And also the willingness to cause mass famines.
Advertisement

by Torrocca » Sun May 28, 2017 1:19 pm
Proctopeo wrote:Torrocca wrote:
I mean when fascist bastards twist an ideology to get themselves into power you can see how purges would occur and Communism would "fail" even though it never ended up being practiced, but sure we'll call it Communism anyway because it's way easier than actually addressing what happened.
Just keep sweeping communism's skeletons under the rug. I'm sure nobody will notice the hundred million dead.

by Greed and Death » Sun May 28, 2017 1:20 pm
Halfblakistan wrote:Deian salazar wrote:again he was a sanders supporter.
funny since sanders is a secular Jew and not big on religion.
That doesn't have much to do with the topic at hand. I could care less who he voted for in the Primary: he was a fascist terrorist, case closed. Something proactive needs to be done about this before sporadic incidents become an everyday reality.

by Uxupox » Sun May 28, 2017 1:20 pm
Torrocca wrote:Proctopeo wrote:Just keep sweeping communism's skeletons under the rug. I'm sure nobody will notice the hundred million dead.
It sure must be easy to blame an ideology for something without actually understanding the ideology itself as well as how it was used historically for the benefit of a greedy few.![]()
For instance: "Boy, those radical extremists killed a few people because they're radical, BETTER BLAME ALL OF ISLAM!"
Or: "Boy, those Crusaders killed a few people because they were crusading, BETTER BLAME ALL OF CHRISTIANITY!"
Or even: "That white supremacist committed unjustifiable murder, BETTER BLAME ALL THE WHITE PEOPLE!"
I could go on for you.

by Torrocca » Sun May 28, 2017 1:21 pm
Uxupox wrote:Torrocca wrote:
It sure must be easy to blame an ideology for something without actually understanding the ideology itself as well as how it was used historically for the benefit of a greedy few.![]()
For instance: "Boy, those radical extremists killed a few people because they're radical, BETTER BLAME ALL OF ISLAM!"
Or: "Boy, those Crusaders killed a few people because they were crusading, BETTER BLAME ALL OF CHRISTIANITY!"
Or even: "That white supremacist committed unjustifiable murder, BETTER BLAME ALL THE WHITE PEOPLE!"
I could go on for you.
You could if you want since it's a free country but if I tried that in the Soviet Union I would be sent to the gulag for "political reeducation" and most likely never be heard from again.

by Proctopeo » Sun May 28, 2017 1:22 pm
Torrocca wrote:Proctopeo wrote:Just keep sweeping communism's skeletons under the rug. I'm sure nobody will notice the hundred million dead.
It sure must be easy to blame an ideology for something without actually understanding the ideology itself as well as how it was used historically for the benefit of a greedy few.![]()
For instance: "Boy, those radical extremists killed a few people because they're radical, BETTER BLAME ALL OF ISLAM!"
Or: "Boy, those Crusaders killed a few people because they were crusading, BETTER BLAME ALL OF CHRISTIANITY!"
Or even: "That white supremacist committed unjustifiable murder, BETTER BLAME ALL THE WHITE PEOPLE!"
I could go on for you.


by Kash Island » Sun May 28, 2017 1:22 pm
Torrocca wrote:Uxupox wrote:
You could if you want since it's a free country but if I tried that in the Soviet Union I would be sent to the gulag for "political reeducation" and most likely never be heard from again.
Because the Soviet Union, a state that pretended to be Communist, actually ever preached Communist ideals. Despite, y'know, Communism calling for the dissolution of the state.

by Uxupox » Sun May 28, 2017 1:23 pm
Torrocca wrote:Uxupox wrote:
You could if you want since it's a free country but if I tried that in the Soviet Union I would be sent to the gulag for "political reeducation" and most likely never be heard from again.
Because the Soviet Union, a state that pretended to be Communist, actually ever practiced Communist ideals. Despite, y'know, Communism calling for the dissolution of the state.

