NATION

PASSWORD

Are YOUR eye contact habits racist?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Minzerland II
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5589
Founded: Aug 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Minzerland II » Fri Apr 28, 2017 7:56 pm

36 Camera Perspective wrote:
Internationalist Bastard wrote:Saying you didn't expect someone to be gay? C'mon, this shits just overboard


It's annoying and stereotypical, especially when repeated over multiple instances. And as you saw in the summary, the harmful effects are real.

The effects they suffer from something so insignificant makes it even more difficult to be sympathetic to their 'plight'.
Last edited by Minzerland II on Fri Apr 28, 2017 7:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Previous Profile: Minzerland
Donkey Advocate & Herald of Donkeydom
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19902
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Fierro » Fri Apr 28, 2017 7:57 pm

The Liberated Territories wrote:All Aspies are racist now.

You know who you are.


Hey, I hate everyone equally thank you.

Arumbia67 wrote:Bit of a side note here, but why do people obsess over eye contact? The fact that I'm not staring at your eyeballs doesn't mean I'm not listening to you.


I guess it's something that Western society teaches people.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
36 Camera Perspective
Minister
 
Posts: 2887
Founded: Jul 18, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby 36 Camera Perspective » Fri Apr 28, 2017 8:20 pm

Minzerland II wrote:
36 Camera Perspective wrote:
It's annoying and stereotypical, especially when repeated over multiple instances. And as you saw in the summary, the harmful effects are real.

The effects they suffer from something so insignificant makes it even more difficult to be sympathetic to their 'plight'.


Or people can stop asking Asians whether they're good at math because they're Asian. The Asian person benefits psychologically, and the asker benefits by not looking like an ignorant idiot anymore. Win-win.
Power, power, the law of the land
Those living for death
Will die by their own hand

User avatar
Olerand
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13169
Founded: Sep 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Olerand » Fri Apr 28, 2017 8:24 pm

This is great. It's a real adventure watching the discoveries being made in these fields today. :p
French citizen. Still a Socialist Party member. Ségolène Royal 2019, I guess Actually I might vote la France Insoumise.

Qui suis-je?:
Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever

User avatar
Forsher
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22041
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
New York Times Democracy

Postby Forsher » Fri Apr 28, 2017 8:26 pm

Let's put it this way...

Say you're an actor and you want to portray that you're uncomfortable being in the presence of the other character (or characters) in the scene with you? What do you do? (We'll imagine it's a company of anarchists who don't believe in hierarchies, i.e. there is no direct to tell you how to block or interpret the scene.)

If you said anything other than avoid eye contact, maximise distance and, probably, put up some kind of physical barrier (perhaps folded arms) you're either lying or are evidence of why anarchy doesn't work (i.e. you should not have been hired, but there was no director to turn you away).

Let's put it this way...

Say you're an actor still in the year 2018 AD and you're having a conversation about the mad man theory of international relationships in a American production of a Nixon biopic (or play, I suppose). What does your dialogue sound like? You're following up a scene where the actor playing Nixon has had an eloquent argument with with Spiro Agnew because, you know, I don't know anyone else from the era.

If you said anything other than fluid and equally eloquent you either don't know much about how dialogue tends to work in the movies, i.e. missing all the placeholders and, erm, interjections that, um, characterise real speech, or evidence for why anarchy does work (although, perhaps, intense realism is utterly unwatchable and suffers from a surfeit of pretension).

The point, as it is always useful to beat people over the head with what you mean to say, is that acting is a kind of contrived realism. It is true that, as in the first example, you're definitely conveying a certain set of meanings (to your audience) with those behaviours/choices. It is also true that there are other potential meanings... that is there is no definite meaning that you can always read into those behaviours. Which is, hopefully, made perfectly clear by the presence of the Nixon biopic... I'll give you a clue: it's not really about Nixon (or, even, our friend Spiro). Or, more violently, in real life, tell, don't show.

tl;dr -- in contract law, you cannot make silence a condition indicating acceptance (you naughty uncle you)
That it Could be What it Is, Is What it Is

Stop making shit up, though. Links, or it's a God-damn lie and you know it.

The normie life is heteronormie

We won't know until 2053 when it'll be really obvious what he should've done. [...] We have no option but to guess.

