Galloism wrote:Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:All jobs are rape then, because we're coerced to do things we may or may not like for money.
Seriously, we have a bad enough problem with rape without you watering down the terminology or what actually constitutes rape. Let's not cheapen people's suffering by suggesting that being paid to have sex on film, or in photography, or anything of the sort, by free will and choice, is anything even remotely close to being forced to endure unwanted sexual contact, penetration, or abuse, whatever gender one might happen to be, and regardless of the gender of the rapist.
Btw, this is the eventual result of term dilution.
It's like the term "sex offender". Now that, in some states, "sex offender" includes someone caught urinating in public while drunk a decade ago, the term has been diluted beyond any real meaning. Consequently, if someone says "X person is a sex offender" my first question is "sex offense for what?" This is because the term has been diluted so much that it, by itself, carries no real meaning or weight anymore.
That's the logical result of Chessmistress and people like her diluting the term 'rape'.
And of course, she constantly chooses to ignore males who are sex workers in order to make her point that "This is only a women's issue" instead of actually wanting equality (Which she has admitted that she doesn't want, she wants a matriarchy, something feminism should be against).