NATION

PASSWORD

[UK] General Election 2017 Superthread

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who will you vote for?

Poll ended at Wed Jun 07, 2017 3:18 am

Conservative Party
182
29%
Green Party
26
4%
Labour Party
182
29%
Liberal Democrats
89
14%
Plaid Cymru
6
1%
Scottish National Party
44
7%
UK Independence Party
56
9%
Other
12
2%
Not voting
41
6%
 
Total votes : 638

User avatar
Frank Zipper
Senator
 
Posts: 4207
Founded: Nov 16, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Frank Zipper » Thu May 25, 2017 7:32 am

Great Nepal wrote: I think the €20-€80bn estimate also includes other commitments (like pension for British MEPs and risk of EU loans agreed by UK going bad etc)


I'm comfortable with not paying Nigel Farage his MEP pension.
Put this in your signature if you are easily led.

User avatar
The Wolfiad
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 495
Founded: Apr 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The Wolfiad » Thu May 25, 2017 7:48 am

Souseiseki wrote:
The Wolfiad wrote:Local campaigning will resume today by Labour and I think the Tories. Both parties will reinitiate their campaigns on Friday.

http://www.progressonline.org.uk/2017/0 ... our-surge/

Little point I want to touch upon about the polls. Last year between the two parties Labour gained 44% of the total votes cast for either Conservative or Tory. Based upon the last YouGov poll, I've worked out in spite of the polling increase Labour, the overall polling increase for the Tories compared to 2015 means that Labour still remains at 44%. In essence what has happened that the increasing amount of votes for the two parties should have benefited the Tories more considering their previous leads, however May's hiccups has meant some of it has drifted to Labour... yet it only puts us at the strength of the Miliband-era Labour Party. If we had a better Leader we perhaps could have an increased proportion of votes among the two parties or ideally a majority. This article above by Conor Pope also gives another analysis into the polling.

EDIT: I've also checked with the other polling companies. The last ORB and Survation (online) poll has us at 42.5%, the Survation phone poll has us at 44%, the last ICM poll at 41%. So technically we are doing worse than Ed Miliband when it all averages out. We live in a two-party system, so the most important metric for one of the two parties is the percentage of votes held relative to the other party. So for instance, even though some polls have Labour polling at the same amount as Blair in 2005, Blair still had a majority of votes cast between the two parties (52% of votes cast for Labour, 48% for the Tories).


milliband era is magic compared to the doom and gloom we heard about corbyn is going to tank the labour party

Not sure on what you are exactly saying, but I don't think of either Brown or Miliband too highly beyond a few things (i.e. Labour's response to the recession - would had been better if Blair got his way in 2005 and we cut public spending from thereon, Brown's fantastic oratory, Brown's sharp and intelligent mind, Miliband pushing for Leveson to be enacted etc). I just think Corbyn is exceptionally terrible to the point it makes those two seem like the greatest Leaders we ever had.
Last edited by The Wolfiad on Thu May 25, 2017 7:52 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Thu May 25, 2017 7:58 am

Frank Zipper wrote:
Great Nepal wrote: I think the €20-€80bn estimate also includes other commitments (like pension for British MEPs and risk of EU loans agreed by UK going bad etc)


I'm comfortable with not paying Nigel Farage his MEP pension.

Best way would be for UK to take over those payments and pass a bill titled "suck it nigel" which retroactively strips him of mep status. I wonder if he'd then sue UK in ECHR...
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Olerand
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13169
Founded: Sep 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Olerand » Thu May 25, 2017 10:38 am

Dooom35796821595 wrote:
Olerand wrote:Money pledged by the United Kingdom to EU programs and initiatives that it was a part of. Why does the United Kingdom insist on shirking its responsibilities? Where is that famous British resolve, that commitment to your obligations?


Money pledged to the EU, as a member of the EU, with the intention of remaining a member. There are no responsibilities, unless the EU can point to the binding legislation that stipulates a member must continue paying for such programs once outside of the EU.

The EU budget is a seven year long document. The United Kingdom pledged money in obligations to EU programs and initiatives that it benefited from, and will most likely still benefit from (even indirectly) after it leaves. The EU is asking for that pledged money.

There are of course no binding legislation, unless if the UK wants to take this to the ECJ. But the EU can stall indefinitely if that is what it wants to do.

Senegalboy wrote:
Olerand wrote:Money pledged by the United Kingdom to EU programs and initiatives that it was a part of. Why does the United Kingdom insist on shirking its responsibilities? Where is that famous British resolve, that commitment to your obligations?

Well these are our responsibilities as a member of the eu
And the British people have strongly urged us to withdraw our membership of the European union
What is the french stance on Brexit and what are their negotiation points

You pledged that money. The EU budget is a seven year long commitment. The UK promised those funds.

