NATION

PASSWORD

Renting vs Private Ownership

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Tzorsland
Diplomat
 
Posts: 826
Founded: May 08, 2004
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Renting vs Private Ownership

Postby Tzorsland » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:26 pm

Yes, I just spend five minutes trying to make a point on a thread to find that the thread is locked (because of a technical point). But damn it, I still have a point and it’s a good and worthy point to make so I’m going to make it anyway. Pardon the appearance but I’m not going to spend another five minutes to rewrite this as a new topic.


One major point; I’m as conservative as all get go and I support “renting” over “private ownership.” I started to support that the day I realized that the age of the “job for life” was gone. With the exception of some brief moments of history (the age of the “flip”) you need a certain level of job stability in order to make home ownership pay. The unemployment rate is higher than it is because unemployed people who are “under water” and those who are not cannot sell their homes to move from where they are (where jobs are currently not) to places where the jobs are. There are some people who should rent and some who should purchase modest homes. Progressive insistence on giving home ownership to people could not afford homes (because of the policies which Progressives put on the housing market) was one of the reasons for the problems in the first place!
"A spindizzy going sour makes the galaxy's most unnerving noise!"
"Cruise lightspeed smooth and slient with this years sleek NEW Dillon-Wagoner gravitron polarity generator."
AKA Retired WerePenguins Frustrated Franciscans Blue Booted Bobbies A Running Man Dirty Americans

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:29 pm

Tzorsland wrote: Progressive insistence on giving home ownership to people could not afford homes (because of the policies which Progressives put on the housing market) was one of the reasons for the problems in the first place!

I've said before, I'll say it again, back when we could file bankruptcy on those homes, and go on to buying another one, it wasn't a problem...

We have Republicans to thank for fucking that up...

User avatar
Natapoc
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19864
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Natapoc » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:34 pm

The whole idea that one can claim to "own" a piece of the earth is simply arrogant and short sighted.

Rent vs Private ownership? Neither.

The earth belongs to all.
Did you see a ghost?

User avatar
Peddieville
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1106
Founded: Mar 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Peddieville » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:36 pm

Maurepas wrote:
Tzorsland wrote: Progressive insistence on giving home ownership to people could not afford homes (because of the policies which Progressives put on the housing market) was one of the reasons for the problems in the first place!

I've said before, I'll say it again, back when we could file bankruptcy on those homes, and go on to buying another one, it wasn't a problem...

We have Republicans to thank for fucking that up...

I'll agree, and add that for the most part it was the Republicans who deregulated the industry to the point where they could give loans to these people. Clinton helped, but for the most part it was Regan and Bush (Sr.).
I have nothing to say

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:37 pm

Natapoc wrote:The earth belongs to all.

Well, until you decide to sit on my piece against my will anyway, :p

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:39 pm

Peddieville wrote:
Maurepas wrote:
Tzorsland wrote: Progressive insistence on giving home ownership to people could not afford homes (because of the policies which Progressives put on the housing market) was one of the reasons for the problems in the first place!

I've said before, I'll say it again, back when we could file bankruptcy on those homes, and go on to buying another one, it wasn't a problem...

We have Republicans to thank for fucking that up...

I'll agree, and add that for the most part it was the Republicans who deregulated the industry to the point where they could give loans to these people. Clinton helped, but for the most part it was Regan and Bush (Sr.).

You know, I actually don't mind that part of it, if I want a loan, I want as few obstacles in the way of it as possible, thats what allows our bubble to inflate...

However, if, all the sudden, I can't afford said loan, I want to be able to get rid of it, and move on, and possibly take on a new one, with as little problems as possible, this allows for a safety-valve of sorts for our bubble...

Removing either of those ruins our bubble and fucks the economy...

User avatar
Uawc
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5102
Founded: Oct 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Uawc » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:40 pm

Natapoc wrote:The whole idea that one can claim to "own" a piece of the earth is simply arrogant and short sighted.

Rent vs Private ownership? Neither.

The earth belongs to all.


This. Exactly this. Nothing to add, nothing to take away.
Pro-democracy, pro-NATO, anti-authoritarian. Mostly disinterested in the current political climate. Polarization is the cancer of the body politic.

