Minoa wrote:Source: http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-china- ... KKBN18A02CRussian President Vladimir Putin said on Sunday that protectionism is a threat to the global economy.
I see double standards in my opinion.
Oh who else but Putin?
Oh yeah
Advertisement
by Internationalist Bastard » Sun May 14, 2017 3:03 am
Minoa wrote:Source: http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-china- ... KKBN18A02CRussian President Vladimir Putin said on Sunday that protectionism is a threat to the global economy.
I see double standards in my opinion.
by Saiwania » Sun May 14, 2017 5:57 am
by Vassenor » Sun May 14, 2017 5:59 am
Saiwania wrote:The US healthcare system has taken yet another blow as of late. Aetna has announced that it is exiting from the ACA's exchanges in Nebraska, Delaware, and Virginia starting in 2018. Aetna expects to lose $200 million this year and it has already lost $700 million between 2014 to 2016. Aetna has exited from at least 11 other states this year.
The sole remaining insurer on the ACA exchange for Nebraska is Medicaid while for Delaware, only Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield remains.
Humana has decided to completely give up on the individual market for health insurance starting in 2018. UnitedHealthcare has exited from Virginia and Wellmark Blue Cross Blue Shield isn't going to sell individual policies in Iowa anymore effective 2018.
The long awaited death spiral of Obamacare is perhaps beginning and soon. The trend of insurers losing massive amounts of money and exiting from the exchanges is only becoming truer with each passing year.
by The Alma Mater » Sun May 14, 2017 6:13 am
Vassenor wrote:Saiwania wrote:The US healthcare system has taken yet another blow as of late. Aetna has announced that it is exiting from the ACA's exchanges in Nebraska, Delaware, and Virginia starting in 2018. Aetna expects to lose $200 million this year and it has already lost $700 million between 2014 to 2016. Aetna has exited from at least 11 other states this year.
The sole remaining insurer on the ACA exchange for Nebraska is Medicaid while for Delaware, only Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield remains.
Humana has decided to completely give up on the individual market for health insurance starting in 2018. UnitedHealthcare has exited from Virginia and Wellmark Blue Cross Blue Shield isn't going to sell individual policies in Iowa anymore effective 2018.
The long awaited death spiral of Obamacare is perhaps beginning and soon. The trend of insurers losing massive amounts of money and exiting from the exchanges is only becoming truer with each passing year.
So why is making it harder for people to get healthcare a good thing?
by Maineiacs » Sun May 14, 2017 7:12 am
Vassenor wrote:Saiwania wrote:The US healthcare system has taken yet another blow as of late. Aetna has announced that it is exiting from the ACA's exchanges in Nebraska, Delaware, and Virginia starting in 2018. Aetna expects to lose $200 million this year and it has already lost $700 million between 2014 to 2016. Aetna has exited from at least 11 other states this year.
The sole remaining insurer on the ACA exchange for Nebraska is Medicaid while for Delaware, only Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield remains.
Humana has decided to completely give up on the individual market for health insurance starting in 2018. UnitedHealthcare has exited from Virginia and Wellmark Blue Cross Blue Shield isn't going to sell individual policies in Iowa anymore effective 2018.
The long awaited death spiral of Obamacare is perhaps beginning and soon. The trend of insurers losing massive amounts of money and exiting from the exchanges is only becoming truer with each passing year.
So why is making it harder for people to get healthcare a good thing?
by AiliailiA » Sun May 14, 2017 7:26 am
Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.
by Ashmoria » Sun May 14, 2017 7:32 am
Galloism wrote:Northern Davincia wrote:Don't you think that the hundreds of billions of dollars put into welfare would be better spent on job investment or public infrastructure?
Hmm.
That's a tough one. The answer is probably "not totally" but "more" might be appropriate. It doesn't have to be all or nothing.
by Grinning Dragon » Sun May 14, 2017 7:52 am
by Ashmoria » Sun May 14, 2017 7:54 am
Grinning Dragon wrote:Ashmoria wrote:since most people on public assistance are unable to work I think its a pretty bad idea.
I would have to agree with ND. Maintaining infrastructure and a job investment environment should have a more top billing vs welfare, as a damaged or failing infrastructure and a stagnant job investment environment is going to have a snowball effect which could very well be detrimental to those on public assistance.
by Minoa » Sun May 14, 2017 8:09 am
Internationalist Bastard wrote:Minoa wrote:Source: http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-china- ... KKBN18A02C
I see double standards in my opinion.
Oh who else but Putin?
Oh yeah
by Northern Davincia » Sun May 14, 2017 8:30 am
Ashmoria wrote:Grinning Dragon wrote:
I would have to agree with ND. Maintaining infrastructure and a job investment environment should have a more top billing vs welfare, as a damaged or failing infrastructure and a stagnant job investment environment is going to have a snowball effect which could very well be detrimental to those on public assistance.
we can and should do both
but I would have to think that letting the disabled, elderly and small children die in order that Atlanta get money for that bridge is inhumane.