by Torrocca » Sun May 28, 2017 1:23 pm
Kash Island wrote:Torrocca wrote:
Because the Soviet Union, a state that pretended to be Communist, actually ever preached Communist ideals. Despite, y'know, Communism calling for the dissolution of the state.
You undersand Fascism is not a racist ideology in itself right? That is Nazism
so is it Fascism you are against or is it National Socialism?

by Kash Island » Sun May 28, 2017 1:25 pm
Torrocca wrote:Uxupox wrote:
It's so obvious now. There was never a real communist state was there?
Well there is no state in a Communist society sooo, no.Kash Island wrote:
You undersand Fascism is not a racist ideology in itself right? That is Nazism
so is it Fascism you are against or is it National Socialism?
I'm strictly against both because they're horrible fucking beliefs.

by Torrocca » Sun May 28, 2017 1:26 pm
Torrocca wrote:Kash Island wrote:
You know Fascism and Nazism are not the same right? Nazism being a sub-form of Fascism.
I wasn't talking about Nazism there, I was talking specifically about how Fascists took Communism and twisted it for their gains and power and how everyone likes to conveniently ignore it when saying, "b-b-but Communism killed people too!" Ignoring that blatant "whataboutism", saying stupid shit like this literally just ignores what happened in these "Communist" societies (hint: they weren't Communist because Communism calls for the dissolution of the state).
But going back to that whataboutism, it seems very funny that everyone seems to want to ignore intentional, systematic genocide (emphasis on that because it's pretty fucking important) and even remotely try to compare it to deaths from famine. There is no comparison because famine is NOT intentional murder, but genocide literally is. It seems that systematic murder isn't important though, because while that's literally a core value of Nazism, "it's okay because they didn't kill that many people so let's let them have free speech!" No. Nazis don't deserve free speech, because it preaches murder and genocide. It's a catalyst for events like what happened in Portland and many other events, most notably the Holocaust. Nazism is literally a plague on humanity.Uxupox wrote:
Sounds like you've never heard of Stalinism and Maoism.
"Show me in the history books where exactly Communists built a state whose purpose was to commit ethnic genocide and push an image of a 'master race'..."
Stalin didn't push an image of a Russian master race nor commit ethnic genocide, Mao didn't push an image of a Han Chinese master race nor commit ethnic genocide.

by Uxupox » Sun May 28, 2017 1:26 pm
Torrocca wrote:Uxupox wrote:
It's so obvious now. There was never a real communist state was there?
Well there is no state in a Communist society sooo, no.Kash Island wrote:
You undersand Fascism is not a racist ideology in itself right? That is Nazism
so is it Fascism you are against or is it National Socialism?
I'm strictly against both because they're horrible fucking beliefs.

by Proctopeo » Sun May 28, 2017 1:27 pm
Torrocca wrote:Uxupox wrote:
It's so obvious now. There was never a real communist state was there?
Well there is no state in a Communist society sooo, no.Kash Island wrote:
You undersand Fascism is not a racist ideology in itself right? That is Nazism
so is it Fascism you are against or is it National Socialism?
I'm strictly against both because they're horrible fucking beliefs.


by Uxupox » Sun May 28, 2017 1:27 pm
Torrocca wrote:Kash Island wrote:
You know Fascism and Nazism are not the same right? Nazism being a sub-form of Fascism.
I wasn't talking about Nazism there, I was talking specifically about how Fascists took Communism and twisted it for their gains and power and how everyone likes to conveniently ignore it when saying, "b-b-but Communism killed people too!" Ignoring that blatant "whataboutism", saying stupid shit like this literally just ignores what happened in these "Communist" societies (hint: they weren't Communist because Communism calls for the dissolution of the state).
But going back to that whataboutism, it seems very funny that everyone seems to want to ignore intentional, systematic genocide (emphasis on that because it's pretty fucking important) and even remotely try to compare it to deaths from famine. There is no comparison because famine is NOT intentional murder, but genocide literally is. It seems that systematic murder isn't important though, because while that's literally a core value of Nazism, "it's okay because they didn't kill that many people so let's let them have free speech!" No. Nazis don't deserve free speech, because it preaches murder and genocide. It's a catalyst for events like what happened in Portland and many other events, most notably the Holocaust. Nazism is literally a plague on humanity.Uxupox wrote:
Sounds like you've never heard of Stalinism and Maoism.
"Show me in the history books where exactly Communists built a state whose purpose was to commit ethnic genocide and push an image of a 'master race'..."
Stalin didn't push an image of a Russian master race nor commit ethnic genocide, Mao didn't push an image of a Han Chinese master race nor commit ethnic genocide.

