>breaking the law
>ever
Mountain people everyone
Advertisement


by Conserative Morality » Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:16 pm
The East Marches II wrote:What does one do with those who can not be rehabilitated?
The Portland Territory wrote:Not that many, actually. With the exception of seat belts, hate those damn things. But the punishment is a fine, not jail time, is it not?

by Conserative Morality » Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:16 pm

by The East Marches II » Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:17 pm

by Conserative Morality » Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:17 pm
Albrenia wrote:His sig says he's 16, so probably none which actually carry punishments of any meaning to a minor.

by The Portland Territory » Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:18 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:The East Marches II wrote:What does one do with those who can not be rehabilitated?
Isolation from society.The Portland Territory wrote:Not that many, actually. With the exception of seat belts, hate those damn things. But the punishment is a fine, not jail time, is it not?
Doesn't matter. You broke the law, and that's that. We need to change the law to punish you permanently for flaunting the law because of your own petty personal preferences.

by Conserative Morality » Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:20 pm
The Portland Territory wrote:Know that really doesnt discredit my argument. Each law has it's own set punishment, not all are the same.

by Senkaku » Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:21 pm

The Portland Territory wrote:I see Prohibitions in a different light than basically everybody else

by Proctopeo » Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:24 pm

by Senkaku » Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:24 pm
Proctopeo wrote:Remember, prohibition worked*.
*In the sense that people were not legally buying alcohol any more, not in the sense that it made them stop drinking it.

by United Muscovite Nations » Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:26 pm

by The Portland Territory » Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:31 pm

by Senkaku » Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:32 pm
The Portland Territory wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:And clearly the laws against not wearing seatbelts isn't harsh enough since you openly admit to ignoring them.
> not realizing I dont see punishments as a means to deter crime, despite me quite clearly stating it
kek, youre trying to use my argument against me even though it's not even my argument
The Portland Territory wrote:The War on Drugs and even Prohibition were failures because society was for the substances, but also that punishments weren't tough enough.

by The Portland Territory » Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:32 pm

by Conserative Morality » Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:33 pm
The Portland Territory wrote:> not realizing I dont see punishments as a means to deter crime, despite me quite clearly stating it
kek, youre trying to use my argument against me even though it's not even my argument

by Senkaku » Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:34 pm
The Portland Territory wrote:Senkaku wrote:Tell me, Portland, would you prefer life in prison or immediate execution for your failure to comply with seatbelt statutes?
Life in Prison. Is it not better to live life in eternal suffering, than not live at all? Not to mention, asking for execution is a coward's way out

by The Portland Territory » Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:34 pm
Senkaku wrote:The Portland Territory wrote:> not realizing I dont see punishments as a means to deter crime, despite me quite clearly stating it
kek, youre trying to use my argument against me even though it's not even my argument
that's funny because uhThe Portland Territory wrote:The War on Drugs and even Prohibition were failures because society was for the substances, but also that punishments weren't tough enough.
The Portland Territory wrote:To me, Prohibitions aren't meant to deter people away from the substance. But rather to get the user and provider off the street and away from the people.

by Zohiania » Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:35 pm

by The Portland Territory » Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:36 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:The Portland Territory wrote:> not realizing I dont see punishments as a means to deter crime, despite me quite clearly stating it
kek, youre trying to use my argument against me even though it's not even my argument
"Th-they broke the law but I'm different!"
Pathetic. Life in prison would be a net gain for society so we don't have to hear this swill.


by The East Marches II » Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:37 pm

by The Portland Territory » Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:37 pm
Senkaku wrote:The Portland Territory wrote:Life in Prison. Is it not better to live life in eternal suffering, than not live at all? Not to mention, asking for execution is a coward's way out
Cool. DHS will henceforth begin the indefinite detention of all people caught without their seatbelts on a national level, either until everyone wears a seatbelt or everyone is in jail.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Eahland, Elejamie, Fractalnavel, Free Stalliongrad, Hispida, James_xenoland, Luziyca, Tarsonis, The Jamesian Republic, The Rio Grande River Basin, Valrifall, Yasuragi
Advertisement