NATION

PASSWORD

Middle East Conflict Megathread (Syria, Iraq, Yemen, etc)

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

What faction(s) do you support in the Syrian civil war? Check any that apply

Syrian government/SAA
98
18%
Syrian Democratic Forces/YPG
124
22%
Tahrir al-Sham (Nusra)
10
2%
Ahrar al-Sham/other opposition
14
3%
Turkey/TFSA
20
4%
ISIS
17
3%
Hezbollah
40
7%
Russia
55
10%
United States/NATO/Israel
130
23%
Iran
49
9%
 
Total votes : 557

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Middle East Conflict Megathread (Syria, Iraq, Yemen, etc)

Postby MERIZoC » Sun Jun 25, 2017 10:00 pm

Image

Red is the government
Green is the Syrian Opposition
Black is ISIS
Yellow is the SDF/Kurds
White is Tahrir al-Sham and other AQ affiliates


It's been a while since we've had anything like this, and given all the events that have been in the news recently, it's probably a good time to make a catch-all discussion thread.


Channel Discord server: https://discord.gg/zhvd7mr

Use this megathread as a place to discuss the number of conflicts and diplomatic incidents going on in the Middle East, from the wars in Iraq, Syria, and Yemen, to the current feud between Saudi Arabia and Qatar, to the question of the Kurds, and much more. The OP is a bit barebones right now, but I'd like to add some helpful resources to it, so if anyone has any recommendations, feel free to TG me or post in the thread I guess.

For now, some current updates.

Qatar and Saudi Arabia:

I know there's already a thread on this, but it's probably reasonable to include discussion of this incident here too, and how it relates to wider MENA issues.

Earlier today, the United States indicated it might not be so enthusiastic about the demands the Saudis have leveled on Qatar.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-40399770
Some demands set by four Arab states on Qatar in return for lifting sanctions will be "difficult to meet", US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson says.
However, Mr Tillerson said the proposals provided a basis for dialogue leading to a solution of the crisis.
On Saturday, Qatar's foreign minister rejected the list of 13 conditions imposed by Saudi Arabia and its allies, Egypt, the UAE and Bahrain.
......
Mr Tillerson said Qatar was assessing the demands and stressed there were "significant areas which provide a basis for ongoing dialogue leading to resolution".
He urged the countries to sit together to stop terrorism and counter extremism.
"A lowering of rhetoric would also help ease the tension," Mr Tillerson said.
After the demands were made on Friday, White House spokesman Sean Spicer said the dispute was "a family issue" that the countries should work out together.

This is a bit different from the rhetoric President Trump has been spewing in the past few days, and the disconnect can't be making anyone happy.

Yemen:
Often left ignored by American media, Yemen is in the midst of a civil war and humanitarian conflict even greater than that in Syria. Saudi Arabia has been waging a brutal war against rebels in the country that has left the Middle East's poorest nation in ruins. The country is now facing a massive cholera outbreak, and most of the population is facing a famine, largely due to a Saudi blockade on the country.

A few days ago, a story broke about UAE torture facilities that have been set up in the country.
https://apnews.com/4925f7f0fa654853bd6f2f57174179fe/US-interrogates-detainees-in-Yemen-prisons-rife-with-torture?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP
MUKALLA, Yemen (AP) — Hundreds of men swept up in the hunt for al-Qaida militants have disappeared into a secret network of prisons in southern Yemen where abuse is routine and torture extreme — including the “grill,” in which the victim is tied to a spit like a roast and spun in a circle of fire, an Associated Press investigation has found.

Senior American defense officials acknowledged Wednesday that U.S. forces have been involved in interrogations of detainees in Yemen but denied any participation in or knowledge of human rights abuses. Interrogating detainees who have been abused could violate international law, which prohibits complicity in torture.

The AP documented at least 18 clandestine lockups across southern Yemen run by the United Arab Emirates or by Yemeni forces created and trained by the Gulf nation, drawing on accounts from former detainees, families of prisoners, civil rights lawyers and Yemeni military officials. All are either hidden or off limits to Yemen’s government, which has been getting Emirati help in its civil war with rebels over the last two years.

