War Gears wrote:Daily reminder that the Japanese were right and merchants belonged on the bottom of society. :^)
U N W E S T E R N
I am suddenly reminded of why I despise all other cultures.
Advertisement
by Conserative Morality » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:19 pm
War Gears wrote:Daily reminder that the Japanese were right and merchants belonged on the bottom of society. :^)
by Napkiraly » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:20 pm
I'll take this post into consideration should the fate of the Burmese Muslims ever come up.Aillyria wrote:Northern Davincia wrote:It is in Europe's interest to oversee the spread of Christendom, as well as the reduction in lesser civilizational traits.
Such as rule by a god-emperor or neglect of the needy.
Yes, and it was in Japan's interest to see to the preservation of their culture. And that's pretty interesting say that Japan was "lesser" for neglecting the needy, when that happened in Catholic dominated Europe too.Salus Maior wrote:
Islam was generally spread to places that were "alien" to it.
Generally through conquest, but not always.
True.
My point is if you're going to try to infect another nation with your religion, you can't cry if your converts are punished by the native government.
by The East Marches II » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:20 pm
by Conserative Morality » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:21 pm
Napkiraly wrote:I'll take this post into consideration should the fate of the Burmese Muslims ever come up.
by The East Marches II » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:22 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:War Gears wrote:
If he had been really intelligent or a real leader of Japan, he'd have supported the growing Shinto sects and used them to counterbalance Buddhism, but he did not. This lack of intelligence was probably the reason he was killed. :^)
>> using syncretic religions to fight syncretic religions
0/10 do not pass go do not collect 200$The East Marches II wrote:Both of you are plebs for reading the Hagakure.
But how would you know how plebbish the Hagakure is unless you yourself have read it? =^)
by Aillyria » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:23 pm
Salus Maior wrote:Aillyria wrote:Yes, and it was in Japan's interest to see to the preservation of their culture. And that's pretty interesting say that Japan was "lesser" for neglecting the needy, when that happened in Catholic dominated Europe too.
My point is if you're going to try to infect another nation with your religion, you can't cry if your converts are punished by the native government.
Read that as "preservation of the status quo that favors the sitting lords at the time".
No, that's barbaric. Unless you think in general it's fine to persecute minorities if it "doesn't fit your culture"? ISIS will be pleased.
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist
West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".
by War Gears » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:24 pm
Salus Maior wrote:Aillyria wrote:Yes, and it was in Japan's interest to see to the preservation of their culture. And that's pretty interesting say that Japan was "lesser" for neglecting the needy, when that happened in Catholic dominated Europe too.
My point is if you're going to try to infect another nation with your religion, you can't cry if your converts are punished by the native government.
Read that as "preservation of the status quo that favors the sitting lords at the time".
No, that's barbaric. Unless you think in general it's fine to persecute minorities if it "doesn't fit your culture"? ISIS will be pleased.
by Conserative Morality » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:25 pm
The East Marches II wrote:Is it time to get the cross?
by Conserative Morality » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:26 pm
by BranchLandia » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:27 pm
by Aillyria » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:30 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist
West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".
by Salus Maior » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:35 pm
by Rostavykhan » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:36 pm
by Northern Davincia » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:39 pm
War Gears wrote:Because no poor existed in majority Christian countries at the time of the 16th century, or today in the 21st.
Buddhism had a concept of helping the poor too, y'know.
In regards to the concept of the Emperor as arahitogami, how is that "uncivilized?"
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Salus Maior » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:42 pm
War Gears wrote:Salus Maior wrote:
Read that as "preservation of the status quo that favors the sitting lords at the time".
No, that's barbaric. Unless you think in general it's fine to persecute minorities if it "doesn't fit your culture"? ISIS will be pleased.
Please stop with the ridiculous nonsense about how Christianity was the champion of the lower classes and that that was the reason it was suppressed by the big bad shogun and his elite, because that is nowhere near close to reality. Christianity was favored by many daimyo and others in the upper class who had no interest in helping the lower classes, and exercised their powers in order to coerce their subordinates into converting as well.
Do you believe that slavery and destroying religious places of worship are barbaric as well?
by Conserative Morality » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:43 pm
Northern Davincia wrote:War Gears wrote:Because no poor existed in majority Christian countries at the time of the 16th century, or today in the 21st.
Buddhism had a concept of helping the poor too, y'know.
In regards to the concept of the Emperor as arahitogami, how is that "uncivilized?"
Buddhism has the concept, yes. Most religions do. However, you don't have events like the Shimabara Rebellion if you care for the poor.
The arahitogami concept is not uncivilized, but merely an attribute of primitivism where men posed as gods, like in Ancient Egypt.
by Aillyria » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:45 pm
Northern Davincia wrote:War Gears wrote:Because no poor existed in majority Christian countries at the time of the 16th century, or today in the 21st.
Buddhism had a concept of helping the poor too, y'know.
In regards to the concept of the Emperor as arahitogami, how is that "uncivilized?"
Buddhism has the concept, yes. Most religions do. However, you don't have events like the Shimabara Rebellion if you care for the poor.
The arahitogami concept is not uncivilized, but merely an attribute of primitivism where men posed as gods, like in Ancient Egypt.
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist
West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".
by Northern Davincia » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:46 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Northern Davincia wrote:Buddhism has the concept, yes. Most religions do. However, you don't have events like the Shimabara Rebellion if you care for the poor.
The arahitogami concept is not uncivilized, but merely an attribute of primitivism where men posed as gods, like in Ancient Egypt.
Because contemporary Europe didn't see such peasant uprisings at the time because they wuz good Christian boys
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Aillyria » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:49 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist
West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Ancientania, Bienenhalde, Big Eyed Animation, Cyptopir, Ethel mermania, Fartsniffage, Ifreann, Ineva, Kreushia, Mergold-Aurlia, Nanatsu no Tsuki, Pale Dawn, Talibanada, The Caleshan Valkyrie, The Jamesian Republic, The Kharkivan Cossacks, Thermodolia, Washington Resistance Army, Wisteria and Surrounding Territories
Advertisement