There is no French stance, France is represented by the EU. But Paris is probably one of the more "hardline" governments in behind the scenes negotiations in Brussels.
Dooom35796821595 wrote:
Frank Zipper wrote:The UK can try to negotiate the amount owed for commitments already agreed to, but it will slow down negotiations, meaning the possibility of no deal at all becomes much more likely. No deal at all will cost us far more in the long run.


Since the tories have not guaranteed the rights of the 3.5 or so million EU nationals living in the UK I'm sure that will be used as leverage to banish this nonsense "divorce bill".

You won't get anything from this other than pissing the EU off. This is a terrible bargaining chip, similar to the EU bargaining with the 1 million plus British residing in its borders.

Great Nepal wrote:
Dooom35796821595 wrote:
They stand to lose one of the largest net contributors to their budget, it's not a little. And I still haven't seen any legal justification for this "divorce bill", have you?

That will happen regardless; and we're talking about about 5bn per year - or 5% of EU's current income. Germany alone could cover that by increasing its commitment by 3.5% or current group of net contributors could make it up by adding 500m per country.

Largely breaks down to commitments made to the budget (reasonable - UK agreed to make payments until 2020 and got things like rebate based on that commitment), ongoing costs associated with British membership (mostly reasonable - EU incurred ongoing costs such as pensions based on reasonable expectation of ongoing contributions from UK), risks signed up to by Britain when it was a member (again reasonable - UK agreed to take on risks associated with defaults so), and cost of withdrawal process (probably not reasonable). UK could probably discuss alternatives for all these cases: ongoing payment till 2020, taking on commitments from EU, separate loan agreement etc but none of these are unreasonable in principle. UK could of course tell EU to suck it because enforcing things against a sovereign state is hard, but then EU will quite likely return the favor by introducing legislation targeted at UK based businesses.

I highly doubt that the EU is asking for a lump sum payment to be made now. It's more likely that Brussels would want the UK to simply keep up with its pledged funds until the pledges expire.
French citizen. Still a Socialist Party member. Ségolène Royal 2019, I guess Actually I might vote la France Insoumise.

Qui suis-je?:
Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever

User avatar
Frank Zipper
Senator
 
Posts: 4207
Founded: Nov 16, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Frank Zipper » Thu May 25, 2017 10:40 am

I like UKIP's slogan "The terrorists won't win and neither will we"
Put this in your signature if you are easily led.

User avatar
Calladan
Minister
 
Posts: 3064
Founded: Jul 28, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Calladan » Thu May 25, 2017 11:50 am

UKIP really have lost the plot. They have written one of the most incredibly racist, bigoted, hate filled manifestos I have EVER seen. I swear to god you would think the BNP or the KKK wrote it.

It is so bigoted, hate filled and racist that are parts of it that are ludicrously self-contradictory.

On one page they plan to ban the Burqa and the Niqab, because they say it is a barrier to integration, hides evidence of domestic abuse and inhibits Vitamin D intake.

And yet on another page, they write this :-

Protect religious freedoms in accordance with Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, provided those beliefs exist firmly within the framework of British law. We will not condone any faith position that is itself intolerant of the human rights of others


Now, I admit I am not a lawyer, but how does wearing a Burqa contradict British Law? And how is it intolerant of the human rights of others? I am fairly sure I don't have a right to see everyone's face when I walk down the street. And I am fairly sure that wearing a Burqa must be covered by the religious freedoms of Article 18 of the UDHR. (Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong).

So if they are going to protect religious freedoms, how exactly are they going to ban an article of clothing that is probably covered by that? Except by being a bunch of hypocritical tosspots?

They plan annual screenings for girls under the age of sixteen who are deemed to be "at risk" of FGM. Which while it sounds good means they get to target families they don't like (and it won't be "good, decent Christian families" - oh no, you can count on that!) and there were a lot of anti-FGM campaigners who thought this would be incredibly traumatic for the girls in question. Plus on top of that, any "at risk" girls returning from countries were FGM is "the cultural norm" would also be subjected to additional checks.

This entire manifesto seems to be an attempt to say "FUCK THE MUSLIMS" and make Britain a country where anyone who isn't Christian or Jewish (or - lets be honest - white) feel no longer welcome and drive them out. It is one of the most appalling things I have read in a good long while, and that includes "My Immortal".

