Crowdfunded Alt-Right Pirates Of The Libyan Coast

[Lady Scylla]

They should never step aside. If you can't make jokes tactfully, then you shouldn't be making jokes at all.

Sometimes blunt insensitivity is what you need, not tactful, beat-around-the-bush jokes you insist upon.

That's adorable. I can make some pretty awful jokes.

[Ifreann]

The thread is about pirates trying to prevent rescue boats from saving refugees. Realistically that is going to kill people. And people in this thread are supporting that.

---

Well what's the difference between throwing out all Muslims because some of them did terrorism and throwing out all Catholics because some of their priests raped children and some of their priests covered that up? Or throwing out all the Tories because some of them supposedly knew about Jimmy Saville and didn't do anything?


It's what the Nazis called people who weren't superior Aryans. I think it literally means something like sub-human.

Good point. I'm going to think on it a bit. At the moment I'm going to go with. Wait no I'm not. That goes back to the weird ideas/trust thought I couldn't get out last time. I blame a book I've been trying to read for a year and a half now.

Calling a race sub human is stupid. Calling Islam, not Muslims, sub par because of its outcomes in comparison to the wests ideas isn't is it?

What I'm getting at is that you clearly just hate Muslims and want them gone, but you're trying to come up with a legitimate reason for that, and every reason you do come up with targets more people than just Muslims, so you keep having to change it so it only targets Muslims.

It'd be easier to just admit you hate Muslims.

[Godular]

Yeah.
But also let's not forget the loony terrorists that weren't Muslim that have committed attacks. Portland, Quebec, Charleston...

My opinion on fascists isn't exactly a secret. Hang every last one of 'em.

Careful, just like islamic extremists, trying to kill them only serves to swell their numbers.

[Torrocca]

Good point. I'm going to think on it a bit. At the moment I'm going to go with. Wait no I'm not. That goes back to the weird ideas/trust thought I couldn't get out last time. I blame a book I've been trying to read for a year and a half now.

Calling a race sub human is stupid. Calling Islam, not Muslims, sub par because of its outcomes in comparison to the wests ideas isn't is it?

What I'm getting at is that you clearly just hate Muslims and want them gone, but you're trying to come up with a legitimate reason for that, and every reason you do come up with targets more people than just Muslims, so you keep having to change it so it only targets Muslims.

It'd be easier to just admit you hate Muslims.

Also the whole advocating for religious genocide, can't forget that.

My opinion on fascists isn't exactly a secret. Hang every last one of 'em.

Careful, just like islamic extremists, trying to kill them only serves to swell their numbers.

Eh, World War Two proved otherwise. But seriously, careful with advocating for death. Can't be breaking rules now.

[Esternial]

Or actually buy a few actual ships but use them to help the refugees. Make videos and edit them to give the appearance you're actually tossing them back to where they came from.

Ooh, and then go the full capitalist way and hire them on to help in further rescue efforts, and keep the cycle going through donations from non-the-wiser Alt-Righters and more rescuing. You could make a religion out of this!

You're getting rid of the refugees crossing the ocean, just not in the direction they imagined.

[Torrocca]

Ooh, and then go the full capitalist way and hire them on to help in further rescue efforts, and keep the cycle going through donations from non-the-wiser Alt-Righters and more rescuing. You could make a religion out of this!

You're getting rid of the refugees crossing the ocean, just not in the direction they imagined.

Bingo. We'll bamboozle them harder than the entire cast of Ocean's 11 ever could!

[The Princes of the Universe]

NatLibs and fascists are not conservatives.

Fascists, Nazis, supremacists, nationalists. A hive of scum and villainy.

And Socjus have proven themselves essentially of like mind except on who to target.

[The Portland Territory]

1. Fine then. Here's one example: http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/11 ... -refugees/
2. Well look it up your fucking self if you want to see it!
3. Still yes.

1. Fucking Breitbart? Seriously? How about something... not biased?
2. It's not my claim to defend.
3. No.

1. Oh dont give me that shit. Just read the fucking article
2. But it's not a claim, it's a fact. Refugees do and have committed terror attacks. To what degree though is what YOU should be debating, not whether or not they commit them at all.
3. Yes

[Donut section]

Good point. I'm going to think on it a bit. At the moment I'm going to go with. Wait no I'm not. That goes back to the weird ideas/trust thought I couldn't get out last time. I blame a book I've been trying to read for a year and a half now.

Calling a race sub human is stupid. Calling Islam, not Muslims, sub par because of its outcomes in comparison to the wests ideas isn't is it?

What I'm getting at is that you clearly just hate Muslims and want them gone, but you're trying to come up with a legitimate reason for that, and every reason you do come up with targets more people than just Muslims, so you keep having to change it so it only targets Muslims.

It'd be easier to just admit you hate Muslims.

Islam. I hate Islam. I know this. It's personal. It's just sort of blown out after my sister was at that concert.

