Right Wing Discussion Thread IX: The Right Man's Burden

by **Senkaku** » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:00 pm

The East Marches II wrote:
Senkaku wrote:So any time I post anything now, your move is "bring up strawmen or ancient history in incoherent non sequiturs"?

It's unconventional, but an interesting move.

I'm afraid.... you know too much

But you have no state security apparatus to take me down and tie off that loose end! Oh no!

by **Senkaku** » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:00 pm

Greater Cesnica wrote:It's been 200 pages since I checked into this clusterfuck.

Nothing's changed don't worry

by **The Portland Territory** » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:00 pm

Greater Cesnica wrote:It's been 200 pages since I checked into this clusterfuck.

Welcome back. Please pay your post tariff

by **FelrikTheDeleted** » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:01 pm

Greater Cesnica wrote:It's been 200 pages since I checked into this clusterfuck.

Welcome back, it is still the loveable clusterfuck it was before.

by **The Portland Territory** » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:01 pm

Senkaku wrote:
The East Marches II wrote:
I'm afraid.... you know too much

But you have no state security apparatus to take me down and tie off that loose end! Oh no!

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/07/0 ... e_your_pc/

by **Northern Davincia** » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:01 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
The East Marches II wrote:
Literally the Kulturkampf did nothing wrong and it didn't go far enough.

More proof that the Germanic and the Anglo are one and the same.

The Romans were right to subjugate the northern barbarians.

by **The East Marches II** » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:02 pm

Senkaku wrote:
The East Marches II wrote:
I'm afraid.... you know too much

But you have no state security apparatus to take me down and tie off that loose end! Oh no!

McSecurityCorp™® :^)

by **The East Marches II** » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:03 pm

Northern Davincia wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:More proof that the Germanic and the Anglo are one and the same.

The Romans were right to subjugate the northern barbarians.

You stay out of this one Libertarian

by **Greater Cesnica** » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:03 pm

FelrikTheDeleted wrote:
Greater Cesnica wrote:It's been 200 pages since I checked into this clusterfuck.

Welcome back, it is still the loveable clusterfuck it was before.

Is 4chan still loved here? I love /pol/ and /b/

by **The Portland Territory** » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:04 pm

Greater Cesnica wrote:
FelrikTheDeleted wrote:
Welcome back, it is still the loveable clusterfuck it was before.

Is 4chan still loved here? I love /pol/ and /b/

> /b/

Pornography and hentai are not allowed on this forum. Shoo!

by **FelrikTheDeleted** » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:05 pm

Greater Cesnica wrote:
FelrikTheDeleted wrote:
Welcome back, it is still the loveable clusterfuck it was before.

Is 4chan still loved here? I love /pol/ and /b/

Ehhh, don't know really.

by **Conserative Morality** » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:05 pm

The East Marches II wrote:
Senkaku wrote:But you have no state security apparatus to take me down and tie off that loose end! Oh no!

McSecurityCorp™® :^)

Relevant

by **The Parkus Empire** » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:06 pm

War Gears wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:Is there anything more degenerate than cotton? Spandex, polyester, we know them to be subversive, but cotton is the fifth column of fabrics.

That explains why its one of the most important crops down in the South, based on all the religious people there.

Cotton destroyed the south.

by **The East Marches II** » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:08 pm

The Portland Territory wrote:
Greater Cesnica wrote:It's been 200 pages since I checked into this clusterfuck.

Welcome back. Please pay your post tariff

Do you mind I use this for the future?

Conserative Morality wrote:
The East Marches II wrote:
McSecurityCorp™® :^)

Relevant

There is nothing wrong this

Greater Cesnica wrote:
FelrikTheDeleted wrote:
Welcome back, it is still the loveable clusterfuck it was before.

Is 4chan still loved here? I love /pol/ and /b/

/int/ernational reporting in

by **Conserative Morality** » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:09 pm

The East Marches II wrote:/int/ernational reporting in

>> not /lit/erati
>> not devou/tg/uardsman

out

by **The Portland Territory** » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:11 pm

The East Marches II wrote:
The Portland Territory wrote:Welcome back. Please pay your post tariff

Do you mind I use this for the future?

Go ahead man

by **The Portland Territory** » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:12 pm

The East Marches II wrote:/int/ernational reporting in

/k/omrade and /pol/ reporting in

by **FelrikTheDeleted** » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:12 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
The East Marches II wrote:/int/ernational reporting in

>> not /lit/erati
>> not devou/tg/uardsman

out

>not /his/torians
>not /k/ommandos

Face it, you're both plebeians.

by **Greater Cesnica** » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:15 pm

Republic of Keshiland wrote:
United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:To "ban magazines"? Do you know what a magazine is?

Yes it let's you shoot with out reloading

Give this man a priest.

by **The East Marches II** » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:17 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
The East Marches II wrote:/int/ernational reporting in

>> not /lit/erati
>> not devou/tg/uardsman

out

Absolutely disgusting, do not want and I can't associate with you anymore

The Portland Territory wrote:
The East Marches II wrote:/int/ernational reporting in

/k/omrade and /pol/ reporting in

Good man!

Greater Cesnica wrote:
Republic of Keshiland wrote:
Yes it let's you shoot with out reloading

Give this man a priest.

wrong thread?

by **Greater Cesnica** » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:17 pm

The East Marches II wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:>> not /lit/erati
>> not devou/tg/uardsman

out

Absolutely disgusting, do not want and I can't associate with you anymore

The Portland Territory wrote:/k/omrade and /pol/ reporting in

Good man!

Greater Cesnica wrote:

Give this man a priest.

wrong thread?

No I'm serious. Give him a priest. I meant to type here.

by **The East Marches II** » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:20 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
War Gears wrote:
That explains why its one of the most important crops down in the South, based on all the religious people there.

Cotton destroyed the south.

Please explain more, I wish to hear your analysis.

by **Greater Cesnica** » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:25 pm

The East Marches II wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:Cotton destroyed the south.

Please explain more, I wish to hear your analysis.

"Well, uh guys, so... Cotton is bad, because it was bad. Reason? Because it was used to persecute black people."

MIC DROP

by **The Portland Territory** » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:25 pm

The East Marches II wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:Cotton destroyed the south.

Please explain more, I wish to hear your analysis.

It's true though! The blacks intentionally enslaved themselves to pick the cotton and have the North sympathize with them, invading the South

12d Chess here

by **United Muscovite Nations** » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:27 pm

The East Marches II wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:Cotton destroyed the south.

Please explain more, I wish to hear your analysis.

It caused the Southern economy to be dependent on one resource, limiting its industrial development. By the time of of the Civil War, the North had something like 97% of arms manufacturing capability.

Right Wing Discussion Thread IX: The Right Man's Burden

Was the Reformation a good thing?

Who is online