NATION

PASSWORD

[UK] General Election 2017 Superthread

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who will you vote for?

Poll ended at Wed Jun 07, 2017 3:18 am

Conservative Party
182
29%
Green Party
26
4%
Labour Party
182
29%
Liberal Democrats
89
14%
Plaid Cymru
6
1%
Scottish National Party
44
7%
UK Independence Party
56
9%
Other
12
2%
Not voting
41
6%
 
Total votes : 638

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Mon Apr 24, 2017 9:25 am

Dumb Ideologies wrote:Going back further, of course, there's when you defended Sous dragging up personal information without my permission as a political beating stick, and then tutted at length about the appropriateness of the tone of my response.


so long as politics continues to have a strong effect on people's personal lives and people's personal lives continue to drive their political interests the two cannot reasonably be considered separate. this is amplified in cases where the politics resolves around people's status or very existence and there is a clear link between the politics in question and that status.

nobody asks the black confederate or the working class tories on NSG for their permission. the problem is so obvious and contradiction so pertinent that the idea seems absurd.
Last edited by Souseiseki on Mon Apr 24, 2017 9:38 am, edited 3 times in total.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45250
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Mon Apr 24, 2017 9:58 am

Souseiseki wrote:
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Going back further, of course, there's when you defended Sous dragging up personal information without my permission as a political beating stick, and then tutted at length about the appropriateness of the tone of my response.


so long as politics continues to have a strong effect on people's personal lives and people's personal lives continue to drive their political interests the two cannot reasonably be considered separate. this is amplified in cases where the politics resolves around people's status or very existence and there is a clear link between the politics in question and that status.

nobody asks the black confederate or the working class tories on NSG for their permission. the problem is so obvious and contradiction so pertinent that the idea seems absurd.


Leaving the fucking EU is not going to lead to the bloody eradication or sodding persecution of our mutual identity category. This excuse is laughable. Enough with the bullshit.

You know full well that some aspects of identity are more sensitive than others. Your tactics are disgraceful and the fact that you even countenance such emotionally abusive methods shows that your perverse desire to feel big for a moment by getting one over on "the enemy" is out of control.

You compensate for your own insecurities through deliberate and conscious abuse of others, and your pretence to cover it with a veneer of "ends justifying the means" is pathetically see-through, like a schoolyard bully hiding in a nun's habit. You're rotten to the core, if there's even anything there at all other than spite and viciousness. You disgust me.
Last edited by Dumb Ideologies on Mon Apr 24, 2017 10:26 am, edited 7 times in total.
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
The Sauganash Union
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1154
Founded: Mar 08, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The Sauganash Union » Mon Apr 24, 2017 10:20 am

Can I build an industrial shipbuilding empire in Belfast and enforce my corporate rule with a brutal police force, or has that time in British politics ended?
A nation founded in the early 1800s by Federalist immigrants from the United States. Has since developed an identity of its own and imperial ambitions. Now a neoliberal imperial power that justifies its aggression by putting it the name of tolerance and social justice.


Handshakes and tie knots. I don't have time for someone who can't master these simple things.

User avatar
Shrilland
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 100
Founded: Apr 24, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Shrilland » Mon Apr 24, 2017 11:03 am

I guess I'll be voting Lib Dem. Don't really want to but it's either them or the Tories that can even win here and I really want May gone. The woman just annoys me and looks bizarre. Her arms are too long. Plus, Tories are all but Labour status right now with how fractured they are. They can't even count on DUP votes for crying out loud! Hoping Lib Dems and Nationalists somehow manage to form a coalition. Highly unlikely but it would be a laugh and probably better than having Tory rule for another 5 years. I am all for reforming the EU right now or leaving altogether to teach the EU that it CANNOT continue to bully members into accepting an economic argument that was debunked by a simple spreadsheet error and you cannot force them to accept millions of ECONOMIC MIGRANTS just for shits and giggles. All in all, this elections has no good outcome unless Nationalists get a coalition for federalism put together

User avatar
USS Monitor
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 30410
Founded: Jul 01, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby USS Monitor » Mon Apr 24, 2017 11:27 am

Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:
so long as politics continues to have a strong effect on people's personal lives and people's personal lives continue to drive their political interests the two cannot reasonably be considered separate. this is amplified in cases where the politics resolves around people's status or very existence and there is a clear link between the politics in question and that status.

nobody asks the black confederate or the working class tories on NSG for their permission. the problem is so obvious and contradiction so pertinent that the idea seems absurd.