They also plan to enshrine St George's Day and St David's Day as bank holidays, but the Scots and Norther Irish can go fuck themselves. Which is probably the only policy that has nothing to do with Muslims in the entire fucking manifesto, but is still pretty insulting to half the population of the country (and is it a co-incidence it is the half that voted against leaving the EU? Probably not).
Tara A McGill, Ambassador to Lucinda G Doyle III
"Always be yourself, unless you can be Zathras. Then be Zathras"
A Rough Guide To Calladan | The Seven Years of Darkness | Ambassador McGill's Facebook Page
"Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, providing they are Christian & white" - Trump

User avatar
The Wolfiad
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 495
Founded: Apr 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The Wolfiad » Thu May 25, 2017 2:33 pm

Holy shitballs, latest YouGov poll:

CON: 43% (-1)
LAB: 38% (+3)
LDEM: 10% (+1)
UKIP: 4% (+1)

http://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/cgi- ... ndary=2015

http://www.electionpolling.co.uk/swingo ... D=10&GRN=2
Last edited by The Wolfiad on Thu May 25, 2017 2:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Olerand
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13169
Founded: Sep 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Olerand » Thu May 25, 2017 2:38 pm

The Wolfiad wrote:Holy shitballs, latest YouGov poll:

CON: 43% (-1)
LAB: 38% (+3)
LDEM: 10% (+1)
UKIP: 4% (+1)

http://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/cgi- ... ndary=2015

http://www.electionpolling.co.uk/swingo ... D=10&GRN=2

... Is Labour actually gaining ground? :lol2: Amazing!
French citizen. Still a Socialist Party member. Ségolène Royal 2019, I guess Actually I might vote la France Insoumise.

Qui suis-je?:
Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Thu May 25, 2017 2:38 pm

The Wolfiad wrote:Holy shitballs, latest YouGov poll:

CON: 43% (-1)
LAB: 38% (+3)
LDEM: 10% (+1)
UKIP: 4% (+1)

http://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/cgi- ... ndary=2015

http://www.electionpolling.co.uk/swingo ... D=10&GRN=2


corbyn the supposedly unelectable launches his final attack

tories sweat bullets as right-wing labour look at each other, not sure whether to support him or flank him

may continues to hide and do nothing and hope she wins on intertia
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
The Wolfiad
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 495
Founded: Apr 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The Wolfiad » Thu May 25, 2017 2:40 pm

FFSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

https://apple.news/A30q8-JPHREuSAG-hTdp1qA

ONE JOB! ONE FUCKING JOB! AND NOW HE'S ALREADY GONE AND BLOWN IT. WELL FUCKING DONE.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Thu May 25, 2017 2:40 pm

Souseiseki wrote:
The Wolfiad wrote:Holy shitballs, latest YouGov poll:

CON: 43% (-1)
LAB: 38% (+3)
LDEM: 10% (+1)
UKIP: 4% (+1)

http://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/cgi- ... ndary=2015

http://www.electionpolling.co.uk/swingo ... D=10&GRN=2


corbyn the supposedly unelectable launches his final attack

tories sweat bullets as right-wing labour look at each other, not sure whether to support him or flank him

may continues to hide and do nothing and hope she wins on intertia


While trying to convince herself that everyone is OK with her having protesters arrested for disrupting her echo chamber.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Frank Zipper
Senator
 
Posts: 4207
Founded: Nov 16, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Frank Zipper » Thu May 25, 2017 2:40 pm

A hung parliament would be glorious.
Put this in your signature if you are easily led.

User avatar
The Wolfiad
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 495
Founded: Apr 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The Wolfiad » Thu May 25, 2017 2:41 pm

Olerand wrote:
The Wolfiad wrote:Holy shitballs, latest YouGov poll:

CON: 43% (-1)
LAB: 38% (+3)
LDEM: 10% (+1)
UKIP: 4% (+1)

http://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/cgi- ... ndary=2015

http://www.electionpolling.co.uk/swingo ... D=10&GRN=2

... Is Labour actually gaining ground? :lol2: Amazing!

Well yeah, but once again Corbyn has to go give me a heartache. I swear to God this is some crazy abusive relationship, the polling gives me hope and then he goes and makes another foreign policy gaffe.
Last edited by The Wolfiad on Thu May 25, 2017 2:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Wolfiad
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 495
Founded: Apr 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The Wolfiad » Thu May 25, 2017 2:42 pm

Frank Zipper wrote:A hung parliament would be glorious.

Probably would still be a Tory majority due to Scotland gains but would be in single digits. Pretty ecstatic (and nervous, considering what Corbyn's come out and said).
Last edited by The Wolfiad on Thu May 25, 2017 2:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Olerand
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13169
Founded: Sep 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Olerand » Thu May 25, 2017 2:49 pm

The Wolfiad wrote:
Olerand wrote:... Is Labour actually gaining ground? :lol2: Amazing!

Well yeah, but once again Corbyn has to go give me a heartache. I swear to God this is some crazy abusive relationship, the polling gives me hope and then he goes and makes another foreign policy gaffe.

I love that. I hope Corbyn makes that speech. What an ironic twist of history. France elects a liberal centrist, chouchou of the markets, and Britain elects an Islamo-gauchiste old leftist. Beautiful. Life is grand.