The secret prisons are inside military bases, ports, an airport, private villas and even a nightclub. Some detainees have been flown to an Emirati base across the Red Sea in Eritrea, according to Yemen Interior Minister Hussein Arab and others.

Several U.S. defense officials, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss the topic, told AP that American forces do participate in interrogations of detainees at locations in Yemen, provide questions for others to ask, and receive transcripts of interrogations from Emirati allies. They said U.S. senior military leaders were aware of allegations of torture at the prisons in Yemen, looked into them, but were satisfied that there had not been any abuse when U.S. forces were present.

“We always adhere to the highest standards of personal and professional conduct,” said chief Defense Department spokeswoman Dana White when presented with AP’s findings. “We would not turn a blind eye, because we are obligated to report any violations of human rights.”

In a statement to the AP, the UAE’s government denied the allegations.

“There are no secret detention centers and no torture of prisoners is done during interrogations.”

Inside war-torn Yemen, however, lawyers and families say nearly 2,000 men have disappeared into the clandestine prisons, a number so high that it has triggered near-weekly protests among families seeking information about missing sons, brothers and fathers.

Needless to say, this is pretty horrific, even for the UAE.

Syria:

Finally there's some new information that's been revealed about the alleged chemical attack by the Assad government back in early April that led to US missile strikes on a Syrian air base. As it turns out, there's not any evidence to support the assertions that the government used chemical weapons at all, as Sy Hersh reports in a new piece published earlier today in Die Welt.
https://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/article165905578/Trump-s-Red-Line.html

When we get a hot tip about a command and control facility,” the adviser added, referring to the target in Khan Sheikhoun, “we do what we can to help them act on it." “This was not a chemical weapons strike,” the adviser said. “That’s a fairy tale. If so, everyone involved in transferring, loading and arming the weapon – you’ve got to make it appear like a regular 500-pound conventional bomb – would be wearing Hazmat protective clothing in case of a leak. There would be very little chance of survival without such gear. Military grade sarin includes additives designed to increase toxicity and lethality. Every batch that comes out is maximized for death. That is why it is made. It is odorless and invisible and death can come within a minute. No cloud. Why produce a weapon that people can run away from?”
......
MSF also visited other hospitals that had received victims and found that patients there “smelled of bleach, suggesting that they had been exposed to chlorine.” In other words, evidence suggested that there was more than one chemical responsible for the symptoms observed, which would not have been the case if the Syrian Air Force – as opposition activists insisted – had dropped a sarin bomb, which has no percussive or ignition power to trigger secondary explosions. The range of symptoms is, however, consistent with the release of a mixture of chemicals, including chlorine and the organophosphates used in many fertilizers, which can cause neurotoxic effects similar to those of sarin.

The internet swung into action within hours, and gruesome photographs of the victims flooded television networks and YouTube. U.S. intelligence was tasked with establishing what had happened. Among the pieces of information received was an intercept of Syrian communications collected before the attack by an allied nation. The intercept, which had a particularly strong effect on some of Trump’s aides, did not mention nerve gas or sarin, but it did quote a Syrian general discussing a “special” weapon and the need for a highly skilled pilot to man the attack plane. The reference, as those in the American intelligence community understood, and many of the inexperienced aides and family members close to Trump may not have, was to a Russian-supplied bomb with its built-in guidance system. “If you’ve already decided it was a gas attack, you will then inevitably read the talk about a special weapon as involving a sarin bomb,” the adviser said. “Did the Syrians plan the attack on Khan Sheikhoun? Absolutely. Do we have intercepts to prove it? Absolutely. Did they plan to use sarin? No. But the president did not say: ‘We have a problem and let’s look into it.’ He wanted to bomb the shit out of Syria.”

I for one, am amazed that the government and media would report a lie to us as an excuse to attack a Middle Eastern country, but here you have it.

Use this thread to share your thoughts and news stories regarding the various conflicts in the region. I'll be posting updates as regularly as I can, and I'll try to let the OP reflect some of the more important ones. As I said before, any recommendations for the OP are welcome.
Last edited by MERIZoC on Wed Jul 11, 2018 9:12 pm, edited 6 times in total.

