NATION

PASSWORD

Trump MAGAthread VI

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Uxupox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Nov 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Uxupox » Tue May 16, 2017 1:43 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Uxupox wrote:The guy is not entirely wrong. As the successors to the Mujaheddin did attack the United States and are a current existent threat to US national interests.

The successors to the Mujahideen largely fought alongside the US forces as part of the Northern Alliance.

May I remind you that the Taliban wasn't even around until '91?


Successor.
A person or thing that immediately follows another
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Tue May 16, 2017 1:44 pm

Natapoc wrote:
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
So what?

The CIA and the Reagan administration supported a bunch of fucking shitbags down in my own country of origin.

Does that mean I wish the CIA was dissolved? No.


I think you believe I'm making an argument that I am not.

I did not say that the CIA would be dissolved if they enact the presidents policies.


The CIA doesn't "enact" any policies. They provide intelligence to the president and enforce certain of the president's covert operations (which they haven't said they wouldn't do).
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Tue May 16, 2017 1:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Uxupox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Nov 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Uxupox » Tue May 16, 2017 1:45 pm

Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
Natapoc wrote:
I think you believe I'm making an argument that I am not.

I did not say that the CIA would be dissolved if they enact the presidents policies.


The CIA doesn't "enact" any policies. They provide intelligence to the president.


They provide intelligence and act in a way that benefits the nation's interest.
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00

User avatar
Natapoc
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19864
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Natapoc » Tue May 16, 2017 1:45 pm

Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
Natapoc wrote:
I think you believe I'm making an argument that I am not.

I did not say that the CIA would be dissolved if they enact the presidents policies.


The CIA doesn't "enact" any policies. They provide intelligence to the president.


They enact policy when they topple governments and carry out invasions and their intelligence gathering is done according to US policy. So yes, they enact US policy.
Did you see a ghost?

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Tue May 16, 2017 1:45 pm

Uxupox wrote:Successor.
A person or thing that immediately follows another

And the successor to the Mujahideen was the Northern Alliance, after they got done squabbling amongst each other in the face of the Taliban (however temporarily). The Taliban was an outside force funded and essentially founded by the Pakistani ISI.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Tue May 16, 2017 1:45 pm

Uxupox wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:Yes but we only trained them because we where trying to take out Ivan who was the bigger threat at the time.


The stupidity of Operation Cyclone is what had a cascading effect on today's affairs specifically those in the Middle East. We should have not intervened in the Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan.


Well, you guys did believe in detente as a policy back then.

Not entirely farfetched you would do that.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Tue May 16, 2017 1:47 pm

Natapoc wrote:
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
The CIA doesn't "enact" any policies. They provide intelligence to the president.


They enact policy when they topple governments and carry out invasions and their intelligence gathering is done according to US policy. So yes, they enact US policy.


That's enforcement, not "enacting" anything.

The president enacts. The CIA enforces on behalf of the president.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Tue May 16, 2017 1:48 pm

Uxupox wrote:
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
The CIA doesn't "enact" any policies. They provide intelligence to the president.


They provide intelligence and act in a way that benefits the nation's interest.


Yes, see edit above.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Uxupox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Nov 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Uxupox » Tue May 16, 2017 1:49 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Uxupox wrote:Successor.

And the successor to the Mujahideen was the Northern Alliance, after they got done squabbling amongst each other in the face of the Taliban (however temporarily). The Taliban was an outside force funded and essentially founded by the Pakistani ISI.


What the hell. The Taliban was not an outside force. It began as part of a tribal movement in cohesion with university students headed by Omar. They took power from the Mujaheddin after the number of tribes grew disillusioned from their authority. They were not an outside force.
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00

User avatar
Natapoc
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19864
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Natapoc » Tue May 16, 2017 1:51 pm

Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
Natapoc wrote:
They enact policy when they topple governments and carry out invasions and their intelligence gathering is done according to US policy. So yes, they enact US policy.


