The problem with a lot of the studies on porn addiction is that they presume that ANY use of pornography is 'addiction'. They don't really distinguish between someone who say has a sex addiction and cannot stop really socially inappropriate behaviour or compulsive pornography use (like literally hours of it every day) and somone who simply views it or reads it. Furthermore, the assumption is that you're looking at images of real people or watching it. I've talked to anti-porn people who had no idea that there was pornographic manga, sites like literotica or anything like that.
Among feminists, the idea is that pornography teaches people to despise women. Among evanglical Christians, the idea is that pornography teaches you to disrespect the sanctity of marriage. So there's a false causal relationship in both cases--that there would be little adultery if ther was no pornography or little rape if there was no pornography. Both are roughly to me like the witch trials in "Monty Python and the Holy Grail".





i wish i got carded.