
by Tzorsland » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:26 pm

by Maurepas » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:29 pm
Tzorsland wrote: Progressive insistence on giving home ownership to people could not afford homes (because of the policies which Progressives put on the housing market) was one of the reasons for the problems in the first place!

by Peddieville » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:36 pm
Maurepas wrote:Tzorsland wrote: Progressive insistence on giving home ownership to people could not afford homes (because of the policies which Progressives put on the housing market) was one of the reasons for the problems in the first place!
I've said before, I'll say it again, back when we could file bankruptcy on those homes, and go on to buying another one, it wasn't a problem...
We have Republicans to thank for fucking that up...

by Maurepas » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:39 pm
Peddieville wrote:Maurepas wrote:Tzorsland wrote: Progressive insistence on giving home ownership to people could not afford homes (because of the policies which Progressives put on the housing market) was one of the reasons for the problems in the first place!
I've said before, I'll say it again, back when we could file bankruptcy on those homes, and go on to buying another one, it wasn't a problem...
We have Republicans to thank for fucking that up...
I'll agree, and add that for the most part it was the Republicans who deregulated the industry to the point where they could give loans to these people. Clinton helped, but for the most part it was Regan and Bush (Sr.).

by Uawc » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:40 pm
Natapoc wrote:The whole idea that one can claim to "own" a piece of the earth is simply arrogant and short sighted.
Rent vs Private ownership? Neither.
The earth belongs to all.

by North Wiedna » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:49 pm
Natapoc wrote:The whole idea that one can claim to "own" a piece of the earth is simply arrogant and short sighted.
Rent vs Private ownership? Neither.
The earth belongs to all.

by North Wiedna » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:50 pm

by Parthenon » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:50 pm

by Maurepas » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:52 pm
North Wiedna wrote:
How will this ever work? I need a place to call my own, otherwise any drifter could occupy any structure and call it his "home" and do anything to it.

by Rentalia » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:52 pm
Natapoc wrote:The whole idea that one can claim to "own" a piece of the earth is simply arrogant and short sighted.
Rent vs Private ownership? Neither.
The earth belongs to all.

by Bafuria » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:52 pm
Natapoc wrote:The whole idea that one can claim to "own" a piece of the earth is simply arrogant and short sighted.
Rent vs Private ownership? Neither.
The earth belongs to all.


by Uawc » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:52 pm
North Wiedna wrote:
How will this ever work? I need a place to call my own, otherwise any drifter could occupy any structure and call it his "home" and do anything to it.

by NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:52 pm
Tzorsland wrote:Progressive insistence on giving home ownership to people could not afford homes (because of the policies which Progressives put on the housing market) was one of the reasons for the problems in the first place!
You-Gi-Owe wrote:I hate all "spin doctoring". I don't mind honest disagreement and it's possible that people are expressing honest opinions, but spin doctoring is so pervasive, I gotta ask if I suspect it.

by Peddieville » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:54 pm
Maurepas wrote:Peddieville wrote:I'll agree, and add that for the most part it was the Republicans who deregulated the industry to the point where they could give loans to these people. Clinton helped, but for the most part it was Regan and Bush (Sr.).
You know, I actually don't mind that part of it, if I want a loan, I want as few obstacles in the way of it as possible, thats what allows our bubble to inflate...
However, if, all the sudden, I can't afford said loan, I want to be able to get rid of it, and move on, and possibly take on a new one, with as little problems as possible, this allows for a safety-valve of sorts for our bubble...
Removing either of those ruins our bubble and fucks the economy...

by UnhealthyTruthseeker » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:56 pm
Natapoc wrote:The whole idea that one can claim to "own" a piece of the earth is simply arrogant and short sighted.
Rent vs Private ownership? Neither.
The earth belongs to all.

by Old Erisia » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:57 pm
Grainne Ni Malley wrote:Hey now that give-a-fuck wasn't free. I expect a check in the mail. ;)
Ryadn wrote:Oh ffs. That's pathetic. If I can manage not to gag with a dick in my throat, you can manage to keep it together with a freaking HAIR on your tongue.
The Parkus Empire wrote:Then stop getting everyone excited, Mr. Human Viagra.
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:I'm a Bignostic Cross-sexual Nondresser. :)
Lackadaisical2 wrote:rofl.... goddesses are weak sexually, Men are so much more appealing.

by Uawc » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:58 pm
Old Erisia wrote:
I claim the spot between the Rockies and the Appalachians!
i'm going to need lots of signs...

by North Wiedna » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:59 pm

by JarVik » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:59 pm
Parthenon wrote:Not all people are meant to be homeowners. It was people that bought into the notion that everyone should own a home and decided that putting $20,000 down on a $300,000 house was a good idea that led to the financial situation we are currently in.
Rent, save up, buy when you can afford it.

by North Wiedna » Thu Mar 18, 2010 4:00 pm


by Peddieville » Thu Mar 18, 2010 4:02 pm

by Maurepas » Thu Mar 18, 2010 4:03 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: -The Rhineland-, American Legionaries, Dimetrodon Empire, DutchFormosa, Floofybit, Gravlen, Gun Manufacturers, Hidrandia, Ifreann, Kehlstein, La Xinga, Mutualist Chaos, Necroghastia, Nilokeras, Phobos Drilling and Manufacturing, South Northville, The Black Forrest, The Grand Fifth Imperium, The Nationalistic Republics of N Belarus, Unitarian Universalism, Utquiagvik, Vassenor
Advertisement