by Torrocca » Sun May 28, 2017 1:28 pm
Uxupox wrote:Torrocca wrote:
Well there is no state in a Communist society sooo, no.
I'm strictly against both because they're horrible fucking beliefs.
Stalin, Lenin, Kalinin, Mao, Pol Pot and Ho Chi Min disagree with your assessment that there was never a communist state. As communism itself is divided into multiple schools of thought.

by Kash Island » Sun May 28, 2017 1:29 pm
Torrocca wrote:Uxupox wrote:
Stalin, Lenin, Kalinin, Mao, Pol Pot and Ho Chi Min disagree with your assessment that there was never a communist state. As communism itself is divided into multiple schools of thought.
From the very first paragraph: "However, contrary to Western usage, these states do not describe themselves as "communist" nor do they claim to have achieved communism; they refer to themselves as Socialist states or Workers' states that are in the process of constructing socialism." So tell me again how they called themselves Communist?

by Torrocca » Sun May 28, 2017 1:31 pm
Kash Island wrote:Torrocca wrote:
From the very first paragraph: "However, contrary to Western usage, these states do not describe themselves as "communist" nor do they claim to have achieved communism; they refer to themselves as Socialist states or Workers' states that are in the process of constructing socialism." So tell me again how they called themselves Communist?
and part of being communist is that exact process....that's what MARXISM IS.
Deian salazar wrote:Torrocca wrote:
From the very first paragraph: "However, contrary to Western usage, these states do not describe themselves as "communist" nor do they claim to have achieved communism; they refer to themselves as Socialist states or Workers' states that are in the process of constructing socialism." So tell me again how they called themselves Communist?
Their names were literally The Chinese Communist Part, The Bolshevik Communist Party(Or some shit), Vietnamese Communist Party, etc.

by Kash Island » Sun May 28, 2017 1:31 pm
Deian salazar wrote:Kash Island wrote:
and part of being communist is that exact process....that's what MARXISM IS.
By the way I feel the need to differentiate Social Democracy and Democratic Socialism from Communism. They don't have the same goal, only Communists view it as a step towards their goal, while Social Democrats and Democratic Socialists view it as their endgoal.

by Uxupox » Sun May 28, 2017 1:33 pm
Torrocca wrote:Kash Island wrote:
and part of being communist is that exact process....that's what MARXISM IS.
"In the process of constructing socialism." That doesn't seem to be gunning toward Communism.Deian salazar wrote:Their names were literally The Chinese Communist Part, The Bolshevik Communist Party(Or some shit), Vietnamese Communist Party, etc.
But they never called their states Communist or said there was any Communist state, which was the point Ux made and what I have given proof is wrong.

by Torrocca » Sun May 28, 2017 1:34 pm
Uxupox wrote:Torrocca wrote:
"In the process of constructing socialism." That doesn't seem to be gunning toward Communism.
But they never called their states Communist or said there was any Communist state, which was the point Ux made and what I have given proof is wrong.
They way they worked was to strive to achieve their goals through the means that they were conducting.
Torrocca wrote:Kash Island wrote:
You know Fascism and Nazism are not the same right? Nazism being a sub-form of Fascism.
I wasn't talking about Nazism there, I was talking specifically about how Fascists took Communism and twisted it for their gains and power and how everyone likes to conveniently ignore it when saying, "b-b-but Communism killed people too!" Ignoring that blatant "whataboutism", saying stupid shit like this literally just ignores what happened in these "Communist" societies (hint: they weren't Communist because Communism calls for the dissolution of the state).
But going back to that whataboutism, it seems very funny that everyone seems to want to ignore intentional, systematic genocide (emphasis on that because it's pretty fucking important) and even remotely try to compare it to deaths from famine. There is no comparison because famine is NOT intentional murder, but genocide literally is. It seems that systematic murder isn't important though, because while that's literally a core value of Nazism, "it's okay because they didn't kill that many people so let's let them have free speech!" No. Nazis don't deserve free speech, because it preaches murder and genocide. It's a catalyst for events like what happened in Portland and many other events, most notably the Holocaust. Nazism is literally a plague on humanity.

