NATION

PASSWORD

Trump MAGAthread VI

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Lady Scylla
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15673
Founded: Nov 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Lady Scylla » Thu May 25, 2017 6:30 pm

Uxupox wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:Oh, okay. You really convinced me over centuries of military theory and recent shitshows showing what a massive problem offensive operations are. Thanks, random internet guy!


I can give you a class on strategic level OPORDS, different levels of war and full spectrum operations if you want.


Should we somehow be impressed?

Here
Image


Now have a seat.

User avatar
The East Marches II
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18033
Founded: Mar 11, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The East Marches II » Thu May 25, 2017 6:32 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
The East Marches II wrote:Moving light units is alot different than heavy tanks and self propelled guns. 5k on the new Eastern Front will be nothing. We need to be able to move 100,000 plus tanks, artillery and all the fun stuff that goes with.

"Light units"

You do realize we were porting around artillery battalions for the Frenchies, right? 5k would be nothing. But as I said, our involvement was minimal in terms of our capabilities. 1/20 of our C-17 fleet. Just our C-17 fleet. Just our active C-17 fleet. That's not including our active C-5s, C-130s, or mothballed C-141s...


C-17s can't fit Abrams. We've only 125 C-5s which can fit a 2 Abrams. We need to move 1,000 tanks but also their support kit (which is more than the tank). Our current airlift isn't sufficient. As I said previously we would be commuting units piecemeal and suffer extremely high losses for it.

User avatar
Uxupox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Nov 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Uxupox » Thu May 25, 2017 6:32 pm

Hittanryan wrote:
Uxupox wrote:
Bush didn't plan missions, nor did Obama and neither will Trump.

Did I say Bush planned missions? I said he embarked on a poorly-planned unilateral military adventure, not that he planned individual missions.


It was planned very well. In fact Ret. Gen. Mattis achievement at completely demolishing the Iraqi forces in the theater with his command of 1st Marine Division was something outstanding and it is beholden with high regards in the military world.
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00

User avatar
Uxupox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Nov 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Uxupox » Thu May 25, 2017 6:33 pm

Lady Scylla wrote:
Uxupox wrote:
I can give you a class on strategic level OPORDS, different levels of war and full spectrum operations if you want.


Should we somehow be impressed?

Here
Image


Now have a seat.


?
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00

User avatar
Internationalist Bastard
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24520
Founded: Aug 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Internationalist Bastard » Thu May 25, 2017 6:33 pm

Proctopeo wrote:
Lady Scylla wrote:
If the US got attacked, I doubt much of Europe would sit back like nothing was happening. Trump's idea that the US is somehow entitled to reimbursement is insane.

I wonder how effective many of those countries would be, at, you know, responding.

I mean they don't just call terrorists losers
Call me Alex, I insist
I am a girl, damnit
Slut Pride. So like, real talk, I’m a porn actress. We’re not all bimbos. I do not give out my information or videos to avoid conflict with site policy. I’m happy to talk about the industry or my thoughts on the career but I will not be showing you any goodies. Sorry
“Whatever you are, be a good one” Abe Lincoln

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Thu May 25, 2017 6:33 pm

The East Marches II wrote:Its a sunk cost at this point. Europe can care all they want but how many tanks can they send to the front to help? That's the important part. Caring does fuck all.

Poland alone has almost half of the tank force of Russia.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu May 25, 2017 6:34 pm

Uxupox wrote:
Hittanryan wrote:Did I say Bush planned missions? I said he embarked on a poorly-planned unilateral military adventure, not that he planned individual missions.


It was planned very well. In fact Ret. Gen. Mattis achievement at completely demolishing the Iraqi forces in the theater with his command of 1st Marine Division was something outstanding and it is beholden with high regards in the military world.

Which did fuck all for the insurgency that followed.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Lady Scylla
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15673
Founded: Nov 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Lady Scylla » Thu May 25, 2017 6:34 pm

Uxupox wrote:
Hittanryan wrote:Did I say Bush planned missions? I said he embarked on a poorly-planned unilateral military adventure, not that he planned individual missions.


It was planned very well. In fact Ret. Gen. Mattis achievement at completely demolishing the Iraqi forces in the theater with his command of 1st Marine Division was something outstanding and it is beholden with high regards in the military world.