Leaving the fucking EU is not going to lead to the bloody eradication or sodding persecution of our mutual identity category. This excuse is laughable. Enough with the bullshit.

You know full well that some aspects of identity are more sensitive than others. Your tactics are disgraceful and the fact that you even countenance such emotionally abusive methods shows that your perverse desire to feel big for a moment by getting one over on "the enemy" is out of control.

You compensate for your own insecurities through deliberate and conscious abuse of others, and your pretence to cover it with a veneer of "ends justifying the means" is pathetically see-through, like a schoolyard bully hiding in a nun's habit. You're rotten to the core, if there's even anything there at all other than spite and viciousness. You disgust me.


*** 1 day ban for flaming ***
Don't take life so serious... it isn't permanent... RIP Dyakovo and Ashmoria
19th century steamships may be harmful or fatal if swallowed. In case of accidental ingestion, please seek immediate medical assistance.
༄༅། །འགྲོ་བ་མི་རིགས་ག་ར་དབང་ཆ་འདྲ་མཉམ་འབད་སྒྱེཝ་ལས་ག་ར་གིས་གཅིག་གིས་གཅིག་ལུ་སྤུན་ཆའི་དམ་ཚིག་བསྟན་དགོས།

User avatar
Socialist Nordia
Senator
 
Posts: 4275
Founded: Jun 03, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Nordia » Mon Apr 24, 2017 11:33 am

So I plugged in the numbers from the thread poll and if NS was the UK, these would be the results.
http://www.electionpolling.co.uk/swingo ... D=18&GRN=6

Hung Parliament: Conservatives short by 39 seats
Conservative: 287
Labour: 237
UKIP: 3
Liberal Democrat: 43
SNP: 55
Green: 2
Plaid Cymru: 4

But this is really only accurate for the parties it lets you plug in.
Internationalist Progressive Anarcho-Communist
I guess I'm a girl now.
Science > Your Beliefs
Trump did 11/9, never forget
Free Catalonia
My Political Test Results
A democratic socialist nation located on a small island in the Pacific. We are heavily urbanised, besides our thriving national parks. Our culture is influenced by both Scandinavia and China.
Our Embassy Program

User avatar
Angleter
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12359
Founded: Apr 27, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Angleter » Mon Apr 24, 2017 11:57 am

[align=center]"I gotta tell you, this is just crazy, huh! This is just nuts, OK! Jeezo man."

User avatar
Philjia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11556
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Philjia » Mon Apr 24, 2017 12:01 pm


Oh good, I get to bring out the Zac Goldsmith clip.
JG Ballard wrote:I want to rub the human race in its own vomit, and force it to look in the mirror.

⚧ Trans rights. ⚧
Pragmatic ethical utopian socialist, IE I'm for whatever kind of socialism is the most moral and practical. Pro LGBT rights and gay marriage, pro gay adoption, generally internationalist, ambivalent on the EU, atheist, pro free speech and expression, pro legalisation of prostitution and soft drugs, and pro choice. Anti authoritarian, anti Marxist. White cishet male.

User avatar
Irona
Minister
 
Posts: 2393
Founded: Dec 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Irona » Mon Apr 24, 2017 12:04 pm



Actually I think Richmond is a perfect example of how the Tories could lose some seats. Liberal pro-eu seats like that are exactly where the tories are going to lose ground to the lib dems

User avatar
Thyerata
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 408
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Thyerata » Mon Apr 24, 2017 1:00 pm

Just in case anyone's interested, the BBC have published their draft guidelines for the election period. While I generally trust the Beeb's impartiality, it's interesting to see the yardstick they set themselves... http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/guidelines/e ... elines.pdf
From the Desk of the Honourable Matthew Merriweather Ph.D. (Law, 2040) LLM Public and International Law, 2036) LLB Law (2035) (all from Thyerata State University)
Thytian Ambassador to the World Assembly and Security Council

I'm a gay man with an LLM, mild Asperger syndrome and only one functioning eye. My IC posts may reflect this, so please be aware

User avatar
Angleter
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12359
Founded: Apr 27, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Angleter » Mon Apr 24, 2017 1:11 pm

Irona wrote:


Actually I think Richmond is a perfect example of how the Tories could lose some seats. Liberal pro-eu seats like that are exactly where the tories are going to lose ground to the lib dems


There's a few they could lose (Bath, Twickenham, Kingston and Surbiton, Oxford West and Abingdon), but I don't expect anything on the scale of Richmond. Or at least I'd like to think not, since my seat is pretty much identical in terms of Remain vote and Tory lead over the LibDems. When Zac lost, he was a) a Brexiteer, b) running in a by-election that nobody asked for, and c) running without his party. Only a) applies to Zac now, and none of them apply to most Tories in similar seats.