User avatar
The East Marches II
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18033
Founded: Mar 11, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The East Marches II » Sun Jun 25, 2017 10:34 pm

First for supporting Al-Douri in Iraq.

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19902
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Fierro » Sun Jun 25, 2017 11:44 pm

MERIZoC wrote:I for one, am amazed that the government and media would report a lie to us as an excuse to attack a Middle Eastern country, but here you have it.


The United States lied about the Gulf of Tonkin incident to escalate their presence in Vietnam. However I'm erring towards generally believing that there was some government involvement because they have already set a precedent in the use of chemical weapons, they have the knowledge and the technical capabilities and their explanation is largely bunk. Which it would be, because they have to come up with something, even if it makes no sense.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
Zarnazia
Secretary
 
Posts: 39
Founded: Mar 31, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Zarnazia » Mon Jun 26, 2017 12:27 am

Costa Fierro wrote:
MERIZoC wrote:I for one, am amazed that the government and media would report a lie to us as an excuse to attack a Middle Eastern country, but here you have it.


The United States lied about the Gulf of Tonkin incident to escalate their presence in Vietnam. However I'm erring towards generally believing that there was some government involvement because they have already set a precedent in the use of chemical weapons, they have the knowledge and the technical capabilities and their explanation is largely bunk. Which it would be, because they have to come up with something, even if it makes no sense.

Yet the syrian government declared a few years back that they would be dismantling their chemical weapon arsenal, not to mention that IS and the FSA are very well known for using chemical weapons, not just in war but for terrorism, I have no doubt that this was done by either IS or the FSA and was made to look like the syrian government did this in an effort to increase the US military presence in syria and to begin firing missiles, is the US prepping for an invasion? It is possible, but I will not jump to conclusions for now.
Pro: Right-wing, Fascism, Nationalism, National Socialism, Paleoconservatism, Christianity,

Anti: Left-wing, Libertarianism, Communism, Socialism, Islam, Globalism, Capitalism,

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19902
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Fierro » Mon Jun 26, 2017 1:30 am

Zarnazia wrote:Yet the syrian government declared a few years back that they would be dismantling their chemical weapon arsenal, not to mention that IS and the FSA are very well known for using chemical weapons, not just in war but for terrorism, I have no doubt that this was done by either IS or the FSA and was made to look like the syrian government did this in an effort to increase the US military presence in syria and to begin firing missiles, is the US prepping for an invasion? It is possible, but I will not jump to conclusions for now.


The Syrian government could have easily hidden a small amount of chemical weapons ingredients in different parts of the country and kept them away from prying eyes, only handing over weapons ingredients and precursors that weren't useful to the regime or past their use by date.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Mon Jun 26, 2017 8:14 pm

https://www.buzzfeed.com/claudiakoerner/white-house-says-syria-may-be-preparing-another-chemical?utm_term=.vcNDEwkMg#.oxMpmRNvo

White House releases a statement saying Syria is planning another chemical weapons attack, to which CENTCOM replies "what?"

User avatar
The Sauganash Union
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1154
Founded: Mar 08, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The Sauganash Union » Mon Jun 26, 2017 8:24 pm

It's a tough pill to swallow, but Assad is really the best of a shitload of bad options here.

His victory is the best result for Syria. We already learned from Dubya that we can't build a democracy in these countries just because we tell them to.
A nation founded in the early 1800s by Federalist immigrants from the United States. Has since developed an identity of its own and imperial ambitions. Now a neoliberal imperial power that justifies its aggression by putting it the name of tolerance and social justice.


Handshakes and tie knots. I don't have time for someone who can't master these simple things.

User avatar
Greater Istanistan
Senator
 
Posts: 4978
Founded: May 15, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Greater Istanistan » Mon Jun 26, 2017 9:19 pm

The Sauganash Union wrote:It's a tough pill to swallow, but Assad is really the best of a shitload of bad options here.

His victory is the best result for Syria. We already learned from Dubya that we can't build a democracy in these countries just because we tell them to.


