Advertisement

by Saiwania » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:41 am

by Aelex » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:42 am
Great Minarchistan wrote:Aelex wrote:And then we can expel them again and again 'till they don't come anymore. Attrition is on our side. ;^)
That looks like an oncologist telling a patient that instead of removing the cancer definitely, it's better for him just to make several surgeries to limit the size of the cancer.


by TURTLESHROOM II » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:42 am
Internationalist Bastard wrote:That's gonna cost a lot of money in the long run though.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/04/28/deportation-costs-immigration/307548001/
That's the US of course but still, that quite a lot of money for a treatment rather then a cure
Ice States abruptly severs all diplomatic relations with TurtleShroom, Ministry of Foreign Affairs baffled -|- Constitutional Eminent Domain amendment ratified, chimeras to be reimbursed in Skillets -|- Official Civil War death count "ten times higher than initially reported", new bodies still found

by Internationalist Bastard » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:42 am
Great Minarchistan wrote:Aelex wrote:And then we can expel them again and again 'till they don't come anymore. Attrition is on our side. ;^)
That looks like an oncologist telling a patient that instead of removing the cancer definitely, it's better for him just to make several surgeries to limit the size of the cancer.

by Aelex » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:43 am
Internationalist Bastard wrote:That's gonna cost a lot of money in the long run though.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/04/28/deportation-costs-immigration/307548001/
That's the US of course but still, that quite a lot of money for a treatment rather then a cure

by Internationalist Bastard » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:43 am
Aelex wrote:Great Minarchistan wrote:
That looks like an oncologist telling a patient that instead of removing the cancer definitely, it's better for him just to make several surgeries to limit the size of the cancer.
Meh, unlike a doctor, we have no oath binding us to try to save the patient or merely look for his best interests so if we get to increase our fees that way...

by Thermodolia » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:43 am
TURTLESHROOM II wrote:I don't get the problem here. These "pirates" are cutting engines from migrant invasion boats and routing them back to Libya where they belong. The invasion of Muslim migrants (many of them hostile and most, but not all, of them men of prime breeding age too cowardly to fight for their nation) should entirely cease. Europe has enough Muslims already, the last we need is more of them.
Haven't multiple terror attacks performed by these groups that sneak in convinced you enough that this group is NEEDED?
First, that isn't piracy; piracy is the unlawful boarding of a ship without the ship master's consent (regardless of intent, Greenpeace was charged with piracy for trying to board a Russian oil tanker to protest). Second, they're not going to be killing these people where they stand.
Simply sending them back to the coast is neither a crime nor a bad act. These people are patriots and governments should subsidize them for as long as they are refusing to do their job.

by Great Minarchistan » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:44 am
Aelex wrote:Great Minarchistan wrote:
That looks like an oncologist telling a patient that instead of removing the cancer definitely, it's better for him just to make several surgeries to limit the size of the cancer.
Meh, unlike a doctor, we have no oath binding us to try to save the patient or merely look for his best interests so if we get to increase our fees that way...

by Kubra » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:44 am
>too cowardly to fight in their home countryTURTLESHROOM II wrote:I don't get the problem here. These "pirates" are cutting engines from migrant invasion boats and routing them back to Libya where they belong. The invasion of Muslim migrants (many of them hostile and most, but not all, of them men of prime breeding age too cowardly to fight for their nation) should entirely cease. Europe has enough Muslims already, the last we need is more of them.
Haven't the multiple terror attacks performed by these groups that sneak in convinced you enough that this group is NEEDED?
First, this isn't piracy; piracy is the unlawful boarding of a ship without the ship master's consent (regardless of intent, Greenpeace was charged with piracy for trying to board a Russian oil tanker to protest). Second, they're not going to be killing these people where they stand. Third, European countries are supposed to be doing this by their own laws.
Simply sending them back to the coast they tried to launch from is neither a crime nor a bad act. These people are patriots and governments should subsidize them for as long as they are refusing to do their job.

