Advertisement
by LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Thu Jun 22, 2017 8:12 am
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.
by Internationalist Bastard » Thu Jun 22, 2017 8:15 am
by Ifreann » Thu Jun 22, 2017 8:18 am
Cabra West wrote:Ifreann wrote:Having uniforms can be a convenient way to ensure that all the pupils have sufficiently protective clothing. Obviously it's not much of a concern in our neck of the woods, but I've heard that in Australia the uniforms provide some UV protection, the better to allow the kids to go outside for lunch with less concerns about them all getting skin cancer later in life. Getting everyone to buy a uniform from the school and the school sourcing the right materials is easier than having the teachers check the tags on everyone's t-shirts before letting them go outside.
Heh, the funny thing is I had been wondering if here, they're not actually doing the exact opposite. Everytime I see teenage girls in the short skirts, with no tights but only kneehigh socks on them, in the winter rain here.
I remember talking to one of them once and was told that this particular school didn't allow the girls to wear trousers, and they had to choose between thin tights and the socks, but weren't allowed to wear both. So the choice was between cold legs and cold feet... No boots allowed, either. Just thin-soled shoes.
Frank Zipper wrote:Ifreann wrote:Having uniforms can be a convenient way to ensure that all the pupils have sufficiently protective clothing. Obviously it's not much of a concern in our neck of the woods, but I've heard that in Australia the uniforms provide some UV protection, the better to allow the kids to go outside for lunch with less concerns about them all getting skin cancer later in life. Getting everyone to buy a uniform from the school and the school sourcing the right materials is easier than having the teachers check the tags on everyone's t-shirts before letting them go outside.
I have heard of schools using uniforms as a method of generating income, as a downside to schools controlling where uniforms can be purchased.
by Ifreann » Thu Jun 22, 2017 8:35 am
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Dress codes are often lambasted for being "sexist," even though they're comparing different body parts and different physical symptoms of arousal, with no objective standard of how much of one corresponds to how much of the other.
The only way for a school dress code to reduce distractions without being "sexist" is to make male and female students wear the exact same things.
by LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:11 am
Ifreann wrote:LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Dress codes are often lambasted for being "sexist," even though they're comparing different body parts and different physical symptoms of arousal, with no objective standard of how much of one corresponds to how much of the other.
...what?
Usually when I've seen people complaining about uniform dress codes being sexist it's centred on skirts. Either people don't like that girls are made to wear skirts with no option for trousers, or people don't like that girls get to choose between skirts and trousers and boys get no choice. Other than that I've seen people complain about sexist rules around jewellery or hairstyles.The only way for a school dress code to reduce distractions without being "sexist" is to make male and female students wear the exact same things.
If the dress code rules were the same for all students then that wouldn't be sexist, yes.
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.
by Esternial » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:16 am
by Ifreann » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:18 am
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Ifreann wrote:...what?
Usually when I've seen people complaining about uniform dress codes being sexist it's centred on skirts. Either people don't like that girls are made to wear skirts with no option for trousers, or people don't like that girls get to choose between skirts and trousers and boys get no choice. Other than that I've seen people complain about sexist rules around jewellery or hairstyles.
If the dress code rules were the same for all students then that wouldn't be sexist, yes.
I was referring to the way dress codes in the absence of gender-neutral uniforms are labelled sexist.
by Godular » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:27 am
by Bressen » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:32 am
by The Emerald Legion » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:38 am
by Nulla Bellum » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:48 am
by Ifreann » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:55 am
Bressen wrote:School uniforms are absolutely fine (ensures that everyone on site is actually a student and brings everyone together in an equal sense of community), though in my current college the younger years have a lack of balance between male uniforms and female uniforms. Both sexes are able to wear polo shirts, jumpers, fleeces and trousers, but the girls get the added choice of wearing skirts. We used to have shorts for the boys during the summer, but now they're not allowed.
I don't particularly see this as sexist, however, and none of the boys really seem to care since summer in England rarely warrants shorts.
by Bressen » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:59 am
Ifreann wrote:Bressen wrote:School uniforms are absolutely fine (ensures that everyone on site is actually a student and brings everyone together in an equal sense of community), though in my current college the younger years have a lack of balance between male uniforms and female uniforms. Both sexes are able to wear polo shirts, jumpers, fleeces and trousers, but the girls get the added choice of wearing skirts. We used to have shorts for the boys during the summer, but now they're not allowed.
I don't particularly see this as sexist, however, and none of the boys really seem to care since summer in England rarely warrants shorts.
This summer does.
by Frank Zipper » Thu Jun 22, 2017 10:09 am
by Bressen » Thu Jun 22, 2017 10:10 am
by Giovenith » Thu Jun 22, 2017 10:20 am
by Thermodolia » Thu Jun 22, 2017 10:20 am
by Ifreann » Thu Jun 22, 2017 10:40 am
Giovenith wrote:I think their supposed benefits are wildly exaggerated. Clothes don't magically create less bullying, better grades, and more respect, staff being good at their jobs does. They give a superficial sense of sophistication due to media convincing us that "uniforms = great school," but really, there's nothing uniforms can accomplish that the school system getting its shit together can't (I invoke the ever-popular example of Finland). Personally, I also just think forcing children to all dress the same is gross and invasive of their autonomy (and no, it's not just like having a job uniform - you can choose your job, most kids can't choose their school).
by Engleberg » Thu Jun 22, 2017 12:01 pm
Umbrellya wrote:"You are literally the most unashamed German I've ever met."
Wiena wrote:"Engleberg you surely are the most savage guy in the whole game."
West Leas Oros 2 wrote:Anything Left of Center: *exists*
Engle: FUCKING REDS!
by LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Thu Jun 22, 2017 12:19 pm
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.
by Dread Lady Nathicana » Thu Jun 22, 2017 12:23 pm
by Bressen » Thu Jun 22, 2017 12:26 pm
Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:We all know the real bottom line with uniforms is getting kids to think of themselves as one of the herd early on, adapt to being another carbon copy, another link in the chain, another brick in the wall, dare i say. Don't lets have individualism or independent expression lest we have problems with control down the line.
March right in, get in queue, uniforms on like good little cogs in the machine - now go do what you're told, think what you're expected to, and take your place in the ongoing effort to keep everyone in their places; the top supported, content, and free to continue coming up with new ways to extort, the middle angry, working, and laboring under the illusion that if they work hard enough they'll break that glass ceiling, the bottom downtrodden, desperate, and carrying the blame for most crime and 'wasted resources' and other 'problems with society' that keeps the whole thing churning...
No. Don't like uniforms, or severe dress codes, or unreasonable rules in schools, and think they're already so far off the rails in what they ought to be doing, what they ought to be teaching, and how they ought to be responding to and providing for the kids in their care that it just about makes me sick.
Grr. Argh. >_o
by Dread Lady Nathicana » Thu Jun 22, 2017 12:55 pm
Bressen wrote:these kids are being forced to wear a certain object of clothing and therefore they are being oppressed
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire, Likhinia, Shrillland, The Black Forrest
Advertisement