NationStates

Lady Scylla wrote:

The Empire of Pretantia wrote:If that were 100% true the president wouldn't have so much trouble trying to get rid of Obamacare.

This sentence doesn't make any sense with your earlier comment. Can we be coherent, please?

Wait, sorry I misunderstood what Soldati was saying. Lemme try again.

Soldati Senza Confini wrote:

The Empire of Pretantia wrote:So she wouldn't pass legislation.

I didn't know the president drafts and executes legislation all on their own.

That's some new government 101 shit I had no idea about.

A law must be signed by the president. Trump with a democratic congress wouldn't approve many of the bills that come his way.

United Muscovite Nations wrote:

Lady Scylla wrote:
You'll forgive me for having no sympathy of Gaddafi's death.

Then you should have sympathy for his country, which is currently entering the sixth year of civil war and has had, by some estimates, a third of the population fleeing.

The NATO intervention destroyed Libya; none of the people who promoted it should ever be forgiven.

I do like emotion and all that, but he was going down eventually, regardless. This isn't even the first time we've intervened in the country.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1986_Unit ... g_of_Libya

Let's also not act like Libya was some magical place before the intervention, or have we conveniently, and almost ironically, forgotten the Arab Spring? Y'know, the precursor to this. Libya is war torn, but so is the rest of the Middle East, I'm not going to shed tears over some twat's death.

United Muscovite Nations wrote:

New haven america wrote:Trump said he didn't want to start war with Syria.

Now he's considering starting war with Syria.

And yet you don't see a problem with that?

I do see a problem with it; that's why I don't support him.

But we didn't know that during the election.

And yet Hillary was the one who was gonna start WWIII, yeah, ok.

I totally knew he was gonna backtrack during the election, a lot of people did, that's what he does. Either that, or he was gonna do something stupider and really start WWIII.

United Muscovite Nations wrote:

New haven america wrote:Trump said he didn't want to start war with Syria.

Now he's considering starting war with Syria.

And yet you don't see a problem with that?

I do see a problem with it; that's why I don't support him.

But we didn't know that during the election.

You might not have, we did though, everyone who didn't vote for him told you what would happen, and we were right

The Empire of Pretantia wrote:A law must be signed by the president. Trump with a democratic congress wouldn't approve many of the bills that come his way.

Eh, I don't know about that for sure.

I mean, it's plausible he could have done that the first year, not so sure he'd keep a path of obstructionism for long tho, considering he's already rubber stamping shit and his own party is majority on both houses, even.

Yes Im Biop wrote:

United Muscovite Nations wrote:I do see a problem with it; that's why I don't support him.

But we didn't know that during the election.

You might not have, we did though, everyone who didn't vote for him told you what would happen, and we were right

Yet there's still not a no-fly zone like the Democratic version of Colin Powell running for president suggested. Even knowing that Trump is shit, there's no reason to vote for Hillary. You guys should have ran someone who couldn't equal Trump in being an anti-Arab shill.

New haven america wrote:

United Muscovite Nations wrote:I do see a problem with it; that's why I don't support him.

But we didn't know that during the election.

And yet Hillary was the one who was gonna start WWIII, yeah, ok.

I totally knew he was gonna backtrack during the election, a lot of people did, that's what he does. Either that, or he was gonna do something stupider and really start WWIII.

Hillary was openly advocating for a no-fly zone in Syria. I don't think she would start WWIII, but nobody puts Bashar in a corner.

United Muscovite Nations wrote:

Yes Im Biop wrote:
You might not have, we did though, everyone who didn't vote for him told you what would happen, and we were right

Yet there's still not a no-fly zone like the Democratic version of Colin Powell running for president suggested. Even knowing that Trump is shit, there's no reason to vote for Hillary. You guys should have ran someone who couldn't equal Trump in being an anti-Arab shill.

We tried, then the DNC Cheated. I literally cant wait for trump to start WW3 just to rub it in the soon to be melted faces of trump voters at this point

Yes Im Biop wrote:

United Muscovite Nations wrote:Yet there's still not a no-fly zone like the Democratic version of Colin Powell running for president suggested. Even knowing that Trump is shit, there's no reason to vote for Hillary. You guys should have ran someone who couldn't equal Trump in being an anti-Arab shill.

We tried, then the DNC Cheated. I literally cant wait for trump to start WW3 just to rub it in the soon to be melted faces of trump voters at this point

Who is he going to start WW3 with?

United Muscovite Nations wrote:

Yes Im Biop wrote:
You might not have, we did though, everyone who didn't vote for him told you what would happen, and we were right

Yet there's still not a no-fly zone like the Democratic version of Colin Powell running for president suggested. Even knowing that Trump is shit, there's no reason to vote for Hillary. You guys should have ran someone who couldn't equal Trump in being an anti-Arab shill.

