NATION

PASSWORD

Do you think that punishing pornographers would right?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

There should be some form of punishment related to pornography?

Fines for producers only
7
2%
Fines for all people involved in production (even actors)
9
2%
Fines even for the users
3
1%
Criminalization of producers
12
3%
Criminalization for all people involved in production (even actors)
15
4%
Criminalization for all people involved + fines for the users
10
2%
Criminalization even for the users
8
2%
Awareness campaigns only
37
9%
Pornography is free speech
325
76%
 
Total votes : 426

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25657
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:14 pm

New haven america wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
As stated in the OP, the main worries aren't about what happens within the sexrape industry, but what happens to men when the final product reach them, and how those men behave towards women.
That's why "regulate the sexrape industry" cannot be really effective to fight such outcome.

As brought up multiple times (You can look through the thread), porn actually lowers rape and sexual violence. Though, I'm not surprised you ignored those post, you tend to do that.

There's nothing but possible correlation to back that up.
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:15 pm

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
New haven america wrote:That was 3-4 decades ago, young one.

I provided much more recent evidence that Reagan is loved. Just accept that your "Most people hate Reagan" was completely full of shit.

Unless Reagan did a porn movie I don't see how he's relevant here.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25657
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:15 pm

Valgora wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:I provided much more recent evidence that Reagan is loved. Just accept that your "Most people hate Reagan" was completely full of shit.


This isn't the topic to talk about fucking Regan.

This topic to talk about fucking porn and prostitution and how the OP is wrong about it.

The point was to show that consensus doesn't lead to good decision making.
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72260
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:16 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
As stated in the OP, the main worries aren't about what happens within the sexrape industry, but what happens to men when the final product reach them, and how those men behave towards women.
That's why "regulate the sexrape industry" cannot be really effective to fight such outcome.

If porn drove all men to rape, why isn't there a rape apocalypse all over the world? I've watched porn and I haven't felt like raping the first woman that gets close to me.

I've been using porn as an exercise program. Once I can do everything in it, I'll know I'm fit again.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Great Minarchistan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5953
Founded: Jan 08, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Minarchistan » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:16 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Minoa wrote:Where is the "regulate the industry" option in the polls?


As stated in the OP, the main worries aren't about what happens within the sexrape industry, but what happens to men when the final product reach them, and how those men behave towards women.
That's why "regulate the sexrape industry" cannot be really effective to fight such outcome.

tfw porn and prostitution is rape

> Poor
> Chooses prostitution when she could go to McDonalds and Walmart
> "rape"

Radfem is such a meme idk if anyone but Chessmistress takes it seriously here.
Awarded for Best Capitalist in 2018 NSG Awards ;')
##############################
Fmr. libertarian, irredeemable bank shill and somewhere inbetween classical liberalism and neoliberalism // Political Compass: +8.75 Economic, -2.25 Social (May 2019)

User avatar
Bressen
Diplomat
 
Posts: 712
Founded: Feb 15, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Bressen » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:17 pm

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
New haven america wrote:As brought up multiple times (You can look through the thread), porn actually lowers rape and sexual violence. Though, I'm not surprised you ignored those post, you tend to do that.

There's nothing but possible correlation to back that up.

whereas the opposite viewpoint literally has nothing to back it up
17 year old British college student.
Studying Law, Philosophy, Ethics and Psychology.
Libertarian minarchist.
"The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilised community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others."
- J.S Mill

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere."
- Voltaire

"My whole religion is this: do every duty, and expect no reward for it, either here or hereafter."
- Bertrand Russell

"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect."
- Mark Twain

"The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities."
- Ayn Rand

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72260
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:18 pm

Gauthier wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:I provided much more recent evidence that Reagan is loved. Just accept that your "Most people hate Reagan" was completely full of shit.

Unless Reagan did a porn movie I don't see how he's relevant here.

Image

Make that notion go away forever.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:19 pm

Great Minarchistan wrote:
Minoa wrote:Where is the "regulate the industry" option in the polls?