User avatar
Minzerland II
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5589
Founded: Aug 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Minzerland II » Fri Apr 28, 2017 8:43 pm

36 Camera Perspective wrote:
Minzerland II wrote:The effects they suffer from something so insignificant makes it even more difficult to be sympathetic to their 'plight'.


Or people can stop asking Asians whether they're good at math because they're Asian. The Asian person benefits psychologically, and the asker benefits by not looking like an ignorant idiot anymore. Win-win.

I think the Asian person can benefit even more by growing a thicker skin, particularly by not making a mockery of themselves by looking like a fool who takes every insignificant 'micro-aggression' as a slight against their person, and allowing the offender to look like the ignorant idiot they are.
Previous Profile: Minzerland
Donkey Advocate & Herald of Donkeydom
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:11 pm

A university newsletter? That's not even a storm in a teacup, y'all.

But for the sake of the argument... Even with the best intentions, the way it's phrased is kind of clumsy and overzealous. Who even wrote it?
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
USS Monitor
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 30747
Founded: Jul 01, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby USS Monitor » Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:32 pm

Costa Fierro wrote:
Arumbia67 wrote:Bit of a side note here, but why do people obsess over eye contact? The fact that I'm not staring at your eyeballs doesn't mean I'm not listening to you.


I guess it's something that Western society teaches people.


The norms do vary between cultures. For example, in Germany, eye-contact is a big thing and people will look you in the eye much more than in the US. It sometimes comes across as nosy or pushy if you're not used to it and you don't realize it's a cultural thing.
Don't take life so serious... it isn't permanent... RIP Dyakovo and Ashmoria
19th century steamships may be harmful or fatal if swallowed. In case of accidental ingestion, please seek immediate medical assistance.
༄༅། །འགྲོ་བ་མི་རིགས་ག་ར་དབང་ཆ་འདྲ་མཉམ་འབད་སྒྱེཝ་ལས་ག་ར་གིས་གཅིག་གིས་གཅིག་ལུ་སྤུན་ཆའི་དམ་ཚིག་བསྟན་དགོས།

User avatar
USS Monitor
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 30747
Founded: Jul 01, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby USS Monitor » Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:43 pm

Thunder Place wrote:But here's the thing, when you're in a situation where picking up on cues like that can be pretty essential to determining how much of a threat to your physical safety someone may be to you, it's a hell of a thing to consider ignoring that information just to stand in solidarity with another oppressed group.


Avoiding eye-contact is usually a sign of fear or standoffishness, not aggression. Even when it is for racial reasons, it is not a sign that someone is a threat to your safety. It's a sign that they are scared of you or want to be left alone.
Don't take life so serious... it isn't permanent... RIP Dyakovo and Ashmoria
19th century steamships may be harmful or fatal if swallowed. In case of accidental ingestion, please seek immediate medical assistance.
༄༅། །འགྲོ་བ་མི་རིགས་ག་ར་དབང་ཆ་འདྲ་མཉམ་འབད་སྒྱེཝ་ལས་ག་ར་གིས་གཅིག་གིས་གཅིག་ལུ་སྤུན་ཆའི་དམ་ཚིག་བསྟན་དགོས།

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19902
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Fierro » Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:59 pm

USS Monitor wrote:The norms do vary between cultures. For example, in Germany, eye-contact is a big thing and people will look you in the eye much more than in the US. It sometimes comes across as nosy or pushy if you're not used to it and you don't realize it's a cultural thing.


Yeah I had my high school social studies teacher tell me about when she had some Samoan students and one of them was getting a dressing down from another teacher. The student kept looking away but the teacher yelled at her to look him in the eye. Turns out in Samoa, looking away from someone when they are angry with you is a sign of being ashamed or something.

Also I've noticed that when I maintain eye contact with people (which I constantly remind myself to do because yay Asperger's), a lot of people seem to do it only briefly.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
Minzerland II
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5589
Founded: Aug 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Minzerland II » Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:23 am

Thunder Place wrote:
USS Monitor wrote:
Avoiding eye-contact is usually a sign of fear or standoffishness, not aggression. Even when it is for racial reasons, it is not a sign that someone is a threat to your safety. It's a sign that they are scared of you or want to be left alone.

