Advertisement

by HMS Queen Elizabeth » Tue Jun 20, 2017 2:06 pm

by Olerand » Tue Jun 20, 2017 2:07 pm
HMS Queen Elizabeth wrote:It's not really important since the bomb. If invasion were a serious threat, I might even support membership.
Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever

by HMS Queen Elizabeth » Tue Jun 20, 2017 2:11 pm
Olerand wrote:HMS Queen Elizabeth wrote:It's not really important since the bomb. If invasion were a serious threat, I might even support membership.
What bomb? The nuclear bomb? But we have more! In this case, it's even more important that you leave, because we're only going to lead to our own mutually assured destruction.
Indeed, for your sake and ours, you should go.

by Olerand » Tue Jun 20, 2017 2:16 pm
HMS Queen Elizabeth wrote:Olerand wrote:What bomb? The nuclear bomb? But we have more! In this case, it's even more important that you leave, because we're only going to lead to our own mutually assured destruction.
Indeed, for your sake and ours, you should go.
More doesn't really matter after the bomb, which is why the EU isn't a threat. Before 1955 or so it would have been a serious threat.
Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever

by HMS Queen Elizabeth » Tue Jun 20, 2017 2:58 pm
Olerand wrote:HMS Queen Elizabeth wrote:More doesn't really matter after the bomb, which is why the EU isn't a threat. Before 1955 or so it would have been a serious threat.
It does matter in as much as we can also wipe you out. So in the end, we're both nuclear wastelands. Leave us now, save yourself Britannia!

by Olerand » Tue Jun 20, 2017 3:06 pm
HMS Queen Elizabeth wrote:Olerand wrote:It does matter in as much as we can also wipe you out. So in the end, we're both nuclear wastelands. Leave us now, save yourself Britannia!
It doesn't matter, because wiping out Britain isn't worth the cost. Nuclear bombs just break the whole historic European power dynamic which was the only reason Britain ever cared about the continent. In strategic terms the Channel was the narrowest it has ever been in about 1943 and today it is the widest it has ever been.
Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever

by HMS Queen Elizabeth » Tue Jun 20, 2017 3:09 pm

by Olerand » Tue Jun 20, 2017 3:28 pm
HMS Queen Elizabeth wrote:You can, and should, be exactly who you want to be, princess.
Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever

by Fartsniffage » Tue Jun 20, 2017 4:03 pm
Olerand wrote:HMS Queen Elizabeth wrote:You can, and should, be exactly who you want to be, princess.
Which is why you must physically save Britannia from us. We will seek to absorb fair Albion into our socialist-fascist-Nazi-Islamist-bureaucratic-pound-thieving nightmarish unitary State, therefore you must separate from us and go as far as possible.

by Olerand » Tue Jun 20, 2017 4:09 pm
Fartsniffage wrote:Olerand wrote:Which is why you must physically save Britannia from us. We will seek to absorb fair Albion into our socialist-fascist-Nazi-Islamist-bureaucratic-pound-thieving nightmarish unitary State, therefore you must separate from us and go as far as possible.
But then who would the French have delusions of superiority about?
Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever

by Fartsniffage » Tue Jun 20, 2017 4:32 pm

by Olerand » Tue Jun 20, 2017 4:37 pm
Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever

by Fartsniffage » Tue Jun 20, 2017 4:44 pm

by Olerand » Tue Jun 20, 2017 4:49 pm
Fartsniffage wrote:Olerand wrote:His hotel bills? I'd check the receipts, didn't you pay for them?
It was that or give him an army. And he'd lost all the others that people had given him.
Still, I think we should bring it up during the financial separation talks during Brexit. He's French so I'd imagine his mini-bar and garlic bread bills alone would cover our side of it....
Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever

by Fartsniffage » Tue Jun 20, 2017 4:50 pm
Olerand wrote:Fartsniffage wrote:
It was that or give him an army. And he'd lost all the others that people had given him.
Still, I think we should bring it up during the financial separation talks during Brexit. He's French so I'd imagine his mini-bar and garlic bread bills alone would cover our side of it....
The audacity... Garlic bread? Is that all you can associate with the Général? Out of all of French cuisine, you have de Gaulle eat garlic bread. Why not frog legs, at least that would have been a little more elegant. No respect...


by Olerand » Tue Jun 20, 2017 4:53 pm

Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever

by Fartsniffage » Tue Jun 20, 2017 4:55 pm

by Olerand » Tue Jun 20, 2017 4:58 pm

Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever

by Dooom35796821595 » Tue Jun 20, 2017 7:18 pm


by Ifreann » Tue Jun 20, 2017 7:39 pm
Dooom35796821595 wrote:Does anyone know what they're going to do on the three weeks of no negotiation between every week of negotiation? And people say teachers get good holiday, negotiation's where it's at.

by Dumb Ideologies » Tue Jun 20, 2017 11:18 pm
Souseiseki wrote:day #1 we immediately cave in and start using the EU's negotiating timetable despite spending months railing against it, calling into question whether we spent months annoying them for nothing. the EU show the UK negotiating team their paper work outlining what they expect to happen and what their general goals are in regards to issues like finances, ireland, etc. and ask the UK team to show them theirs, only to be told the UK team didn't bother making one and some half-assed white paper from 6 months ago should be good enough.
*tugs collar nervously*
by Souseiseki » Tue Jun 20, 2017 11:24 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Souseiseki wrote:day #1 we immediately cave in and start using the EU's negotiating timetable despite spending months railing against it, calling into question whether we spent months annoying them for nothing. the EU show the UK negotiating team their paper work outlining what they expect to happen and what their general goals are in regards to issues like finances, ireland, etc. and ask the UK team to show them theirs, only to be told the UK team didn't bother making one and some half-assed white paper from 6 months ago should be good enough.
*tugs collar nervously*
I'm not one to kinkshame, but being so in thrall to the Europeans that you've let them collar you is quite something.

by Vassenor » Wed Jun 21, 2017 3:25 am

by Dumb Ideologies » Wed Jun 21, 2017 3:36 am
Vassenor wrote:Thirty Conservative MPs announce intention to break government majority in the event of a "no-deal" Brexit.
But I thought "No Deal" was meant to be the best outcome.
by Souseiseki » Thu Jun 22, 2017 8:18 am
Brexit: Philip Hammond admits UK's planned withdrawal already hitting economic investment
Chancellor says a transitional deal with the EU is needed to ‘start seeing businesses investing again’
Businesses are already pulling investment because of Brexit, the Chancellor has admitted – as he again urged Theresa May to agree a “transitional arrangement”.
Philip Hammond said a temporary deal with the EU was badly needed to get “businesses investing again”, appearing to acknowledge that companies are currently putting their plans on hold.
“The thing that is causing concern in the business community is the risk of a cliff edge,” Mr Hammond said.
In his Mansion House speech in the City of London this week, he dropped any pretence that he sees economic benefits to EU withdrawal – while insisting Britain will leave.
The Chancellor urged Ms May to abandon her red line that securing immigration controls is the first priority, in favour of a deal to protect jobs.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Achan, Bhang Bhang Duc, Continental Free States, Fahran, Fartsniffage, Forsher, Hirota, Ifreann, James_xenoland, Lativs, Port Caverton, Soviet Haaregrad, The Astral Mandate
Advertisement