I think that has been true for a couple pages. Its fun to read though
Advertisement

by Aelex » Tue May 23, 2017 10:22 am
Philjia wrote:My mistake, of course boiling people down to basic attributes is individualist policy.

by Galloism » Tue May 23, 2017 10:22 am

by Royal Baronga » Tue May 23, 2017 10:22 am

by Calladan » Tue May 23, 2017 10:22 am
Galloism wrote:I always think it's funny to replace "muslims" with "jews" in my head on these type of threads and see how many people sound like literally Hitler.

by Liriena » Tue May 23, 2017 10:22 am
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Shrilland » Tue May 23, 2017 10:22 am
Liriena wrote:Shrilland wrote:
If he was the first to do so then no. But he isn't now is he? Many "refugee" attacks are for ISIL. It sure is a strange pattern. If you don't oppose ISIL, that's fine, but don't try to force Britain to deal with your hateful and evil mindset.
This was not, by definition, a "refugee attack". The culprit was not a refugee, and my opposition to ISIL does not preclude me also opposing the white supremacist narrative.

by Liriena » Tue May 23, 2017 10:23 am
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Salandriagado » Tue May 23, 2017 10:24 am

by Royal Baronga » Tue May 23, 2017 10:24 am
Galloism wrote:I always think it's funny to replace "muslims" with "jews" in my head on these type of threads and see how many people sound like literally Hitler.

by Salandriagado » Tue May 23, 2017 10:24 am
Galloism wrote:Salandriagado wrote:
And yet the overwhelming majority of Muslims have never committed a crime.
I'm not sure that's true, or, at least, it depends on your definition of "crime".
I'm pretty sure the overwhelming majority of everybody has committed a crime at some point, provided you classify "crime" to include "regulatory infractions", like speeding or incorrect disposal of hazardous materials.

by Raermany » Tue May 23, 2017 10:25 am
Gallia- wrote:Raermany wrote:
20+ years ago, Korean leader.
It's not terrorism if it wasn't done before n years prior!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoko_Asahara
Asahara/Matsumoto was Japanese.
Not sure where you're getting the goofy idea he was Korean. Perhaps you're confusing him with Hayashi, who was the perpetrator of the attack (hardly a kingpin) and ethnic Korean from Tokyo?

by Salandriagado » Tue May 23, 2017 10:25 am

by Galloism » Tue May 23, 2017 10:25 am

by Galloism » Tue May 23, 2017 10:26 am
Salandriagado wrote:Galloism wrote:I'm not sure that's true, or, at least, it depends on your definition of "crime".
I'm pretty sure the overwhelming majority of everybody has committed a crime at some point, provided you classify "crime" to include "regulatory infractions", like speeding or incorrect disposal of hazardous materials.
I'm defining "crime" to mean "felony offence".

by Liriena » Tue May 23, 2017 10:26 am
Shrilland wrote:Liriena wrote:This was not, by definition, a "refugee attack". The culprit was not a refugee, and my opposition to ISIL does not preclude me also opposing the white supremacist narrative.
Nobody here said anything about "white supremecy", but congrats for assuming my race and proving that you are actually racist.
Shrilland wrote:The culprit was the child of refugees. Meaning that the threat is still there after the refugees have children.
Shrilland wrote:The issue isn't going away and just hiding behind shallow racism isn't going to make it go away as much as you want it to
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Aelex » Tue May 23, 2017 10:26 am
Galloism wrote:I always think it's funny to replace "muslims" with "jews" in my head on these type of threads and see how many people sound like literally Hitler.

by Raermany » Tue May 23, 2017 10:26 am
Caracasus wrote:Raermany wrote:
Ok, let's drop god: I have a teacake in orbit around this planet right now, it's very delicious and soft.
Prove there's no floating teacake.
More bullshit. You know you are completely wrong on this and continuing to deflect. No evidence exists to prove or disprove teacakes. There are literally libraries full of documented evidence regarding genocides, nationalism and so forth.
Like I said, prove it.

by Royal Baronga » Tue May 23, 2017 10:29 am
Liriena wrote:Shrilland wrote:
Nobody here said anything about "white supremecy", but congrats for assuming my race and proving that you are actually racist.
Congrats for assuming I was referring to you.Shrilland wrote:The culprit was the child of refugees. Meaning that the threat is still there after the refugees have children.
So preemptively punish refugees for the crimes their native-born children might commit.Shrilland wrote:The issue isn't going away and just hiding behind shallow racism isn't going to make it go away as much as you want it to
The issue isn't going to be solved by demonizing an entire religion and all refugees either. You don't stop the radicalization of young Muslim men by ostracizing their entire community.

by Philjia » Tue May 23, 2017 10:30 am
Aelex wrote:Philjia wrote:My mistake, of course boiling people down to basic attributes is individualist policy.
Please point out where exactly I did that in the post you responded to. I know it's easier to grasp as straws than to acknowledge a truth you dislike but at least don't try to be so blatant at doing it. :^)
JG Ballard wrote:I want to rub the human race in its own vomit, and force it to look in the mirror.

by Galloism » Tue May 23, 2017 10:30 am
Royal Baronga wrote:Liriena wrote:Congrats for assuming I was referring to you.
So preemptively punish refugees for the crimes their native-born children might commit.
The issue isn't going to be solved by demonizing an entire religion and all refugees either. You don't stop the radicalization of young Muslim men by ostracizing their entire community.
If you don't have any muslims in your country they can't blow you up at a concert or Vroom Vroom you at nice in France

by Raermany » Tue May 23, 2017 10:30 am
Liriena wrote:Shrilland wrote:
Nobody here said anything about "white supremecy", but congrats for assuming my race and proving that you are actually racist.
Congrats for assuming I was referring to you.Shrilland wrote:The culprit was the child of refugees. Meaning that the threat is still there after the refugees have children.
So preemptively punish refugees for the crimes their native-born children might commit.Shrilland wrote:The issue isn't going away and just hiding behind shallow racism isn't going to make it go away as much as you want it to
The issue isn't going to be solved by demonizing an entire religion and all refugees either. You don't stop the radicalization of young Muslim men by ostracizing their entire community.

by Royal Baronga » Tue May 23, 2017 10:32 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aguaria Major, Dimetrodon Empire, Dtn, El Lazaro, Fractalnavel, Medoll, Necroghastia, Pizza Friday Forever91
Advertisement