Trump MAGAthread VI

[Liriena]

Jared Kushner Under Scrutiny in Russia Probe, Say Officials

Well, darn.

Is the net closing in on Trump?

Maybe. Who knows what will come out of this?

[Genivaria]

Jared Kushner Under Scrutiny in Russia Probe, Say Officials

Well, darn.

So there are at least 4 or 5 people that should go down if/when Trump goes down too at this rate.

Fingers crossed that Pence is number 6 somehow.

[Olerand]

Yeah. The last guy had some tact at least.

All this one's screeching makes me want to do is read some erotic literature with interracial romance in it. x3

Why do so many derogatory racial words in the English language sound like baby speak? Genuinely, it's not a joke on racists being infantile, but all of those words are... like a baby attempting to form something.

[Liriena]

All this one's screeching makes me want to do is read some erotic literature with interracial romance in it. x3

Why do so many derogatory racial words in the English language sound like baby speak? Genuinely, it's not a joke on racists being infantile, but all of those words are... like a baby attempting to form something.

*shrug*

[Thermodolia]

:blush:

So there are at least 4 or 5 people that should go down if/when Trump goes down too at this rate.

Fingers crossed that Pence is number 6 somehow.

Ryan and Mcturtle should be numbers 7 and 8

[FelrikTheDeleted]

I can bench 450 motherfucker. I could snap your in half.

Provided that you're not lying, of course.

[FelrikTheDeleted]

Just ignore him. He's DOS

My apologies, I am responding out of habit.

[Proctopeo]

That's insane.

Also inaccurate.

But the Sweden boogeyman pays more dividends when you don't care too much about the facts.

That's a direct quote from a Wikipedia article that links the Swedish penal code; now, of course, these links are dead, so I found a relatively up-to-date version, in the original Swedish.

The relevant part, that is, Chapter 16 Section 8, roughly translated to this:

The person in the statement or communication, spread, threatens or expresses contempt for a national, ethnic or other such group of persons with allusion to race, color, national or ethnic origin, religious belief or sexual orientation, shall be sentenced for incitement to imprisonment not exceeding two years or if the crime is petty, to a fine.

Serious offense shall be sentenced to imprisonment for between six months and four years. In assessing whether the offense is grave, should be considered especially if the message had a particularly menacing or offensive content, and spread to a large number of people in a way that was likely to cause significant attention. Act (2002: 800).

So, no, it's not inaccurate. Hate speech laws in Sweden do include the "expression of contempt".

[Calladan]

All this one's screeching makes me want to do is read some erotic literature with interracial romance in it. x3

Why do so many derogatory racial words in the English language sound like baby speak? Genuinely, it's not a joke on racists being infantile, but all of those words are... like a baby attempting to form something.

Think about the intelligence level of the people who use them and who had to invent them. (And yes - that IS an insult to racists, before you ask!)

[Great Franconia and Verana]

The reactions of NATO world leaders while Trump lectured them on spending. Priceless.

[Corrian]

So there are at least 4 or 5 people that should go down if/when Trump goes down too at this rate.

Watergate toolk down 60 something people, let's try and beat that record

60? Really? Holy shit.

Well, so far Pence may already know stuff too due to being a part of the transition team
Jeff Sessions doesn't properly disclose his meetings with Russia
Kushner is tied up in this somehow.
Trump is pretty much a walking conflict of interest from the get go, obstruction of justice, and potentially Russian ties added on.
Michael Flynn is pretty obviously going down.

Who else?

[Thermodolia]

Watergate toolk down 60 something people, let's try and beat that record

60? Really? Holy shit.

Well, so far Pence may already know stuff too due to being a part of the transition team
Jeff Sessions doesn't properly disclose his meetings with Russia
Kushner is tied up in this somehow.
Trump is pretty much a walking conflict of interest from the get go, obstruction of justice, and potentially Russian ties added on.
Michael Flynn is pretty obviously going down.

Who else?

Granted many of those where staff and FBI and CIA agents

[Great Franconia and Verana]

Watergate toolk down 60 something people, let's try and beat that record

60? Really? Holy shit.

Well, so far Pence may already know stuff too due to being a part of the transition team
Jeff Sessions doesn't properly disclose his meetings with Russia
Kushner is tied up in this somehow.
Trump is pretty much a walking conflict of interest from the get go, obstruction of justice, and potentially Russian ties added on.
Michael Flynn is pretty obviously going down.

Who else?

It will be much easier to impeach Trump than Pence.
The GOP would be perfectly happy with Pence as President, and another sane Republican (Portman? Ryan? Rubio?) as his VP.

[Ghategen]

When you read all these pages and just see all the trump bashing. Would you of rather Clinton won? Both sucked trump just sucked least.

[Calladan]

Watergate toolk down 60 something people, let's try and beat that record

60? Really? Holy shit.

Well, so far Pence may already know stuff too due to being a part of the transition team
Jeff Sessions doesn't properly disclose his meetings with Russia
Kushner is tied up in this somehow.
Trump is pretty much a walking conflict of interest from the get go, obstruction of justice, and potentially Russian ties added on.
Michael Flynn is pretty obviously going down.

Who else?

Well I would guess if her husband and her father are asked to leave, Ivanka is probably not staying on much longer, whether is indicted or not.

[Calladan]

When you read all these pages and just see all the trump bashing. Would you of rather Clinton won? Both sucked trump just sucked least.