That's enforcement, not "enacting" anything.

The president enacts. The CIA enforces on behalf of the president.


Call it whatever you like. If the CIA stops providing intelligence to the president as was suggested by the person to whom I replied, they would no longer be serving their role and a reorganization would be a possibility.
Did you see a ghost?

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Tue May 16, 2017 1:53 pm

Natapoc wrote:
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
That's enforcement, not "enacting" anything.

The president enacts. The CIA enforces on behalf of the president.


Call it whatever you like. If the CIA stops providing intelligence to the president as was suggested by the person to whom I replied, they would no longer be serving their role and a reorganization would be a possibility.


No, it wouldn't.

The CIA can stop giving intelligence to the president, passing it through a middle man like Pence to then be given to Trump.

They can do that, and Trump calling for their reorganization or dissolution would not be wise. Could he do it? Yes. Would it be wise? No, it wouldn't.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Natapoc
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19864
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Natapoc » Tue May 16, 2017 1:54 pm

Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
Natapoc wrote:
Call it whatever you like. If the CIA stops providing intelligence to the president as was suggested by the person to whom I replied, they would no longer be serving their role and a reorganization would be a possibility.


No, it wouldn't.

The CIA can stop giving intelligence to the president, passing it through a middle man like Pence to then be given to Trump.

They can do that, and Trump calling for their reorganization or dissolution would not be wise. Could he do it? Yes. Would it be wise? No, it wouldn't.


Trump is not particularly wise.
Did you see a ghost?

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78485
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Tue May 16, 2017 1:55 pm

Uxupox wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:Yes but we only trained them because we where trying to take out Ivan who was the bigger threat at the time.


The stupidity of Operation Cyclone is what had a cascading effect on today's affairs specifically those in the Middle East. We should have not intervened in the Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan.

Hindsight is 20/20
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Tue May 16, 2017 1:55 pm

Uxupox wrote:What the hell. The Taliban was not an outside force. It began as part of a tribal movement in cohesion with university students headed by Omar. They took power from the Mujaheddin after the number of tribes grew disillusioned from their authority. They were not an outside force.

In 1991, the Taliban (a movement originating from Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-run religious schools for Afghan refugees in Pakistan) also developed in Afghanistan as a politico-religious force. The most often-repeated story and the Taliban's own story of how Mullah Omar first mobilized his followers is that in the spring of 1994, neighbors in Singesar told him that the local governor had abducted two teenage girls, shaved their heads, and taken them to a camp where they were raped. 30 Taliban (with only 16 rifles) freed the girls, and hanged the governor from the barrel of a tank. Later that year, two militia commanders killed civilians while fighting for the right to sodomize a young boy. The Taliban freed him. Mullah Omar started his movement with fewer than 50 armed madrassah students in his hometown of Kandahar.[74][75]

In the beginning the Taliban numbered in the hundreds, were badly equipped and low on munitions. Within months however 15,000 students arrived from the madrassas in Pakistan.

...

The Taliban, however, suffered a devastating defeat against government forces of the Islamic State under the command of Ahmad Shah Massoud. The Taliban's early victories in 1994 were followed by a series of defeats that resulted in heavy losses which led analysts to believe that the Taliban movement as such might have run its course. Pakistan, however, started to provide stronger military support to the Taliban. On September 26, 1996, as the Taliban with military support by Pakistan and financial support by Saudi Arabia prepared for another major offensive, Massoud ordered a full retreat from Kabul to continue anti-Taliban resistance in the Hindu Kush mountains instead of engaging in street battles in Kabul. The Taliban entered Kabul on September 27, 1996, and established the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. Many analysts like Amin Saikal describe the Taliban as developing into a proxy force for Pakistan's regional interests.[71][78][82][86][87][88]
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Tue May 16, 2017 1:57 pm

Natapoc wrote:
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
No, it wouldn't.

The CIA can stop giving intelligence to the president, passing it through a middle man like Pence to then be given to Trump.