Glory to Ukraine, glory to the heroes!

User avatar
North Wiedna
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17759
Founded: Apr 01, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby North Wiedna » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:49 pm

Natapoc wrote:The whole idea that one can claim to "own" a piece of the earth is simply arrogant and short sighted.

Rent vs Private ownership? Neither.

The earth belongs to all.

Well, then I own the plot of land you are currently accessing the Internet from, and I've got some development plans...
I am not at all interested in immortality, only in the taste of tea.

User avatar
North Wiedna
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17759
Founded: Apr 01, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby North Wiedna » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:50 pm

UAWC wrote:
Natapoc wrote:The whole idea that one can claim to "own" a piece of the earth is simply arrogant and short sighted.

Rent vs Private ownership? Neither.

The earth belongs to all.


This. Exactly this. Nothing to add, nothing to take away.

How will this ever work? I need a place to call my own, otherwise any drifter could occupy any structure and call it his "home" and do anything to it.
I am not at all interested in immortality, only in the taste of tea.

User avatar
Vanzef
Envoy
 
Posts: 258
Founded: May 23, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vanzef » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:50 pm

UAWC wrote:
Natapoc wrote:The whole idea that one can claim to "own" a piece of the earth is simply arrogant and short sighted.

Rent vs Private ownership? Neither.

The earth belongs to all.


This. Exactly this. Nothing to add, nothing to take away.

Double this^^ :P
Political Compass:
Economic Left/Right: -8.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.33

I'm a Democratic Market Socialist.

User avatar
Parthenon
Senator
 
Posts: 3512
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Parthenon » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:50 pm

Not all people are meant to be homeowners. It was people that bought into the notion that everyone should own a home and decided that putting $20,000 down on a $300,000 house was a good idea that led to the financial situation we are currently in.

Rent, save up, buy when you can afford it.
The Parthenese Confederation
Parthenon
Intergallactic Hell
The Bleeding Roses
West Parthenon
Former GDODAD/Metus Member

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:52 pm

North Wiedna wrote:
UAWC wrote:
Natapoc wrote:The whole idea that one can claim to "own" a piece of the earth is simply arrogant and short sighted.

Rent vs Private ownership? Neither.

The earth belongs to all.


This. Exactly this. Nothing to add, nothing to take away.

How will this ever work? I need a place to call my own, otherwise any drifter could occupy any structure and call it his "home" and do anything to it.

The Gypsies function that way, IIRC...

User avatar
Rentalia
Envoy
 
Posts: 336
Founded: Aug 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Rentalia » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:52 pm

Natapoc wrote:The whole idea that one can claim to "own" a piece of the earth is simply arrogant and short sighted.

Rent vs Private ownership? Neither.

The earth belongs to all.


I agree

however is this proved that collectivistic doctrines and public ownership of land often lead to the tragedy of the commons

i prefer the idea of Henry George

Geolibertarians are advocates of geoism, which is the position that all land is a common asset to which all individuals have an equal right to access, and therefore if individuals claim the land as their property they must pay rent to the community for doing so. Rent need not be paid for the mere use of land, but only for the right to exclude others from that land, and for the protection of one's title by government.
"Thus, in the United States, the once exceedingly useful term "libertarian" has been hijacked by egotists who are in fact enemies of liberty in the full sense of the word.""

Economic Left/Right: -3.75 ;Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.51

User avatar
Bafuria
Senator
 
Posts: 4200
Founded: Dec 07, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Bafuria » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:52 pm

Natapoc wrote:The whole idea that one can claim to "own" a piece of the earth is simply arrogant and short sighted.

Rent vs Private ownership? Neither.

The earth belongs to all.


Image
Economic 3.1, Social -4.1

User avatar
Uawc
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5102
Founded: Oct 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Uawc » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:52 pm

North Wiedna wrote:
UAWC wrote:
Natapoc wrote:The whole idea that one can claim to "own" a piece of the earth is simply arrogant and short sighted.

Rent vs Private ownership? Neither.

The earth belongs to all.


This. Exactly this. Nothing to add, nothing to take away.