Philjia wrote:

Oh good, I get to bring out the Zac Goldsmith clip.


And the greatest song of all time.
[align=center]"I gotta tell you, this is just crazy, huh! This is just nuts, OK! Jeezo man."

User avatar
Anywhere Else But Here
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5651
Founded: Mar 05, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Anywhere Else But Here » Mon Apr 24, 2017 1:40 pm

Angleter wrote:
Irona wrote:
Actually I think Richmond is a perfect example of how the Tories could lose some seats. Liberal pro-eu seats like that are exactly where the tories are going to lose ground to the lib dems


There's a few they could lose (Bath, Twickenham, Kingston and Surbiton, Oxford West and Abingdon), but I don't expect anything on the scale of Richmond. Or at least I'd like to think not, since my seat is pretty much identical in terms of Remain vote and Tory lead over the LibDems. When Zac lost, he was a) a Brexiteer, b) running in a by-election that nobody asked for, and c) running without his party. Only a) applies to Zac now, and none of them apply to most Tories in similar seats.

He's fairly high profile though, and not in a good way. Between the by-election and the mayoral race, I wonder if he might have a kind of reverse momentum ("Oh, Zac Goldsmith. That serial loser.") I reckon b) also sort of applies; he's now running as a Tory in an election nobody asked for. His return to the party so soon after the Heathrow thing could be seen as a cynical move as well.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Mon Apr 24, 2017 2:42 pm

Actually I think when it comes to the burqa ban we should be quite open that it is about banning a piece of clothing promoted by religious extremist sects with a long history of violence: Salafists, Wahhabis, and Deobandis. That is why we see not too many, for the time being that is, since they are still rather small. This will change however if we do not nip them in the bud - it is disconcerting how younger Muslims are becoming more radical than their parents. We are in a conflict with such ideologies and we should no longer treat them with soft gloves. Many Muslims across the world also are against burqas.

We must nip such radical sects in the bud. They have no place in our societies and preferably the entire world.

User avatar
Neo Balka
Minister
 
Posts: 3124
Founded: Feb 07, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Balka » Mon Apr 24, 2017 2:46 pm

Napkiraly wrote:Actually I think when it comes to the burqa ban we should be quite open that it is about banning a piece of clothing promoted by religious extremist sects with a long history of violence: Salafists, Wahhabis, and Deobandis. That is why we see not too many, for the time being that is, since they are still rather small. This will change however if we do not nip them in the bud - it is disconcerting how younger Muslims are becoming more radical than their parents. We are in a conflict with such ideologies and we should no longer treat them with soft gloves. Many Muslims across the world also are against burqas.

We must nip such radical sects in the bud. They have no place in our societies and preferably the entire world.


But nap! Thats Racist! eh?
The mere fact that i pissed someone off either means i stood for something or i said something offensive.
in this day and age it's both.
#garbagehumanbeing

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Mon Apr 24, 2017 2:55 pm

Neo Balka wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:Actually I think when it comes to the burqa ban we should be quite open that it is about banning a piece of clothing promoted by religious extremist sects with a long history of violence: Salafists, Wahhabis, and Deobandis. That is why we see not too many, for the time being that is, since they are still rather small. This will change however if we do not nip them in the bud - it is disconcerting how younger Muslims are becoming more radical than their parents. We are in a conflict with such ideologies and we should no longer treat them with soft gloves. Many Muslims across the world also are against burqas.

We must nip such radical sects in the bud. They have no place in our societies and preferably the entire world.


But nap! Thats Racist! eh?

Of course! I mean we shall forget that I oppose it becomes it mainly stems from sects that I view as harmful for Muslims and their well being, but alas that shall not be considered.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66787
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Mon Apr 24, 2017 2:58 pm

So how does banning certain forms of dress actually help eliminate those ideologies?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Mon Apr 24, 2017 2:59 pm

HMS Queen Elizabeth wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
She isn't, though: there are enough hardliners in the Tory party that will vote against anything reasonable that she needs to listen to their shite. Presumably, she's trying to fix that.

What's there to vote on? The Tory hardliners oppose parliament voting on the deal and they have pretty much succeeded removing parliament from the equation. I also find it hard to believe that Labour and the Lib Dems would back Tory hardliners against a moderate settlement.