Supposing these polls hold and Corbyn keeps, despite all odds, gaining ground of course. :lol2:
French citizen. Still a Socialist Party member. Ségolène Royal 2019, I guess Actually I might vote la France Insoumise.

Qui suis-je?:
Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever

User avatar
Shrillland
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22257
Founded: Apr 12, 2010
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Shrillland » Thu May 25, 2017 2:54 pm

Olerand wrote:
The Wolfiad wrote:Well yeah, but once again Corbyn has to go give me a heartache. I swear to God this is some crazy abusive relationship, the polling gives me hope and then he goes and makes another foreign policy gaffe.

I love that. I hope Corbyn makes that speech. What an ironic twist of history. France elects a liberal centrist, chouchou of the markets, and Britain elects an Islamo-gauchiste old leftist. Beautiful. Life is grand.

Supposing these polls hold and Corbyn keeps, despite all odds, gaining ground of course. :lol2:


I'm actually surprised that May hasn't pulled the classic campaign response after a terrorist attack, i.e. wrap the Union Jack round herself and play patriotism like a used Hammond Organ. It works just about everywhere else.
How America Came to This, by Kowani: Racialised Politics, Ideological Media Gaslighting, and What It All Means For The Future
Plebiscite Plaza 2024
Confused by the names I use for House districts? Here's a primer!
In 1963, Doctor Who taught us all we need to know about politics when a cave woman said, "Old men see no further than tomorrow's meat".

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Thu May 25, 2017 2:56 pm

Shrillland wrote:
Olerand wrote:I love that. I hope Corbyn makes that speech. What an ironic twist of history. France elects a liberal centrist, chouchou of the markets, and Britain elects an Islamo-gauchiste old leftist. Beautiful. Life is grand.

Supposing these polls hold and Corbyn keeps, despite all odds, gaining ground of course. :lol2:


I'm actually surprised that May hasn't pulled the classic campaign response after a terrorist attack, i.e. wrap the Union Jack round herself and play patriotism like a used Hammond Organ. It works just about everywhere else.


People are already screaming about how this was a false flag to boost her numbers. Not sure she wants to fan those flames.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Thu May 25, 2017 2:56 pm

The Wolfiad wrote:FFSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

https://apple.news/A30q8-JPHREuSAG-hTdp1qA

ONE JOB! ONE FUCKING JOB! AND NOW HE'S ALREADY GONE AND BLOWN IT. WELL FUCKING DONE.


he's not wrong. the rise of ISIS is inextricably linked to the iraq war and how it was handled, though obviously it's not exactly going to become a popular talking point.

e: he even says it doesn't make the attack any less horrible or take responsibility away from the attackers, but that's not going to make the headlines either.
Last edited by Souseiseki on Thu May 25, 2017 2:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Mostrov
Minister
 
Posts: 2701
Founded: Aug 06, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Mostrov » Thu May 25, 2017 3:12 pm

Last edited by Mostrov on Fri Mar 15, 2024 2:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Thu May 25, 2017 3:19 pm

Mostrov wrote:Remember when my predictions about a victory seemed a little daft?

If he does win, we would likely see a coup—no time in the last two centuries have the military ever made political threats as they have. In this current mood, that could quite quickly turn into a civil-war. And consider you have popular ground swell to 'do something' about all the Muslims!


Why is everyone so obsessed with the idea of a Military Coup?

And what happens if Liz pulls a Juan Carlos and tells the military to stop being stupid?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Thu May 25, 2017 3:22 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Mostrov wrote:Remember when my predictions about a victory seemed a little daft?

If he does win, we would likely see a coup—no time in the last two centuries have the military ever made political threats as they have. In this current mood, that could quite quickly turn into a civil-war. And consider you have popular ground swell to 'do something' about all the Muslims!


Why is everyone so obsessed with the idea of a Military Coup?

And what happens if Liz pulls a Juan Carlos and tells the military to stop being stupid?


I haven't seen anybody other than Mostrov even mention a coup.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Thu May 25, 2017 3:26 pm

Did someone say coup? Coup guys? Coup!

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Thu May 25, 2017 3:27 pm

Salandriagado wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
Why is everyone so obsessed with the idea of a Military Coup?

And what happens if Liz pulls a Juan Carlos and tells the military to stop being stupid?


I haven't seen anybody other than Mostrov even mention a coup.


Supposedly it did the rounds when he was first elected leader with various senior military types saying they'd start one if he was elected PM.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Thu May 25, 2017 3:29 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
I haven't seen anybody other than Mostrov even mention a coup.


Supposedly it did the rounds when he was first elected leader with various senior military types saying they'd start one if he was elected PM.


Was this around the same time Corbyn was going full anti NATO, and claiming Russia "weren't unprovoked" with their actions in Ukraine?

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Thu May 25, 2017 3:30 pm

no officer, i was saying "coo! coo!", like a chicken
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Likhinia

Advertisement

Remove ads