How would regulated porn be? "Condom is mandatory"? :rofl:


Taxes, working conditions, minimum wages, working time restrictions, benefits, etc.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Bressen
Diplomat
 
Posts: 712
Founded: Feb 15, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Bressen » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:19 pm

Great Minarchistan wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
As stated in the OP, the main worries aren't about what happens within the sexrape industry, but what happens to men when the final product reach them, and how those men behave towards women.
That's why "regulate the sexrape industry" cannot be really effective to fight such outcome.

tfw porn and prostitution is rape

> Poor
> Chooses prostitution when she could go to McDonalds and Walmart
> "rape"

Radfem is such a meme idk if anyone but Chessmistress takes it seriously here.

but she didn't actually choose to have consensual sex for money because she's not able to make her own decisions because patriarchy, so it must be rape

checkmatemistress
Last edited by Bressen on Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
17 year old British college student.
Studying Law, Philosophy, Ethics and Psychology.
Libertarian minarchist.
"The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilised community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others."
- J.S Mill

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere."
- Voltaire

"My whole religion is this: do every duty, and expect no reward for it, either here or hereafter."
- Bertrand Russell

"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect."
- Mark Twain

"The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities."
- Ayn Rand

User avatar
Oneracon
Senator
 
Posts: 4735
Founded: Jul 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Oneracon » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:21 pm

Proctopeo wrote:
Bressen wrote:
Given the level of confusion about the meaning of pornography, it may be useful if it is defined for the purposes of this paper. The (unanimous) Canadian Supreme Court redefinition of pornography, in February 1992, as material that degrades women or promotes violence is the interpretation used here (Supreme Court of Canada 1992). This paper's concern is not about putting fig leaves on classical statues; it is about the increasingly virulent tide of material in which the primary concern appears to be to demean women and reassert their treatment as inferiors

Either I'm reading this wrong, or the Canadian Supreme Court made a drastic and extremely idiotic decision to redefine pornography in such a way that it always degrades or promotes violence against women.
If it's the latter, then surely the study of the correlation between pornography and sexual violence is inherently flawed as it uses a definition that categorises pornography in such a way that it has to be degrading or violent towards women.

According to Canada, most porn isn't porn, if I'm reading that right.

It's actually a case of the study in question REALLY misunderstanding the ruling of R v Butler (1992). The laws affected by the Butler decision relate to criminal laws on all obscene materials rather than specifically "pornography" (semantics, really... but in Canadian law we love us some semantics).

In Butler the Court redefined "obscene materials" in the case of pornography from being all sexually explicit materials to narrow it to only those which fall into one of two categories:
  • Explicit sex with violence
  • Explicit sex without violence, but which subjects participants to treatment that is degrading or dehumanizing (in some cases - i.e. non-consensual)
Essentially the Court expanded the legality of pornography by stating that, as long as it cannot be shown to be degrading to women, it is not a violation of laws related to obscene materials.
Last edited by Oneracon on Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Oneracon IC Links
Factbook
Embassies

"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power"
Pro:LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa
Anti: Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza

Your resident Canadian neutral good socdem graduate student.

*Here, queer, and not a prop for your right-wing nonsense.*

User avatar
Chessmistress
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5161
Founded: Mar 16, 2015
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Chessmistress » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:22 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
As stated in the OP, the main worries aren't about what happens within the sexrape industry, but what happens to men when the final product reach them, and how those men behave towards women.
That's why "regulate the sexrape industry" cannot be really effective to fight such outcome.

If porn drove all men to rape, why isn't there a rape apocalypse all over the world? I've watched porn and I haven't felt like raping the first woman that gets close to me.


Never said that porn drove all men to rape: I think that porn tend to make men watching it behaving worse towards women, treating us more as objects than human beings.
The effects is probably close to zero on some men, barely relevant on some other men, relevant but far away from droving them to rape on some other men, even more relevant but still not enough to drove them to commit rape on some other men, and, finally, droving some men to commit rape. Probably those who are droven by porn to commit rape were already sexist and misogynists, but still less than before becoming porn consumers. And so on.
Last edited by Chessmistress on Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
OOC:
Radical Feminist, caring about the oppressed gender, that's why I have a strong sense of justice.

PRO:
Radical Feminism (proudly SWERF - moderately TERF),
Gender abolitionism,
birth control and population control,
affirmative ongoing VERBAL consent,
death penalty for rapists.

AGAINST:
patriarchy,
pornography,
heteronormativity,
domestic violence and femicide.