Yeah, white people who are scared are some of the most dangerous people. Every white cop who shoots a black kid says "I was in fear of my life." And I'm saying that as a white person.

'Most dangerous people'.
Previous Profile: Minzerland
Donkey Advocate & Herald of Donkeydom
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)

User avatar
Philjia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11835
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Philjia » Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:54 am

I don't usually look people in the eye. If I do, it's because I like them and am trying to be intimate, or because I really don't like them and am trying to intimidate them.

⚧ Trans rights. ⚧
Pragmatic ethical utopian socialist, IE I'm for whatever kind of socialism is the most moral and practical. Pro LGBT rights and gay marriage, pro gay adoption, generally internationalist, ambivalent on the EU, atheist, pro free speech and expression, pro legalisation of prostitution and soft drugs, and pro choice. Anti authoritarian, anti Marxist. White cishet male.

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19902
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Fierro » Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:02 am

Philjia wrote:I don't usually look people in the eye. If I do, it's because I like them and am trying to be intimate, or because I really don't like them and am trying to intimidate them.


Intimidating intimacy?
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
FelrikTheDeleted
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8949
Founded: Aug 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby FelrikTheDeleted » Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:14 am

Costa Fierro wrote:
Philjia wrote:I don't usually look people in the eye. If I do, it's because I like them and am trying to be intimate, or because I really don't like them and am trying to intimidate them.


Intimidating intimacy?


Philjia: *Looks friend in the eye*

Friend: "Is that the intimate-stare or the intimidation-stare?"

Philjia: *Contiunes to stare*

Friend: "Cmon, give me a break, you're sending me mixed signals!"

User avatar
USS Monitor
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 30747
Founded: Jul 01, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby USS Monitor » Sat Apr 29, 2017 2:10 am

Thunder Place wrote:
USS Monitor wrote:
Avoiding eye-contact is usually a sign of fear or standoffishness, not aggression. Even when it is for racial reasons, it is not a sign that someone is a threat to your safety. It's a sign that they are scared of you or want to be left alone.

Yeah, white people who are scared are some of the most dangerous people. Every white cop who shoots a black kid says "I was in fear of my life." And I'm saying that as a white person.


Not that kind of scared. Seriously, there is a difference in body language between people that are just shy and people that are aggressive.

There are people that are shy around blacks, but not around whites. This has absolutely nothing to do with being violently racist. In fact, it's sometimes people that are trying really hard not be racist, but they're afraid they will slip up, and that's what makes them uncomfortable around blacks. The fact that they aren't a physical threat doesn't mean they aren't annoying, and sometimes black people do get tired of it and snap at them (or at socially awkward people whose behavior looks similar).

Aggressive people are more likely to give you dirty looks instead of looking away, or if they do look away, they'll carry themselves differently from someone who's doing it out of shyness.

Maybe there are a few black people out there who are absolutely terrible at reading body language, but in most cases, if they're getting mad at you for being shy around them, it's just a question of feeling excluded, not feeling physically threatened. Feeling excluded can still make people really upset, though.
Don't take life so serious... it isn't permanent... RIP Dyakovo and Ashmoria
19th century steamships may be harmful or fatal if swallowed. In case of accidental ingestion, please seek immediate medical assistance.
༄༅། །འགྲོ་བ་མི་རིགས་ག་ར་དབང་ཆ་འདྲ་མཉམ་འབད་སྒྱེཝ་ལས་ག་ར་གིས་གཅིག་གིས་གཅིག་ལུ་སྤུན་ཆའི་དམ་ཚིག་བསྟན་དགོས།

User avatar
Minoa
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6079
Founded: Oct 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Minoa » Sat Apr 29, 2017 4:05 am

The newsletter is far too oddly specific and also failed to consider people who genuinely struggle to socialise (Autism, social anxiety, etc.).
Mme A. d'Oiseau, B.A. (State of Minoa)

User avatar
Austrasien
Minister
 
Posts: 3183
Founded: Apr 07, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Austrasien » Sat Apr 29, 2017 4:32 am

Dumb Ideologies wrote:NSG...are YOUR eye contact habits racist?


