Terror attack in St.Petersburg Metro, 14 dead

[Marado]

Rest in peace, Russia.

[Washington Resistance Army]

The article you cited?

"Interfax said the bomber was known to have links to radical Islam."

So where does it say that was his motivation, rather than just an incidental fact that everyone is seizing on because it fits their narrative?

Are you really that desperate to defend Islam?

[Marado]

So where does it say that was his motivation, rather than just an incidental fact that everyone is seizing on because it fits their narrative?

Are you really that desperate to defend Islam?

[Mattopilos II]

The article you cited?

"Interfax said the bomber was known to have links to radical Islam."

So where does it say that was his motivation, rather than just an incidental fact that everyone is seizing on because it fits their narrative?

Vass, there is realizing that not all Muslims commit terrorist acts and don't defend those acts, and then there is being downright blind to an attack that was clearly motivated by religion. Learn to separate the two, and please, PLEASE don't be the latter.

[Bakery Hill]

The article you cited?

"Interfax said the bomber was known to have links to radical Islam."

So where does it say that was his motivation, rather than just an incidental fact that everyone is seizing on because it fits their narrative?

True, it's probably just a coincidence.

It's equally likely that he bombed a metro station killing eleven people because they raised ticket prices.

[Marado]

So where does it say that was his motivation, rather than just an incidental fact that everyone is seizing on because it fits their narrative?

Vass, there is realizing that not all Muslims commit terrorist acts and don't defend those acts, and then there is being downright blind to an attack that was clearly motivated by religion. Learn to separate the two, and please, PLEASE don't be the latter.

Why is Russia suffering from ISIS? I hope this doesn't reach the U.S. or China.

[Washington Resistance Army]

Vass, there is realizing that not all Muslims commit terrorist acts and don't defend those acts, and then there is being downright blind to an attack that was clearly motivated by religion. Learn to separate the two, and please, PLEASE don't be the latter.

Why is Russia suffering from ISIS? I hope this doesn't reach the U.S. or China.

It already has reached the US, Orlando happened.

Radical Islam doesn't discriminate, they'll kill just about everyone they can.

[Marado]

Why is Russia suffering from ISIS? I hope this doesn't reach the U.S. or China.

It already has reached the US, Orlando happened.

Radical Islam doesn't discriminate, they'll kill just about everyone they can.

[Vassenor]

So where does it say that was his motivation, rather than just an incidental fact that everyone is seizing on because it fits their narrative?

Come on Vas, you're really stretching for that one.

So where does it say that was his motivation, rather than just an incidental fact that everyone is seizing on because it fits their narrative?

Are you really that desperate to defend Islam?

Three basic rules of investigation.

Assume Nothing
Believe Nothing
Challenge Everything.

At no point did I say it couldn't be. Just that we had no evidence that it was right now.

[Marado]

Come on Vas, you're really stretching for that one.

Are you really that desperate to defend Islam?

Three basic rules of investigation.

Assume Nothing
Believe Nothing
Challenge Everything.

At no point did I say it couldn't be. Just that we had no evidence that it was right now.

Call that, "The ABCs of Investigation".

[Vassenor]

So where does it say that was his motivation, rather than just an incidental fact that everyone is seizing on because it fits their narrative?

Vass, there is realizing that not all Muslims commit terrorist acts and don't defend those acts, and then there is being downright blind to an attack that was clearly motivated by religion. Learn to separate the two, and please, PLEASE don't be the latter.

So what is your evidence that this was motivated by religion?

[Marado]

Vass, there is realizing that not all Muslims commit terrorist acts and don't defend those acts, and then there is being downright blind to an attack that was clearly motivated by religion. Learn to separate the two, and please, PLEASE don't be the latter.

So what is your evidence that this was motivated by religion?

Catching the culprits, interrogating them, and making them confess that ISIS is responsible for this.

[Alvecia]

Come on Vas, you're really stretching for that one.

Are you really that desperate to defend Islam?

