27 pm
B.P.D.: Dossier on parallel home-worlds released, will be updated regularly to include more encountered in the Convergence.
by Socialista Mozambique » Mon Nov 20, 2017 12:27 am
Durin VII wrote:Can somebody possibly explain to me why Saudi-Arabia is so terrible at the geopolitical game? I mean, sure they lost Iraq, failed miserably in Syria and aren't exactly booking much progress in Yemen; But why on earth are they willingly pushing nations (Qatar & Lebanon) into Iranian hands?
Personally I don't have a problem with that at all as I favour Iran a thousand times over Saudi-Arabia, but I just don't understand. Is there something I'm missing or are they really this stupid?
by Pilarcraft » Mon Nov 20, 2017 12:36 am
Socialista Mozambique wrote:Durin VII wrote:Can somebody possibly explain to me why Saudi-Arabia is so terrible at the geopolitical game? I mean, sure they lost Iraq, failed miserably in Syria and aren't exactly booking much progress in Yemen; But why on earth are they willingly pushing nations (Qatar & Lebanon) into Iranian hands?
Personally I don't have a problem with that at all as I favour Iran a thousand times over Saudi-Arabia, but I just don't understand. Is there something I'm missing or are they really this stupid?
That's actually a pretty good question. Their failure to exert meaningful influence in the Middle East does raise the question why they even bother. I guess when you have the US for an ally you can lose a lot before getting worked about it, and being a premier oil site allows for some leeway.
B.P.D.: Dossier on parallel home-worlds released, will be updated regularly to include more encountered in the Convergence.
by Socialista Mozambique » Mon Nov 20, 2017 12:39 am
Pilarcraft wrote:to be fair it's just the KSA's attempts at staying relevant, more than anything.
at least, in my opinoin.
by Alsheb » Mon Nov 20, 2017 1:09 am
by Durin VII » Mon Nov 20, 2017 3:29 am
Socialista Mozambique wrote:Durin VII wrote:Can somebody possibly explain to me why Saudi-Arabia is so terrible at the geopolitical game? I mean, sure they lost Iraq, failed miserably in Syria and aren't exactly booking much progress in Yemen; But why on earth are they willingly pushing nations (Qatar & Lebanon) into Iranian hands?
Personally I don't have a problem with that at all as I favour Iran a thousand times over Saudi-Arabia, but I just don't understand. Is there something I'm missing or are they really this stupid?
That's actually a pretty good question. Their failure to exert meaningful influence in the Middle East does raise the question why they even bother. I guess when you have the US for an ally you can lose a lot before getting worked about it, and being a premier oil site allows for some leeway.
by Socialista Mozambique » Mon Nov 20, 2017 3:46 am
Durin VII wrote:True. Something got me thinking while I was at it, was Saudi-Arabia ever good at this game? So far I can generally only think of them just throwing money at everything, just bribing nations to their will. The only meaningful exception would be the oil boycott they did along with OPEC back in the day when they still hated Israel.
by Pilarcraft » Mon Nov 20, 2017 3:49 am
Socialista Mozambique wrote:Durin VII wrote:True. Something got me thinking while I was at it, was Saudi-Arabia ever good at this game? So far I can generally only think of them just throwing money at everything, just bribing nations to their will. The only meaningful exception would be the oil boycott they did along with OPEC back in the day when they still hated Israel.
Saudi Arabia did fund Egypt to help rebuild their military after the Six-Day War, and I wouldn't be surprised if Saudi Arabia supported Iraq in the Iraq-Iran War.
B.P.D.: Dossier on parallel home-worlds released, will be updated regularly to include more encountered in the Convergence.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Corporate Collective Salvation, Google [Bot], Hidrandia, Neu California, Repreteop, Tarsonis, The Black Forrest, ThE VoOrIaPeN DiScOrD, Valrifall
Advertisement