Thermodolia wrote:So apparently this is happening http://qklnk.co/Rtp6dq
OK, Spicer's position is tenuous, this isn't surprising.
Could you please not use tinyurl or quklnk unless there's some good reason to do so? It conceals the real URL, ie the masthead source and also the name the source gave to the article. Which normally one can see by hovering over the link. Seeing that stuff allows us to avoid giving hits to sites which some of us boycott, and actually get some idea of what you're actually talking about when you say "this is happening".
Well I can't make you of course, but please?