I mean, I agree with this, BUT, that still doesn't mean that the no-fly zone concept isn't being thrown around, and that Trump is soon going to prove you wrong in even that.

Most of what I said during election time how I saw Trump as president is unfolding, so I really wasn't too far off, myself. Things are just going to get worse before they get any better.

Washington Resistance Army wrote:

Yes Im Biop wrote:
We tried, then the DNC Cheated. I literally cant wait for trump to start WW3 just to rub it in the soon to be melted faces of trump voters at this point

Who is he going to start WW3 with?

At this point? His own family probably, amns to stupid to live and yet he has the football.

Washington Resistance Army wrote:Who is he going to start WW3 with?

CHINA

Soldati Senza Confini wrote:

United Muscovite Nations wrote:Yet there's still not a no-fly zone like the Democratic version of Colin Powell running for president suggested. Even knowing that Trump is shit, there's no reason to vote for Hillary. You guys should have ran someone who couldn't equal Trump in being an anti-Arab shill.

I mean, I agree with this, BUT, that still doesn't mean that the no-fly zone concept isn't being thrown around, and that Trump is soon going to prove you wrong in even that.

Most of what I said during election time how I saw Trump as president is unfolding, so I really wasn't too far off, myself. Things are just going to get worse before they get any better.

When that happens, I'll protest, and hope that the SAA and Russians can win; however, I don't think we could have prevented that by voting for Hillary. One can be anti-Hillary and anti-Trump at the same time. Both Trump and Hillary are, for good reason, two of the most hated people in the country.

Conserative Morality wrote:

Washington Resistance Army wrote:Who is he going to start WW3 with?

CHINA GYNA

Fixed that for you.

Ism wrote:

Conserative Morality wrote:CHINA GYNA

Fixed that for you.

Lewd

Vassenor wrote:

United Muscovite Nations wrote:It does mean they have to work for a foreign government.

TIL prosecutors don't work for the government

Crown prosecutor no less.

United Muscovite Nations wrote:

Ism wrote:
Fixed that for you.

Lewd

It's not lewd, it's presidential.

Conserative Morality wrote:

Washington Resistance Army wrote:Who is he going to start WW3 with?

CHINA

Could be worse, tbh. Fighting a bunch of chinesium powered junk doesn't sound all that bad.

Washington Resistance Army wrote:

Conserative Morality wrote:CHINA

Could be worse, tbh. Fighting a bunch of chinesium powered junk doesn't sound all that bad.

Ehh, China has the best anti ship missiles in the world, and the stuff they use is on par with ours, kinda like how soviets used to export junk but kept the goodies to themselves, a war with china would be costly to both sides,

Washington Resistance Army wrote:

Conserative Morality wrote:CHINA

Could be worse, tbh. Fighting a bunch of chinesium powered junk doesn't sound all that bad.

Sounds pretty awful to me.

Yes Im Biop wrote:

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Could be worse, tbh. Fighting a bunch of chinesium powered junk doesn't sound all that bad.

Ehh, China has the best anti ship missiles in the world, and the stuff they use is on par with ours, kinda like how soviets used to export junk but kept the goodies to themselves, a war with china would be costly to both sides,

>China
>best anything in the world

Pick one and only one friendo

United Muscovite Nations wrote:

New haven america wrote:And yet Hillary was the one who was gonna start WWIII, yeah, ok.

I totally knew he was gonna backtrack during the election, a lot of people did, that's what he does. Either that, or he was gonna do something stupider and really start WWIII.

Hillary was openly advocating for a no-fly zone in Syria. I don't think she would start WWIII, but nobody puts Bashar in a corner.

Trump is openly considering making a no-fly zone in Syria.

But he's apparently better for some arbitrary reason.

Washington Resistance Army wrote:

Yes Im Biop wrote:
Ehh, China has the best anti ship missiles in the world, and the stuff they use is on par with ours, kinda like how soviets used to export junk but kept the goodies to themselves, a war with china would be costly to both sides,

>China
>best anything in the world

Pick one and only one friendo

I'll pick both and add in a sinking Nimitz as the opening salvo.

New haven america wrote:

United Muscovite Nations wrote:Hillary was openly advocating for a no-fly zone in Syria. I don't think she would start WWIII, but nobody puts Bashar in a corner.

Trump is openly considering making a no-fly zone in Syria.

But he's apparently better for some arbitrary reason.

If he actually does one, then he will be as bad, because then he will have done what Clinton said she was going to do.

I see a possible loophole with the new emails that have arisen around Mr Trump Jr.

Could the Trump Administration claim that as the there is no such thing as the "Crown Prosecutor of Russia", they technically didn't deal with a foreign government?