[Torrocca]

1. Fucking Breitbart? Seriously? How about something... not biased?
2. It's not my claim to defend.
3. No.

1. Oh dont give me that shit. Just read the fucking article
2. But it's not a claim, it's a fact. Refugees do and have committed terror attacks. To what degree though is what YOU should be debating, not whether or not they commit them at all.
3. Yes

1. Breitbart's so far right that I literally can't see it from my side of the political spectrum. Find something unbiased.
2. Again. Show. The. Data.
3. No.

[Donut section]

1. Oh dont give me that shit. Just read the fucking article
2. But it's not a claim, it's a fact. Refugees do and have committed terror attacks. To what degree though is what YOU should be debating, not whether or not they commit them at all.
3. Yes

1. Breitbart's so far right that I literally can't see it from my side of the political spectrum. Find something unbiased.
2. Again. Show. The. Data.
3. No.

I wish someone would teach me how to post pictures so I could post the "far right political spectrum" meme every time a lefty authoritarian uses "far right".

[Torrocca]

1. Breitbart's so far right that I literally can't see it from my side of the political spectrum. Find something unbiased.
2. Again. Show. The. Data.
3. No.

I wish someone would teach me how to post pictures so I could post the "far right political spectrum" meme every time a lefty authoritarian uses "far right".

Good thing I'm not an authoritarian!

[The Princes of the Universe]

1. Breitbart's so far right that I literally can't see it from my side of the political spectrum. Find something unbiased.
2. Again. Show. The. Data.
3. No.

They're not far-right. I'm far right (non-constitutional monarchism is as far to the right as you can get). They're fascists.

[Sanctissima]

1. Breitbart's so far right that I literally can't see it from my side of the political spectrum. Find something unbiased.
2. Again. Show. The. Data.
3. No.

I wish someone would teach me how to post pictures so I could post the "far right political spectrum" meme every time a lefty authoritarian uses "far right".

Just use the Img tool above your text box "[img]""[/img]" (without the quotation marks), then right-click on the image you want to post, select "copy image address" and paste it between [img]and[/img].

[Bakery Hill]

I wish someone would teach me how to post pictures so I could post the "far right political spectrum" meme every time a lefty authoritarian uses "far right".

Just use the Img tool above your text box "[img]""[/img]" (without the quotation marks), then right-click on the image you want to post, select "copy image address" and paste it between [img]and[/img].

MVP right here

[Torrocca]

1. Breitbart's so far right that I literally can't see it from my side of the political spectrum. Find something unbiased.
2. Again. Show. The. Data.
3. No.

They're not far-right. I'm far right (non-constitutional monarchism is as far to the right as you can get). They're fascists.

To think I, a Red-blooded Commie, have fallen in some state of agreement with a monarchist!



I mean, it's not that bad considering we are in some agreement, so...

[Donut section]

I wish someone would teach me how to post pictures so I could post the "far right political spectrum" meme every time a lefty authoritarian uses "far right".

Just use the Img tool above your text box "[img]""[/img]" (without the quotation marks), then right-click on the image you want to post, select "copy image address" and paste it between [img]and[/img].

Marry me?

[Napkiraly]

1. Breitbart's so far right that I literally can't see it from my side of the political spectrum. Find something unbiased.
2. Again. Show. The. Data.
3. No.

I wish someone would teach me how to post pictures so I could post the "far right political spectrum" meme every time a lefty authoritarian uses "far right".

Even I've been called far-right, which is a source of much hilarity.

[Zottistan]

1. Breitbart's so far right that I literally can't see it from my side of the political spectrum. Find something unbiased.
2. Again. Show. The. Data.
3. No.

They're not far-right. I'm far right (non-constitutional monarchism is as far to the right as you can get). They're fascists.

They're not really fascists either. I guess radical classical liberals with maybe a few authoritarian policies would describe them best.

[The Princes of the Universe]

They're not far-right. I'm far right (non-constitutional monarchism is as far to the right as you can get). They're fascists.

To think I, a Red-blooded Commie, have fallen in some state of agreement with a monarchist!
I mean, it's not that bad considering we are in some agreement, so...

We're probably not terribly different on economics.

[Chestaan]

I wish someone would teach me how to post pictures so I could post the "far right political spectrum" meme every time a lefty authoritarian uses "far right".

Even I've been called far-right, which is a source of much hilarity.

Eww tankies

[Torrocca]

To think I, a Red-blooded Commie, have fallen in some state of agreement with a monarchist!
I mean, it's not that bad considering we are in some agreement, so...

We're probably not terribly different on economics.

A... communist monarchist?

Huh.

[The Princes of the Universe]

They're not far-right. I'm far right (non-constitutional monarchism is as far to the right as you can get). They're fascists.

They're not really fascists either. I guess radical classical liberals with maybe a few authoritarian policies would describe them best.

More than a few.

[Napkiraly]

Even I've been called far-right, which is a source of much hilarity.

Eww tankies

I wouldn't mind tankies if they used a proper tank like a Challenger or an Abrams.

[Ifreann]

...Refugees do and have committed terror attacks. To what degree though is what YOU should be debating, not whether or not they commit them at all...

Does it actually matter?

Refugees committing terrorist attacks doesn't make it acceptable to interfere with rescue operations at sea and endanger people's lives.