Advertisement
by The East Marches II » Sat May 06, 2017 9:48 pm
by Neo Balka » Sat May 06, 2017 9:50 pm
The East Marches II wrote:There would be no winner. Our liberals complain about the dehumanization of Russians when the topic of nukes are brought up. They won't have the stomach to commit to decisive action that would end the war in the opening days (not to say they wouldn't start bad things later, it would take time for them to build up to that point). The conservatives wouldn't have the manpower to take the cities outright and it would bog down into siege warfare. Manufacturing is extremely decentralized these days, its not like you can flip a refrigerator factory into making bombs like you used to in the old days. It also isn't concentrated in cities either. t. worked in CNC Control of that would be irrelevant as the supply lines and chains would be all broken up/worthless. Foreigners would get involved tossing guns and ammo out like candy. Some foreign power would seize our nuclear weapons for certain as those can't be allowed to be floating about. Like jackals, the world would circle and make a feast of us. Balkanization with bandit militias everywhere is the best case scenario.
by Minzerland II » Sat May 06, 2017 9:58 pm
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)
by Neo Balka » Sun May 07, 2017 12:14 am
Minzerland II wrote:The Conservatives have Based Stickman last I heard. Just saying.
by Minzerland II » Sun May 07, 2017 12:18 am
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)
by Route Fourteen » Sun May 07, 2017 12:22 am
by Montchevre » Sun May 07, 2017 8:11 am
by Montchevre » Sun May 07, 2017 8:15 am
Montchevre wrote:If this is a real conflict, there would be a unified populace that would seize at least some frontier needed for food or power production, just like the Paris Commune did. Plus, most major cities can easily access power sources or international trade, and they would be more able to pay for it given their control of banks, the treasury, most industry, and most valuable technology and service production.
by Oldenfranck » Sun May 07, 2017 8:56 am
by Torrocca » Sun May 07, 2017 9:02 am
by Tekeristan » Sun May 07, 2017 10:13 am
Neo Balka wrote:The East Marches II wrote:There would be no winner. Our liberals complain about the dehumanization of Russians when the topic of nukes are brought up. They won't have the stomach to commit to decisive action that would end the war in the opening days (not to say they wouldn't start bad things later, it would take time for them to build up to that point). The conservatives wouldn't have the manpower to take the cities outright and it would bog down into siege warfare. Manufacturing is extremely decentralized these days, its not like you can flip a refrigerator factory into making bombs like you used to in the old days. It also isn't concentrated in cities either. t. worked in CNC Control of that would be irrelevant as the supply lines and chains would be all broken up/worthless. Foreigners would get involved tossing guns and ammo out like candy. Some foreign power would seize our nuclear weapons for certain as those can't be allowed to be floating about. Like jackals, the world would circle and make a feast of us. Balkanization with bandit militias everywhere is the best case scenario.
Balkanization eh?
we shall claim the midwest as a free republic until things are not fucked up.
by Valrifell » Sun May 07, 2017 10:13 am
by Neo Balka » Sun May 07, 2017 10:39 am
by Uxupox » Sun May 07, 2017 12:18 pm
by Bayan Principalities » Sun May 07, 2017 1:54 pm
by Neutraligon » Sun May 07, 2017 2:04 pm
Bayan Principalities wrote:Liberals, simply because the international reaction would certainly be on the side of liberals. In addition, conservatives are too uneducated to be able to capture large cities with large liberal populations.
Ultimately, the war would end up looking more like a failed conservative revolt than a collapse of society.
by Ifreann » Sun May 07, 2017 2:50 pm
Neutraligon wrote:Bayan Principalities wrote:Liberals, simply because the international reaction would certainly be on the side of liberals. In addition, conservatives are too uneducated to be able to capture large cities with large liberal populations.
Ultimately, the war would end up looking more like a failed conservative revolt than a collapse of society.
And now we get the conservatives are uneducated BS. Seriously the only point of this thread seems to throw out stupid stereotypes.
by Aurilius » Sun May 07, 2017 2:59 pm
Bayan Principalities wrote:Liberals, simply because the international reaction would certainly be on the side of liberals. In addition, conservatives are too uneducated to be able to capture large cities with large liberal populations.
Ultimately, the war would end up looking more like a failed conservative revolt than a collapse of society.
by Roosevetania » Sun May 07, 2017 3:00 pm
by Escape from Trump » Sun May 07, 2017 3:06 pm
by Englar Empire » Sun May 07, 2017 3:15 pm
by Ifreann » Sun May 07, 2017 3:18 pm
Englar Empire wrote:Conservatives have guns. Liberals have flowers. Who do you think wins?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Cyptopir, IC-Water, Juristonia, Likhinia, Republics of the Solar Union, Simonia, Singaporen Empire, Soul Reapers, Stratonesia, The French National Workers State
Advertisement