Not only that, but I'd posit a direct correlation between Western involvement and successful democracies. They didn't touch Tunisia and it turned out pretty hot, but on the other hand we know how well Libya "democratized" and Qatar's Arab Spring was crushed with American-supplied guns. There are other factors too, of course, but in general telling people to be democratic has the opposite effect.
ASK ME ABOUT HARUHIISM

DYNASTIES ARE THEFT/IMPEACH REINHARD/YANG WENLI 2020

"I am not a champion of lost causes, but of causes not yet won." - Norman Thomas

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19902
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Fierro » Tue Jun 27, 2017 12:51 am

Greater Istanistan wrote:Not only that, but I'd posit a direct correlation between Western involvement and successful democracies. They didn't touch Tunisia and it turned out pretty hot, but on the other hand we know how well Libya "democratized" and Qatar's Arab Spring was crushed with American-supplied guns. There are other factors too, of course, but in general telling people to be democratic has the opposite effect.


Tunisia is also one of the most liberal states in the Arab world, so it wasn't going to turn to complete crap as soon as the leader was removed.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
I didnt vote for Trump
Envoy
 
Posts: 240
Founded: Nov 11, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby I didnt vote for Trump » Tue Jun 27, 2017 4:56 am

Is it possible to have a discussion about US over-involvement in Syria (put diplomatically) without taking away from the fact that Assad is a genocidal lunatic with no credibility, and is actually responsible for starting all of these conflicts?

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19902
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Fierro » Tue Jun 27, 2017 5:25 am

I didnt vote for Trump wrote:Is it possible to have a discussion about US over-involvement in Syria (put diplomatically) without taking away from the fact that Assad is a genocidal lunatic with no credibility, and is actually responsible for starting all of these conflicts?


Is he genocidal? Not really, although he has the dubious honour of having his country plunge itself into civil war when the people rebelled (again), although his father had the benefit of no social media. Is he responsible for all the conflicts in the Middle East? Only the one in Syria.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
Uxupox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Nov 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Uxupox » Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:01 am

Costa Fierro wrote:
I didnt vote for Trump wrote:Is it possible to have a discussion about US over-involvement in Syria (put diplomatically) without taking away from the fact that Assad is a genocidal lunatic with no credibility, and is actually responsible for starting all of these conflicts?


Is he genocidal? Not really, although he has the dubious honour of having his country plunge itself into civil war when the people rebelled (again), although his father had the benefit of no social media. Is he responsible for all the conflicts in the Middle East? Only the one in Syria.


He is also to be blamed for spilling the violence into the Northern regions of Iraq.
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00

User avatar
Rangila
Diplomat
 
Posts: 523
Founded: Oct 20, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Rangila » Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:04 am

Assad is the legitimate President of Syria

Iraq needs to just continue fighting against ISIS and other terrorist groups

Yemen would be better under the Houthis
British Authoritarianist

Pro: British Nationalism, Non-interventionism, authoritarianism, Russia, Syrian Arab Republic, Houthis, Novorossiya, Nashi, Gun control
Neutral: Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraqi Government, PR of China, DPRK, Gaddafi/Green Resistance, National Communism
Anti: USA, Israel, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, UK Government, UK Labour Party, Liberalism, Fascism, NATO, EU

User avatar
Improved werpland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1109
Founded: May 02, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Improved werpland » Tue Jun 27, 2017 8:28 am

What is it about the Houthis that make them so attractive to certain people on the Internet?

User avatar
Cuprum
Senator
 
Posts: 3664
Founded: Jun 21, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Cuprum » Tue Jun 27, 2017 8:40 am

Once Kurdistan is independent... That region will have some peace for a couple of years until a new ISIS appears.

User avatar
Mongeley
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 200
Founded: Apr 30, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Mongeley » Tue Jun 27, 2017 8:44 am

Let's go Rojava! :bow:
Political compass: X = -10.0, Y = -6.92 (My path.)
Xenofeminist: Read the manifesto

User avatar
Wanderjar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1895
Founded: Feb 17, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Wanderjar » Tue Jun 27, 2017 8:49 am

The Sauganash Union wrote:It's a tough pill to swallow, but Assad is really the best of a shitload of bad options here.

His victory is the best result for Syria. We already learned from Dubya that we can't build a democracy in these countries just because we tell them to.


