The effects they suffer from something so insignificant makes it even more difficult to be sympathetic to their 'plight'.
Advertisement
by Minzerland II » Fri Apr 28, 2017 7:56 pm
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)
by Costa Fierro » Fri Apr 28, 2017 7:57 pm
Arumbia67 wrote:Bit of a side note here, but why do people obsess over eye contact? The fact that I'm not staring at your eyeballs doesn't mean I'm not listening to you.
by 36 Camera Perspective » Fri Apr 28, 2017 8:20 pm
Minzerland II wrote:36 Camera Perspective wrote:
It's annoying and stereotypical, especially when repeated over multiple instances. And as you saw in the summary, the harmful effects are real.
The effects they suffer from something so insignificant makes it even more difficult to be sympathetic to their 'plight'.
by Olerand » Fri Apr 28, 2017 8:24 pm
Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever
by Forsher » Fri Apr 28, 2017 8:26 pm
by Minzerland II » Fri Apr 28, 2017 8:43 pm
36 Camera Perspective wrote:Minzerland II wrote:The effects they suffer from something so insignificant makes it even more difficult to be sympathetic to their 'plight'.
Or people can stop asking Asians whether they're good at math because they're Asian. The Asian person benefits psychologically, and the asker benefits by not looking like an ignorant idiot anymore. Win-win.
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)
by Liriena » Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:11 pm
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by USS Monitor » Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:32 pm
by USS Monitor » Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:43 pm
Thunder Place wrote:But here's the thing, when you're in a situation where picking up on cues like that can be pretty essential to determining how much of a threat to your physical safety someone may be to you, it's a hell of a thing to consider ignoring that information just to stand in solidarity with another oppressed group.
by Costa Fierro » Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:59 pm
USS Monitor wrote:The norms do vary between cultures. For example, in Germany, eye-contact is a big thing and people will look you in the eye much more than in the US. It sometimes comes across as nosy or pushy if you're not used to it and you don't realize it's a cultural thing.
by Minzerland II » Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:23 am
Thunder Place wrote:USS Monitor wrote:
Avoiding eye-contact is usually a sign of fear or standoffishness, not aggression. Even when it is for racial reasons, it is not a sign that someone is a threat to your safety. It's a sign that they are scared of you or want to be left alone.
Yeah, white people who are scared are some of the most dangerous people. Every white cop who shoots a black kid says "I was in fear of my life." And I'm saying that as a white person.
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)
by Philjia » Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:54 am
by Costa Fierro » Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:02 am
Philjia wrote:I don't usually look people in the eye. If I do, it's because I like them and am trying to be intimate, or because I really don't like them and am trying to intimidate them.
by FelrikTheDeleted » Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:14 am
by USS Monitor » Sat Apr 29, 2017 2:10 am
Thunder Place wrote:USS Monitor wrote:
Avoiding eye-contact is usually a sign of fear or standoffishness, not aggression. Even when it is for racial reasons, it is not a sign that someone is a threat to your safety. It's a sign that they are scared of you or want to be left alone.
Yeah, white people who are scared are some of the most dangerous people. Every white cop who shoots a black kid says "I was in fear of my life." And I'm saying that as a white person.
by Austrasien » Sat Apr 29, 2017 4:32 am
by Austrasien » Sat Apr 29, 2017 4:33 am
Thunder Place wrote:Yeah, white people who are scared are some of the most dangerous people. Every white cop who shoots a black kid says "I was in fear of my life." And I'm saying that as a white person.
by Calladan » Sat Apr 29, 2017 4:48 am
Austrasien wrote:Thunder Place wrote:Yeah, white people who are scared are some of the most dangerous people. Every white cop who shoots a black kid says "I was in fear of my life." And I'm saying that as a white person.
Much like the risk of dying of Islamic terrorism, the risk of a black man being killed by a cop is quite trivial compared to pretty much any other cause of death.
by Katganistan » Sat Apr 29, 2017 4:53 am
by Katganistan » Sat Apr 29, 2017 5:26 am
Pope Joan wrote:Looking somebody in the eye on the streets of New York can be considered an act of aggression, or a threat, no matter what ethnicity is involved.
So maybe do not try this outside of Oxford?
by Esternial » Sat Apr 29, 2017 5:49 am
Katganistan wrote:Pope Joan wrote:Looking somebody in the eye on the streets of New York can be considered an act of aggression, or a threat, no matter what ethnicity is involved.
So maybe do not try this outside of Oxford?
True. Subway rides are made up of the majority of people trying to find somewhere to rest their eyes that won't be considered a provocation. (A book, an ad, not looking people in the face.)
by The Holy Empire of Dietmaria » Sat Apr 29, 2017 5:53 am
by Lady Scylla » Sat Apr 29, 2017 6:03 am
Pope Joan wrote:Looking somebody in the eye on the streets of New York can be considered an act of aggression, or a threat, no matter what ethnicity is involved.
So maybe do not try this outside of Oxford?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, Google [Bot], Silvamar
Advertisement