Demolishing Iraqi forces. You mean the fact that the Iraqi military had severe loyalty issues and would often flee? Not much of a win there. There's a reason the first war was so bloody short.

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78486
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Thu May 25, 2017 6:34 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:Why am I arguing with you? You'd love to see NATO dissolved. Any action towards that goal would be praised regardless of logical consistency or viability.

Oh right, enlisted in the military but never wants to fight.

You do know that most troops don't want to go to war because they've seen shit they don't want to put anyone though
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Lady Scylla
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15673
Founded: Nov 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Lady Scylla » Thu May 25, 2017 6:34 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Uxupox wrote:
It was planned very well. In fact Ret. Gen. Mattis achievement at completely demolishing the Iraqi forces in the theater with his command of 1st Marine Division was something outstanding and it is beholden with high regards in the military world.

Which did fuck all for the insurgency that followed.


That's what we get when we put the oppressed in power over their previous oppressors.

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78486
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Thu May 25, 2017 6:35 pm

Genivaria wrote:
Uxupox wrote:
Here we see the violent man on the prowl looking for the next war. Ahh the smell of dying children in the morning. Makes me cry a tear of joyness of thee!

Hey man. Being a soldier does not mean having a boner for death and destruction of all other beings.

I'm still thinking about trying the military again.
Maybe not bring up the ADHD this time.

I wouldn't try it. If they find out it's an automatic discharge
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Uxupox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Nov 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Uxupox » Thu May 25, 2017 6:36 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Uxupox wrote:
It was planned very well. In fact Ret. Gen. Mattis achievement at completely demolishing the Iraqi forces in the theater with his command of 1st Marine Division was something outstanding and it is beholden with high regards in the military world.

Which did fuck all for the insurgency that followed.


That's because there was no imposition of a strict military government and in tie with the hearts of minds strategy it was not opted to see the rearmament of the local native forces.
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu May 25, 2017 6:36 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Gauthier wrote:Oh right, enlisted in the military but never wants to fight.

You do know that most troops don't want to go to war because they've seen shit they don't want to put anyone though

There's not enjoying a conflict and there's trying to dodge the job description.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Proctopeo
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12370
Founded: Sep 26, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Proctopeo » Thu May 25, 2017 6:37 pm

Internationalist Bastard wrote:
Proctopeo wrote:I wonder how effective many of those countries would be, at, you know, responding.

I mean they don't just call terrorists losers

I don't see how that relates
Arachno-anarchism || NO GODS NO MASTERS || Free NSG Odreria

User avatar
Corrian
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 74857
Founded: Mar 19, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Corrian » Thu May 25, 2017 6:37 pm

Why does Texas seem to think "Hey, see all of this horrible shit other states passed? Let's try to pass all of those as fast as possible"
My Last.FM and RYM

Look on the bright side, one day you'll be dead~Street Sects

User avatar
Lady Scylla
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15673
Founded: Nov 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Lady Scylla » Thu May 25, 2017 6:38 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Genivaria wrote:I'm still thinking about trying the military again.
Maybe not bring up the ADHD this time.

I wouldn't try it. If they find out it's an automatic discharge


I wouldn't try it period. Not while Trump's in office. If he manages to not get us into another war, I will be surprised.

User avatar
Ism
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6152
Founded: Oct 14, 2011
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ism » Thu May 25, 2017 6:38 pm

Corrian wrote:Why does Texas seem to think "Hey, see all of this horrible shit other states passed? Let's try to pass all of those as fast as possible"


Because everything is bigger in Texas. Well, almost everything.

User avatar
Lady Scylla
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15673
Founded: Nov 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Lady Scylla » Thu May 25, 2017 6:39 pm

Corrian wrote:Why does Texas seem to think "Hey, see all of this horrible shit other states passed? Let's try to pass all of those as fast as possible"


Because my state has been run by Republicans that are some of the most shallow lifeforms on the planet.
Last edited by Lady Scylla on Thu May 25, 2017 6:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Thu May 25, 2017 6:39 pm

The East Marches II wrote:C-17s can't fit Abrams.

Then it's a good thing our military consists of more than just Abrams.
We've only 125 C-5s which can fit a 2 Abrams. We need to move 1,000 tanks but also their support kit (which is more than the tank). Our current airlift isn't sufficient. As I said previously we would be commuting units piecemeal and suffer extremely high losses for it.