How will this ever work? I need a place to call my own, otherwise any drifter could occupy any structure and call it his "home" and do anything to it.


Just put up a sign that says it's occupied. Simple.
Pro-democracy, pro-NATO, anti-authoritarian. Mostly disinterested in the current political climate. Polarization is the cancer of the body politic.

Glory to Ukraine, glory to the heroes!

User avatar
NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ
Minister
 
Posts: 3272
Founded: Apr 04, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:52 pm

Tzorsland wrote:Progressive insistence on giving home ownership to people could not afford homes (because of the policies which Progressives put on the housing market) was one of the reasons for the problems in the first place!

uh huh......
You-Gi-Owe wrote:I hate all "spin doctoring". I don't mind honest disagreement and it's possible that people are expressing honest opinions, but spin doctoring is so pervasive, I gotta ask if I suspect it.

User avatar
Peddieville
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1106
Founded: Mar 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Peddieville » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:54 pm

Maurepas wrote:
Peddieville wrote:I'll agree, and add that for the most part it was the Republicans who deregulated the industry to the point where they could give loans to these people. Clinton helped, but for the most part it was Regan and Bush (Sr.).

You know, I actually don't mind that part of it, if I want a loan, I want as few obstacles in the way of it as possible, thats what allows our bubble to inflate...

However, if, all the sudden, I can't afford said loan, I want to be able to get rid of it, and move on, and possibly take on a new one, with as little problems as possible, this allows for a safety-valve of sorts for our bubble...

Removing either of those ruins our bubble and fucks the economy...

There's a sweet spot b/w not being able to get a loan, and hobos taking out millions. But we were reasonably near the sweet spot before all the deregulation. We got too near the hobo part.
I have nothing to say

User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:56 pm

Natapoc wrote:The whole idea that one can claim to "own" a piece of the earth is simply arrogant and short sighted.

Rent vs Private ownership? Neither.

The earth belongs to all.


I failed to see how land can't be just as owned as anything else.
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?

User avatar
Old Erisia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5256
Founded: Feb 13, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Old Erisia » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:57 pm

UAWC wrote:
North Wiedna wrote:
UAWC wrote:
Natapoc wrote:The whole idea that one can claim to "own" a piece of the earth is simply arrogant and short sighted.

Rent vs Private ownership? Neither.

The earth belongs to all.


This. Exactly this. Nothing to add, nothing to take away.

How will this ever work? I need a place to call my own, otherwise any drifter could occupy any structure and call it his "home" and do anything to it.


Just put up a sign that says it's occupied. Simple.


I claim the spot between the Rockies and the Appalachians! :D

i'm going to need lots of signs...
Coming eventually
(Apparently 2010's Sexiest Male NSer. Congrats TDH.)
ಠ__ಠ
Weid's "trick". Officially.
From New Hayesalia
Grainne Ni Malley wrote:Hey now that give-a-fuck wasn't free. I expect a check in the mail. ;)
Ryadn wrote:Oh ffs. That's pathetic. If I can manage not to gag with a dick in my throat, you can manage to keep it together with a freaking HAIR on your tongue.
The Parkus Empire wrote:Then stop getting everyone excited, Mr. Human Viagra.
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:I'm a Bignostic Cross-sexual Nondresser. :)
Lackadaisical2 wrote:rofl.... goddesses are weak sexually, Men are so much more appealing.

Remembers the Botafogo

User avatar
Uawc
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5102
Founded: Oct 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Uawc » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:58 pm

Old Erisia wrote:
UAWC wrote:
North Wiedna wrote:
UAWC wrote:
Natapoc wrote:The whole idea that one can claim to "own" a piece of the earth is simply arrogant and short sighted.

Rent vs Private ownership? Neither.

The earth belongs to all.


This. Exactly this. Nothing to add, nothing to take away.

How will this ever work? I need a place to call my own, otherwise any drifter could occupy any structure and call it his "home" and do anything to it.


Just put up a sign that says it's occupied. Simple.


I claim the spot between the Rockies and the Appalachians! :D

i'm going to need lots of signs...


