Advertisement
by Soyouso » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:30 pm
by Pope Joan » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:31 pm
by Jello Biafra » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:34 pm
Soyouso wrote:Why can't we just go help places that actually suffer from racism
by Internationalist Bastard » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:35 pm
by 36 Camera Perspective » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:35 pm
by 36 Camera Perspective » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:36 pm
by Internationalist Bastard » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:36 pm
by 36 Camera Perspective » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:37 pm
by 36 Camera Perspective » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:37 pm
by Bressen » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:38 pm
Jello Biafra wrote:Bressen wrote:okay, so it's not sexist because they're including white women alongside white men. that still doesn't remove the fact that it's racist.
Well, a microaggression is the casual degradation of any marginalized group. It is possible that one marginalized group may casually degrade another, but it is more likely that a group that is not marginalized would do the degradation.
(White people can be marginalized, but not on the basis of their race.)also ''many of them would be judged the same if they were said by another person'' isn't something you can know. you're basically saying you know that the people posting these comments are egalitarian in their complaining about microaggressions.
So you think a comment that "Hispanic people have absolutely no control over their kids" would be judged as being fine if it were said by an Asian woman?
by 36 Camera Perspective » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:39 pm
by Internationalist Bastard » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:40 pm
by Internationalist Bastard » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:41 pm
36 Camera Perspective wrote:Soyouso wrote:Other countries have it far worse. They're not worrying about whether people look at them or not because their lives are in danger. The stuff SJWs worry about is usually harmless, like this.
Again, it's not "harmless". Less pressing than other racial matters, certainly, but certainly not harmless at the very same time.
by Soyouso » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:42 pm
36 Camera Perspective wrote:Soyouso wrote:Other countries have it far worse. They're not worrying about whether people look at them or not because their lives are in danger. The stuff SJWs worry about is usually harmless, like this.
Again, it's not "harmless". Less pressing than other racial matters, certainly, but certainly not harmless at the very same time.
by 36 Camera Perspective » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:42 pm
by Jello Biafra » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:43 pm
Bressen wrote:define ''marginalised group''.
by The United Remnants of America » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:43 pm
by 36 Camera Perspective » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:44 pm
by Internationalist Bastard » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:44 pm
by Internationalist Bastard » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:45 pm
by Bressen » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:46 pm
Jello Biafra wrote:Bressen wrote:define ''marginalised group''.
"Social exclusion is the process in which individuals or people are systematically blocked from (or denied full access to) various rights, opportunities and resources that are normally available to members of a different group, and which are fundamental to social integration and observance of human rights within that particular group (e.g., housing, employment, healthcare, civic engagement, democratic participation, and due process)."
A marginalized group would be a group that suffers from social exclusion.
by Galloism » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:47 pm
Rodez wrote:I don't know about you guys, but I've mastered a particularly racist gaze and use it to stare down people of color all the time.
by 36 Camera Perspective » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:47 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alvecia, Ariddia, Eahland, East Leaf Republic, Emotional Support Crocodile, Ifreann, Pasong Tirad, Simonia, Sublime Ottoman State 1800 RP, The Xenopolis Confederation
Advertisement