They can do that, and Trump calling for their reorganization or dissolution would not be wise. Could he do it? Yes. Would it be wise? No, it wouldn't.


Trump is not particularly wise.


Yes, I am aware he's an idiot with the attention span of a goldfish.
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Tue May 16, 2017 1:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78485
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Tue May 16, 2017 1:57 pm

Natapoc wrote:
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
The CIA doesn't "enact" any policies. They provide intelligence to the president.


They enact policy when they topple governments and carry out invasions and their intelligence gathering is done according to US policy. So yes, they enact US policy.

The CIA doesn't do invasions. Coups yes, invasions no
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Izandai
Senator
 
Posts: 4330
Founded: May 27, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Izandai » Tue May 16, 2017 1:58 pm

Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
Natapoc wrote:
Trump is not particularly wise.


Yes, I am aware he's an idiot with the attention span of a goldfish.

That's an insult to goldfish (who actually have perfectly reasonable attention spans).
Shinkadomayaka wrote:
JUNCKS wrote:Ozzy is awesome but Jesus is awesomer

Hey, this is a church thread. No mentioning religion!

Lunatic Goofballs wrote:
Rambhutan wrote:
My blind porcupine takes exception to this


Your blind porcupine can read text? :blink:

Neanderthaland wrote:
Izandai wrote:I try to be a generous fuck. I'm more likely to have sex with someone more than once that way.

Although for some reason they always act insulted when I try to pay them to communicate how much I value sex.

Ism wrote:We don't dislike what Trump does because he's Trump, we dislike Trump because of what Trump does.

Fartsniffage wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Lots of people are evil, and most of them are closer to home than ISIS


Oooooh. The rare self burn.

Grenartia wrote:Authoritarianism is political sadomasochism, change my mind.
Age subject to change without notice.

User avatar
Natapoc
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19864
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Natapoc » Tue May 16, 2017 1:58 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Natapoc wrote:
They enact policy when they topple governments and carry out invasions and their intelligence gathering is done according to US policy. So yes, they enact US policy.

The CIA doesn't do invasions. Coups yes, invasions no


I see you desire a debate over semantics.

Debate denied.
Did you see a ghost?

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78485
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Tue May 16, 2017 1:58 pm

Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
Natapoc wrote:
Call it whatever you like. If the CIA stops providing intelligence to the president as was suggested by the person to whom I replied, they would no longer be serving their role and a reorganization would be a possibility.


No, it wouldn't.

The CIA can stop giving intelligence to the president, passing it through a middle man like Pence to then be given to Trump.

They can do that, and Trump calling for their reorganization or dissolution would not be wise. Could he do it? Yes. Would it be wise? No, it wouldn't.

I'd rather them give it to SECDEF mattis
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Uxupox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Nov 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Uxupox » Tue May 16, 2017 1:59 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Uxupox wrote:What the hell. The Taliban was not an outside force. It began as part of a tribal movement in cohesion with university students headed by Omar. They took power from the Mujaheddin after the number of tribes grew disillusioned from their authority. They were not an outside force.

In 1991, the Taliban (a movement originating from Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-run religious schools for Afghan refugees in Pakistan) also developed in Afghanistan as a politico-religious force. The most often-repeated story and the Taliban's own story of how Mullah Omar first mobilized his followers is that in the spring of 1994, neighbors in Singesar told him that the local governor had abducted two teenage girls, shaved their heads, and taken them to a camp where they were raped. 30 Taliban (with only 16 rifles) freed the girls, and hanged the governor from the barrel of a tank. Later that year, two militia commanders killed civilians while fighting for the right to sodomize a young boy. The Taliban freed him. Mullah Omar started his movement with fewer than 50 armed madrassah students in his hometown of Kandahar.[74][75]

In the beginning the Taliban numbered in the hundreds, were badly equipped and low on munitions. Within months however 15,000 students arrived from the madrassas in Pakistan.

...