Not really but I practice every day.
The leafposter formerly known as The Kievan People

The weak crumble, are slaughtered and are erased from history while the strong survive. The strong are respected and in the end, peace is made with the strong.

User avatar
Austrasien
Minister
 
Posts: 3183
Founded: Apr 07, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Austrasien » Sat Apr 29, 2017 4:33 am

Thunder Place wrote:Yeah, white people who are scared are some of the most dangerous people. Every white cop who shoots a black kid says "I was in fear of my life." And I'm saying that as a white person.


Much like the risk of dying of Islamic terrorism, the risk of a black man being killed by a cop is quite trivial compared to pretty much any other cause of death.
The leafposter formerly known as The Kievan People

The weak crumble, are slaughtered and are erased from history while the strong survive. The strong are respected and in the end, peace is made with the strong.

User avatar
Calladan
Minister
 
Posts: 3064
Founded: Jul 28, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Calladan » Sat Apr 29, 2017 4:48 am

Austrasien wrote:
Thunder Place wrote:Yeah, white people who are scared are some of the most dangerous people. Every white cop who shoots a black kid says "I was in fear of my life." And I'm saying that as a white person.


Much like the risk of dying of Islamic terrorism, the risk of a black man being killed by a cop is quite trivial compared to pretty much any other cause of death.


I think in the UK you are more likely to get hit by a car falling out of an aeroplane that is carrying the dead corpse of a shark than being killed by a terrorist. And the shark would have to be wearing an "Ed Clark 1980" t-shirt if you want to calculate the odds of being shot by a police officer.
Tara A McGill, Ambassador to Lucinda G Doyle III
"Always be yourself, unless you can be Zathras. Then be Zathras"
A Rough Guide To Calladan | The Seven Years of Darkness | Ambassador McGill's Facebook Page
"Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, providing they are Christian & white" - Trump

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 36980
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Sat Apr 29, 2017 4:53 am

It's absolutely ignorant bullshit. This is idiotic because there are cultures in which looking someone directly in the eyes is considered incredibly rude.

User avatar
Lady Scylla
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15673
Founded: Nov 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Lady Scylla » Sat Apr 29, 2017 5:13 am

36 Camera Perspective wrote:
Soyouso wrote:...Not looking people in the eye causes harm now?
Can you elaborate on what you mean?


Of course I'm not referring to any kind of physical harm, but I believe, consistent with psychological research, that micro-aggressions are psychologically harmful.


And I'd say said research is full of shit.

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 36980
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Sat Apr 29, 2017 5:26 am

Pope Joan wrote:Looking somebody in the eye on the streets of New York can be considered an act of aggression, or a threat, no matter what ethnicity is involved.

So maybe do not try this outside of Oxford?

True. Subway rides are made up of the majority of people trying to find somewhere to rest their eyes that won't be considered a provocation. (A book, an ad, not looking people in the face.)

User avatar
Esternial
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 54394
Founded: May 09, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Esternial » Sat Apr 29, 2017 5:49 am

Katganistan wrote:
Pope Joan wrote:Looking somebody in the eye on the streets of New York can be considered an act of aggression, or a threat, no matter what ethnicity is involved.

So maybe do not try this outside of Oxford?

True. Subway rides are made up of the majority of people trying to find somewhere to rest their eyes that won't be considered a provocation. (A book, an ad, not looking people in the face.)

Not sure it's immediately associated with aggression, but eye contact typically signals you're looking for some kind of interaction.

User avatar
The Holy Empire of Dietmaria
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 44
Founded: Nov 28, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The Holy Empire of Dietmaria » Sat Apr 29, 2017 5:53 am

my eyes are racists. it's annoying for my left-wing nose who is stuck in the middle between the two.

User avatar
Lady Scylla
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15673
Founded: Nov 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Lady Scylla » Sat Apr 29, 2017 6:03 am

Pope Joan wrote:Looking somebody in the eye on the streets of New York can be considered an act of aggression, or a threat, no matter what ethnicity is involved.

So maybe do not try this outside of Oxford?


I was taught to only look at someone in the eyes if being intimate, to intimidate, or to show you were being serious. In all other cases, it's polite to avoid eye-contact.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, Google [Bot], Silvamar

Advertisement

Remove ads