The point. You have missed it.
Pro-democracy, pro-NATO, anti-authoritarian. Mostly disinterested in the current political climate. Polarization is the cancer of the body politic.

Glory to Ukraine, glory to the heroes!

User avatar
North Wiedna
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17759
Founded: Apr 01, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby North Wiedna » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:59 pm

UAWC wrote:
North Wiedna wrote:
UAWC wrote:
Natapoc wrote:The whole idea that one can claim to "own" a piece of the earth is simply arrogant and short sighted.

Rent vs Private ownership? Neither.

The earth belongs to all.


This. Exactly this. Nothing to add, nothing to take away.

How will this ever work? I need a place to call my own, otherwise any drifter could occupy any structure and call it his "home" and do anything to it.


Just put up a sign that says it's occupied. Simple.

Well, what if I take away and burn the sign? Then by your logic is is vacant, and I can put a sign up claiming ownership of it and the whole street as I gain a stockpile of weapons to defend it all.
I am not at all interested in immortality, only in the taste of tea.

User avatar
JarVik
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1554
Founded: Jun 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby JarVik » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:59 pm

Parthenon wrote:Not all people are meant to be homeowners. It was people that bought into the notion that everyone should own a home and decided that putting $20,000 down on a $300,000 house was a good idea that led to the financial situation we are currently in.

Rent, save up, buy when you can afford it.


^^This.

Is there mortgage insurance in the States? Here in Canada if you buy a home with less than 25% down you have an additional monthly cost of (compulsary) mortgage insurance which you pay to the bank. Does't help the buyer, its to protect the bank, and its not a tiny fee so its a serious improvement to have 25% or more down when buying a home.
I like pancakes!
In search of SpellCheck
Swims with Leaches!

User avatar
North Wiedna
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17759
Founded: Apr 01, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby North Wiedna » Thu Mar 18, 2010 4:00 pm

Maurepas wrote:
North Wiedna wrote:
UAWC wrote:
Natapoc wrote:The whole idea that one can claim to "own" a piece of the earth is simply arrogant and short sighted.

Rent vs Private ownership? Neither.

The earth belongs to all.


This. Exactly this. Nothing to add, nothing to take away.

How will this ever work? I need a place to call my own, otherwise any drifter could occupy any structure and call it his "home" and do anything to it.

The Gypsies function that way, IIRC...

Oh, we all want to be gypsies. :roll:
I am not at all interested in immortality, only in the taste of tea.

User avatar
Peddieville
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1106
Founded: Mar 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Peddieville » Thu Mar 18, 2010 4:02 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:
Natapoc wrote:The whole idea that one can claim to "own" a piece of the earth is simply arrogant and short sighted.

Rent vs Private ownership? Neither.

The earth belongs to all.


I failed to see how land can't be just as owned as anything else.

Well, how can anything be owned outside of as a human construct? Land's just another object of this construct. In fact, it is even less of a human construct, as other animals own "land" (territory) as well as humans. Therefore, it's more of a creation of evolution, which means that owning land is more natural than owning anything else.
I have nothing to say

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Thu Mar 18, 2010 4:03 pm

North Wiedna wrote:
Maurepas wrote:
North Wiedna wrote:
UAWC wrote:
Natapoc wrote:The whole idea that one can claim to "own" a piece of the earth is simply arrogant and short sighted.

Rent vs Private ownership? Neither.

The earth belongs to all.


This. Exactly this. Nothing to add, nothing to take away.

How will this ever work? I need a place to call my own, otherwise any drifter could occupy any structure and call it his "home" and do anything to it.

The Gypsies function that way, IIRC...

Oh, we all want to be gypsies. :roll:

Well I didn't say it was desirable, just possible...

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: -The Rhineland-, American Legionaries, Dimetrodon Empire, DutchFormosa, Floofybit, Gravlen, Gun Manufacturers, Hidrandia, Ifreann, Kehlstein, La Xinga, Mutualist Chaos, Necroghastia, Nilokeras, Phobos Drilling and Manufacturing, South Northville, The Black Forrest, The Grand Fifth Imperium, The Nationalistic Republics of N Belarus, Unitarian Universalism, Utquiagvik, Vassenor

Advertisement

Remove ads