Do you think that punishing pornographers would right?

[Alvecia]

Porn doesn't really contribute to reproduction

Porn is for people who don't have partners to breed with.

Well...not necessarily.

[New haven america]

The world pop. is 7.5 Bil. and growing, and our planet can't take it.

But sure, let's reproduce more, that won't be harmful at all, nope...

Because using "kek" unitonically is a sure sign of responsible parenting material.

Yepyepyep.

[Galloism]

Than not doing so? Yeah, I'd agree. I'd take a good wank over blue balls any day.

In my opinion, it's better to impregnate a woman and get children than fapping.

We'd best help the sperm refugees.

[Valgora]

*shrug* I guess some of us figure there's more to life than breeding

Yes, fapping and hence wasting semen is definitely something more good.

Men constantly produce semen; therefore, it's not really wasted.

[Galloism]

Yes, fapping and hence wasting semen is definitely something more good.

Men constantly produce semen; therefore, it's not really wasted.

You could provide me fertile women on some sort of a conveyor belt to prevent any of my sperm from being wasted.

I'm not sure that's practical for everyone, but we could probably support a few men that way to make sure that none of their sperm is wasted.

[Valgora]

In my opinion, it's better to impregnate a woman and get children than fapping.

The world pop. is 7.5 Bil. and growing, and our planet can't take it.

But sure, let's reproduce more, that won't be harmful at all, nope...

Well... to be honest, the developed countries are having a problem with people not reproducing enough thus causing negative population growth.

[Thermodolia]

Than not doing so? Yeah, I'd agree. I'd take a good wank over blue balls any day.

In my opinion, it's better to impregnate a woman and get children than fapping.

Oh good no. Children are monsters. I'm probably never going to have any and just be the awesome uncle

[Thermodolia]

Over my dead body.

Killing someone over porn doesn't sound very healthy. Just saying...

Well I'm not just going to give up my porn

[Luminesa]

The world pop. is 7.5 Bil. and growing, and our planet can't take it.

But sure, let's reproduce more, that won't be harmful at all, nope...

Because using "kek" unitonically is a sure sign of responsible parenting material.

Yes, irony is extremely hard to spot these days, mi compadre.

[Chessmistress]

Porn doesn't really contribute to reproduction

Porn is for people who don't have partners to breed with.

Do you know that such category includes even a lot of misogynists who hate women because they can't get laid?

However: no, the main problem is men who watch porn and then become abusive towards all women but particularly towards their partners.

[Valgora]

Porn is for people who don't have partners to breed with.

Do you know that such category includes even a lot of misogynists who hate women because they can't get laid?

However: no, the main problem is men who watch porn and then become abusive towards all women but particularly towards their partners.

It has been already been fucking said in this thread: most people who become abusive towards women because of porn are doing that because they're too fucking stupid to realize that porn isn't realistic.

[Galloism]

Do you know that such category includes even a lot of misogynists who hate women because they can't get laid?

However: no, the main problem is men who watch porn and then become abusive towards all women but particularly towards their partners.

It has been already been fucking said in this thread: most people who become abusive towards women because of porn are doing that because they're too fucking stupid to realize that porn isn't realistic.

Also, there's no evidence that porn causes violence, and significant evidence that porn availability and sexual violence are actually negatively correlated (more porn is correlated with less sexual violence, less porn associated with more sexual violence).

I can't say that enough.

[Neo Balka]

Men constantly produce semen; therefore, it's not really wasted.

You could provide me fertile women on some sort of a conveyor belt to prevent any of my sperm from being wasted.

I'm not sure that's practical for everyone, but we could probably support a few men that way to make sure that none of their sperm is wasted.

if you need a job at Balk brand Sex swings, i can hook you up.

[Oneracon]

Porn is for people who don't have partners to breed with.

Do you know that such category includes even a lot of misogynists who hate women because they can't get laid?

However: no, the main problem is men who watch porn and then become abusive towards all women but particularly towards their partners.

To which, instead of better sex education to combat the unrealism (is that even a word?) of pornography and instill healthy attitudes toward sex, you've proposed the equivalents of using a chainsaw to perform brain surgery.

Most egregious is this tacit endorsement of allowing the government to mandate content blocking on electronic devices? With absolutely no concept of how such a thing would be misused to further the oppression of groups like gender and sexual minorities?

[Chessmistress]

Do you know that such category includes even a lot of misogynists who hate women because they can't get laid?

However: no, the main problem is men who watch porn and then become abusive towards all women but particularly towards their partners.

To which, instead of better sex education to combat the unrealism (is that even a word?) of pornography and instill healthy attitudes toward sex, you've proposed the equivalents of using a chainsaw to perform brain surgery.

I don't live in USA: we have extensive sex education in the school since decades, and still porn is a problem.

Most egregious is this tacit endorsement of allowing the government to mandate content blocking on electronic devices? With absolutely no concept of how such a thing would be misused to further the oppression of groups like gender and sexual minorities?

That depends by the government, mainly by their political orientation, but also the number of women in the government plays a role (that's why gender quotas for politics are so important).
"Lesbian" pornography is a fake just only meant for men, by the way...

[Ethel mermania]

To which, instead of better sex education to combat the unrealism (is that even a word?) of pornography and instill healthy attitudes toward sex, you've proposed the equivalents of using a chainsaw to perform brain surgery.

I don't live in USA: we have extensive sex education in the school since decades, and still porn is a problem.

Most egregious is this tacit endorsement of allowing the government to mandate content blocking on electronic devices? With absolutely no concept of how such a thing would be misused to further the oppression of groups like gender and sexual minorities?