It's a thread about Trump. With Trump's name IN THE TITLE. What did you think this would be about? The weather???????

[Ghategen]

When you read all these pages and just see all the trump bashing. Would you of rather Clinton won? Both sucked trump just sucked least.

It's a thread about Trump. With Trump's name IN THE TITLE. What did you think this would be about? The weather???????

In all honesty man i was excepting less trump bashing then there is. This is more toxic than breitbart.

[Gravlen]

Also inaccurate.

But the Sweden boogeyman pays more dividends when you don't care too much about the facts.

That's a direct quote from a Wikipedia article that links the Swedish penal code; now, of course, these links are dead, so I found a relatively up-to-date version, in the original Swedish.

The relevant part, that is, Chapter 16 Section 8, roughly translated to this:

The person in the statement or communication, spread, threatens or expresses contempt for a national, ethnic or other such group of persons with allusion to race, color, national or ethnic origin, religious belief or sexual orientation, shall be sentenced for incitement to imprisonment not exceeding two years or if the crime is petty, to a fine.

Serious offense shall be sentenced to imprisonment for between six months and four years. In assessing whether the offense is grave, should be considered especially if the message had a particularly menacing or offensive content, and spread to a large number of people in a way that was likely to cause significant attention. Act (2002: 800).

So, no, it's not inaccurate. Hate speech laws in Sweden do include the "expression of contempt".

It's inaccurate because you're ignoring the written, stated intentions of the lawmakers, an important source for interpreting Swedish laws. You're also ignoring how the law has been interpreted by the Swedish Supreme Court and is used by the Swedish criminal courts. In addition, you didn't mention the European Convention of Human Rights, which further limits it's application.

In short, far from all "expressions of contempt" fall under the law. Hence, inaccurate.

Alla uttalanden av nedsättande eller förnedrande natur omfattas dock inte. Uttalanden som inte kan anses överskrida gränserna för en saklig kritik av vissa grupper faller utanför det straffbara området. För straffbarhet krävs att det är fullt klart att uttalandet överskrider gränsen för en saklig och vederhäftig diskussion rörande gruppen i fråga. Hänsyn till opinionsfriheten och kritikrätten får visserligen inte åberopas som skydd för uttalanden som uttrycker missaktning mot en hel folkgrupp på grund av att den t.ex. tillhör en viss nationalitet och av denna anledning skulle vara mindre värd. (Se prop. 1970:87 s. 130, jfr prop. 2001/02:59 s. 14 f. och 37 f.) Det straffbara området skall dock inte sträckas så långt att det kommer att omfatta även en saklig diskussion om eller kritik av homosexualitet. Kriminaliseringen skall inte utgöra hinder mot opinionsfriheten eller ett hot mot den fria åsiktsbildningen. Vidare skall vetenskapens frihet bevaras. I det sagda ligger att också sådana påståenden som bäst bemöts eller tillrättaläggs i en fri och öppen debatt inte skall omfattas av kriminaliseringen. (Prop. 2001/ 02:59 s. 35 f.)

https://lagen.nu/dom/nja/2005s805

[Conserative Morality]

When you read all these pages and just see all the trump bashing. Would you of rather Clinton won? Both sucked trump just sucked least.

Aw, poor Trump, getting criticized for being a man-child. "Please stop reminding me of the failures of the man I voted in =((((("

[Ghategen]

When you read all these pages and just see all the trump bashing. Would you of rather Clinton won? Both sucked trump just sucked least.

Aw, poor Trump, getting criticized for being a man-child. "Please stop reminding me of the failures of the man I voted in =((((("

Trump being criticized is ok. Hating him to hate him is another matter. Also speaking of that arnt the left suppose to be the loving part of the political spectrum

[Uxupox]

The reactions of NATO world leaders while Trump lectured them on spending. Priceless.

What's wrong here?

[Astrolinium]

Aw, poor Trump, getting criticized for being a man-child. "Please stop reminding me of the failures of the man I voted in =((((("

Trump being criticized is ok. Hating him to hate him is another matter. Also speaking of that arnt the left suppose to be the loving part of the political spectrum

That's precisely why the left opposes Trump. His policies thus far have been policies of exclusion, of indifference, and of corrupt self-interest.

[Hittanryan]

When you read all these pages and just see all the trump bashing. Would you of rather Clinton won? Both sucked trump just sucked least.

Yes we mustn't criticize the Dear Leader for being an inexperienced, incompetent, lying narcissist who has already repeatedly embarrassed our nation. Any press coverage of his glaring mistakes is obviously fake news. The Immortal Emperor doesn't make mistakes.

[Ghategen]

Trump being criticized is ok. Hating him to hate him is another matter. Also speaking of that arnt the left suppose to be the loving part of the political spectrum

That's precisely why the left opposes Trump. His policies thus far have been policies of exclusion, of indifference, and of corrupt self-interest.

His policies so far haven't been that bad some of them arnt great but at least he's attempting to deal with illegals and preventing terrorist from entering the country.

[Conserative Morality]

Trump being criticized is ok. Hating him to hate him is another matter.

Get over the persecution complex. Trump may think that he's hated for no other reason than to hate him, and may spew that nonsense to his followers, but the truth is that he gives plenty of reasons to hate him - and seems to add more with each passing day.

Also speaking of that arnt the left suppose to be the loving part of the political spectrum

No.