I thought that everyone that believes in a socialist utopian state (following the laws(?) of Karl Marx) is considered a communist?
Advertisement
by The Batavia » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:12 am
by The Batavia » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:14 am
Esternial wrote:I'd vote for only to make "french fries" a thing of the past.
Screw all the other consequences. Belgium must receive reparations.
by Luminesa » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:15 am
Elwher wrote:And when this passes, will Hamilton be shut down for appropriating white European culture?
by Imperializt Russia » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:16 am
Luminesa wrote:Salandriagado wrote:
Doesn't exist.
Controlled by the people, not the state.
"Money" also doesn't exist.
Also wrong.
The Soviet Union never claimed to be Communist.
I point you to the party that created the Soviet Union, which was *GAAAAAAASP* Communist!
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Commun ... viet-Union
And it was founded by a Communist!
http://www.history.com/topics/vladimir-lenin
Of course, one can be open to the idea that the country strayed from pure communism as it got more powerful, but it cannot be denied that the USSR at least had Communist roots-unless you simply flat deny the existence of the Russian Communist Party.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Luminesa » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:16 am
by The Batavia » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:17 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Luminesa wrote:I point you to the party that created the Soviet Union, which was *GAAAAAAASP* Communist!
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Commun ... viet-Union
And it was founded by a Communist!
http://www.history.com/topics/vladimir-lenin
Of course, one can be open to the idea that the country strayed from pure communism as it got more powerful, but it cannot be denied that the USSR at least had Communist roots-unless you simply flat deny the existence of the Russian Communist Party.
The Communist Party was a state organ tasked with putting the country on the road to communism, a transition that may take decades or centuries.
The Soviet Union, let alone its Communist Party, never claimed to have attained communism.
This is... basic ideology, man.
by Imperializt Russia » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:17 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Luminesa » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:17 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Luminesa wrote:I point you to the party that created the Soviet Union, which was *GAAAAAAASP* Communist!
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Commun ... viet-Union
And it was founded by a Communist!
http://www.history.com/topics/vladimir-lenin
Of course, one can be open to the idea that the country strayed from pure communism as it got more powerful, but it cannot be denied that the USSR at least had Communist roots-unless you simply flat deny the existence of the Russian Communist Party.
The Communist Party was a state organ tasked with putting the country on the road to communism, a transition that may take decades or centuries.
The Soviet Union, let alone its Communist Party, never claimed to have attained communism.
This is... basic ideology, man.
by The Batavia » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:19 am
by Imperializt Russia » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:20 am
The Batavia wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:The Communist Party was a state organ tasked with putting the country on the road to communism, a transition that may take decades or centuries.
The Soviet Union, let alone its Communist Party, never claimed to have attained communism.
This is... basic ideology, man.
So they basically used "muh communism" as an excuse to be an total dictatorship?
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Gauthier » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:29 am
Luminesa wrote:Gauthier wrote:Thread still masturbating to fantasies of the UN being abolished and every nation for themselves it seems. Sigh.
I'm sorry, what?
Gotta accuse other people of "masturbating to fantasies" because apparently you now consider that a bad thing. Looks like you're finally maturing, fam. :^3
Now, if you have anything actually useful to stay, you can post. If not, I suppose this tells us something else-you've turned on the Russians and you have embraced the pan-globalism of President Merkel! WE NOW HAS PROOFS. :^))))))))))))
by Dylar » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:32 am
Gauthier wrote:Luminesa wrote:I'm sorry, what?
Gotta accuse other people of "masturbating to fantasies" because apparently you now consider that a bad thing. Looks like you're finally maturing, fam. :^3
Now, if you have anything actually useful to stay, you can post. If not, I suppose this tells us something else-you've turned on the Russians and you have embraced the pan-globalism of President Merkel! WE NOW HAS PROOFS. :^))))))))))))
Oh, did you get promoted to Moderator now? How nice.
St. Albert the Great wrote:"Natural science does not consist in ratifying what others have said, but in seeking the causes of phenomena."