Favorite Quotes: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ches ... /id=403173

User avatar
Great Minarchistan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5953
Founded: Jan 08, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Minarchistan » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:22 pm

Salandriagado wrote:
Great Minarchistan wrote:
How would regulated porn be? "Condom is mandatory"? :rofl:


Taxes, working conditions, minimum wages, working time restrictions, benefits, etc.


I don't think they'd like those. In fact, out of all govt. regulated jobs prostitutes and porn actresses could have (even a frikkin McDonalds job), they voluntarily took the sex path that isn't regulated.
Last edited by Great Minarchistan on Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Awarded for Best Capitalist in 2018 NSG Awards ;')
##############################
Fmr. libertarian, irredeemable bank shill and somewhere inbetween classical liberalism and neoliberalism // Political Compass: +8.75 Economic, -2.25 Social (May 2019)

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43468
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby New haven america » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:22 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Gauthier wrote:If porn drove all men to rape, why isn't there a rape apocalypse all over the world? I've watched porn and I haven't felt like raping the first woman that gets close to me.


Never said that porn drove all men to rape: I think that porn tend to make men watching it behaving worse towards women, treating us more as objects than human beings.
The effects is probably close to zero on same men, barely relevant on some other men, relevant but far away from droving them to rape on some other men, even more relevant but still not enough to drove them to commit rape on some other men, and, finally, droving some men to commit rape. Probably those who are droven by porn to commit rape were already sexist and misogynists, but still less than before becoming porn consumers. And so on.

What about women who watch porn? Do they become self-hating rapists?
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Great Minarchistan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5953
Founded: Jan 08, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Minarchistan » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:24 pm

New haven america wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
Never said that porn drove all men to rape: I think that porn tend to make men watching it behaving worse towards women, treating us more as objects than human beings.
The effects is probably close to zero on same men, barely relevant on some other men, relevant but far away from droving them to rape on some other men, even more relevant but still not enough to drove them to commit rape on some other men, and, finally, droving some men to commit rape. Probably those who are droven by porn to commit rape were already sexist and misogynists, but still less than before becoming porn consumers. And so on.

What about women who watch porn? Do they become self-hating rapists?


Women watching femdom porn is a signal of the success of the radfem revolution

checkmate
Awarded for Best Capitalist in 2018 NSG Awards ;')
##############################
Fmr. libertarian, irredeemable bank shill and somewhere inbetween classical liberalism and neoliberalism // Political Compass: +8.75 Economic, -2.25 Social (May 2019)

User avatar
Bressen
Diplomat
 
Posts: 712
Founded: Feb 15, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Bressen » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:25 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Gauthier wrote:If porn drove all men to rape, why isn't there a rape apocalypse all over the world? I've watched porn and I haven't felt like raping the first woman that gets close to me.


Never said that porn drove all men to rape: I think that porn tend to make men watching it behaving worse towards women, treating us more as objects than human beings.
The effects is probably close to zero on some men, barely relevant on some other men, relevant but far away from droving them to rape on some other men, even more relevant but still not enough to drove them to commit rape on some other men, and, finally, droving some men to commit rape. Probably those who are droven by porn to commit rape were already sexist and misogynists, but still less than before becoming porn consumers. And so on.


can you at least try and support your claims beyond your own mental faculties
17 year old British college student.
Studying Law, Philosophy, Ethics and Psychology.
Libertarian minarchist.
"The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilised community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others."
- J.S Mill

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere."
- Voltaire

"My whole religion is this: do every duty, and expect no reward for it, either here or hereafter."
- Bertrand Russell

"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect."
- Mark Twain

"The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities."
- Ayn Rand

User avatar
Great Minarchistan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5953
Founded: Jan 08, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Minarchistan » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:26 pm

Bressen wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
Never said that porn drove all men to rape: I think that porn tend to make men watching it behaving worse towards women, treating us more as objects than human beings.
The effects is probably close to zero on some men, barely relevant on some other men, relevant but far away from droving them to rape on some other men, even more relevant but still not enough to drove them to commit rape on some other men, and, finally, droving some men to commit rape. Probably those who are droven by porn to commit rape were already sexist and misogynists, but still less than before becoming porn consumers. And so on.


can you at least try and support your claims beyond your own mental faculties


if she does that she'll abandon radfem because it has no valid arguments, o stupid
Awarded for Best Capitalist in 2018 NSG Awards ;')
##############################
Fmr. libertarian, irredeemable bank shill and somewhere inbetween classical liberalism and neoliberalism // Political Compass: +8.75 Economic, -2.25 Social (May 2019)

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43468
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby New haven america » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:28 pm

Great Minarchistan wrote:
New haven america wrote:What about women who watch porn? Do they become self-hating rapists?