That depends by the government, mainly by their political orientation, but also the number of women in the government plays a role (that's why gender quotas for politics are so important).
"Lesbian" pornography is a fake just only meant for men, by the way...

i know an awful lot of lesbians who disagree, hell i know a couple of straight women who disagree as well

[Valgora]

To which, instead of better sex education to combat the unrealism (is that even a word?) of pornography and instill healthy attitudes toward sex, you've proposed the equivalents of using a chainsaw to perform brain surgery.

I don't live in USA: we have extensive sex education in the school since decades, and still porn is a problem.

Most egregious is this tacit endorsement of allowing the government to mandate content blocking on electronic devices? With absolutely no concept of how such a thing would be misused to further the oppression of groups like gender and sexual minorities?

That depends by the government, mainly by their political orientation, but also the number of women in the government plays a role (that's why gender quotas for politics are so important).
"Lesbian" pornography is a fake just only meant for men, by the way...

The number of women in the government won't fucking affect how the government will mandate content blocking. That will be negative either way.

And who gives a fuck if lesbian pornography is just only meant for men. How do you know whether or not lesbians watch porn?

[Souseiseki]

That depends by the government, mainly by their political orientation, but also the number of women in the government plays a role (that's why gender quotas for politics are so important).
"Lesbian" pornography is a fake just only meant for men, by the way...

some of the most repressive laws on the books today were introduced, backed and supported by women. there are some cases where we were rescued from even worse laws by the actions of a conservative man.

and yes, actual lesbian pornography is much more niche but also does exist.

[Oneracon]

To which, instead of better sex education to combat the unrealism (is that even a word?) of pornography and instill healthy attitudes toward sex, you've proposed the equivalents of using a chainsaw to perform brain surgery.

I don't live in USA: we have extensive sex education in the school since decades, and still porn is a problem.

There is always room for improvement when it comes to sex education.

Most egregious is this tacit endorsement of allowing the government to mandate content blocking on electronic devices? With absolutely no concept of how such a thing would be misused to further the oppression of groups like gender and sexual minorities?

That depends by the government, mainly by their political orientation, but also the number of women in the government plays a role (that's why gender quotas for politics are so important).

Women can promote misogynist attitudes as terrible as any man could come up with. See Eliza Lynn Linton, Esther Vilar, Phyllis Schlafly, REAL Women of Canada.

I see no reason why they are inherently more trustworthy. A good rule of thumb is that if you wouldn't trust your opponents with a power, you shouldn't give it to yourself. If you give the government a mandate to allow mandatory blocking of content do you honestly believe they would stop at pornography? Once that power has been given there is nothing stopping a future government from declaring further topics inappropriate and subject to blocking.

"Lesbian" pornography is a fake just only meant for men, by the way...

I don't give a shit about lesbian pornography, I'm talking about these blockers being abused (as they already are) to block young queer youth trying to access information on their sexuality. And yes, that includes queer women. Algorithms in these filtering software don't distinguish between content that is pornographic versus what is educational or scientific information about sex.

This what I cannot stand about anti-sex feminism and/or SWERFism, this willingness to throw everyone else under the bus in the name of this holy war against all forms of pornography and sexual content between consenting adults. We saw it in the 1980s with the likes of Catherine McKinnon and Andrea Dworkin teaming up with the Religious Right in the United States and we're seeing it again now.

[Costa Fierro]

I don't live in USA: we have extensive sex education in the school since decades, and still porn is a problem.

Just because you say it is a problem does not make it so.

That depends by the government, mainly by their political orientation, but also the number of women in the government plays a role (that's why gender quotas for politics are so important).

Irrelevant.

"Lesbian" pornography is a fake just only meant for men, by the way...

Clearly you haven't seen any amateur stuff.

I see no reason why they are inherently more trustworthy.

Because according to Chessmistress, women make better politicians purely because they are women.

[Galloism]

To which, instead of better sex education to combat the unrealism (is that even a word?) of pornography and instill healthy attitudes toward sex, you've proposed the equivalents of using a chainsaw to perform brain surgery.

I don't live in USA: we have extensive sex education in the school since decades, and still porn is a problem.

Most egregious is this tacit endorsement of allowing the government to mandate content blocking on electronic devices? With absolutely no concept of how such a thing would be misused to further the oppression of groups like gender and sexual minorities?

That depends by the government, mainly by their political orientation, but also the number of women in the government plays a role (that's why gender quotas for politics are so important).
"Lesbian" pornography is a fake just only meant for men, by the way...

Again, back here in the real world, more porn is correlated with LESS rape.

Why do you want more people raped?

[Costa Fierro]

Do you know that such category includes even a lot of misogynists who hate women because they can't get laid?

And here we are wondering why men become misogynists in the first place.

[KrakenCo]

Porn is for people who don't have partners to breed with.

Do you know that such category includes even a lot of misogynists who hate women because they can't get laid?

However: no, the main problem is men who watch porn and then become abusive towards all women but particularly towards their partners.

the stupidity

it hurts

[Costa Fierro]

Why do you want more people raped?

Control male sexuality by making men scared to have sex.

[Saiwania]

The world pop. is 7.5 Bil. and growing, and our planet can't take it. But sure, let's reproduce more, that won't be harmful at all, nope...

It is the fault of all the poor countries along with China and India. All of the Blacks, Asians, Latinos, Arabs, and such appear to reproduce way too much. None of these groups should be expanding. They're hogging more than their fair share of the gene pool. Only the populations of the wealthy countries (with no immigrants included) should be reproducing at present. In other words, the White people.