There will be many, many bills put through parliament dealing with various small and tangentially related aspects of the discussions, that ridiculous enabling act notwithstanding. At present, factions within the Tory party that want to steer negotiations in a particular direction can just stall progress indefinitely by messing with those bills until they get what they want. Getting a bigger majority would let her ignore more of those factions.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:02 pm

The Wolfiad wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Some people, I'm sure, still like Bertie.

Like who?

In other news...

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/po ... 99776.html

The last time the Tories had a majority of seats in Wales was at the start of Queen Victoria's reign.


Erm, no? It was in the middle of George V's reign.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:06 pm

Vassenor wrote:So how does banning certain forms of dress actually help eliminate those ideologies?

Try actually quoting the person you are addressing.

It is a step in showing how we will not tolerate a symbol of their ideologies, in the same way that Germany banned Nazi symbolism and various Central and Eastern European countries banned communist symbols in their respective denazification and decommunization efforts.

User avatar
Thyerata
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 408
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Thyerata » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:08 pm

To be honest I wish the NS poll was the real life poll - I've just fed the Swingometer the the figures from the most recent YouGov voting intention survey. Labour lose 79 seats to the tories...

http://www.electionpolling.co.uk/swingo ... D=12&GRN=3
From the Desk of the Honourable Matthew Merriweather Ph.D. (Law, 2040) LLM Public and International Law, 2036) LLB Law (2035) (all from Thyerata State University)
Thytian Ambassador to the World Assembly and Security Council

I'm a gay man with an LLM, mild Asperger syndrome and only one functioning eye. My IC posts may reflect this, so please be aware

User avatar
Islamic Republic e Jariri
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10838
Founded: Apr 19, 2013
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Islamic Republic e Jariri » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:15 pm

Thyerata wrote:To be honest I wish the NS poll was the real life poll - I've just fed the Swingometer the the figures from the most recent YouGov voting intention survey. Labour lose 79 seats to the tories...

http://www.electionpolling.co.uk/swingo ... D=12&GRN=3


On the plus side maybe that will convince Labour to change leadership.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159117
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:18 pm

Napkiraly wrote:
Vassenor wrote:So how does banning certain forms of dress actually help eliminate those ideologies?

Try actually quoting the person you are addressing.

It is a step in showing how we will not tolerate a symbol of their ideologies, in the same way that Germany banned Nazi symbolism and various Central and Eastern European countries banned communist symbols in their respective denazification and decommunization efforts.

Germany banned military uniforms? This is the first I've heard of it.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:30 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:Try actually quoting the person you are addressing.

It is a step in showing how we will not tolerate a symbol of their ideologies, in the same way that Germany banned Nazi symbolism and various Central and Eastern European countries banned communist symbols in their respective denazification and decommunization efforts.

Germany banned military uniforms? This is the first I've heard of it.

...

I'm seriously trying to figure out how you went through the mental gymnastics necessary to actually post that.

User avatar
Neo Balka
Minister
 
Posts: 3124
Founded: Feb 07, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Balka » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:32 pm

Napkiraly wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Germany banned military uniforms? This is the first I've heard of it.

...

I'm seriously trying to figure out how you went through the mental gymnastics necessary to actually post that.


They did ban the nice looking uniforms tho.
The mere fact that i pissed someone off either means i stood for something or i said something offensive.
in this day and age it's both.
#garbagehumanbeing

User avatar
Roosevetania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 667
Founded: Jan 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Roosevetania » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:36 pm

It's shameful that May is taking advantage of the disarray Labour's in to seize power. Also, Corbyn is really stupid for supporting this.

But anyway, if I lived in the UK I would be going door-to-door for Labour. I really love Corbyn. A Labour-SNP-Lib Dem coalition would be my dream, but...
White Male, Libertarian Socialist, Anti-Fascist, United Methodist, American Deep South
Pro: socialism, anarchism (ideally), antifa, radical democracy, universal liberation, gun rights, open borders, revolution
Anti: capitalism, the state, authoritarianism, capitalist wars, capital punishment, Israel, generally most bourgeois institutions

Yang Jianguo, Member of the Revolutionary People's Party in the NS Parliament

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: America Republican Edition, American Legionaries, Emotional Support Crocodile, Eragon Island, Hidrandia, Immoren, Melrovia, Mezzigiorno rp 2000s, Neo-American States, Northern Seleucia, Oceasia, Tarsonis, The Selkie, The United Penguin Commonwealth, Valentine Z

Advertisement

Remove ads