Women watching femdom porn is a signal of the success of the radfem revolution

checkmate

IIRC, radfems think that dominant women are hurting themselves because they're living out a "Male power fantasy."
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72260
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:30 pm

New haven america wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
Never said that porn drove all men to rape: I think that porn tend to make men watching it behaving worse towards women, treating us more as objects than human beings.
The effects is probably close to zero on same men, barely relevant on some other men, relevant but far away from droving them to rape on some other men, even more relevant but still not enough to drove them to commit rape on some other men, and, finally, droving some men to commit rape. Probably those who are droven by porn to commit rape were already sexist and misogynists, but still less than before becoming porn consumers. And so on.

What about women who watch porn? Do they become self-hating rapists?

Everyone's daily reminder that roughly 90% of women watch porn online at least occasionally, and the vast majority do it for themselves (IE, they watch porn alone).
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Bressen
Diplomat
 
Posts: 712
Founded: Feb 15, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Bressen » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:30 pm

New haven america wrote:
Great Minarchistan wrote:
Women watching femdom porn is a signal of the success of the radfem revolution

checkmate

IIRC, radfems think that dominant women are hurting themselves because they're living out a "Male power fantasy."

why is it that the moment women get empowered they're only empowered because 'men' and this is a bad thing because 'men'
Last edited by Bressen on Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
17 year old British college student.
Studying Law, Philosophy, Ethics and Psychology.
Libertarian minarchist.
"The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilised community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others."
- J.S Mill

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere."
- Voltaire

"My whole religion is this: do every duty, and expect no reward for it, either here or hereafter."
- Bertrand Russell

"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect."
- Mark Twain

"The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities."
- Ayn Rand

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43468
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby New haven america » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:32 pm

Bressen wrote:
New haven america wrote:IIRC, radfems think that dominant women are hurting themselves because they're living out a "Male power fantasy."

why is it that the moment women get empowered they're only empowered because 'men' and this is a bad thing because 'men'

IDK, ask Chess.

I'm gonna go with "Because the struggle never ends!"
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43468
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby New haven america » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:38 pm


Stop spreading your anti-feminist lies!
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72260
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:42 pm


Facts are terribly inconvenient to most extreme ideologies, as I understand.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Great Minarchistan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5953
Founded: Jan 08, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Minarchistan » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:43 pm

Galloism wrote:
New haven america wrote:Stop spreading your anti-feminist lies!

Facts are terribly inconvenient to most extreme ideologies, as I understand.


Taxation is still theft.

/skip
Awarded for Best Capitalist in 2018 NSG Awards ;')
##############################
Fmr. libertarian, irredeemable bank shill and somewhere inbetween classical liberalism and neoliberalism // Political Compass: +8.75 Economic, -2.25 Social (May 2019)

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:49 pm

New haven america wrote:
Great Minarchistan wrote:
Women watching femdom porn is a signal of the success of the radfem revolution

checkmate

IIRC, radfems think that dominant women are hurting themselves because they're living out a "Male power fantasy."

And bear porn still encourages objectification of women because one of the men "simulates traditional female submissive role".
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Hakons
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5619
Founded: Jul 14, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Hakons » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:07 pm

Pornography is inherently adulterous and relegates women to sex objects. It is obviously a general harm to society. On the other hand, pornography could be considered a freedom of expression. Personally, I don't think having the right to do something means you shoulddo something.
“All elements of the national life must be made to drink in the Life which proceedeth from Him: legislation, political institutions, education, marriage and family life, capital and labour.” —Pope Leo XIII

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Achan, Aggicificicerous, Al-Momenta, Dimetrodon Empire, Eahland, Fahran, Hispida, Necroghastia, New Aradania, Philjia, Picairn, Ryemarch, The Imperial State of Ateria, The Jamesian Republic, The marxist plains, The North Polish Union, The Two Jerseys, Thermodolia, Valentine Z, Valyxias, Vivida Vis Animi

Advertisement

Remove ads