The Taliban, however, suffered a devastating defeat against government forces of the Islamic State under the command of Ahmad Shah Massoud. The Taliban's early victories in 1994 were followed by a series of defeats that resulted in heavy losses which led analysts to believe that the Taliban movement as such might have run its course. Pakistan, however, started to provide stronger military support to the Taliban. On September 26, 1996, as the Taliban with military support by Pakistan and financial support by Saudi Arabia prepared for another major offensive, Massoud ordered a full retreat from Kabul to continue anti-Taliban resistance in the Hindu Kush mountains instead of engaging in street battles in Kabul. The Taliban entered Kabul on September 27, 1996, and established the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. Many analysts like Amin Saikal describe the Taliban as developing into a proxy force for Pakistan's regional interests.[71][78][82][86][87][88]


Damn those 15,000 students defeated the great Mujaheddin that bested the Soviet forces. Looks like the power of knowledge triumphs over firepower any day.
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Tue May 16, 2017 1:59 pm

Natapoc wrote:I see you desire a debate over semantics.

Debate denied.

Coup v. invasion is technically semantics.

Then again, so is 'murder v. suicide'.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78485
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Tue May 16, 2017 1:59 pm

Natapoc wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:The CIA doesn't do invasions. Coups yes, invasions no


I see you desire a debate over semantics.

Debate denied.

I don't care. The CIA does it job and they do it well.
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Tue May 16, 2017 2:01 pm

Natapoc wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:The CIA doesn't do invasions. Coups yes, invasions no


I see you desire a debate over semantics.

Debate denied.


Says the person who pointed out a semantic point and when rebuffed you just went "whatever".

In any case, your hypothesis that Trump would reorganize the CIA and FBI over him not receiving intel is not necessarily something I am concerned about. What I am concerned about is what is the intel community going to do about it. Because it doesn't really matter what form does Trump's retaliation to the CIA and other intelligence agencies is, the intelligence community is still going to have to take a decision as to how to act from here on out in regards of the president.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Tue May 16, 2017 2:01 pm

Uxupox wrote:Damn those 15,000 students defeated the great Mujaheddin that bested the Soviet forces. Looks like the power of knowledge triumphs over firepower any day.

Dedication trumps divided firepower. The Mujahideen were largely fighting amongst themselves before the arrival of the Taliban as a serious threat. See: ISIS v. Iraq, particularly in the early days of the war. Not only that, but as the quote I literally just provided mentioned, they suffered devastating defeats before Pakistan upped their game in supporting them. Here, let me quote it for you, again, since clearly the first time didn't register:
The Taliban's early victories in 1994 were followed by a series of defeats that resulted in heavy losses which led analysts to believe that the Taliban movement as such might have run its course. Pakistan, however, started to provide stronger military support to the Taliban. On September 26, 1996, as the Taliban with military support by Pakistan and financial support by Saudi Arabia prepared for another major offensive, Massoud ordered a full retreat from Kabul to continue anti-Taliban resistance in the Hindu Kush mountains instead of engaging in street battles in Kabul. The Taliban entered Kabul on September 27, 1996, and established the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. Many analysts like Amin Saikal describe the Taliban as developing into a proxy force for Pakistan's regional interests.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78485
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Tue May 16, 2017 2:02 pm

Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
Natapoc wrote:
I see you desire a debate over semantics.

Debate denied.


Says the person who pointed out a semantic point and when rebuffed you just went "whatever".

In any case, your hypothesis that Trump would reorganize the CIA and FBI over him not receiving intel is not necessarily something I am concerned about. What I am concerned about is what is the intel community going to do about it. Because it doesn't really matter what form does Trump's retaliation to the CIA and other intelligence agencies is, the intelligence community is still going to have to take a decision as to how to act from here on out in regards of the president.

And it could be anything from super petty to very drastic
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bagong Timog Mindanao, Eahland, Google [Bot], Infected Mushroom, Southland, Tarsonis

Advertisement

Remove ads