Three basic rules of investigation.

Assume Nothing
Believe Nothing
Challenge Everything.

At no point did I say it couldn't be. Just that we had no evidence that it was right now.

I don't need to look at the weather report to assume that those black clouds overhead mean rain's coming.
Based on the available evidence of previous attacks and radical Islams explicit intentions, it is not illogical to assume they are the cause until proven otherwise.

[Vassenor]

So what is your evidence that this was motivated by religion?

Catching the culprits, interrogating them, and making them confess that ISIS is responsible for this.

I mean what evidence do we have at this moment in time.

[Marado]

Catching the culprits, interrogating them, and making them confess that ISIS is responsible for this.

I mean what evidence do we have at this moment in time.

Not much, but more will be revealed after interrogation.

[Bakery Hill]

Come on Vas, you're really stretching for that one.

Are you really that desperate to defend Islam?

Three basic rules of investigation.

Assume Nothing
Believe Nothing
Challenge Everything.

At no point did I say it couldn't be. Just that we had no evidence that it was right now.

Thanks detective.

[Marado]

Three basic rules of investigation.

Assume Nothing
Believe Nothing
Challenge Everything.

At no point did I say it couldn't be. Just that we had no evidence that it was right now.

Thanks detective.

Vassenor Holmes.

[Alvecia]

Come on Vas, you're really stretching for that one.

Are you really that desperate to defend Islam?

Three basic rules of investigation.

Assume Nothing
Believe Nothing
Challenge Everything.

At no point did I say it couldn't be. Just that we had no evidence that it was right now.

Actually, fuck those rules. They completely ignore any knowledge gained previously.
I don't throw out the entire body of scientific knowledge every time I start a new study.

[Marado]

Three basic rules of investigation.

Assume Nothing
Believe Nothing
Challenge Everything.

At no point did I say it couldn't be. Just that we had no evidence that it was right now.

Actually, fuck those rules. They completely ignore any knowledge gained previously.
I don't throw out the entire body of scientific knowledge every time I start a new study.

Generally speaking, that's skepticism.

[Washington Resistance Army]

Come on Vas, you're really stretching for that one.

Are you really that desperate to defend Islam?

Three basic rules of investigation.

Assume Nothing
Believe Nothing
Challenge Everything.

At no point did I say it couldn't be. Just that we had no evidence that it was right now.

That might work if it wasn't already stated he had links to radical Islam.

We already tried to do this whole "well he had links to radical Islam but it must be something else" thing with the Orlando piece of shit and that turned out to be solely because of his extreme interpretation of his religion, not any of the nonsense people tried to peddle. I get you always try to jump to Islams defense, it's something you and Gauth both do on a regular basis but when a Muslim with known links to radical Islam out a bombing it's pretty safe to assume what his reasoning was.

[Alvecia]

Actually, fuck those rules. They completely ignore any knowledge gained previously.
I don't throw out the entire body of scientific knowledge every time I start a new study.

Generally speaking, that's skepticism.

No it isn't. Skepticism follows the evidence.

[Marado]

Generally speaking, that's skepticism.

No it isn't. Skepticism follows the evidence.

Or hypothesis or claims?

[Vassenor]

Three basic rules of investigation.

Assume Nothing
Believe Nothing
Challenge Everything.

At no point did I say it couldn't be. Just that we had no evidence that it was right now.

Actually, fuck those rules. They completely ignore any knowledge gained previously.
I don't throw out the entire body of scientific knowledge every time I start a new study.

...What does that have to do with what I said?

[Alvecia]

No it isn't. Skepticism follows the evidence.

Or hypothesis or claims?

Clarify. Perhaps elsewhere though, this is enough of a thread jack as it is.

[Marado]

Actually, fuck those rules. They completely ignore any knowledge gained previously.
I don't throw out the entire body of scientific knowledge every time I start a new study.

...What does that have to do with what I said?

Beats me. There was nothing of knowledge about science there.