by Daeseong » Sun May 28, 2017 1:36 pm
Kash Island wrote:Torrocca wrote:
Because the Soviet Union, a state that pretended to be Communist, actually ever preached Communist ideals. Despite, y'know, Communism calling for the dissolution of the state.
You undersand Fascism is not a racist ideology in itself right? That is Nazism
so is it Fascism you are against or is it National Socialism?

by New haven america » Sun May 28, 2017 1:36 pm

by Proctopeo » Sun May 28, 2017 1:37 pm
Torrocca wrote:Kash Island wrote:
You know Fascism and Nazism are not the same right? Nazism being a sub-form of Fascism.
I wasn't talking about Nazism there, I was talking specifically about how Fascists took Communism and twisted it for their gains and power and how everyone likes to conveniently ignore it when saying, "b-b-but Communism killed people too!" Ignoring that blatant "whataboutism", saying stupid shit like this literally just ignores what happened in these "Communist" societies (hint: they weren't Communist because Communism calls for the dissolution of the state).
But going back to that whataboutism, it seems very funny that everyone seems to want to ignore intentional, systematic genocide (emphasis on that because it's pretty fucking important) and even remotely try to compare it to deaths from famine. There is no comparison because famine is NOT intentional murder, but genocide literally is. It seems that systematic murder isn't important though, because while that's literally a core value of Nazism, "it's okay because they didn't kill that many people so let's let them have free speech!" No. Nazis don't deserve free speech, because it preaches murder and genocide. It's a catalyst for events like what happened in Portland and many other events, most notably the Holocaust. Nazism is literally a plague on humanity.

by Kash Island » Sun May 28, 2017 1:38 pm
Daeseong wrote:Kash Island wrote:
You undersand Fascism is not a racist ideology in itself right? That is Nazism
so is it Fascism you are against or is it National Socialism?
This is patently incorrect.
Though it's true that not all fascists were Nazis - and thus were not necessarily antisemites or eugenicists - fascism is inherently racist - as compared to right-wing authoritarianism. The defining feature of fascism literally was stressing one's national identity and this justified conquest as a necessary evil in a macrocosm of international Darwinism.
Racism, as defined by Oxford's online dictionary, is to antagonize against a person or group based on his or her nationality or racial identity. Fascism literally and inextricably advocates for this as a part of its very defining ethos. Palingenetic millenarianism and ultranationalism both inherently exalt race as defining features of a national rejuvenation, and these concepts were inherent to fascism as a whole - not just Nazism.

by Irona » Sun May 28, 2017 1:39 pm
Deian salazar wrote:Torrocca wrote:
From the very first paragraph: "However, contrary to Western usage, these states do not describe themselves as "communist" nor do they claim to have achieved communism; they refer to themselves as Socialist states or Workers' states that are in the process of constructing socialism." So tell me again how they called themselves Communist?
Their names were literally The Chinese Communist Party, The Bolshevik Communist Party(Or some shit), Vietnamese Communist Party, etc.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alcala-Cordel, Dummkopfen, Elejamie, Greater Miami Shores 3, Hispida, Ifreann, James_xenoland, Kolegei, Neu California, New Temecula, Nilokeras, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Nova Paradisius, Ors Might, Point Blob, Riviere Renard, San Lumen, Spy balloons, The Crimson Isles, The Holy Machine, Victorian Anarchy
Advertisement