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Neutraligon » Sun May 14, 2017 9:04 am
Northern Davincia wrote:Ashmoria wrote:we can and should do both
but I would have to think that letting the disabled, elderly and small children die in order that Atlanta get money for that bridge is inhumane.
Numerically, how many people on welfare are genuinely unable to work compared to those who can?
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Sun May 14, 2017 9:10 am
Saiwania wrote:The US healthcare system has taken yet another blow as of late. Aetna has announced that it is exiting from the ACA's exchanges in Nebraska, Delaware, and Virginia starting in 2018. Aetna expects to lose $200 million this year and it has already lost $700 million between 2014 to 2016. Aetna has exited from at least 11 other states this year.
The sole remaining insurer on the ACA exchange for Nebraska is Medicaid while for Delaware, only Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield remains.
Humana has decided to completely give up on the individual market for health insurance starting in 2018. UnitedHealthcare has exited from Virginia and Wellmark Blue Cross Blue Shield isn't going to sell individual policies in Iowa anymore effective 2018.
The long awaited death spiral of Obamacare is perhaps beginning and soon. The trend of insurers losing massive amounts of money and exiting from the exchanges is only becoming truer with each passing year.
by Washington Resistance Army » Sun May 14, 2017 9:13 am
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Sun May 14, 2017 9:15 am
Saiwania wrote:The long awaited death spiral of Obamacare is perhaps beginning and soon.
by Thermodolia » Sun May 14, 2017 9:17 am
Ashmoria wrote:Grinning Dragon wrote:
I would have to agree with ND. Maintaining infrastructure and a job investment environment should have a more top billing vs welfare, as a damaged or failing infrastructure and a stagnant job investment environment is going to have a snowball effect which could very well be detrimental to those on public assistance.
we can and should do both
but I would have to think that letting the disabled, elderly and small children die in order that Atlanta get money for that bridge is inhumane.
by Thermodolia » Sun May 14, 2017 9:19 am
by Ashmoria » Sun May 14, 2017 9:20 am
Northern Davincia wrote:Ashmoria wrote:we can and should do both
but I would have to think that letting the disabled, elderly and small children die in order that Atlanta get money for that bridge is inhumane.
Numerically, how many people on welfare are genuinely unable to work compared to those who can?
by Thermodolia » Sun May 14, 2017 10:17 am
Senkaku wrote:
Every time I see James Clapper, he looks like he's aged twenty years since the last time I saw him.
by Saiwania » Sun May 14, 2017 10:18 am
by Genivaria » Sun May 14, 2017 10:24 am
Saiwania wrote:I'll admit as much that I can't wait for Obamacare to fail and it collapsing is exactly what I want. Even better would be if the Republican AHCA becomes law. I anticipate that the AHCA will prove so disastrous that the Democrats will sweep congress in 2018 and 2020 and we'll be getting a single payer system.
There might be a ton of suffering and maybe some death in the interim but it is necessary and it will all be worth it if my long game scenario plays out with clockwork precision. What we absolutely can't have, is the ACA surviving long enough to never go away and the US will be stuck with a private insurer system for decades if not indefinitely.
by Proctopeo » Sun May 14, 2017 10:32 am
Genivaria wrote:Saiwania wrote:I'll admit as much that I can't wait for Obamacare to fail and it collapsing is exactly what I want. Even better would be if the Republican AHCA becomes law. I anticipate that the AHCA will prove so disastrous that the Democrats will sweep congress in 2018 and 2020 and we'll be getting a single payer system.
There might be a ton of suffering and maybe some death in the interim but it is necessary and it will all be worth it if my long game scenario plays out with clockwork precision. What we absolutely can't have, is the ACA surviving long enough to never go away and the US will be stuck with a private insurer system for decades if not indefinitely.
The one where rape and pregnancies are now pre-existing conditions?
That one?
by Corrian » Sun May 14, 2017 10:39 am
Saiwania wrote:I'll admit as much that I can't wait for Obamacare to fail and it collapsing is exactly what I want. Even better would be if the Republican AHCA becomes law. I anticipate that the AHCA will prove so disastrous that the Democrats will sweep congress in 2018 and 2020 and we'll be getting a single payer system.
There might be a ton of suffering and maybe some death in the interim but it is necessary and it will all be worth it if my long game scenario plays out with clockwork precision. What we absolutely can't have, is the ACA surviving long enough to never go away and the US will be stuck with a private insurer system for decades if not indefinitely.
by Saiwania » Sun May 14, 2017 10:47 am
Genivaria wrote:The one where rape and pregnancies are now pre-existing conditions? That one?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Eahland, Ethel mermania, Habsburg Mexico, Jerzylvania, Keltionialang, Kostane, New Ziedrich, Philjia, Plan Neonie, Port Carverton, The Kharkivan Cossacks, Tungstan, Yerrisey
Advertisement