That's 250 Abrams/trip. Eight hours in the air at cruising speed from New York to France. Are you telling me that we can't coordinate more than one round trip every 1.75 days for our C-5 fleet in times of trouble? Or that the necessary support kit either cannot fit in anything less than a C-5 or would take more than another 7 days?
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
The East Marches II
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18033
Founded: Mar 11, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The East Marches II » Thu May 25, 2017 6:39 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
The East Marches II wrote:Its a sunk cost at this point. Europe can care all they want but how many tanks can they send to the front to help? That's the important part. Caring does fuck all.

Poland alone has almost half of the tank force of Russia.


2 to 1 odds with shit tanks (only 100 Leopard 2s and the rest cold war left over T-72 and T-55s) is bad but unlike the rest of Europe they believe and are willing to fight. Poland takes its defense seriously. They deserve a special exemption from my condemnation as do the British. They do work too especially with the two new carriers which will free up an American carrier.

User avatar
Uxupox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Nov 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Uxupox » Thu May 25, 2017 6:39 pm

Lady Scylla wrote:
Uxupox wrote:
It was planned very well. In fact Ret. Gen. Mattis achievement at completely demolishing the Iraqi forces in the theater with his command of 1st Marine Division was something outstanding and it is beholden with high regards in the military world.


Demolishing Iraqi forces. You mean the fact that the Iraqi military had severe loyalty issues and would often flee? Not much of a win there. There's a reason the first war was so bloody short.


Have you seen how he completely reformed his own staff and how he effectively used his logistical capacity during the engagements in the war? The guy is a genius.

He just didn't demolish the normal troops but also the Republican guard with what seemed at the time no effort.
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Thu May 25, 2017 6:39 pm

Lady Scylla wrote:
Uxupox wrote:
It was planned very well. In fact Ret. Gen. Mattis achievement at completely demolishing the Iraqi forces in the theater with his command of 1st Marine Division was something outstanding and it is beholden with high regards in the military world.


Demolishing Iraqi forces. You mean the fact that the Iraqi military had severe loyalty issues and would often flee? Not much of a win there. There's a reason the first war was so bloody short.

Quite a number of the units that Mattis and his troops engaged were, iirc, Republican Guard and foreign volunteers. The latter may not have been especially competent but they were certainly willing to die fighting against the "infidels". They were finding Syrians, Libyans, Egyptians, Sudanese, etc. A lot stayed after the invasion to take part in the insurgency.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu May 25, 2017 6:40 pm

Lady Scylla wrote:
Corrian wrote:Why does Texas seem to think "Hey, see all of this horrible shit other states passed? Let's try to pass all of those as fast as possible"


Because my state has been run by Republicans that are perhaps from the guck at the bottom of the barrel.

Oh right, they want to pass their own Dick Police Bill.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Internationalist Bastard
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24520
Founded: Aug 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Internationalist Bastard » Thu May 25, 2017 6:40 pm

Proctopeo wrote:
Internationalist Bastard wrote:I mean they don't just call terrorists losers

I don't see how that relates

I mean track record shows we tend to work together a lot when it comes to terrorism, and yet Trump likes to claim America does all the work
Call me Alex, I insist
I am a girl, damnit
Slut Pride. So like, real talk, I’m a porn actress. We’re not all bimbos. I do not give out my information or videos to avoid conflict with site policy. I’m happy to talk about the industry or my thoughts on the career but I will not be showing you any goodies. Sorry
“Whatever you are, be a good one” Abe Lincoln

User avatar
Uxupox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Nov 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Uxupox » Thu May 25, 2017 6:40 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:You do know that most troops don't want to go to war because they've seen shit they don't want to put anyone though

There's not enjoying a conflict and there's trying to dodge the job description.


Seems to me you just want to see blood reign. Specifically Russian.
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Askhidel, Awqnia, Emotional Support Crocodile, Google [Bot], Kostane, Love Peace and Friendship, Luminesa, Omphalos, Republics of the Solar Union, So uh lab here, Tarsonis, Teffland, The Jamesian Republic, Tiami, Tungstan

Advertisement

Remove ads