As much as I hate to admit it, you're correct. All of the Syrians I know and have interviewed (I was until relatively recently working for a think tank as a Middle East/North Africa SME) have said that the days of the idealistic and objectively good FSA fighters are long, long gone. The good ones have all died. Now, they're either opportunistic criminals, mercenaries with ambiguous intentions in their own right, or less extreme Islamists than ISIS or Jabhat al-Nousra. Allowing Assad to remain in power is the less dangerous option long term as the resultant instability from an FSA win would inevitably allow the Salafists to increasingly gain control, even if they wear a different cloak, so to speak, than ISIS. Edit: It also doesn't change the tenuous balance of power of the region, and the absolute blood letting that the SAA and Hezbollah have suffered there will mean that Iran won't achieve relative gains in influence to Saudi Arabia, keeping the region in check a bit longer.
Last edited by Wanderjar on Tue Jun 27, 2017 8:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
MT
The Dual Habsburg Kingdom and Afrikaner Free State of Wanderjar

King Kristian von Habsburg
State President Michael Blair
Prime Minister Jan van Hoyek
Economic Left/Right: 9.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.59
"And I will execute great vengeance upon them with furious rebukes; and they shall know that I am the LORD, when I shall lay my wrath upon them." Ezekiel 25:17

FT
Loyal World of the Imperium of Man

User avatar
Wanderjar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1895
Founded: Feb 17, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Wanderjar » Tue Jun 27, 2017 8:53 am

Cuprum wrote:Once Kurdistan is independent... That region will have some peace for a couple of years until a new ISIS appears.


Unlikely to ever happen. Even if they do, all that'll happen is that Iraq, Turkey and Iran will immediately invade it and return it to the status quo. A truly independent Kurdistan is an impossibility. As much as I like and respect the Kurds, never met a Kurdish person who wasn't gracious and just a superb person, they're not strong enough to beat Iraq right now, much less Turkey and especially not Iran.

I didnt vote for Trump wrote:Is it possible to have a discussion about US over-involvement in Syria (put diplomatically) without taking away from the fact that Assad is a genocidal lunatic with no credibility, and is actually responsible for starting all of these conflicts?


That's actually not accurate. Assad is neither genocidal, nor a lunatic. Nor, additionally, did he start this civil war. He very eagerly tried to liberalize Syria back in 2002 until the military and mukhabarat put their foot down and didn't allow it to happen. This shows me that Assad has no real control over Syria but is allowed to persist as such as a figure head. Most countries in the Middle East are like that, best described as Praetorian states where the military wields the true influence, but often times in an indirect way. As long as the military gets what it wants, ie every year its funding increases, is allowed to be a primary stakeholder in the economy for profit (Egypt being the most egregious about this with controlling somewhere around 40% of GDP) and doesn't lose its privileged position as the "defender of the nation's honor", they'll more or less allow the civilian executive to do as it likes until they cross certain boundaries. When that happens, the military either thoroughly discourages that government position by threat orovertly by coup. Syria is far from an exception to this, in general, though they are much more nuanced about it than Egypt or other states. EDIT: UAE, Qatar and Bahrain are the exceptions. They and other rentier states buy off their population and military by frequent hardware purchases through vast oil profits, but also these three avoid the problem of a nationalistic military altogether by largely staffing it with mercenaries from Pakistan and Bangladesh. UAE also hires large numbers of Western mercenaries too, the head of their Royal Guard is in fact a former Australian general, for example. Just bringing that up to understand that though the previously mentioned is a general rule for the study of civil-military relations in the Middle East and North Africa, not all countries fall into that practice.
Last edited by Wanderjar on Tue Jun 27, 2017 9:08 am, edited 2 times in total.
MT
The Dual Habsburg Kingdom and Afrikaner Free State of Wanderjar

King Kristian von Habsburg
State President Michael Blair
Prime Minister Jan van Hoyek
Economic Left/Right: 9.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.59
"And I will execute great vengeance upon them with furious rebukes; and they shall know that I am the LORD, when I shall lay my wrath upon them." Ezekiel 25:17

FT
Loyal World of the Imperium of Man

User avatar
The Empire of Pretantia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39273
Founded: Oct 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Empire of Pretantia » Tue Jun 27, 2017 9:15 am