by Seradahn » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:44 am

by Nova Stephania » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:44 am

by Aelex » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:44 am
Internationalist Bastard wrote:Pretty much. We can argue till the cows come home on immigration, at the end of the day though, foreign aid supporting development and stabilization efforts seems cheaper

by Vassenor » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:45 am

by Kubra » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:46 am
Maybe they willAelex wrote:Internationalist Bastard wrote:Pretty much. We can argue till the cows come home on immigration, at the end of the day though, foreign aid supporting development and stabilization efforts seems cheaper
"Let's give dictators and corrupt ""presidents"" money for development, I'm sure they tots won't just pocket it!"

by Internationalist Bastard » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:46 am
Aelex wrote:Internationalist Bastard wrote:That's gonna cost a lot of money in the long run though.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/04/28/deportation-costs-immigration/307548001/
That's the US of course but still, that quite a lot of money for a treatment rather then a cure
And yet it's still a more viable solution than pumping money into shitholes hoping they will get better or just throwing in the towel.

by Bakery Hill » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:46 am
Kubra wrote:>too cowardly to fight in their home countryTURTLESHROOM II wrote:I don't get the problem here. These "pirates" are cutting engines from migrant invasion boats and routing them back to Libya where they belong. The invasion of Muslim migrants (many of them hostile and most, but not all, of them men of prime breeding age too cowardly to fight for their nation) should entirely cease. Europe has enough Muslims already, the last we need is more of them.
Haven't the multiple terror attacks performed by these groups that sneak in convinced you enough that this group is NEEDED?
First, this isn't piracy; piracy is the unlawful boarding of a ship without the ship master's consent (regardless of intent, Greenpeace was charged with piracy for trying to board a Russian oil tanker to protest). Second, they're not going to be killing these people where they stand. Third, European countries are supposed to be doing this by their own laws.
Simply sending them back to the coast they tried to launch from is neither a crime nor a bad act. These people are patriots and governments should subsidize them for as long as they are refusing to do their job.
>hostile to us
Basically saying "if only these bastards would go home and join ISIS"

by Danceria » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:46 am
Internationalist Bastard wrote:Great Minarchistan wrote:
That looks like an oncologist telling a patient that instead of removing the cancer definitely, it's better for him just to make several surgeries to limit the size of the cancer.
Pretty much. We can argue till the cows come home on immigration, at the end of the day though, foreign aid supporting development and stabilization efforts seems cheaper

by Thermodolia » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:47 am
TURTLESHROOM II wrote:Internationalist Bastard wrote:That's gonna cost a lot of money in the long run though.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/04/28/deportation-costs-immigration/307548001/
That's the US of course but still, that quite a lot of money for a treatment rather then a cure
If you have a secure border, deportation is a one-time expense, compared to the years of waste spent on handouts to the deprivation of citizens and lawful immigrants that need them.

by Bakery Hill » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:47 am

by Aelex » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:47 am
Great Minarchistan wrote:Why not simply reduce the welfare state dude

by Gauthier » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:47 am

by Geilinor » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:48 am

by Kubra » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:48 am
And hey, since we're on the topic of giving people a good standard of living to solve problems relating to migration, here's the only good thing takimag ever publishedInternationalist Bastard wrote:Aelex wrote:And yet it's still a more viable solution than pumping money into shitholes hoping they will get better or just throwing in the towel.
Is it? I'm looking for a proper source right now, but I seem to remember the US stopping the Honduran mass migration with foreign aid

by Bakery Hill » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:48 am
Aelex wrote:Great Minarchistan wrote:Why not simply reduce the welfare state dude
I agree with the necessity to cut down on some things like healthcare (tho not all the maternity related shit, we need it to keep our birthrate up) but education and subside are merely investment to keep the country running, reducing them would be folly.
Over all, I'd rather not weaken the State unnecessarily and destroying the welfare state would do that.

by Internationalist Bastard » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:48 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dazchan, Kitsuva, The Rio Grande River Basin
Advertisement