Franko Tildon wrote:Fire washes the skin off the bone and the sin off the soul. It cleans away the dirt. And my momma didn't raise herself no dirty boy.
by Luminesa » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:34 am
Gauthier wrote:Luminesa wrote:I'm sorry, what?
Gotta accuse other people of "masturbating to fantasies" because apparently you now consider that a bad thing. Looks like you're finally maturing, fam. :^3
Now, if you have anything actually useful to stay, you can post. If not, I suppose this tells us something else-you've turned on the Russians and you have embraced the pan-globalism of President Merkel! WE NOW HAS PROOFS. :^))))))))))))
Oh, did you get promoted to Moderator now? How nice.
by Luminesa » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:35 am
by The Batavia » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:39 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Fuck Stalin.
by Jamzmania » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:48 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Luminesa wrote:I point you to the party that created the Soviet Union, which was *GAAAAAAASP* Communist!
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Commun ... viet-Union
And it was founded by a Communist!
http://www.history.com/topics/vladimir-lenin
Of course, one can be open to the idea that the country strayed from pure communism as it got more powerful, but it cannot be denied that the USSR at least had Communist roots-unless you simply flat deny the existence of the Russian Communist Party.
The Communist Party was a state organ tasked with putting the country on the road to communism, a transition that may take decades or centuries.
The Soviet Union, let alone its Communist Party, never claimed to have attained communism.
This is... basic ideology, man.
The Alexanderians wrote:"Fear no man or woman,
No matter what their size.
Call upon me,
And I will equalize."
-Engraved on the side of my M1911 .45
by Luminesa » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:49 am
Jamzmania wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:The Communist Party was a state organ tasked with putting the country on the road to communism, a transition that may take decades or centuries.
The Soviet Union, let alone its Communist Party, never claimed to have attained communism.
This is... basic ideology, man.
That doesn't mean the party was not a communist party or Lenin was not a communist.
by Greater North American Confederacy » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:57 am
Proctopeo wrote:You read the title right, folks: the UN is considering making "cultural appropriation" of indigenous cultural things illegal.. And an article with opposite slant for balance.
What do you think, NSG? Is this reasonable? Is it too authoritarian? Or is it just absurd?
In my personal opinion, this is 1) authoritarian and tyrannical, 2) absurd, and 3) dangerous. I do, however, think at least their heart is in their right place and this doesn't appear to be out of malice, but out of stupidity (t. Hanlon's Razor); essentially, their intentions are well, but their actions aren't.
Hope I did it right yall
by Imperializt Russia » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:59 am
Jamzmania wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:The Communist Party was a state organ tasked with putting the country on the road to communism, a transition that may take decades or centuries.
The Soviet Union, let alone its Communist Party, never claimed to have attained communism.
This is... basic ideology, man.
That doesn't mean the party was not a communist party or Lenin was not a communist.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Jamzmania » Thu Jun 22, 2017 10:07 am
Greater North American Confederacy wrote:Proctopeo wrote:You read the title right, folks: the UN is considering making "cultural appropriation" of indigenous cultural things illegal.. And an article with opposite slant for balance.
What do you think, NSG? Is this reasonable? Is it too authoritarian? Or is it just absurd?
In my personal opinion, this is 1) authoritarian and tyrannical, 2) absurd, and 3) dangerous. I do, however, think at least their heart is in their right place and this doesn't appear to be out of malice, but out of stupidity (t. Hanlon's Razor); essentially, their intentions are well, but their actions aren't.
Hope I did it right yall
This whole thing is complete bull crap. How would this EVER be enforced. Yet another reason the UN is a useless bureaucracy with nothing better to do than pull this sort of nonsense out of its collective ass.
The Alexanderians wrote:"Fear no man or woman,
No matter what their size.
Call upon me,
And I will equalize."
-Engraved on the side of my M1911 .45
by The Batavia » Thu Jun 22, 2017 10:30 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhirisian Puppet Nation, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bovad, Electioneer, Emotional Support Crocodile, Greater Guantanamo, Hidrandia, Jorsania, Sarolandia, Segral, Shearoa, Valyxias, Zancostan, Zurkerx
Advertisement