We need a new Middle East.
ywn be as good as this video
Gacha
Trashing other people's waifus
Anti-NN
EA
Douche flutes
Zimbabwe
Putting the toilet paper roll the wrong way
Every single square inch of Asia
Lewding Earth-chan
Pollution
4Chan in all its glory and all its horror
Playing the little Switch controller handheld thing in public
Treading on me
Socialism, Communism, Anarchism, and all their cousins and sisters and brothers and wife's sons
Alternate Universe 40K
Nightcore
Comcast
Zimbabwe
Believing the Ottomans were the third Roman Empire
Parodies of the Gadsden flag
The Fate Series
US politics

User avatar
Cuprum
Senator
 
Posts: 3664
Founded: Jun 21, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Cuprum » Tue Jun 27, 2017 9:17 am

Wanderjar wrote:
Unlikely to ever happen. Even if they do, all that'll happen is that Iraq, Turkey and Iran will immediately invade it and return it to the status quo. A truly independent Kurdistan is an impossibility. As much as I like and respect the Kurds, never met a Kurdish person who wasn't gracious and just a superb person, they're not strong enough to beat Iraq right now, much less Turkey and especially not Iran.



You are underestimating the Peshmerga (They are more efficient than the Syrian and Iraqi army and they have increased their territories in Iraq and Syria), who have being fighting since the dawn of the days and they are more reliable than Turkey since they are secular and pseudo socialist. Kurdistan will be a new buffer state between Syria, Turkey, Iran and Russian ambitions, a new Kosovo basically.

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Tue Jun 27, 2017 8:26 pm

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/tillerson-and-mattis-cleaning-up-kushners-middle-east-mess/

Turns out Tillerson was pretty pissed at being contradicted by Trump (can't imagine why), and he's offering some explanation as to why it happened. Looks like Otaiba (UAE ambassador, real scumbag) has been leaning hard on Kushner, who in turn has been pressuring Trump. There's absolutely no way a wealthy man-child and the Beltway's foremost millennial Arab sociopath running America's foreign policy could end poorly, right?

User avatar
Sovaal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13695
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Sovaal » Tue Jun 27, 2017 8:29 pm

The Empire of Pretantia wrote:We need a new Middle East.

With hookers! And blackjack! You know what, forget the Middle East part!
Most of the time I have no idea what the hell I'm doing or talking about.

”Many forms of government have been tried and will be tried in this world of sin and woe.
No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is
the worst form of government, except for all the others that have been tried from time to time." -
Winston Churchill, 1947.

"Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon – so long as there is no answer to it – gives claws to the weak.” - George Orwell

User avatar
The East Marches II
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18033
Founded: Mar 11, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The East Marches II » Tue Jun 27, 2017 8:33 pm

MERIZoC wrote:http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/tillerson-and-mattis-cleaning-up-kushners-middle-east-mess/

Turns out Tillerson was pretty pissed at being contradicted by Trump (can't imagine why), and he's offering some explanation as to why it happened. Looks like Otaiba (UAE ambassador, real scumbag) has been leaning hard on Kushner, who in turn has been pressuring Trump. There's absolutely no way a wealthy man-child and the Beltway's foremost millennial Arab sociopath running America's foreign policy could end poorly, right?


The question is now that they are committed, will they send in troops? The Turks, Iranians and Russians being an alliance is a meme, I disagree with the article, merely associates of convenience for the time.

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19902
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Fierro » Tue Jun 27, 2017 9:26 pm

Improved Werpland wrote:What is it about the Houthis that make them so attractive to certain people on the Internet?


They're fighting the Saudis. That's it.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
Uxupox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Nov 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Uxupox » Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:13 am

Costa Fierro wrote:
Improved Werpland wrote:What is it about the Houthis that make them so attractive to certain people on the Internet?


They're fighting the Saudis. That's it.


At least with the Saudi's you can claim to duress in a court under the Houthi you dead either way.
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cretie, Cyptopir, Dumb Ideologies, Eahland, Haereon, Hidrandia, Italyoo, Kinqueven, The Vooperian Union, Valles Marineris Mining co, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads